Yuppley wrote:
Quote:
See, he said the wind serpent. Which gramatically speaking is a gerenal statement which refers to all windserpents.
I'm kind of surprised, as you spelled both grammatically and general wrong, but more than that,
the wind serpent refers to the wind serpent being mentioned, and the family of wind serpents would be known as just that, wind serpents, with a s. Wind serpent is not a plural, like fish, or deer, etc., it is just like the plural of serpent, serpents. I'm not trying to earn an *** hat or anything, I'm just wondering how you got that.
Lol I did spell that wrong, shame on me, it was 5:00 had to finish the post before I left work so I rushed it.
It's hard to pick out one grammatical flaw in a sentence that is all together poor. But I'll try.
Wind serpent isn't plural, you are right, as long as you are talking about individual types of wind serpents. However, by putting "the" in front of it, you qualify wind serpent. Turning a noun into a proper noun. Wind Serpent, being the singular family name for all wind serpents.
To use another example.
Snakes are reptiles.
Obviously I am referring to all snakes. In a plural sense.
The snake is a reptile.
Same thing, put differently. "The snake" is referring to all snakes, but it is using the singular family name.
That snake is a reptile.
This one is referring to one particular snake.
I know you aren't trying to be an asshat, it's a good discussion, that wouldn't have been caused if proper sentences were used in the first place. lol
But it's a good thing hopefully some will read this and realize why grammar and spelling is important to relay your point properly without any misunderstandings.