Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Does Frost have a chance?Follow

#1 Apr 09 2008 at 8:36 PM Rating: Good
*
69 posts
I realize that fire is the raiding spec for a mage, but how much worse is frost?....I am currently specced frost at lvl 52 and enjoy it very much, and plan to do alot of pvp and raids, etc....pretty much everything the game has to offer....I really just want to stick with frost if i can for every situation, so is there a way that frost can become viable in raids???
#2 Apr 09 2008 at 8:44 PM Rating: Good
*
139 posts
Frost is viable as DPS in raids, but don't disillusion yourself to think you will be keeping up in DPS with the fire mages. From what I have heard, all things equal, frost at T4 lvl will be higher DPS than fire (think Pol sighted it with some back up info somewhere, so I'll trust it for now). But if you take time to make the epic tailoring fire set you don't have to worry about that. I also greatly enjoy frost, but don't be afraid to try out fire at 70, I love it in raids and I still spec frost for some questing and pvp.

If you want to raid as frost take a 10/0/51 or a 2/0/59 or even a 0/0/61 and you will be viable as DPS, but you won't be above the 2/48/11 or 10/48/3 fire mages with tailoring/T5+ gear.
#3 Apr 09 2008 at 9:16 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Mhog wrote:
From what I have heard, all things equal, frost at T4 lvl will be higher DPS than fire (think Pol sighted it with some back up info somewhere, so I'll trust it for now).


I have seen some convincing argument to that effect, yes.

Mhog wrote:
But if you take time to make the epic tailoring fire set you don't have to worry about that.


This is quite true, and makes the previous argument somewhat moot for tailors. Spellfire is a much better mage set than FSW is.

Mhog wrote:
If you want to raid as frost take a 10/0/51 or a 2/0/59 or even a 0/0/61 and you will be viable as DPS, but you won't be above the 2/48/11 or 10/48/3 fire mages with tailoring/T5+ gear.


Personally, I'd recommend a 17/0/44 since I'm a big fan of having a few points in Arcane Meditation.
#4 Apr 09 2008 at 9:57 PM Rating: Good
*
139 posts
Not sure how I forgot 17/0/44 as that is what I always spec when I actually go frost. FSW is a decent set, but the garbage set bonus really brings it down. If it had a comparable set bonus to the Spellfire, frost would become more viable. But as stated before, I personally like being fire in raids. PvP as frost is also much more enjoyable (for me).
#5 Apr 10 2008 at 4:36 AM Rating: Good
***
1,262 posts
That FSW set bonus is godly for warlocks...
#6 Apr 10 2008 at 5:00 AM Rating: Default
Well im fire and i have a frost friend mage...me and him both do kara together and yea frost mages can be good in PVE and in some fights Frost is even better....i really dont like frost but i will have to go 1 day because of arena...so frost is good for both....even though i dont like it
#7 Apr 10 2008 at 6:03 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
ktangent wrote:
That FSW set bonus is godly for warlocks...


Agreed. It's not a BAD set bonus...it's just not great for mages.
#8 Apr 10 2008 at 6:53 AM Rating: Decent
**
320 posts
I've been Frost for almost my entire Mage career (dabbled in Fire and Arcane specs earlier), and I'll be staying Frost for when I PvP (really, really like 10/0/51, might change to get Imp CS though). However, for PvE and raiding, I'm definitely lacking in the damage department, especially as bosses are immune to freezing and thus you lose shatter crits.

I'm currently in the process of building up my Spellfire / -strike set and converting to the Fire build (2/48/10, Ice veins ftw) to be viable end-game PvE.
#9 Apr 10 2008 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
*
84 posts
I raid frost. SSC/TK/Hyjal.
I usualy take number 1 dps spot. Beating our warlocks and our ele shammys. They can give me a run for my money and take it from me, but i usualy come out on top.
9/52 is my frost raid spec, its good to me.
I have my guilds fire mages thinkin they should go frost.
If your enjoying frost, yea its possible to raid with, and you are still lvl 52. You have plenty of time before fire or frost will even become an issue.
#10 Apr 10 2008 at 11:10 AM Rating: Excellent
CalenciaBlue wrote:
I raid frost. SSC/TK/Hyjal.
I usualy take number 1 dps spot. Beating our warlocks and our ele shammys. They can give me a run for my money and take it from me, but i usualy come out on top.
9/52 is my frost raid spec, its good to me.
I have my guilds fire mages thinkin they should go frost.
If your enjoying frost, yea its possible to raid with, and you are still lvl 52. You have plenty of time before fire or frost will even become an issue.


I want to see some wow web stats of this.
#11 Apr 10 2008 at 12:50 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,262 posts
Quote:
I want to see some wow web stats of this.


/agree.... cause that is BS. ;-) Warlocks scale much better than mages at T5 levels.... as do hunters & rogues.
#12 Apr 11 2008 at 11:28 AM Rating: Default
*
69 posts
See the reason I asked this is because my friend has had a mage for bout 2 years now and says that when he raids as frost he out dps fire mages in his guild....And he says it really just comes down to the skill of the player, but he also said that when he raids as fire that he does much more dmg than he can with frost....I really just wanted to hear what ppl had to say about frost in raids because I am in love with frost and can't see myself wanting to spec differently...I've tried fire but just did not like the survivability when everything went wrong.
#13 Apr 11 2008 at 11:42 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,262 posts
Quote:
See the reason I asked this is because my friend has had a mage for bout 2 years now and says that when he raids as frost he out dps fire mages in his guild....


The fire mages either 1) suck (by suck, I mean they don't have a concept of the best 'dps' spell rotations/knowledge of good gear/are wearing +healing gear, etc) or 2) have unequal gear or 3) a combination of 1 & 2.

Quote:
And he says it really just comes down to the skill of the player


This is somewhat true, but gear plays a big part as well.

Quote:
but he also said that when he raids as fire that he does much more dmg than he can with frost....


Interesting... I'd be into helping my guildies out...

Quote:
I really just wanted to hear what ppl had to say about frost in raids because I am in love with frost and can't see myself wanting to spec differently...I've tried fire but just did not like the survivability when everything went wrong.


Frost is okay to raid in. It is an opportunity cost. Meaning that even if you're #1 damager as frost, you lose damage because you would have been #1 damage by more as fire. This is an 'other-centric' mindset rather than a 'selfish' mindset that looks only at your individual damage. For example, if you had done x% more damage, would the boss have died sooner, resulting in a successful kill of a boss vs. a wipe because the healer went OOM.

When ice block became trainable for all, fire mages now have their 'ohhh crap' button.
#14REDACTED, Posted: Apr 11 2008 at 1:41 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Always a pleasure to be called a BS'er, thanks ktangent.
#15 Apr 12 2008 at 4:49 PM Rating: Excellent
There is nothing wrong with the use of Frost for raids, although for it to truly shine, putting you on par with a Fire mage, you'll have to be use Icy Veins and your trinkets a lot if you're the kind of mage obsessed with topping the damage meter. I play a Troll frosty, berserking is a nice boost to overall DPS. It is possible to out DPS an Arc/Fire mage in the Spellfire set if you really put forth the effort.

The bottom line, we are a DPS class, virtually any school you wish to spec the heaviest in will be just fine in a raid, provided that you keep a level head about it.
____________________________
"Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible c*** : me."
#16 Apr 14 2008 at 5:05 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,262 posts
Quote:
A player who uses frost who then goes fire wont do the same damage, much like a healer who leveled as dps then has no clue how to heal.


Fire damage is pretty easy to do, esp against bosses.

scorch x 5, fireball x 7 (depending on lag), scorch x 1. Rinse repeat. Frost raid damage is just braindead: Frostbolt x 1,000,000.

As for a frost mage being able to beat a comparably geared warlock in T5/6..... like I said, wws or it didn't happen. FYI, you don't have to get your whole guild to post stuff. Fire mages even have issues chasing down warlocks due to shadowbolt scalability and frost doesn't do as much damage on raid bosses as fire, by quite a bit.

For those of you who say, "You can raid frost if you want to", I maintain that you can do just that. It comes at a cost. That cost is usually time because you do less dps. You want to do that, have fun. I, myself, raided frost for a very long time but more because I wanted to have an occasional ice block as an 'ohhh crap' button.

The difference between leveling a healer shadow and switching to holy is HUGE, the difference between 1 type of damage and another is relatively small. In classes like paladins, all 3 specs are essentially 3 different classes (same with druids). For mages.... not so much. DPS is DPS. You just use a different spell.
#17 Apr 16 2008 at 12:03 AM Rating: Decent
*
84 posts
Quote:
/agree.... cause that is BS. ;-) Warlocks scale much better than mages at T5 levels.... as do hunters & rogues.


Quote:
I want to see some wow web stats of this.


Was a terrible raid night for me, and not great for our guild for a few reasons, but heres the wowweb for it. And yes, i died from a spout. Again not a good night for me. But here was our SSC Tonight.

http://wowwebstats.com/hcc4orvho2o6w?m
#18 Apr 16 2008 at 12:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
CalenciaBlue wrote:
Quote:
/agree.... cause that is BS. ;-) Warlocks scale much better than mages at T5 levels.... as do hunters & rogues.


Quote:
I want to see some wow web stats of this.


Was a terrible raid night for me, and not great for our guild for a few reasons, but heres the wowweb for it. And yes, i died from a spout. Again not a good night for me. But here was our SSC Tonight.

http://wowwebstats.com/hcc4orvho2o6w?m


Not bad numbers at all for a mage in that level of gear(at least, from what I've seen). How much Haste you rocking exactly? I know I could have added it up from your armory, but I'm feeling lazy.

Also, if one were to assume that your neckpiece procced only on frostbolts, that's roughly 9% proc rate. If you add in all spells you cast except blizzard, that's about 6.3% proc rate. Even with blizzard, that's roughly 5%. Overall, not too bad of a proc, considering the Mana Etched 4pc is a 2% proc rate and the Spellstrike proc is roughly equivalent to a 5% proc rate.

Edit: Oh, and to those doubting Calencia, you have to also consider skill levels when you call BS on something. An exceptionally played mage will easily outDPS a mediocre or even pretty good warlock despite scaling differences.

I'll be honest, I personally rarely manage to top those numbers, but I also almost never have access to an elemental shaman, which they have two of. Also, your melee would be doing a bit better if they had windfury, which your top rogue didn't, as far as I can tell.

Edited, Apr 16th 2008 2:35am by Poldaran
#19 Apr 16 2008 at 4:59 AM Rating: Good
***
1,262 posts
Quote:
Edit: Oh, and to those doubting Calencia, you have to also consider skill levels when you call BS on something. An exceptionally played mage will easily outDPS a mediocre or even pretty good warlock despite scaling differences


99% of the posts that say, "I out dps everything as a x/y/z spec" that is known not to be the best dps raiding specs is BS. Skill plays a part, but imagine, if you will, the amount of damage Calencia could/would have done as a fire spec'ed mage.

My point has always been, and always will be that raiding frost is less dps than raiding as fire.

Gratz, Calencia for posting some nice numbers.

Edit: Looked closely at WWS data... you did get beat by a lock & a shammy, but you did put up good numbers...

Edited, Apr 16th 2008 8:12am by ktangent
#20 Apr 16 2008 at 7:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
ktangent wrote:
Quote:
Edit: Oh, and to those doubting Calencia, you have to also consider skill levels when you call BS on something. An exceptionally played mage will easily outDPS a mediocre or even pretty good warlock despite scaling differences


99% of the posts that say, "I out dps everything as a x/y/z spec" that is known not to be the best dps raiding specs is BS. Skill plays a part, but imagine, if you will, the amount of damage Calencia could/would have done as a fire spec'ed mage.


I know, but there's been a lot of hostility around here lately. And that's my main concern. Because I'm a bobdarned carebear.
#21 Apr 16 2008 at 9:35 AM Rating: Good
***
1,262 posts
Quote:
Because I'm a bobdarned carebear.


Uh... look at your sig.... :-/ Nuff said. ;-)
#22 Apr 16 2008 at 10:13 AM Rating: Excellent
*
84 posts
Quote:
Not bad numbers at all for a mage in that level of gear(at least, from what I've seen). How much Haste you rocking exactly? I know I could have added it up from your armory, but I'm feeling lazy.


180spell haste. Gives me 11% increased cast speed.

Quote:
Skill plays a part, but imagine, if you will, the amount of damage Calencia could/would have done as a fire spec'ed mage.


I myself am still undecided about this. I almost went into this ssc as fire to again see the differences for myself, but i decided i would go as frost to get this post up. And i've gone into a ZA as fire before, did 200dps less than i usually do, I was very rusty with fire which played a big part. but i am almost starting to think haste scales with frost better than fire. haste gear kills crit/hit rating and hurts +dmg. That doesn't flow with a fire mages mojo.

Quote:
but I also almost never have access to an elemental shaman, which they have two of. Also, your melee would be doing a bit better if they had windfury, which your top rogue didn't, as far as I can tell.


Yea, the 2 ele shammy's are new additions. One was resto who put his foot down, other is new. They are nice to have around. We usualy have an enhance shammy for melee. But we had a few alternates in that raid. It's great when our Boomkin is with us heh.

Edited, Apr 16th 2008 2:25pm by CalenciaBlue
#23 Apr 16 2008 at 12:16 PM Rating: Good
***
1,262 posts
Quote:
I myself am still undecided about this. I almost went into this ssc as fire to again see the differences for myself, but i decided i would go as frost to get this post up. And i've gone into a ZA as fire before, did 200dps less than i usually do, I was very rusty with fire which played a big part. but i am almost starting to think haste scales with frost better than fire. haste gear kills crit/hit rating and hurts +dmg. That doesn't flow with a fire mages mojo.


Ah, so the haste gear doesn't have much crit on it for fire to use to produce lots of ignite ticks! This could be a huge factor, as that is what fire lives and breathes on. Could be your rustyness with fire contributed. Also, make sure you're looking at the individual boss fights, as trash is just that... trash. It's boss fights which matter (IMO) and that is where frost has issues in that you can't freeze a boss for those big shatter crits that you get on the trash.

Anyways, thanks for posting that WWS.
#24 Apr 20 2008 at 1:07 AM Rating: Decent
**
821 posts
I have a question regarding frostmages in raids, hope this fits here.

Every now and than i hear about raid who bring a "frostbot" which is supposed to be a frostmage i assume, now i wonder what exactly he is brought for and what he adds in as utility, since it can´t be dps.

I am not even sure if i am not imagining this "frostbot" thing...getting old and all, you know.
#25 Apr 20 2008 at 4:57 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Oakenwrath wrote:
I have a question regarding frostmages in raids, hope this fits here.

Every now and than i hear about raid who bring a "frostbot" which is supposed to be a frostmage i assume, now i wonder what exactly he is brought for and what he adds in as utility, since it can´t be dps.

I am not even sure if i am not imagining this "frostbot" thing...getting old and all, you know.


Never heard of that, though I could see that being useful for Vashj or if the other mages are 40/0/21.
#26 Apr 20 2008 at 5:51 AM Rating: Good
***
1,245 posts
CalenciaBlue wrote:
but i am almost starting to think haste scales with frost better than fire. haste gear kills crit/hit rating and hurts +dmg. That doesn't flow with a fire mages mojo.


I think you, sir, have just made new conventional wisdom for mages.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 148 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (148)