Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Why Lawl Ret?Follow

#102 Mar 15 2008 at 1:57 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Animosity, looking at the game from different perspectives based on progression through content. Same old jive again. Too many years posting in the Asylum has me posting in a condescending manner.

DPS is subjective, there are fights where a Prot pally will win it, fights where a sub/assassin rogue with burst damage and long cool downs will beat down a swords rogue. Kara is also a very poor gauge of dps for a number of reasons, whether it be a fight like Aran, or Locks on Curator. With lots of trash and short boss fights it is indeed quite a poor test that is in no way indicative of how things will play out in 25 man raids.

Is ret horrible, no. Unless you are in a raid with poorly played DPS they should be placing middle of the pack, cracking the top five on occassion. CS, keeping up Imp SotC, Jol and JoW is nice too.

Ret suffers from the fact that Non ret pallies can bring the same utility with little to no fuss involved, as opposed to putting a Prot warrior in a melee group to give battleshout/buffs rather than be doing commanding shout and rocking a warlocks imp stam buff.

You may try to argue otherwise but doing so only exposes the fact that you haven't set foot in a raid greater than 10 men, which while an elitist thing to say still doesn't mitigate the fact taht you are talking about group structure in content you have never experienced.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#103 Mar 15 2008 at 3:49 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
this argument is getting old.

Ret is great for low lvl arena, all BGs, 5mans, and 10mans. dps, for the respective gear lvl is above average. overall utility and buffs are again above average.

in 25 mans, gear tapers off a bit and dps doesn't increase accordingly. however, raidwide and partywide buffs become more relevant. Ret pallies are not always in "the melee group". some fights will have the Ret in one of the "dps groups" where the higher dps'ers will get the partywide buffs. so the argument "Holy pally can do a Rets job" rarely applies, because you wont always have a Holy pally in said group.

in hi lvl arena, the paladin's classwide(read: not just Ret) flaws are revealed. can you still break 2000? sure. is it easy? not if the SL/SL lock and Resto druid have anything to say.
#104 Mar 15 2008 at 5:00 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
tommyguns wrote:
Ret is great for low lvl arena, all BGs, 5mans, and 10mans. dps, for the respective gear lvl is above average. overall utility and buffs are again above average.

This is why the argument is getting old.

No. Ret has passable utility and buffs and acceptable (I assume, if played right; again, never seen it done) DPS. If there is a line drawn somewhere that qualifies as "average", then they are most certainly below it. Again, passable, but objectively speaking, still on the lower half of the DPS roster if not the spec/class that slots in at the very bottom. Hey... someone has to do it.

Quote:
however, raidwide and partywide buffs become more relevant. Ret pallies are not always in "the melee group". some fights will have the Ret in one of the "dps groups" where the higher dps'ers will get the partywide buffs.

Again, disagree. Buffs are actually just as relevant, if not more so, in 5-10 man content where it requires a fairly minimal effort to keep said buffs applied. They provide a greater benefit in 25-man content, but boss mechanics have you backing off and repositioning so often that it can often be tough to keep them constantly applied, both buffs and debuffs. As I said in my previous post, personal DPS is severely underrated anymore for no good reason.

Quote:
in hi lvl arena, the paladin's classwide(read: not just Ret) flaws are revealed. can you still break 2000? sure. is it easy? not if the SL/SL lock and Resto druid have anything to say.

Quite so. I think Ret is worlds better off than it used to be; I would most certainly call it "viable". However, certain specs hit their rating ceiling much earlier than others in the arena, and I would agree that you shouldn't expect to see anything above 2000 unless you (and your team) are superb. Su-perb.
#105 Mar 15 2008 at 5:08 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
i haven't been to Gruul's in a while. just downed High King:

http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh141/tommy0guns/PvE/WoWScrnShot_031508_205917.jpg

i'll post em as i go. im pvp spec atm, btw.
#106 Mar 15 2008 at 6:10 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
Gruul:
http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh141/tommy0guns/PvE/WoWScrnShot_031508_220558.jpg
#107 Mar 15 2008 at 6:41 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
I'm sorry, I all of a sudden forgot about the past two years on this forum. Remind me again, at what point have we ever taken your screenshots seriously?
#108 Mar 15 2008 at 7:07 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
i woulda settled for a 'gratz', but a 'stfu' is what i have to take apparently.
#109 Mar 15 2008 at 9:47 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
tommyguns wrote:
i woulda settled for a 'gratz', but a 'stfu' is what i have to take apparently.

You'd get the "grats" if you were like, "Hey, check it out, I know the Ret spec isn't going to do the job for you, but if you really know how to play it you can do this: (insert screenshot here)."

You and version 2.0 seem to think that Ret is destined for the top of the meter by default and that the rest of us are just lying to ourselves because we're jealous of Ret and have concocted this huge conspiracy to keep the spec down. This is why you get the "stfu".
#110 Mar 15 2008 at 10:39 PM Rating: Good
**
648 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
since math isn't your friend


i find this funny since the point of my 2+3=5 is because you apparently don't have terribly great math. somehow according to you 25>60 which to most people makes no logical sense.... so, amuse yourself, mock the simplicity of my math while you complicate your own arguements to come to illogical conclusions. feel free. just don't expect me to continue to beleive that your knowledge>my experience when you tell me 25>60..... but then i've never been to BT. perhaps logic changes there. kinda like "new math". maybe imaginary numbers become real and established rules of math disintegrate under that awesome knowledge of bodh and friends.


Gaudion wrote:
You'd get the "grats" if you were like, "Hey, check it out, I know the Ret spec isn't going to do the job for you, but if you really know how to play it you can do this: (insert screenshot here)."


...... wow, you guys are skilled at the barbed contradictions. did you both learn from the same place? i'm pretty sure all tommyguns said in his post, was "i just did an instance i haven't done in a while, and here's the SC.." i'm pretty sure there is an understood "if you know how to play ret you can do this". it's pretty obvious. we've both acknoledged all along that there are a lot of rets that don't play at his level. seriously, you guys are so eager to bash the ret spec and particularly myself and tommyguns that your once hard to combat arguements are filling with holes and selfcontradictions.

i'm not sure if i'd rather have logic without full knowledge or knowledge without real logic.... might want to take a little time to reply so you don't contradict yourself.

oh, and awesome job tommy :) grats on downing gruul!
#111 Mar 16 2008 at 5:48 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Quote:
No. Ret has passable utility and buffs and acceptable ... DPS


/nod

Quote:
Ret pallies are not always in "the melee group". some fights will have the Ret in one of the "dps groups" where the higher dps'ers will get the partywide buffs.


2% dps, 2%.

All to pull a ret pally from Windfury, Feral Crit, Warrior AP buff, etc? Effectively mitigating all sources they have to increase their dps. Why not use a BM hunter who gives the group a 3% dps buff. That might shave .8 seconds off a fight compared to a fraction less with Ret being in a caster group..
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#112 Mar 16 2008 at 6:16 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
Quote:
All to pull a ret pally from Windfury, Feral Crit, Warrior AP buff, etc?


i said not always, i didnt say never.

last night we had a dps war, rogue, enh sham, ret pally, and hunter all in the same grp to overload the buffs and dmg output. everyone got a piece of the buff pie.
#113 Mar 16 2008 at 8:00 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I am sure the Hunter enjoyed Windfury. /sarcasm
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#114 Mar 16 2008 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good
Well this is my first time posting but I've been looking at this topic for a while and it's interesting to watch people who usually get along just fine on the forums become worst enemies when it comes to the topic of...Ret pallies; scary, scary.

My main is a ret pally and unlike a lot of other ret pallies talking here (no offense) I have gone to SSC and Mag and such. Ret pallies can dps, they arn't gods but they arn't the worst thing to bring either.

I remember my guilds first Mag kill, I came as ret even though I was usually our prot pally of doom and I was #1 dps. We had is recorded on WoW web stats but my guild fell apart and I lost the info (I'll post it once I find it again).

And Mag isn't BT or Hyjal but it's still not a cake walk and we had some good rogues I had to beat.

But I will admit ret does lack a lot, there really is no reason to bring one unless you know they do great dps or you just need another dps filler.

But for me I take advantage of the fact everyone hates ret, because everyone hates me blizz makes me more powerful to try and get more ret pallies out there. But most of the new ret pallies are idiots who can't out dps the tank. So everyone still hates ret and blizz continues to make ret pallies better. So for me it's great that i'm hated it just means i'm not gonna get nerfed anytime soon.
#115 Mar 16 2008 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
MedicODoom wrote:
I remember my guilds first Mag kill, I came as ret even though I was usually our prot pally of doom and I was #1 dps.



Did you have a click rotation on Mag?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#116 Mar 16 2008 at 8:29 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
I am sure the Hunter enjoyed Windfury. /sarcasm


The Unleashed Rage would be nice ;) If the Hunter was in close enough that is ...
#117 Mar 16 2008 at 9:58 PM Rating: Decent
Maulgak wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
I am sure the Hunter enjoyed Windfury. /sarcasm


The Unleashed Rage would be nice ;) If the Hunter was in close enough that is ...


It doesn't increase RAP, only MAP.
#118 Mar 17 2008 at 5:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
RPZip wrote:
Maulgak wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
I am sure the Hunter enjoyed Windfury. /sarcasm


The Unleashed Rage would be nice ;) If the Hunter was in close enough that is ...


It doesn't increase RAP, only MAP.


Really? I thought all items/abilities/etc that didn't specifically say Ranged or Melee AP increased both? Hmm, guess I learned something today.

Besides, if he was enjoying the Windfury, he'd enjoy the MAP ;)

Edited, Mar 17th 2008 6:37am by Maulgak
#119 Mar 17 2008 at 8:17 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Did you have a click rotation on Mag?


No I will admit I didn't have to do any clicking. But niether did the 2 rogues and the 1 dps warrior in my group and I beat them in the dps meters.

(sorry still looking for report)
#120 Mar 17 2008 at 8:28 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
MedicODoom wrote:
Quote:
Did you have a click rotation on Mag?


No I will admit I didn't have to do any clicking. But niether did the 2 rogues and the 1 dps warrior in my group and I beat them in the dps meters.

That's... pretty sad on their part. All merits (or lack thereof) of Ret Pallies aside, no one should be beating a Rogue in DPS on a fight like Mag, especially if s/he's not involved in a click rotation.
#121 Mar 23 2008 at 2:48 AM Rating: Default
I am so sick of hearing ppl badmouth the Ret pally. Like you said, it takes more skill than most of you posses or are willing to put forth. to start out we are offered the worse gear of any class by blizz then you have to contend with the fact that most ret pallys have no clue what they are doing. I have been playing the game for a little under 3 months, and have capped and gotten myself some decent gear, the pieces of the S1 set worth wearing. Playing ret is not for the light of heart or the lazy, if you want an easy no skill req class roll a lock, go afliction and have some fun, but I like melee and I like skill, so I am going ret. It takes time and dedication but a ret pally can pwn, outlast a warrior, crush a clothie and if you can see a rouge to hit him he is toast. you dont seem to complain about a ret pally when we save your butt in a BG or heal your whiny ***. All you nooblets to the genre, all you retards that have chosen WoW as your first MMO are just speaking from what you know, but I have been playing these games long before Blizz introduced their very communistic PvP system *meaning that its great in theory and horrible in practice.* So if you are on Suramar and this post hurt your little feeling come see big pappa Suffus and let m3 h4m3rz put you to rest, and to all you ret pallys taking it seriously, hang in there, dont just default to the nasty pvp gear that blizz offers you and keep at it. True, ret is a hard way to go in PvP but it can work and for the love of god, its a game, have fun with it.
#122 Mar 23 2008 at 4:30 AM Rating: Decent
**
842 posts
forgive a warrior trolling in the pally forums, but...

if you guys complain about itemization so much, then why not just wear enhancement shaman gear? shouldn't it have the stats you're looking for?
#123 Mar 23 2008 at 5:58 AM Rating: Good
xCherubiMx wrote:
I am so sick of hearing ppl badmouth the Ret pally. Like you said, it takes more skill than most of you posses or are willing to put forth. to start out we are offered the worse gear of any class by blizz then you have to contend with the fact that most ret pallys have no clue what they are doing.


Worst gear of any class... I would agree if they weren't fixing all that in the next patch. Out with the spell damage, in with the crit and resil.

Quote:

I have been playing the game for a little under 3 months, and have capped and gotten myself some decent gear, the pieces of the S1 set worth wearing. Playing ret is not for the light of heart or the lazy, if you want an easy no skill req class roll a lock, go afliction and have some fun, but I like melee and I like skill, so I am going ret.


Whole lot of experience you're bringing to this table.


Quote:

It takes time and dedication but a ret pally can pwn, outlast a warrior, crush a clothie and if you can see a rouge to hit him he is toast. you dont seem to complain about a ret pally when we save your butt in a BG or heal your whiny ***.


Gotta love how you probably didn't even read this thread before posting. The reasons why ret sucks have nothing to do with BGs, it has to do with raiding and top tier arena. You can't just say "my class r0x because it requires more skill and I have more skill than j00." You come up against someone who knows what they are doing, and you may end up having a hard time with that clothie, warrior, or rogue or whatever you think is easy prey. Start doing some arena, get up in the brackets and you'll see just how much you fail.

Quote:

All you nooblets to the genre, all you retards that have chosen WoW as your first MMO are just speaking from what you know, but I have been playing these games long before Blizz introduced their very communistic PvP system *meaning that its great in theory and horrible in practice.*


Yeah.. NONE of us have played anything other than WoW. Smiley: rolleyes Either way... I don't really see your point. "You might know more about WoW because you play it a lot, but I know more than all of you because I've played other games.... even though this is a very WoW-specific topic." Yeah... probably should have thought about that one (probably this entire post) before putting it up here. It doesn't solidify your point and just makes you look more like an idiot.

Quote:

So if you are on Suramar and this post hurt your little feeling come see big pappa Suffus and let m3 h4m3rz put you to rest, and to all you ret pallys taking it seriously, hang in there, dont just default to the nasty pvp gear that blizz offers you and keep at it. True, ret is a hard way to go in PvP but it can work and for the love of god, its a game, have fun with it.


The very fact that you used 1337 5p34k shows me that you aren't going to put any hammer near me, and my holy, prot, or ret paladin will whipe the floor with you. The PvP gear is going to be some of the best gear for Ret Paladins in the game, with the S3 gear already at that point. The ONLY sentence in your post that has any merit is that last one. It's your money, I can't tell you what to do with it. But for those who actually care about other people, about which is the best spec and will help out in a team environment (i.e. raiding and arenas) then we gotta tell them the god's honest truth.

I really don't know why I just broke your post down like that... You are already condemned to default or sub-default just from the idiotic way you decided to write that out. I guarantee you even ret paladins are going to rate you down, because you offered no points to the table of this discussion, attacked the forum members here, and used leet speak... AND it's your first post. Not a very good way to start out around here.


Quote:
forgive a warrior trolling in the pally forums, but...

if you guys complain about itemization so much, then why not just wear enhancement shaman gear? shouldn't it have the stats you're looking for?


Well, the way I understand it, Enh Shamans already have a problem with their itemization. But I don't think anyone here would avoid a mail piece if it had better stats than their current piece.
#124 Mar 23 2008 at 6:10 AM Rating: Decent
**
713 posts
To put it bluntly, because shammies wear mail not plate. It's for the same reason we dont wear cloth or (shudder) leather very often. Its because we are Paladins and we wear plate like your warrior
#125 Mar 23 2008 at 6:13 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
Quote:
xCherubiMx wrote:
I am so sick of hearing ppl badmouth the Ret pally. Like you said, it takes more skill than most of you posses or are willing to put forth. to start out we are offered the worse gear of any class by blizz then you have to contend with the fact that most ret pallys have no clue what they are doing.


Worst gear of any class... I would agree if they weren't fixing all that in the next patch. Out with the spell damage, in with the crit and resil.


both wrong. its not the gear, its how it is used. we need ALL stats(save spirit) for our spells and abilities. we want to be melee but are left with a book half filled with caster spells. we need talents or abilities to convert the playstyles like when a resto druid goes bear form.
#126 Mar 23 2008 at 7:05 AM Rating: Good
**
648 posts
xCherubiMx wrote:
I am so sick of hearing ppl badmouth the Ret pally. Like you said, it takes more skill than most of you posses or are willing to put forth. to start out we are offered the worse gear of any class by blizz then you have to contend with the fact that most ret pallys have no clue what they are doing. I have been playing the game for a little under 3 months, and have capped and gotten myself some decent gear, the pieces of the S1 set worth wearing. Playing ret is not for the light of heart or the lazy, if you want an easy no skill req class roll a lock, go afliction and have some fun, but I like melee and I like skill, so I am going ret. It takes time and dedication but a ret pally can pwn, outlast a warrior, crush a clothie and if you can see a rouge to hit him he is toast. you dont seem to complain about a ret pally when we save your butt in a BG or heal your whiny ***. All you nooblets to the genre, all you retards that have chosen WoW as your first MMO are just speaking from what you know, but I have been playing these games long before Blizz introduced their very communistic PvP system *meaning that its great in theory and horrible in practice.* So if you are on Suramar and this post hurt your little feeling come see big pappa Suffus and let m3 h4m3rz put you to rest, and to all you ret pallys taking it seriously, hang in there, dont just default to the nasty pvp gear that blizz offers you and keep at it. True, ret is a hard way to go in PvP but it can work and for the love of god, its a game, have fun with it.


wow.... i don't even know what to say except ty capjack for your reply to this (i always find it amusing to see you leave your normal tactful manners and chew people out - awesome). i come back from a week in the field to find a 'fellow' ret with less than 3 months playing this game dragging my ret spec through dog $#!+ making not one valid point (except its your money, play how you like).... cherub, i think i appreciate your attempt to defend ret.... in the future, read the thread, understand the arguments and realize that there are limits here... calling the regulars here that know more than you even think there is to know "nooblets" annoys even those of us who would otherwise have stood by you and definitely exceeds the limits here. you my friend, have earned my first rate down for unwarranted flaming and arugument without any logic or even apparent understanding.

i hope you take some time and think about the issues here. read some back threads perhaps. think about ret with an open mind. yes it can succeed, did up to opera in kara last night and was a close second in dps (i know bodh... kara isn't the real litmus test.... i'll be moving on to gruuls soon). on the other hand just because some don't choose to play ret doesn't mean they don't have skill - it often means they choose to apply their skill to other classes or specs. whatever i may say about bodh he obviously didn't get to BT without skill...
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 155 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (155)