while i do enjoy the hemo build for pvp, and acknowledge that other builds may be better, for my little alt rogue that i have fun with in bgs, the hemo build works well for me. my weapon swapper macro wroks quite well as i like to ambush then swap to swowrds for non stealthed combat.
my question is, are fists better than swords for hemo build? theres no proc like in the combat spec, and the fists have a higher top end than the swords at the same speed. i have enough honor to get the season one swords or fists and i am not sure which way to go.
thanks
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- question
questionFollow
Fists have a higher top end, but given equal dps, that means they also have a lower bottom end.
Without a weapon specialization talent, it really doesn't matter. If you are a serious statistician, you may consider that since swords have the tightest damage range, their output is more stable in the RNG sense. You wouldn't really notice it, but RNGs can be streaky, i.e. a low run or a high run. With swords your low run would be a little better.
Honestly, such a "streak" would barely be noticeable in the long run. The long run being the length of a single pvp fight.
Without a weapon specialization talent, it really doesn't matter. If you are a serious statistician, you may consider that since swords have the tightest damage range, their output is more stable in the RNG sense. You wouldn't really notice it, but RNGs can be streaky, i.e. a low run or a high run. With swords your low run would be a little better.
Honestly, such a "streak" would barely be noticeable in the long run. The long run being the length of a single pvp fight.
Recent Visitors: 172
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (172)
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- question
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC