Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

Why Lawl Ret?Follow

#127 Mar 23 2008 at 8:22 AM Rating: Good
**
842 posts
arthoriuss wrote:
To put it bluntly, because shammies wear mail not plate. It's for the same reason we dont wear cloth or (shudder) leather very often. Its because we are Paladins and we wear plate like your warrior


o.O

seriously? have you never heard of warriors wearing leather to dps in if it's an upgrade? if there were a CLOTH chestpiece out there with 50 crit rating, 70 str and 30 hit rating, i couldn't care less if it had 83 armor, i'd wear it in a heartbeat.
#128 Mar 23 2008 at 8:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Well I don't agree with that, I would wear cloth or leather or mail if I found the stats to be better both in Healing and DPSing. Only all plate set I would carry is tanking for obvious reasons.

But that's just it though, Enh gear suits enh shammies just fine, they have a little more focus on their spells than we do (shocks, totems, etc..), but they tend to emphasize more on int and mana regen than we need.

Having said that, there are mail pieces that focus more on melee stats instead of caster stats, and if I found a piece that was better than what I had in terms of stats, and no one else wanted it, I would keep it.
#129 Mar 23 2008 at 9:28 AM Rating: Decent
**
842 posts
CapJack of the Seven Seas wrote:
Well I don't agree with that, I would wear cloth or leather or mail if I found the stats to be better both in Healing and DPSing.


my comment on cloth armor was in reference to I, being a dps warrior, not I as a prospective retadin.
#130 Mar 23 2008 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
CapJack of the Seven Seas wrote:
Well I don't agree with that, I would wear cloth or leather or mail if I found the stats to be better both in Healing and DPSing. Only all plate set I would carry is tanking for obvious reasons.

But that's just it though, Enh gear suits enh shammies just fine, they have a little more focus on their spells than we do (shocks, totems, etc..), but they tend to emphasize more on int and mana regen than we need.

Having said that, there are mail pieces that focus more on melee stats instead of caster stats, and if I found a piece that was better than what I had in terms of stats, and no one else wanted it, I would keep it.


How about hunter gear, out of sheer curiousity? At least the stuff with less regen, I mean.
#131 Mar 23 2008 at 9:35 AM Rating: Decent
@tommyguns is that dps supposed to be impressive? 600 on HKM and 780 on Gruul? If I ever got that low something would be drastically wrong. Those instances I'm trying to push for 1000 dps (and I average 950+ in mostly badge gear 2/4 T4). I remember back when my old-old guild were progressing in early 25 man content (ie. Gruul's lair), if you didn't do 800 dps, you were replaced by someone who could. If you want, I can show you MY gruul's lair dps charts next time I do it.


@everyone else: OK look, I'm sick and frigging tired of going over this argument time and time again. But hey, someone else wants to make the stupid waste-of-my-time argument again, so here I go. Want to know why lawl ret, truly? Because A.) Their dps is terrible, its just like MS warriors, unless you have the perfect party setup with every conceivable buff, then you're going to get smoked by most dps. B.) There is NEVER... I repeat NEVER a situation where a ret paladin being in the raid makes the difference between downing the boss, and wiping on it. Let me list off some examples:

Try to do Kael or RoSouls without a rogue.
Try to do Tidewalker or High King without a mage.
Try to do Mag (or Garr if you wanna go old-school) without a warlock.

Shaman's tremor totem can be a raid saver for archimonde.
Hunter's misdirect can be a raid saver if someone needs to pick up a mob far away or your offtank needs to build more threat
Shadow priest's mana regen can mean the difference between killing a boss and not.
Druid's hots can get a tank through silence.


There is simply no situation where a ret paladin makes the difference between a raid downing a boss, and not. That coupled with average dps, is why I have, and always will continue to believe in lawl ret, even if the rate-down monkeys don't let me say it anymore.
#132 Mar 23 2008 at 10:49 AM Rating: Default
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Some of us rate up from time to time, thanks for the concise and completely beautiful post Dilbrt.


Edited, Mar 23rd 2008 2:50pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#133 Mar 23 2008 at 11:31 AM Rating: Excellent
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:


How about hunter gear, out of sheer curiousity? At least the stuff with less regen, I mean.


If it's better than what I got, than sure. That's kinda they key word there. Better. Well I guess better and free, i.e. instance drops. I'm not paying a huge bounty for gear which I know there is better gear for me which focus on the stats that I need in an instance.

At the same time, I wouldn't roll on the gear if the hunter was there and wanted it, cause hey... it's meant for him.

Quote:
my comment on cloth armor was in reference to I, being a dps warrior, not I as a prospective retadin.


I meant that in my healing set I wouldn't hesitate to pick up cloth, just like in my dps set. I realize what you were saying.

#134 Mar 23 2008 at 12:30 PM Rating: Excellent
**
648 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
How about hunter gear, out of sheer curiousity? At least the stuff with less regen, I mean.


yes, if it was really better i'd take it. the problem with shammy, hunter and rogue gear though isn't really the mp5 or int or spell damage... its that they tend to have AP instead of strength. not all of it, but most of it. if i'm wearing something with 48 str and see a rogue peice drop with 100 AP (assuming other stats are equal) i'm not going to take it. Divine Strength and BoK both make strength worth much more than AP. the few peices of leather/mail that have strength or considerably more AP/crit i'll gladly take. i'm wearing a leather helm at the moment i think.
#135 Mar 23 2008 at 3:51 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
Quote:
@tommyguns is that dps supposed to be impressive? 600 on HKM and 780 on Gruul? If I ever got that low something would be drastically wrong. Those instances I'm trying to push for 1000 dps (and I average 950+ in mostly badge gear 2/4 T4). I remember back when my old-old guild were progressing in early 25 man content (ie. Gruul's lair), if you didn't do 800 dps, you were replaced by someone who could. If you want, I can show you MY gruul's lair dps charts next time I do it.


impressive? i dont know. #1 and #2 on a successful HKM and Gruuls downing? yes. i would only care to see your dps charts if it included a Ret pally, otherwise WWS has a slew of T6 rogues kickin out 2k+. but if u'd like to post em anyway, this board is free. btw, i can usually do 700-800dps on my frostmage on a tank n spank boss, but i'll still choose my pally for relatively mobile fights like Gruul. buffs anyone?


on the topic of hunter/shammy gear: they are not really Ret pally qualified. warrior gear is the way to go with +str, +hit, +crit, +haste, armor penetration, see badge gear. if you dont have immediate access to that stuff, then a little piece of mail here and there is fine.
#136 Mar 23 2008 at 7:20 PM Rating: Default
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I think the thing is that while you can down HK with that kind of dps it is almost bad enough that its embarrassing to mention it. Either your players are extremely undergeared or poorly played. Possibly both. By the time you get to Gruul you should be able to pull 800 dps pretty easily.

Oh and don't even get me started on raiding ice spec as a mage, its as bad as having to have a long chat with a rogue about the fact that swords are better dps or the shammy with fast swing weapons and having to tell him that 2.6 is where he should be at period, no argument. Well I guess you can argue if you want to air your ignorance of the game for all to see.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#137 Mar 23 2008 at 8:28 PM Rating: Good
***
1,503 posts
pve + pvp = frost
#138 Mar 24 2008 at 2:44 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
PvP yes, PvE no.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#139 Mar 24 2008 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
PvP yes, PvE no.


Actually, I'm starting to think PvE with frost is relatively possible(at least at the T5 level, will have to get back to you on T6 stuff when I see it more... and not on cutting edge progression guilds). However, even that being said, the builds are fairly different.

So even if one were to accept the possibility of raid frost, you can't have your cake and eat it too, as it were.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 168 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (168)