Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Now that EVERYTHING is rupturable....Follow

#1 Apr 11 2008 at 6:08 AM Rating: Decent
Would that make ShS or combat/sub (31/30) a more viable raid spec than just full combat/***?? When I did Kara the other night I was ShS, just to test it out, and I was in 3rd place right behind a very geared hunter (the guildmaster) and mage. Comments, thoughts, flames, appreciated!

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 10:48am by BiOhAcKeR
#2 Apr 11 2008 at 7:54 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
No.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#3 Apr 11 2008 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
i currently raid SHS Swords. In Kara I am usually 3rd on DPS behind a well geard hunter and lock. I think in Kara ranged damage has a slight advantage to melee DPS anyways. But I respeced the cookie cutter combat sword spec and was still 3rd (granted my rotation was not perfect). But for my need to PVP and raid without going broke on respecing twice a week SHS was not that far behind Combat. Typically I beleive the DPS is about 6%-11%. This was going off memory. someone may have a more detailed model of the DPS drop between the 2 builds.





(Please don't call me a noob cause of my spec, i know combat swords is the best raid spec, but this it is what I like the best for my $15 a month :P)

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 1:37pm by likeaninja
#4 Apr 11 2008 at 9:53 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
3rd on DPS in Kara is like saying, "hay guyz, i don't suck THAT bad!!!"

Keep in mind that any Kara group will have the following:

2-3 tanks
2-4 healers, usually on the heavier side if your guild doesn't clear it in 2 hours like T6 guilds.

That leaves 4-6 spots for DPS. So when you say you placed 3rd, you're really saying that you suck and should respec combat swords.
#5 Apr 11 2008 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
In my guild for kara there is 2 tanks, 2 healers and the rest is DPS so losing out to a hunter and a lock who dont have to move to drop damage I say im doing pretty well. Yes i realize that combat swords is the raid spec...will I ever respec to combat swords...maybe....if i have a brain tumor and can only hit the SS button. I hated combat spec, i found it boring and unexciting. If I need to lose some DPS to keep from slashing my wrists I would say thats an o.k trade off.

Now realize I stated my opinion, some people like Combat spec and thats fine for them, but I will most likely get flamed anyway.


I would like for someone to post hard numbers as to what the overall differance in DPS is (assuming the same gear is involved).

Just a side note- having on rogue with Hemo actually increases the damage of the raid.

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 2:25pm by likeaninja
#6 Apr 11 2008 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
likeaninja wrote:
I would like for someone to post hard numbers as to what the overall differance [sic] in DPS is (assuming the same gear is involved).

Elitist Jerks Roguecraft 101
Start there.

Hunters, locks, spriests and (to a lesser extent) mages have to worry more about CC in Kara than a rogue. CC takes time away from DPS rotations. Not to mention they have the mana issue to deal with. Generally, Kara isn't the "best" place for a rogue to shine, but at least you're almost entirely focused on pure DPS output (with a few interrupts and an occasional off-tank role thrown in).


And I was third last night in the first half of our weekly Kara run. By a massive .8% according to Recount. Argh!!!!! I'm ashamed and full of anger at my lack of focus on the Curator's adds!

My Kara group has a friendly rivalry between 3 of us DPSers. Rest assured, this loss will be avenged! My point is that being 3rd on the meter is relative.
#7 Apr 11 2008 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
likeaninja wrote:
In my guild for kara there is 2 tanks, 2 healers and the rest is DPS so losing out to a hunter and a lock who dont have to move to drop damage I say im doing pretty well. Yes i realize that combat swords is the raid spec...will I ever respec to combat swords...maybe....if i have a brain tumor and can only hit the SS button. I hated combat spec, i found it boring and unexciting. If I need to lose some DPS to keep from slashing my wrists I would say thats an o.k trade off.

I'd check to see if the rest of your Kara group feels the same way.

Quote:
Now realize I stated my opinion, some people like Combat spec and thats fine for them, but I will most likely get flamed anyway.

Yes. You will. Combat is the highest sustained damage build, and the rogue's role in raiding is sustained damage. I'm sure you can figure out why you fail now.

Quote:
I would like for someone to post hard numbers as to what the overall differance in DPS is (assuming the same gear is involved).

Just from fiddling with my spreadsheet, 20/41/0 yields 1131 buffed DPS (which I've hit a few times on fights like Lurker), while 20/0/41 yields only 1095 DPS, about a 3% loss. Of course, those calculation assume that you personally use all 10 Hemo charges on each application, so the real DPS will be much less.

Quote:
Just a side note- having on rogue with Hemo actually increases the damage of the raid.

No. Having a rogue with Hemo increases damage from other melee DPS. Unless that increased damage outweighs the DPS you're losing by not speccing Combat (hint: it doesn't), Hemo actually decreases the damage of the raid.

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 1:45pm by Demea
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#8 Apr 11 2008 at 11:09 AM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Movement? In Kara?

What fight are you talking about, other than Prince?

You honestly have no idea what you're talking about. In heavy sub you're going to be doing the same thing, just replacing SS with Hemo.
#9 Apr 11 2008 at 11:12 AM Rating: Decent
first, my kara group knows my spec and does not mind.

second, flaming someone opinion is does nothing. You wont change my opinion and i wont change yours. I even told you I recognized that Combat swords was the raiding spec. I simply find SHS more fun, mixed with the fact that I do arena's and BG's and dont like to respec every other day. Flame away and waste your time if it makes you feel better.

Third, you say 3% under perfect conditions, so I dont believe 6%-11% was that far off. Even if it was 15% I still have more fun with my current spec.

Fourth, If I am correct Hemo will help out both tanks, myself, and the other rogue in my group who is speced combat swords, so 4 people benefit from my Hemo. Which might not fully make up the differance in my spec but it draws it closer to yours.

Again these are my opinions.
#10 Apr 11 2008 at 11:38 AM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
From what I understand--and I may easily be wrong here--but isn't the Hemo buff only of practical use in 25-mans? Meaning that there isn't enough melee DPS players in a 10 man or instance group to benefit more than the loss in personal DPS of one?

It's a buff regardless of how many players of course. But the tipping point I've heard is minimum 4 equally geared melee DPS plus the Hemo rogue. I'll add this to the "things to look up" list. Just bringing it up for clarification in the thread.
#11 Apr 11 2008 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
Coming in 3rd in DPS when everyone else has gear from TK, Gruul, SSC, and Mag isn't bad at all. It doesn't mean I suck so honestly you have no clue what you're talking about. I have ONE piece of t4 gear and about 2 items from Kara, the rest are all pieces I crafted and badge of justice items, so coming in 3rd does not mean that I suck at all. The only time I spec combat is when I do the 25 man raids, which is rare.

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 4:37pm by BiOhAcKeR
#12 Apr 11 2008 at 12:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
Hemo is a physical dps buff, meaning hunters(and their pets) + melee benefit from the hemo debuff. In a 25 man(2-3 tanks, 4 melee dps, 2-3 hunters, 2-3 pets, 10 physical dps minimum) you will never see the hemo debuff, it just disappears way too quickly. In 10mans, its more of a personal buff/tank buff as you usually don't run kara/za with a full melee group(enhance shammy, feral druid, dps warr, and 2 rogues).

And as step spec the hemo debuff doesn't come close to helping with the loss of personal dps compared to combat. And outside the Prince fight there is absolutely 0 benefit to being step spec in kara. On Prince tho, its really fun to never have to run out as cheat death will keep you alive every time you get enfeebled(provided you don't get an infernal drop on you at the exact same time, but thats what clos is for). I crushed an equally gear combat rogue as step spec on prince by being able to dps 100% of the time as he had to run out 4-5 times because of enfeebles(had a feral druid tanking and rupture was ticking for 400ish), was really fun i do admit. But the rest of the time the other rogue was killing me, beat me by like 10% on shade for instance.

**armory isn't working for Valendil, keeps trying to show some lvl 14 druid, already sent them an error email, course that was 2 days ago, feel free to send em another one if its still not working.

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 3:12pm by mahlerite
#13 Apr 11 2008 at 1:16 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
BiOhAcKeR wrote:
Coming in 3rd in DPS when everyone else has gear from TK, Gruul, SSC, and Mag isn't bad at all. It doesn't mean I suck so honestly you have no clue what you're talking about. I have ONE piece of t4 gear and about 2 items from Kara, the rest are all pieces I crafted and badge of justice items, so coming in 3rd does not mean that I suck at all. The only time I spec combat is when I do the 25 man raids, which is rare.

Edited, Apr 11th 2008 4:37pm by BiOhAcKeR

Yes it does.

I beat TK/SSC geared people regularly, and I don't have anything beyond T4 gear.

Coming in 3rd, again, means you're mediocre at best, and you're awful at worst.

Either way, you got your answer to your OP.

No, ShS or 0/31/30 are not viable.

BTW, your guild leader actually has really, really ****** gear.
#14 Apr 11 2008 at 9:17 PM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
Sub isn't a raid tree.

This argument gets done every other week.

You can raid with ShS or some combat/sub hybrid if you want. Just don't tell us how awesome it is, because we know just how awesome it isn't.
#15 Apr 12 2008 at 1:10 AM Rating: Decent
*
54 posts
The point of being a raid rogue is beating the crap out of everybody on dps, since on 99% of the fights there's nothing more required of u to do.

And coming 3rd because u don't want to spec swords shows no respect for u'r guild and for it's advancement.
#16 Apr 12 2008 at 3:14 AM Rating: Decent
What about a guild's respect for its members? Sure, everybody wants to do well, but not to the point where they're forcing fellow players to die of boredom in exchange for 2-3% extra efficiency. If all hemo charges are used up - and they will be - then the raid damage is only a few percent behind. Your personal damage will be much lower, and it's up to you whether or not you can live with that (a lot of rogues seem to have some kind of deep insecurity here), but there is absolutely no reason why a guild should have a problem with it (if the marginal difference is enough to wipe the raid then there are bigger problems). An enhancement shaman healing is not viable, a fury warrior tanking is not viable, but a subtlety rogue raiding is perfectly viable; not optimal, but viable.

If your guild is ok with it, then you already have your answer (and if they weren't ok with it, you should look for a new one).
#17 Apr 12 2008 at 8:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Since I wanted hard evidence, i respeced again to Combat swords from SHS swords.

Did'nt change my gear, did a full clear of kara with the new spec and compared it to the DPS of my old one.

My DPS was about 200-250 DPS higher with combat swords.

If i could do math i would tell you the percentage.

Now I dont want all the elitists to jump on my and say "I told you so" because I admited in my first post that combat swords was better for raiding. Overall I like SHS better. However with such a gross differance in DPS I will most likely be respecing before traiding and then respec back after. Doing dailies on 3 toons , money is easy to come by.


Here i come SS spam
#18 Apr 12 2008 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
*
70 posts
It is not often that I am suprised and amazed. But today it happened.

I am both suprised and amazed at exactly how much of a complete Richard Theo is.

Bravo Take a bow Theo. Your epeen must be raw by the amount of stroking you seem to give it.

Thank you. That is all.
#19 Apr 12 2008 at 8:50 AM Rating: Good
**
924 posts
Dude, you don't deserve to even look at theo's epeen.
#20 Apr 12 2008 at 9:03 AM Rating: Default
playing on my lock in kara, im rarely beaten by any spec rogue, when i play my mates rogue i come 2nd/3rd.

rogues get it easy at 1st with amount of hit they have on their gear, then when other classes get the minimum for their specs rogues fall into palce where they should be(3rd), even my fury warrior beats rogues in kara and he has 3 epixx, against full kara rogues.

but i have MUCH more fun on a hemo rogue than an SS spamming nub-class.

Quote:
Dude, you don't deserve to even look at theo's epeen.

his e-peen is a self enlarged e-weener
#21 Apr 12 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Good
redbarronthesecond wrote:
playing on my lock in kara, im rarely beaten by any spec rogue, when i play my mates rogue i come 2nd/3rd.

rogues get it easy at 1st with amount of hit they have on their gear, then when other classes get the minimum for their specs rogues fall into palce where they should be(3rd), even my fury warrior beats rogues in kara and he has 3 epixx, against full kara rogues.

but i have MUCH more fun on a hemo rogue than an SS spamming nub-class.

Quote:
Dude, you don't deserve to even look at theo's epeen.

his e-peen is a self enlarged e-weener


Well, running w/ 900 SD, and < 19% crit as destro, I find it hard to believe that you outdpsed a full Kara rogue. And if you did....they were just bad.
#22 Apr 12 2008 at 10:13 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,550 posts
...how is Combat Swords any more boring than ShS?

OMG! Instead of spamming SS you are spamming Hemo! ZOMG SO MUCH MORE FUN!!11!1!one!eleven!!!1
#23 Apr 12 2008 at 12:05 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
And if you did....they were just bad.


expected responce
#24 Apr 12 2008 at 12:40 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Doesn't mean its not true.
#25 Apr 12 2008 at 1:13 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
nibsir wrote:
It is not often that I am suprised and amazed. But today it happened.

I am both suprised and amazed at exactly how much of a complete Richard Theo is.

Bravo Take a bow Theo. Your epeen must be raw by the amount of stroking you seem to give it.

Thank you. That is all.

So when people are nice and say, "oh, yeah, ShS is alright for raiding, but combat swords would be better," that would definitely get across the point that ShS is not OK for raiding?

No? Yeah, I thought so.

I'm an ******* for a reason on this forum. A lot of the rogues here are better players for it, and that's not me being egotistical or stroking my epeen (which is massive, if any ladies wanted to know).
#26 Apr 12 2008 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
*
70 posts
you're talking to a member of the choir. I know combat swords is the best. You just dont have to be a be a prick and a half to back up what you can proove. Thats all I am saying.

At no point will people disagree with you on the math but then totally fall in line iwth you cause you toss people under the bus.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 123 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (123)