GranokTheZombieGod wrote:
Hitashleavt...Go home...now...there are so many things could say to you right now but i wont. You only play a huntard and a warrior anyway...so its you who dosent know what they are talking about. The future for huntards and warriors is bright, while we get thrown down the toilet...If you honestly think blizzard actually cares about classes other than huntards and warriors then Ive got some swampland on mars to sell you.
It's spelled Hunt
er.
Hunt
ard is a condescending term used to describe a hunter who has no idea what he's doing.
The irony in your post is that you probably only play warlcock, so you wouldn't have a clue in the first place about the balance between the classes. Of course, other than you getting shamefully owned by players of certain classes a bit too often. This doesn't necessarily have to do with game balance though, but merely player skillfulness/skillessness.
I play both hunter and warrior, however not warlock. I'm not making any statements to whether or not this nerfs differently specced warlocks in either way, simply because I find I don't have enough knowledge of the class to form an accurate opinion. Perhaps something you should teach yourself... Don't make retarded statements of other classes whom you have no other experiences of other than second-hand. While it's ok to make all sorts of statements about how this effects
warlocks as a warlock player, don't get other classes involved.
This goes out to Banatu (edit: and OversoultheImmaculate) too. You guys don't have a clue, so don't embarrass yourselves.
Edited, Mar 5th 2008 12:02am by Utarius