Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Really that useless?Follow

#1 Feb 12 2008 at 8:37 AM Rating: Decent
Are shamans really that bad at PvP?

I come from playing a warlock, and i've loved this class from the time I created it. Theres one problem standing in my way now, I play on a PvP realm..

So would it be a good idea to go ahead and move away from the class before I get anymore attached, or do you think blizzard will eventually make them viable in PvP?

Thanks for any help given.
#2 Feb 12 2008 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
**
861 posts
What type of pvp do you want to do? I've had fun with my shammy in the chaos of BGs, they're very powerful when working in teams. Haven't made it to arena level but I believe the QQ there, not the best 1 on 1 class.
#3 Feb 12 2008 at 8:58 AM Rating: Good
**
514 posts
LOL, warlock to shaman, that's like 2 extremes in terms of PVP!

I started as a horde undead warlock,..... then I switch to alliance on another server coz my friends asked me to join them. And..... I felt the pinch. Urrgh.

From the bully to the bullied.
#4 Feb 12 2008 at 7:33 PM Rating: Decent
Do you want the honest answer?

Shaman are currently the WORST class in the game for PvP...

Some may argue diffently, but those who have played a shaman pre-BC know better. Elemental is awesome until you're noticed and everyone will focus fire on you.
Enhance is awesome against...well nothing really, we can't escape, we can't close distance, and we can't break stunlock other than trinkets. Resto is just prolonging the inevitable.
#5 Feb 12 2008 at 10:00 PM Rating: Decent
Taurrus wrote:
Do you want the honest answer?

Shaman are currently the WORST class in the game for PvP...

Some may argue diffently, but those who have played a shaman pre-BC know better. Elemental is awesome until you're noticed and everyone will focus fire on you.
Enhance is awesome against...well nothing really, we can't escape, we can't close distance, and we can't break stunlock other than trinkets. Resto is just prolonging the inevitable.


Taurrus you have been complaining about shaman lately, why do you keep posting here and just keep making QQ comments about how much you hate them?

Just go play Lolscape or something.
#6 Feb 12 2008 at 11:40 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,031 posts
I love playing as a Shaman. When a class underestimates me, I'll 2 shot them. Elemental has so much burst damage, and that's why every class will come after us. Left to do the damage, we'll rock any class, and fast.
____________________________
Sir Exodus the Cheesemaker wrote:
Quote:
"All this talk of vaginas is making me thirsty."


#7 Feb 13 2008 at 11:16 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I love playing as a Shaman. When a class underestimates me, I'll 2 shot them. Elemental has so much burst damage, and that's why every class will come after us. Left to do the damage, we'll rock any class, and fast.

Congrats on reaching level 35.
#8 Feb 13 2008 at 11:26 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,031 posts
I get it! That's funny! Har har har.
____________________________
Sir Exodus the Cheesemaker wrote:
Quote:
"All this talk of vaginas is making me thirsty."


#9 Feb 13 2008 at 4:12 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,245 posts
Gaudion wrote:
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I love playing as a Shaman. When a class underestimates me, I'll 2 shot them. Elemental has so much burst damage, and that's why every class will come after us. Left to do the damage, we'll rock any class, and fast.

Congrats on reaching level 35.


You can try that on someone whose sig doesn't have a graphic saying 70 Orc Shaman.
#10 Feb 13 2008 at 4:30 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Raglu wrote:
Gaudion wrote:
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I love playing as a Shaman. When a class underestimates me, I'll 2 shot them. Elemental has so much burst damage, and that's why every class will come after us. Left to do the damage, we'll rock any class, and fast.

Congrats on reaching level 35.


You can try that on someone whose sig doesn't have a graphic saying 70 Orc Shaman.

Your point being?

Anyone who claims they're two-shotting people at 70 is either full of it or not playing the same game we are. Even in the best case scenario that's not possible. Unless he's ganking level 20's...
#11 Feb 13 2008 at 6:47 PM Rating: Default
Not 2 shotting... more like 4-5 shotting, but when 2 of those are LO, and one of those is a shock, its practically the same, just 0.5 secs longer.

Plus it looks way cooler. Smiley: nod
#12 Feb 13 2008 at 9:23 PM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
GigglesThePig wrote:
Not 2 shotting... more like 4-5 shotting, but when 2 of those are LO, and one of those is a shock, its practically the same, just 0.5 secs longer.

Still not happening to people in PvP gear.

Everything would have to proc and crit, and the combined total chance of that happening is somewhere around 1.4% if I remember correctly. And even then it still wouldn't be enough. This was gone over in another thread not too long ago.
#13 Feb 14 2008 at 6:47 AM Rating: Good
I'm sorry but I'm going to have to agree with gaudion on one point here. You can't 2 or even 4-5 shot people at 70 unless they still have lolgreens. Thats why i respeced from elemental (which i have been since i could spec) to resto, i may not be able to face nuke anymore, but at least i can actually win 1v1 scnerios now.

On another note, yes Weakened, We do have great burst, and people will single you out because of the fact that you are a shaman.
#14 Feb 14 2008 at 9:03 PM Rating: Default
***
1,031 posts
Don't underestimate Shaman, that's all I'm getting across. I can two shot some people, but yeah, stuff's gotta proc. And when it does, it's nice. We're not useless in the sense that we can overpower every class that comes for us, but if we're able to sit back or even get a small amount of back up, it's very easy to have your way with another class.
____________________________
Sir Exodus the Cheesemaker wrote:
Quote:
"All this talk of vaginas is making me thirsty."


#15 Feb 15 2008 at 12:17 AM Rating: Default
shammys well try killing a resto as just about any kind of caster enhance can burst hard but as been posted have to close distance and ele (my spec) the burst is incredible and learn to kite ftw
#16 Feb 15 2008 at 3:28 AM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
WeakenedShadow, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Don't underestimate Shaman, that's all I'm getting across. I can two shot some people, but yeah, stuff's gotta proc. And when it does, it's nice. We're not useless in the sense that we can overpower every class that comes for us, but if we're able to sit back or even get a small amount of back up, it's very easy to have your way with another class.

For the second time, no, you can't. Unless you're attacking pre-70 people or people still in blues and greens, you're not two-shotting anyone. Against an opponent in PvP gear, Chain Lightning, our most damaging spell, is going to crit for like 2000-2500. So 2250 (average crit) + 1125 (LO proc and average crit) + 2000 (LB average crit) + 1000 (LO proc and average crit) = 6375. That won't kill me, and I've only got 7700 life at the moment because I'm not even in full S1 yet. People in full PvP gear are going to be sporting 10k life easy. Even two of your top-end crits with full procs are not going to reach 10k. You can add a shock crit onto that and it's still not going to be 10k.

Try again.
#17 Feb 15 2008 at 7:03 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
learn to kite ftw


It's not that easy in pvp. Frost shock is an 8 second, 40% snare, barely less than running backwards, so unless by kite them you mean run backwards and spam "frost shock"...wait, that still won't work. You won't kill them and his/her team mates will probably bail them out by then, if they dont decide to pop a trinket and snare you.

edit : frost shock is 8 sec, not 6 >.<

here you go http://www.lolcats.com/view/152

Edited, Feb 15th 2008 10:09am by Draeneipally
#18 Feb 16 2008 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,031 posts
I'm not arguing with you, fool.
____________________________
Sir Exodus the Cheesemaker wrote:
Quote:
"All this talk of vaginas is making me thirsty."


#19 Feb 16 2008 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
I wouldn't either if I was on your end of this debate.
#20 Feb 16 2008 at 9:52 PM Rating: Default
**
569 posts
I dunno. The guy's right in a "stuff's gotta proc" sense.

My mage has 6.5k hitpoints (limited PVP gear; just the staff)

My shaman's lightning bolts often crit for ~3k nowadays. It's not hard to see that with a LO proc and two crits I can two-shot a non-PVP-geared 70.

(note: Not trying to argue that this makes shamans strong in PVP...)

Edited, Feb 17th 2008 1:00am by Axehilt
#21 Feb 16 2008 at 10:26 PM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
Axehilt wrote:
My shaman's lightning bolts often crit for ~3k nowadays. It's not hard to see that with a LO proc and two crits I can two-shot a non-PVP-geared 70.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. You're taking one of the lowest HP-total 70's and placing them in non-PvP gear. Under that circumstances? Yeah, sure. Is anyone going to take you seriously if that's what you're using to base your general references on? Hell no. You'll get laughed out of town.

Besides, again, look at the math. Even if you've got a 40% spell crit chance, which is really high, it works out like this: .40 (CL crit) x .20 (LO proc) .40 (LO crit) x .40 (LB crit) x .20 (LO proc) x .40 (LO crit) = .00256. You're talking about a .26% chance. Barely over one-forth of a percent. Are you kidding me? Plus there's the fact that people in full PvP gear are going to have 400 resiliance which is going to drive your crit chance down another 10%, your crit damage down 20%, and both of those even further if they have anti-crit talents.

Saying, "I could win the lottery," doesn't actually make me rich.

Edited, Feb 17th 2008 1:28am by Gaudion
#22 Feb 17 2008 at 8:43 AM Rating: Default
**
569 posts
You're retarded.

If you want to argue that these numbers are useless because they don't work against players with high resilience, fine. But don't say it can't be done or it has a crazy low chance against poorly geared players, because that's not true.

The reason you're retarded is you assume everything has to proc to kill my mage. It doesn't. My mage isn't horribly geared, he's just not amazingly geared for PVP. A sizable portion of BG PVPers are geared the same way!

After crunching numbers my lightning bolts crit for 3.1k and have a 34.x% chance to crit against my mage (including resilience reductions, trinket, bloodfury, TOW, and wrath)

(the two assumptions were (a) 5% dmg talent applies after +dmg and (b) WOWWiki's coefficient page is correct that we have 79.4% coefficient)

Basically I'd have a 13.6% chance of two-shotting my mage (.34*.4) because I only need one crit and one LO proc (out of two LO proc chances) to kill him. If you save EM for the 2nd bolt the chance raises slightly to 14.0% because at that point you only need two *LO procs in a row to kill the mage (.2*.2=0.4% added to your existing chance) (*the first LO proc will crit from EM)

14% is a reasonable chance to say that you can two-shot someone in PVP.

Again, I'm not trying to say shamans are good in PVP, just that I think your numbers were incredibly inaccurate. That said, I frequently do find myself at the top of damage dealt and killing blows in the AVs I dabble in. But it's just dabbling, as on the whole I find WOW's PVP to be fairly unenjoyable (even on my mage, which is a strong PVP class imo)
#23 Feb 17 2008 at 9:34 AM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
Axehilt wrote:
You're retarded.

If you want to argue that these numbers are useless because they don't work against players with high resilience, fine. But don't say it can't be done or it has a crazy low chance against poorly geared players, because that's not true.

The reason you're retarded is you assume everything has to proc to kill my mage. It doesn't. My mage isn't horribly geared, he's just not amazingly geared for PVP. A sizable portion of BG PVPers are geared the same way!

I'm retarded because I offer up a point and hard numbers to back it up? And you rated me down for that? Wow. That'll teach me to be the voice of reason and not give people false hope from now on.

Quote:
After crunching numbers my lightning bolts crit for 3.1k and have a 34.x% chance to crit against my mage (including resilience reductions, trinket, bloodfury, TOW, and wrath)

(the two assumptions were (a) 5% dmg talent applies after +dmg and (b) WOWWiki's coefficient page is correct that we have 79.4% coefficient)

Here's something I don't understand: Why do you need to crunch numbers to know how much your LB will crit for? I would imagine if you've done any manner of PvP at all--and if you haven't, you shouldn't be giving advice on this--you should know what your LB's crit for on average.

Let me ask you this, and be honest: How many people have you personally two-shot with your Elemental Shaman? In BG's? In the arena?

Quote:
Basically I'd have a 13.6% chance of two-shotting my mage (.34*.4) because I only need one crit and one LO proc (out of two LO proc chances) to kill him. If you save EM for the 2nd bolt the chance raises slightly to 14.0% because at that point you only need two *LO procs in a row to kill the mage (.2*.2=0.4% added to your existing chance)(*the first LO proc will crit from EM)

14% is a reasonable chance to say that you can two-shot someone in PVP.

.34 x .20 x 1.00 (EMLB) x .20 = .0136 or 1.36%.

Firing up EM before a CL or LB only guarantees that the CL or LB itself will proc. The resulting LO, should there be one, still has it's own chance to crit (or not).

And now you've brought trinkets into it... I guess we'll also have to assume the Mage's Ice Barrier isn't up (lawl) in addition to not having any PvP gear at all... The more you go on with this the more ridiculous it gets. Just because it's possible under a set of highly controlled, optimal variables doesn't give you the leeway to make blanket statements like, "Shaman can two-shot people!" Like I said... I could win the lottery tomorrow but it doesn't actually make me rich right now.
#24 Feb 17 2008 at 2:38 PM Rating: Default
**
569 posts
I haven't two-shotted anyone in BGs. But it's not uncommong to 3-shot them (earthshock in addition to the two LBs)

The math on my LBs was mostly to put it in more hard math than merely fixating on a crit or two and saying "Oh yeah I crit for 3.5k all the time!"

Quote:
.34 x .20 x 1.00 (EMLB) x .20 = .0136 or 1.36%.


That's the chance for two LOs. I don't need two LOs to two-shot my mage! I just need 1crit + 1LO or 2LOs (if I EM the 2nd LB).

We can make up any sort of "iceblock" counters you want, but the entire point of this is the potential does exist and it's not ridiculously small (14% is reasonable). The sooner you concede this mathematically-proven point, the sooner we can get on with agreeing that it almost never happens in real world PVP due to a variety of counters existing.
#25 Feb 17 2008 at 4:07 PM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
Axehilt wrote:
... it almost never happens in real world PVP due to a variety of counters existing.

Why are you arguing with me if you understand this? Do you have some obsessive-compulsive drive for conflict?

Edited, Feb 17th 2008 7:08pm by Gaudion
#26 Feb 17 2008 at 11:43 PM Rating: Default
**
569 posts
Mostly because compared to my specific shaman vs. mage example your math was off by an order of magnitude, so it felt like you were using statistics as a bludgeon to support your argument, where it should've been applied more logically.

You'd have had my total agreement if you took my 14% chance of two-shotting, multiplied it by the actual percentage of PUG BGers with sub-6.7k health and low resil, and came away with the incredibly low chance of actually achieving a two-shot in real world situations.

Edited, Feb 18th 2008 2:44am by Axehilt
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 68 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (68)