Ming gets wtfbbqpwnedFollow

Ming is a slighlty boring, old, troll.

But that pwns nobody but the one who made it. Apart from the fact that he talks like a wannabe rapper (and the original product sounds stupid enough) it's rap.

Rap is terrible. (Plus, while the lyrics are fairly good, he's a bad rapper).


Edited, Apr 3rd 2008 12:45pm by Kavekk

You really can't judge whether the rap is good or not unless you get to the end of the song. I'm willing to bet that both of you saying that it's terrible didn't listen to the entire thing.

The beginning is an intro, FYI.

It was pretty decent, but that he was talking about how ******* dumb Ming is made it a 10/10 in my book.

The "Overnight 70" is much better than the Ming thing, which made me want to stick chopsticks in my ears.

"let me be ur powerleveler!" lawlz.

If a rap song mentions dropping bombs its a bad rap song.



Unless it's Outkast's B.O.B. (Bombs Over Baghdad).

Well I think all country is bad so all country singers are bad artists.

Logical fallacy is a logical fallacy.

I hate rap.

It's a damned funny song, cleverly written.

Kavekk wrote


Right here, you admitted that you "dislike rap, so" which makes little sense because you have violated a comma rule and the use of a conjunction. Because you have inserted "so" at the end of a sentence with joining a second clause to it, the other readers of this forum must infer what that clause is. You could have used an elipse (...) but that doesn't make any sense with your use of a comma. The most logical conclusion that we now must infer is "...but I dislike rap as a genre, so he's a bad rapper."

This is still a logical fallacy, because we are discussing an art form, not moral absolutism (and whether or not there is such a thing is also dependent on your world view). Art is most definitely subjective, not objective. If good and bad in terms of an art form are objective then it should be clearly obvious to the outside observer whether this musician is good or bad. Given the number of posts that are not in agreement on this matter, it is reasonable to say we are discussing something subjective. Both arguments, therefore, whether true are not, rely on bad premises and are therefore invalid. The first premise being based on your opinion, which is not an authority, and the second being based on the objectivity of good and bad art which was wrong Q.E.D.

Edited, Apr 4th 2008 3:26am by FelRogue

Thanks, Theo, but I'm not trying to be a grammar ****, though I do try to hold myself to high standards so as not to be misunderstood. If one is going to make philosophical assertions then one must be very careful in how one words them, or the meaning may be lost. However, we are getting off topic.
I'm not a fan of rap either, but I found the song creative and amusing. It's just weird to hear someone rap about WoW. LQTM The fact that it ridiculed some narcissist so much the better.

(1) I meant subjective, not objective. My argument makes no sense if it is objective but does make sense if it was subjective. if you do not like a genre then you can perfectly well say that you think that everyone within that genre is bad (at music, saying they're bad at rap because yopu ahte all rap music is a bit of a stretch imo) - it is not a logical fallacy to do so. I would understand why someone would not pay attention to that opinion, though it was not the one I was advancing.

2) I'm fully aware that it wasn't gramatically correct (I was posting as if I were talking; if I had been talking, I would have made a kind of 'so there you go' gesture). I thought it was pretty clear, though, because I already said I thought he was a bad rapper (bad at rap) in the first sentence you quoted. I was just expanding on why I didn't like the lyrics either (because they were rap). Apart from that was my assertion that he himself was bad at rapping.




Edited, Apr 4th 2008 9:32am by Kavekk

Uh, Nitrana is one of the best-known rogues in the world. He was on the #1 WSG team back when that was where competitive PvP happened, and he's consistently been on the #1 rated team in each bracket on Bloodlust.

He also won last year's 3v3 tournament at the WSVG Toronto.

He gets paid to play WoW, if that tells you how successful he is.

Ming is a loser who thinks he's better than he really is. He makes up **** about him being the "rogue class hero" and then equates every situation in his life to Naruto and basketball. He then writes emo blogs about Itachi or someone dying IN AN ANIME and saying that he's literally crying and he will continue crying because the only hero he's ever had died today.

That's the kind of tool Ming is; you don't really even have to insult him. Just sit back and let him make a fool out of himself.

Apparently you attended a school who's basic premise of English was not spelling.

Exactly, so why write a rap about the guy??



When you what? Looked in you lap?



This "Im a cyber badass" act never gets old... I just watched an office episode where dwight had second life on his computer and he could fly. I bet you would have muscles and a girl on each arm. Where in the HELL did you gather I was a "gun control lobby"??? At no point did I imply I was for gun control. I am however for not kicking people when they are down.



... he is just another guy that plays WOW...

If he is being idolized because he wins cash and is #1 rogue in the world, then I think he should set some life goals because that doesnt really mean $hit when he gets up from the keyboard does it.

Dont get me wrong I am not defending Ming

Im just not humored by this OMFGBBQ