Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Why Lawl Ret?Follow

#52 Mar 11 2008 at 2:28 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
But overall, I think I've confirmed thru this thread that these paladin forums are one big ret pally bashing party with a lot of people who never played ret before being more than happy to poke and jab at every opportunity.


I'm sorry I didn't tell you exactly what you wanted to hear. I take it ALLLLL back. Retribution is sunshine and kittens, and everyone in the world will want to party with you dispite your shortcomings and YOU are going to be the one that proves to the world that Retribution is viable in raids and high-rating arenas.

Go get 'em tiger.
#53 Mar 11 2008 at 4:07 PM Rating: Good
kittens are so cute! ^^
sunshine is so warm on my skin . . .

im so happy . . . oh wait, i just shat myself. . .
#54 Mar 12 2008 at 12:55 AM Rating: Default
Kara isn't a good testing area for Ret Pally DPS. Step into a 25 man and see where you are on the ranks of DPS. Besides 10 mans are practically heroics.
#55 Mar 12 2008 at 6:24 AM Rating: Excellent
*
212 posts
Quote:
Kara isn't a good testing area for Ret Pally DPS. Step into a 25 man and see where you are on the ranks of DPS. Besides 10 mans are practically heroics.


First off I'll just say that I play Holy (ret to 70 and respec) and in our typical 25 man setup we will have 4 pallys. 2 holy, 1 tank, 1 ret. Our ret pally is the only one in the guild so he gets any and all of the ret plate drops that he wants and is thus pretty well geared.

In terms of DPS, he is in the top 5 every single raid. He is also one of the first to die every boss encounter (that's more being melee than ret) so if he lived, would probably be top if not top most times. I wouldn't say he was better geared than anyone else, we are all pretty similar (T4/T5 gear) but he is very skilled.

I personally appreiciate that he can refresh my judgments so I don't have to keep running in and reapply. I like to keep at max range so my shiny armour doesn't get dirty :p The extra blessing, bubble, emergency healing, DI all have their uses.

If I had a choice, I'd pick a ret pally over a dps warrior.
#56 Mar 12 2008 at 7:19 AM Rating: Good
**
648 posts
CapJack of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
But overall, I think I've confirmed thru this thread that these paladin forums are one big ret pally bashing party with a lot of people who never played ret before being more than happy to poke and jab at every opportunity.


I'm sorry I didn't tell you exactly what you wanted to hear. I take it ALLLLL back. Retribution is sunshine and kittens, and everyone in the world will want to party with you dispite your shortcomings and YOU are going to be the one that proves to the world that Retribution is viable in raids and high-rating arenas.

Go get 'em tiger.


lol. i know you're bashing me too, but that made me laugh.

on a positive note, i did go back to kara with the giuid i went with a few weeks ago. having the right attitude in your group and at least decent skill you can get invited back even as ret... hopefully a littlle encouragement for the newer rets.
#57 Mar 12 2008 at 8:59 AM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
bawbaag - thank you for providing a different perspective. I was hoping someone would chime with a more realistic perspective than a typical "u ret, so u suk n00b" rant.

My point is, sans the true lousy player who sucks playing any class let alone ret, retribution paladins have more use than most people give them credit for. It seems like the venom I read on these forums are pointed more towards bad players who happen to play Ret, instead of properly evaluating the class itself.

Pound for pound, as far as what each DPS class brings to a raid, you have to argue that ret brings a lot of value themselves. Argue these points if you wish:

    fury/arms warrior

Pros: no mana dependence - can fight forever, well armored (can't be one shotted), can emergency tank if needed by pulling out a 1-hander and shield and changing stances
Cons: DPS output is generally less than other DPS classes, brings nothing else to the party

    Rogue

Pros: insane DPS, ability to sap (CC), ability to stealth and scout
Cons: can be one shotted very easily, ability to sap (it's a non-combat CC, and only on humanoids), brings no other utility to the raid

    Mage

Pros: very high DPS and awesome AOE, frost mages can help slow down trash mobs, refreshment table, combat CC (sheep) for humanoids/animals, spellsteal, counterspell
Cons: easily killed, mana dependent (esp arcane)

    Warlock

Pros: different pets bring various abilities to a fight, soulstones, healthstones, good DPS/DoT's, banish-ability on elementals
Cons: easily killed, mana dependent, very limited CC ability

    Balance druids

Pros: very good single target DPS, tough spellcaster in moonkin form (rarely one-shotted), Innervate ability can help healers that are
low on mana, combat rez
Cons: has only CC for animals, rooting can only be used outdoors, DPS is generally lower than most DPS classes, 20 minute cooldown on rezzes

    Shamans

Pros: very high burst DPS (enhancement spec), totems, non-combat rez, self/emergency healing, good armor
Cons: still fairly easy to kill (mail armor), mana dependent and mana-hungry, no CC capability

    Shadow Priests

Pros: high DPS with DoT abilities, mana regen capability, emergency healing, non-combat rez, undead CC capability
Cons: easily killed, mana dependent, limited CC capability

    Retribution paladins

Pros: very high burst damage, judgements and seals during combat help increase mana regen/health/damage/crits, auras, emergency/self healing, non-combat rezzes, spell interrupts (stuns and repentence), well armored (can't be one-shotted), can emergency tank by pulling out a 1-hander and a shield
Cons: no real CC capability (turn undead has limited use), mana dependent

I don't think you can just look at the damage meter and decide that ret sucks. Besides, being 2nd or 3rd on a DPS meter while bringing 90 to 95% of a rogue's or mage's damage output isn't something to be ashamed of. So really, can you call ret pallies useless in raids? I'd choose a ret pally over a fury/arms warrior or balance druid.

Edited, Mar 12th 2008 1:02pm by TooRetForYou

Edited, Mar 12th 2008 1:03pm by TooRetForYou
#58REDACTED, Posted: Mar 12 2008 at 9:07 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I just ignored it
#59 Mar 12 2008 at 9:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
There are some problems with you pro/con list.

Fury/arms warriors can bring something to the party, big AP/HP buff and blood frenzy.

the fact a class can be one shotted means little as pretty much every class that isnt a tank that pulls aggro on a raid boss will get one shotted. cloth or plate. Yes, a ret pally will get one shotted.

you are also exaggerating the usefulness of the ret pally pros. for example, the only judgement they can bring that somebody MIGHT not have (but could) is imp SotC. The only benefit is Crusader Strike/sanctity aura. Spell interrupts dont work on raid bosses.

In closing, you are still basing off 5 mans. when people say lol ret or just flat out question its usefulness it is from a raid perspective. raid bosses, gruul+. not even kara. We dont consider 5 mans or kara trash.

edit: forgot sanc aura heh.

Edited, Mar 12th 2008 10:34am by KTurner
#60 Mar 12 2008 at 9:45 AM Rating: Good
I gave you a reasonable list of reasons why not ret, as well as other people here have. Joking aside, you just wanted to hear us say that ret is awesome and didnt care about the reasons.
#61REDACTED, Posted: Mar 12 2008 at 9:54 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'm hip with the explanations. I'm not with the attitude. Any class played well is viable IMO. And no - ret isn't uber. I never said it was. But whatever. I'm ready to move on to other topics.
#62 Mar 12 2008 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
There were like 2 or 3 people that were somewhat bashing ret, mostly in jest, and you took that as everyone hates ret and will say whatever they want to say to make sure that no one specs it.
#63 Mar 12 2008 at 11:15 AM Rating: Default
***
2,396 posts
Every new Ret who comes to this board to prove a point does the exact same thing you did in this thread. You asked a question, but you didn't accept the answers because they weren't what you wanted to hear. You weren't "eager to hear our thoughts". You'd already made up your mind long before you created the thread.

So... why? What was the point? What exactly were you trying to accomplish?
#64 Mar 12 2008 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good
*
98 posts
Quote:
Every new Ret who comes to this board to prove a point does the exact same thing you did in this thread. You asked a question, but you didn't accept the answers because they weren't what you wanted to hear. You weren't "eager to hear our thoughts". You'd already made up your mind long before you created the thread.

So... why? What was the point? What exactly were you trying to accomplish?


My simple answer is I really like playing ret and maybe I just wanted to know that these 6 months of leveling my toon to 70 and gearing him up for Kara and beyond isn't just an exercise in futility. Based on the overwhelmingly cold response I got, I know to expect the worst now.

On the other hand, I just can't see myself tanking as a prot pally (I already do that as a druid and I like the druid better), or healing as a holy pally. I've tried both and they're not for me. Ret's the only way to go.

I guess I just have to live with the deficiencies of the build and make the best of it. Thanks for the input, everyone. Ret may be flawed but it's fun - that's all that counts for me.
#65 Mar 12 2008 at 11:50 AM Rating: Default
TooRetForYou wrote:

I'm hip with the explanations. I'm not with the attitude. Any class played well is viable IMO. And no - ret isn't uber. I never said it was. But whatever. I'm ready to move on to other topics.


Did we time travel back to the 60's or something?
#66 Mar 12 2008 at 7:37 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
TooRetForYou wrote:
On the other hand, I just can't see myself tanking as a prot pally (I already do that as a druid and I like the druid better), or healing as a holy pally. I've tried both and they're not for me. Ret's the only way to go.

I guess I just have to live with the deficiencies of the build and make the best of it. Thanks for the input, everyone. Ret may be flawed but it's fun - that's all that counts for me.

You know, if you'd been that reasonable to begin with, no one would have thought any less of you. I've always maintained that it's your character; you should play what you want. If you want to play Ret, then by all means, play Ret. Just make sure you're prepared to accept the inherent limitations of the build and the in-game prejudices that come with it.

And please, just... for God's sake... whatever you do, do not make the mistake of going into the end-game with a Retribution build and toolofjesus' attitude. You are not God's gift to DPS. Everyone else who plays a Ret Pally doesn't suck (that bad). You are not going to be the first, only, or best guy to come along and WTFPWN with Ret where others have tried and failed, proving to the world that you, and Retribution by proxy, are just that awesome.

You're just another Ret Pally in a long line of Ret Pallies.
#67 Mar 12 2008 at 9:34 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
KTurner the Meaningless wrote:
There are some problems with you pro/con list.

Fury/arms warriors can bring something to the party, big AP/HP buff and blood frenzy.


Not to mention saying that Warlocks are mana dependent. Sure, they have a mana bar, but it can effectively be unlimited.
#68 Mar 13 2008 at 10:28 AM Rating: Good
**
648 posts
Gaudion wrote:
Just make sure you're prepared to accept the inherent limitations of the build and the in-game prejudices that come with it.


i agree 100%. as long as you realize what your limitations are and what your strengths are you can play on the strengths of your character to be a benefit to those around you. this pretty much goes for any class though lol. and yes, be prepared for not only in-game, but also forum prejudices if you're going to be posting pro-ret on here. ret requires some thick skin and often the ability to laugh at yourself with everyone else. if you like to debate though pls do, just don't cry about people hating on ret.

Gaudion wrote:
And please, just... for God's sake... whatever you do, do not make the mistake of going into the end-game with a Retribution build and toolofjesus' attitude. You are not God's gift to DPS. Everyone else who plays a Ret Pally doesn't suck (that bad). You are not going to be the first, only, or best guy to come along and WTFPWN with Ret where others have tried and failed, proving to the world that you, and Retribution by proxy, are just that awesome.

You're just another Ret Pally in a long line of Ret Pallies.



yeah, don't be like that tool. he's a pain in the backside. wait... that's me isn't it....

and just for the record i'm not God's gift to DPS or RET or anything as limited as that.... I am God's gift to the world ;) just kidding of course. i'm pretty sure if you've actually read anything at all i've posted you've seen that i tend to refer to better rets than myself. I know i'm not the best. i know i'm not even in the top couple percent. i do know that i'm on the right track. and i do know what i know about ret and how i perform compared to others at my level on my server (ret and regular dps classes). i'm still working on improving. well, i was till i got hacked and my gear stolen :(

another thing i've said MANY times and even have in the ret guide i wrote i don't think that ret is the greatest spec for dps. i do think it's capable. i definitely think that we should be helping people who are trying ret to learn how to play ret instead of telling them to give up and reroll a class they won't enjoy as much. i tried a rogue and hated it. i have a hunter and it's ok, but i lost interest in the mid 50's... ret has been fun all the way to 70 and still is the most fun i've had. i'm sorry you don't like that i'm having fun as ret. i think the fact that you have to put words in my mouth to discredit me says a lot for your arguement.
#69 Mar 13 2008 at 12:22 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,680 posts
I'm sure I'm adding fuel to a fire, but for folks who are new there is something missing from the discussion on the viability of Ret pallies at 70 that must be brought up: Threat.

From what I can see (and let me note that I do not have a 70 pally), there is no way to reduce your threat as a Ret pally other than to erase it with a bubble.* If you're pumping out the same DPS as a rogue or mage without any way to reduce your threat generation, then I hope you have a good shield and healer as you'll be tanking soon enough.

All DPS-centric classes have some talent or innate mechanic that reduces threat, but I don't see one in the Ret tree. Am I missing it? Please advise if I'm clueless here.


And personally, I would try out a Ret pally in my 5man/heroic groups. I would not expect them to top the meters, but if they're responsible players and don't cause wipes why not? Also note that I don't generally expect sub rogues, affliction 'locks or ice mages to top the meters either. Buffs, CC, etc can be just as important as damage output.


*edit: It seems I was also wrong about this. See post below and apologies for not checking my facts more carefully.

Edited, Mar 14th 2008 2:08pm by TherionSaysWhat
#70 Mar 13 2008 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
*
98 posts
Quote:
I'm sure I'm adding fuel to a fire, but for folks who are new there is something missing from the discussion on the viability of Ret pallies at 70 that must be brought up: Threat.

From what I can see (and let me note that I do not have a 70 pally), there is no way to reduce your threat as a Ret pally other than to erase it with a bubble. If you're pumping out the same DPS as a rogue or mage without any way to reduce your threat generation, then I hope you have a good shield and healer as you'll be tanking soon enough.

All DPS-centric classes have some talent or innate mechanic that reduces threat, but I don't see one in the Ret tree. Am I missing it? Please advise if I'm clueless here.


And personally, I would try out a Ret pally in my 5man/heroic groups. I would not expect them to top the meters, but if they're responsible players and don't cause wipes why not? Also note that I don't generally expect sub rogues, affliction 'locks or ice mages to top the meters either. Buffs, CC, etc can be just as important as damage output.


Ret pallies actually don't have many issues with pulling Threat. We have a lot of threat reducing capabilities - the Fanaticism talent drops our threat by up to 30%, and Blessing of Salvation (which I always have up during raids) reduces it another 30%. We have two choices for aggro wipe: Blessing of Protection on ourselves, or Divine Shield. In all boss fights I don't hold anything back - I proc all my trinkets and use all my attacks, usually resulting in a top 2 or 3 placing on the Damage meter (darn rogues and enhance shamans always beat me), and I still don't draw any aggro. It also helps to count to 5 before you start whailing on something, just to make sure your MT holds aggro.

EDIT: Omen Threat meters help too =D

Edited, Mar 13th 2008 4:49pm by TooRetForYou
#71 Mar 13 2008 at 1:13 PM Rating: Excellent
**
648 posts
TherionSaysWhat wrote:
I'm sure I'm adding fuel to a fire, but for folks who are new there is something missing from the discussion on the viability of Ret pallies at 70 that must be brought up: Threat.

From what I can see (and let me note that I do not have a 70 pally), there is no way to reduce your threat as a Ret pally other than to erase it with a bubble. If you're pumping out the same DPS as a rogue or mage without any way to reduce your threat generation, then I hope you have a good shield and healer as you'll be tanking soon enough.

All DPS-centric classes have some talent or innate mechanic that reduces threat, but I don't see one in the Ret tree. Am I missing it? Please advise if I'm clueless here.


And personally, I would try out a Ret pally in my 5man/heroic groups. I would not expect them to top the meters, but if they're responsible players and don't cause wipes why not? Also note that I don't generally expect sub rogues, affliction 'locks or ice mages to top the meters either. Buffs, CC, etc can be just as important as damage output.


um, yeah, threat was a huge issue pre 2.3. but now fanaticism (right before CS in the ret tree) reduces our threat by 30%. this usually is enough, and when it isn't enough we still have Blessing of Salvation we can use too. threat is pretty well a non-issue anymore. as long as i let the tank have any kind of head start there's no way i'll catch up unless the tank really sucks. my rogue and mage friend are both usually above me on threat meters.
#72bodhisattva, Posted: Mar 13 2008 at 1:47 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Threat cap is not as bad as it once was, still lacks FD, Vanish, Soulshatter which is why Rogues, BM hunters and Locks WTFPWN face on the longer 10+ min 25 man content bosses.
#73 Mar 13 2008 at 2:39 PM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
Quote:
...um, yeah, threat was a huge issue pre 2.3. but now fanaticism...

I stand corrected, thanks. My experience with Ret Pallies is obviously limited. So that's another reason to take off the anit-Ret list.
#74 Mar 13 2008 at 2:58 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Even with Fanaticism they still can't dish out the dps certain other classes do before hitting the threat wall. Saw it first hand. In SSC/TK.

Remember guys this is not just about threat, not just DPS, not just utility, and not just Ret. Big picture, with a lot of different aspects that need to be taken into account and played in order of priority and viewed through the lense of experience, not assumptions based on entry level content and 25 man stuff you have never seen before.

It all comes around to a point made earlier in the thread. The dps is ho hum for a myriad of reasons in 25 man raids, the utility can be brought by either Prot or Holy pallies. A guild may or may not want one depending upon the structure of the raid but they are not 'must have" which often means they get left out as most raids tend to min/max in order to progress and mediocre dps with questionable utility that classes already in the raid can bring is like trying to sell an eskimo a fridge in terms of trying to sell a raid leader into giving you a raid slot.

Edited, Mar 13th 2008 6:59pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#75 Mar 13 2008 at 5:27 PM Rating: Good
**
648 posts
lol, elitism at its best. honestly, though, what would we do without bodh's vast knowledge base and lack of concern for other peoples feelings? bodh, if it wasn't for you knowing more and being as vehemently anti-ret as you are, ret debates on here would be dull.

i'm hoping blizz can get me my gear back so i can work at getting past kara to experience the absolute fail that awaits me.

i am curious though... if end game raids are so min/max do dps druids or shamans or warriors exist there? none of them have more dps, less threat and necessary utility that can't be brought by tanking or healing members of their class. oh, and i was wondering.... do holy or prot pallies take imp sotc? i can't check armory at the moment, but do you have it in your spec? i don't have anything in ret on my holy pally, but if its worth getting in place of kings or additional holy talents i'll consider changing my holy spec.

#76 Mar 13 2008 at 5:41 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
It may be elitism, the sad thing is that it is also the God's honest truth.


Which is why some of us are looking at Illidan and some of us are stuck on the first step of end game.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 194 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (194)