Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

PvP, Wow, I rock!Follow

#1 Feb 25 2008 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
*Long, I love my class story, skip to bottom for message of post if you must*

Basically, I queued up for AB and WSG on my shaman. I just hit 29, but without windfury I was a little worried at how this would work out. I'm by no means twinked, or anything like that, although I have about 3-4 blues, rest are greens.

I OWNED. I'm sure this drops at 70 or something, you know everyone on the O Boards hates how shamans don't one shot everything (note sarcasm, I see shamans own PvP at 70 on muh mage Smiley: nod).

Earthshock healers, Frostshock runners, Earthbind totem and sometimes my Searing totem, it was just to much fun. I came out number one on Killing Blows (and I wasn't spamming shocks to try and steal killing blows, that's just dumb) and I came out number one on HKs. I was like number 2 on damage, and I wasn't even twinked. I was PvPing to win, taking flags, defending, and dropping support totems.

When I crit it was basically bye bye whatever class. Flurry + Shamanistic Focus was a quick way to take down any enemy :). I could go on and on, about how owned the one on one fights I had.

*/Long Story, here's my message:*

Basically what I'm gathering from my PvP experiences so far, we do good if we're in a group. Makes sense to me, we're a group support class, so of course we need to be in a group to shine. I don't know why so many people complain about the class PvP wise. Enhancement with WF procs, crits, and the ever so lovely shocks/totems, we seem to do great. Elemental owns with LB spam alone, and resto, well you just can't kill a resto shaman. Good luck. So why is there so much complaining about the Shaman class right now? My PoV is my Mage at 70 (and watching other shamans) and my 29 shaman.


#2REDACTED, Posted: Feb 25 2008 at 3:52 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The only thing that bothers me is that I can only rate you down for this once.
#3 Feb 25 2008 at 4:11 PM Rating: Good
Once you hit 70 that will all change, you will be kited by everyone, elemental will not be able to pew pew while that warrior hams him, and that hunter will dispell that restolamas earth shield.
#4 Feb 25 2008 at 6:24 PM Rating: Default
**
514 posts
You opponents were not very competent I suppose I think.

Rule number 1, never leave the shaman lone, or u'll regret it, kekekek.

Once someone pays attention to u, u know what it's like at lvl 70s. U die fast and often can only sit there and suck thumb, not being able to much while being cc-ied, stunlocked, rooted, watever. I don't BG much at lower levels, maybe CCs are not as effective then so it might not be as bad.

I still try to mesh my shocks, etc. hoping for something to go off during a 'break' though.

These days, my strategy is... be a porcupine. Coz I'm the number 1 target,.. so I try to survive (stack stam, ress) and let them take a while to kill me, while my teammates kill them, kekeke.
#5 Feb 26 2008 at 12:33 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,031 posts
Hey, Gaudion, be a bigger douche bag for us.
____________________________
Sir Exodus the Cheesemaker wrote:
Quote:
"All this talk of vaginas is making me thirsty."


#6 Feb 26 2008 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Hey, Gaudion, be a bigger douche bag for us.


...I'm sorry, what?

Anyways, I suppose at 70 I'm only seeing extremely welly geared shamans, and that you really lack in 2v2 and perhaps 3v3 (?). 5v5 I heard shamans shine though, and that's cause we're a group oriented class. I ran with a pack, and I was able to survive because of great heals, focus fire, and over all a nice healthy mix of totems/shocks.

I suppose, however, that at 70 with all the CC that becomes available to a lot of classes that could easily change. /shrugs, at least I'm having fun.
#7 Feb 26 2008 at 2:17 PM Rating: Decent
Dude, i totally agree. I was checking out my friend play BG´s and adopted his "jump-like-crazy-for-confusion-style" and i ended up killing EVERYTHING! and the guys i met were not sucky, my best memory(this was last week) was when i fought a 39pala with all the drops from Herod and i totally smacked him.. totally. and the casters were no problem either, just tremor or grounding totem and put them over ur knees and start the spanking.

it was really awsome, only problem were the kiting from hunters but i can live with that..
#8 Feb 26 2008 at 2:23 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Hey, Gaudion, be a bigger douche bag for us.

Just as long as you keep two-shotting people for us, sweetheart.

For Christ's sake. The guy's Shaman is level 29. He's not even half-way through the game yet. He can come back and tell us all how great Shaman are when he has a clue and/or a 70.
#9 Feb 26 2008 at 2:26 PM Rating: Decent
**
842 posts
Draeneipally wrote:
Once you hit 70 that will all change, you will be kited by everyone, elemental will not be able to pew pew while that warrior hams him, and that hunter will dispell that restolamas earth shield.


yep.

when you and the warrior are both level 70, he has stam and armor up the wazoo, and he has mortal strike (which warriors don't get til level 41 at the earliest) along with WW, 2/2 imp slam, possibly imp hamstring, piercing howl, second wind and imp. intercept..... not having your own cc/root/snare and not being able to burst the warrior down starts to suck really, really hard. shaman are damn near the easiest pvp target at level 70 for me, and i hardly ever pvp.

Edited, Feb 26th 2008 5:26pm by fromanthebarbarian
#10 Feb 26 2008 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
Gaudion wrote:
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Hey, Gaudion, be a bigger douche bag for us.

Just as long as you keep two-shotting people for us, sweetheart.

For Christ's sake. The guy's Shaman is level 29. He's not even half-way through the game yet. He can come back and tell us all how great Shaman are when he has a clue and/or a 70 shaman, since he has a mage.


FTFY. Anyways, I'm not saying that you don't have weaknesses, but I do see enhancement shamans own at 70. So what's the big QQ over? Or are we just used to PRE-BC.

EDIT: cn't spllz.

Edited, Feb 26th 2008 5:57pm by Enigmen
#11 Feb 26 2008 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Most of the posters who brought hate upon your thread are posters who are so deep into either raiding or Arena PvP that they've forgotten about everything else.

I've been a Battleground monkey for the last two years and let me just say that a well-geared Enhancement Shaman can bring a lot of pain onto the field. 1200+ crits with one-handed Windfury procs. 3000+ two-handed Windfury crits and so on.

I bet the majority of the posters who claim that Shamans suck in PvP have never tried all three talent trees with the right gear. People keep telling me Druids suck in PvP as well, if they're not Restoration or Critchicken spec'd. I'm Feral, have some PvP welfare (not really welfare for Alliance players since we lose everything) epics and I'm wtfowning people in Battlegrounds.

And the first one to tell me Battlegrounds isn't real PvP can have a nice cup of stfu. You didn't develop the game. You're not going to tell me what is real and what is not.

Reading over your post, Enigmen, made me slightly nostalgic. I created my Shaman ages ago. Before The Burning Crusade was released. I remember how low level Battlegrounds were. Before the twinks and all that crap.

Good times.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#12 Feb 26 2008 at 4:17 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
but I do see enhancement shamans own


I have a hunter on my server who is friends with a few of my friends, she is currently 48. But whenever i say anything regarding shamans needing buffs she goes out on me saying shamans are the most OP class in the game. Not because she has played one but, because she has seen enh shamans own mages, seen resto shaman beat hunters/locks, and seen elemental shamans own rogues.

So have I, it's all circumstantial. I have seen this happen before too. But 9/10, the cards are not in the shaman's favor.
#13 Feb 26 2008 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Mazra wrote:
I bet the majority of the posters who claim that Shamans suck in PvP have never tried all three talent trees with the right gear.

"You suck."

That's what you're saying and it's pretty much the only kind of justification that someone who hasn't been 70 for a few months and gotten arena gear and/or played in the arena can offer. Which is why those of us who have met all of those requirements get pissed off when people like you and him say asinine things like that.

Quote:
And the first one to tell me Battlegrounds isn't real PvP can have a nice cup of stfu. You didn't develop the game. You're not going to tell me what is real and what is not.

It's not so much that BG's aren't "real PvP" as they are the single poorest indication of how your class is or isn't balanced for PvP. It doesn't really matter how deficient your spec or class is when you've got half a dozen people to back you up or half a dozen people to hide behind. You could have the single worst conglomeration of talents and/or gear available and still be effective with mob mentality.

In 2v2 and 3v3 arena there is no one else around to fight your battles for you. The smaller the scale of PvP gets, the more important individual skill, spec, and class become. And it doesn't matter how deadly you are with a wooden spoon, if the other guy has a gun you are still going to lose.
#14 Feb 26 2008 at 9:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Gaudion wrote:
The only thing that bothers me is that I can only rate you down for this once.


Smiley: grin Not even going to rate you down for that, cause you made me laugh really hard. I <3 the class in PvP, as well as PvE, sue me.

Anyways, in my opinion the 2v2 is a bad bracket to talk about. The best going team is a resto druid/warlock or a resto druid/ms warrior. In otherwords, the 2v2 bracket really doesn't count. In 3v3 shamans are the first target. How you deal with it is what counts. Do you go into the corner and cry buff, buff, buff, or do you learn how to adapt, how to deal with it, and think of some possible strategies?

I don't know, I'm not 70, so I'm not really going to argue. I'm just going to point out, that if I'm having fun PvPing why is that bad?

#15 Feb 26 2008 at 9:53 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Do you go into the corner and cry buff, buff, buff, or do you learn how to adapt, how to deal with it, and think of some possible strategies?


Go ghost wolf, pop earth shield, hide until the battle begins and your DPs needs heals. Smiley: schooled
#16 Feb 27 2008 at 4:53 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
I have been PvPing hard last week (I saved up enough for S1 helm, chest and pants in last week and got S2 shoulders yesterday) and you know, I been having a good time in BGs, whether it be a premade or just a pug BG I feel like i am really tearing ally up, In a BG you can really stick it to your enemies as ele as long as you are not jumped by multiple people (I have been jumped by like 5 rogues before nothing to do but watch my screen and wait for the end)

Yes we are not best PvP class, but in a BG where skill and luck can really make the difference, just don't stray to far from others and try to not get too deep into the enemy lines, cause once your surrounded your screwed (specialty by any melee).

Arena's is another thing though...
#17 Feb 27 2008 at 5:19 AM Rating: Decent
*
158 posts
Quote:
Dude, i totally agree. I was checking out my friend play BG´s and adopted his "jump-like-crazy-for-confusion-style" and i ended up killing EVERYTHING! and the guys i met were not sucky, my best memory(this was last week) was when i fought a 39pala with all the drops from Herod and i totally smacked him.. totally. and the casters were no problem either, just tremor or grounding totem and put them over ur knees and start the spanking.

it was really awsome, only problem were the kiting from hunters but i can live with that..


That right there proves they were "sucky" players.
#18 Feb 27 2008 at 5:59 AM Rating: Decent
**
842 posts
jmfmb wrote:
but in a BG where skill and luck can really make the difference, just don't stray to far from others and try to not get too deep into the enemy lines, cause once your surrounded your screwed (specialty by any melee).

Arena's is another thing though...


o.O

what matters most in BG's is not getting noticed, especially for you guys. BG's are the least skill-involved type of PvP.
#19 Feb 27 2008 at 6:10 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
Quote:

o.O

what matters most in BG's is not getting noticed, especially for you guys. BG's are the least skill-involved type of PvP.


I wouldn't say BGs have no skill behind them, less then arena yes. BGs are a ton of fun though, and grinding up gear for BGs from honor and Arena points will improve your BG experience.
#20 Feb 27 2008 at 6:33 AM Rating: Decent
**
454 posts
Stop the QQ about 2v2 and 3v3 - the games is supposed to be balanced around 5v5 - and you aren't the worst class off there!
#21 Feb 27 2008 at 6:48 AM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
Gaudion wrote:
It's not so much that BG's aren't "real PvP" as they are the single poorest indication of how your class is or isn't balanced for PvP. It doesn't really matter how deficient your spec or class is when you've got half a dozen people to back you up or half a dozen people to hide behind. You could have the single worst conglomeration of talents and/or gear available and still be effective with mob mentality.


I don't get it. If any of this was true, how did we determine PvP balance when we didn't have Arena?

Did we all get around in a circle, start ******* and see how far our ejaculate travels? Because that seems to be the popular method, going by posts made in this thread.

#22 Feb 27 2008 at 7:35 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
zepoodle wrote:
I don't get it. If any of this was true, how did we determine PvP balance when we didn't have Arena?

Before the arena we measured it in duels (which would be the same thing as a one-on-one encounter in a BG). It's not that hard to figure out. The basic rule is to put yourself in a position where you have no one to rely on other than yourself against an opponent in the same position with comparable gear.
#23 Feb 27 2008 at 8:45 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,031 posts
Wow, that one post I did must have really gotten to you. Really slammed your psyche.
____________________________
Sir Exodus the Cheesemaker wrote:
Quote:
"All this talk of vaginas is making me thirsty."


#24 Feb 27 2008 at 9:58 AM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
Gaudion wrote:
Before the arena we measured it in duels (which would be the same thing as a one-on-one encounter in a BG). It's not that hard to figure out. The basic rule is to put yourself in a position where you have no one to rely on other than yourself against an opponent in the same position with comparable gear.


So basically, what you're saying is that Arena isn't a viable way of measuring PvP balance either. Because there isn't a 1v1 Arena bracket. Last I checked, you have anywhere from one to four partners, skewing your analysis according to your own criteria.

How about we agree on this: Arena and BGs are different types of PvP, and saying "BGs give you a skewed estimate of PvP balance" is inaccurate and facetious because what you were really saying was "BGs give you a skewed estimate of Arena PvP balance", which is indeed true, and also irrelevant.

Which leads to my actual point: The OP was commenting on how well his shaman did in the 29 bracket recently. Replying "But Shamans suck at end game" is a little bit off-target.
#25 Feb 27 2008 at 10:05 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
zepoodle wrote:
Gaudion wrote:
Before the arena we measured it in duels (which would be the same thing as a one-on-one encounter in a BG). It's not that hard to figure out. The basic rule is to put yourself in a position where you have no one to rely on other than yourself against an opponent in the same position with comparable gear.


So basically, what you're saying is that Arena isn't a viable way of measuring PvP balance either. Because there isn't a 1v1 Arena bracket. Last I checked, you have anywhere from one to four partners, skewing your analysis according to your own criteria.

How about we agree on this: Arena and BGs are different types of PvP, and saying "BGs give you a skewed estimate of PvP balance" is inaccurate and facetious because what you were really saying was "BGs give you a skewed estimate of Arena PvP balance", which is indeed true, and also irrelevant.

As I have said time and time again, the smaller the scale of PvP, the less effective Shaman are. The reverse is also true. Shaman go from horrid in duels, world PvP, and 2v2 to mediocre in 3v3, good in 5v5, and acceptable in BG's.

It still doesn't change the fact that as a stand-alone class, Shaman are severely lacking in PvP balance. Why should Shaman be the only class justified by "Go play 5v5 or run with a pack in BG's"? It's really easy for other people who don't actually main Shaman at 70 to harp on, but when you're the one maining the Shaman at 70 and you can't win a one-on-one encouter to save your life, you tend to get a little cranky.

Quote:
Which leads to my actual point: The OP was commenting on how well his shaman did in the 29 bracket recently. Replying "But Shamans suck at end game" is a little bit off-target.

And using experience in a 29 BG to make a blanket statement like, "The class is great and everyone playing them at 70 must really suck if they think otherwise," is more than a little off-target as well.
#26 Feb 27 2008 at 10:56 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,909 posts
Gaudion wrote:
As I have said time and time again, the smaller the scale of PvP, the less effective Shaman are. The reverse is also true. Shaman go from horrid in duels, world PvP, and 2v2 to mediocre in 3v3, good in 5v5, and acceptable in BG's.


There. See? That's a much better way of putting it. You should have said that to start with. Instead you rated down the OP without really explaining your point, or bothering to understand his. Then when someone points out that Arena isn't the only way to measure PvP, you respond that it's the only accurate way - and then disprove yourself by saying that it's not really that accurate.

I'm not criticizing your opinion of end-game shaman PvP, I'm just criticizing the logic you use to prove it.

Quote:
And using experience in a 29 BG to make a blanket statement like, "The class is great and everyone playing them at 70 must really suck if they think otherwise," is more than a little off-target as well.


Except that's not what the OP said. I figured it's what you think he said, but what he wanted to tell everyone was "Man, my Shaman kicks *** at level 29." In fact;

Enigmen wrote:
Basically what I'm gathering from my PvP experiences so far, we do good if we're in a group. Makes sense to me, we're a group support class, so of course we need to be in a group to shine.


He's made the same point you just did.

Edited, Feb 27th 2008 1:58pm by zepoodle
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 21 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (21)