Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Logical Fallacy - Appeal to AuthorityFollow

#1 Jan 30 2008 at 3:40 PM Rating: Default
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
To the Ret Pallies:

Why should I take you seriously.

You have never progressed beyond Karazahn. Your arena rating has never gone past 1650. You have repeatedly paraded your ignorance of several aspects of gameplay like a shameless *****. It is not like you reached end game yesterday, you have been there for the last 6+ months with it as your sole focus and that is the best you could accomplish.

I on the other hand have sweated blood, and worked my way to the final steps of the game. I have a 1900+ 2v2. I have been here for months laying down knowledge, correcting you when you were wrong, reading other forums and versing myself in the minutae of the class always looking to increase my knowledge of all aspects of the class we call Paladin.

Yet it is you that balks when I say "Lawl ret".

/scoff



<this post made for earning brownie points Celcio cyborz>

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 6:40pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#2 Jan 30 2008 at 3:48 PM Rating: Excellent
because its just a game.
#3bodhisattva, Posted: Jan 30 2008 at 3:52 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Didnt you know the internet is serious bizness
#4 Jan 30 2008 at 3:56 PM Rating: Excellent
I find the idea of a Ret paly in pve intriguing, but I have yet to see one do well enough to warrant a raid spot...

That being said, in the 3v3 format, Ret PLD are becoming a force to be reckoned with. Mock them at your own risk.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 6:56pm by Tyrandor
#5 Jan 30 2008 at 4:00 PM Rating: Good
**
713 posts



Target: The RuenBahamut of Doom

/agree
#6 Jan 30 2008 at 4:09 PM Rating: Decent
**
454 posts
Quote:
You have never progressed beyond Karazahn. Your arena rating has never gone past 1650. You have repeatedly paraded your ignorance of several aspects of gameplay like a shameless *****. It is not like you reached end game yesterday, you have been there for the last 6+ months with it as your sole focus and that is the best you could accomplish.

I on the other hand have sweated blood, and worked my way to the final steps of the game. I have a 1900+ 2v2. I have been here for months laying down knowledge, correcting you when you were wrong, reading other forums and versing myself in the minutae of the class always looking to increase my knowledge of all aspects of the class we call Paladin.


BT and hyjal is above kara level as far as I'm informed, or did I get something wrong here? Ret palla in endgame (who imo needs to get a bigger manapool)

Does a above 2k ret palla count as being above 1650? (his 2s team is with a shockadin, playing for fun) Ret palla above 2k rating

Reasons enough? I've not even found the best PvE palla for you there, though he is one of them, but I think I nailed it in PvP. You question should be: "To the bad players of wow who have close to 0 understanding of your class: Why should I take you seriously?" Answer to that would be, you shouldn't, but you should open your eyes and stop being so prejudicing. Oh, and to answer your "LAWL ret" I'll say - "LAWL HOLY IN 2s"
#7 Jan 30 2008 at 4:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
krqllebqlle, du er dansk, ik'?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#8 Jan 30 2008 at 5:19 PM Rating: Default
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Ahhh but I can link Holy Pallies with better arena scores and better BT gear!

Alas the point was missed, I was making fun of those who appeal to authority and also the scrub ret pallies of this forum who have extremely limited end game experience, all at the same time.

I should find a smarter audience.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#9 Jan 30 2008 at 5:59 PM Rating: Good
**
554 posts
I don't have a retpally, never have and never will, then again Bodh,
why should I take you seriously? Will taking you or wow more seriously
make me more sucessful at life? will I get rich? laid more? 5 years
now will taking you more seriously mean anything in my life?

I bet the answer is no.

and no you don't have to take retpally's seriously, but trust me kid I sure as hell dont take you seriously.
#10 Jan 30 2008 at 6:04 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Taking me seriously will make hair grow on your chest and increase your libido.

Studies were done to prove the truthiness of that claim, they all came back positive.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#11 Jan 30 2008 at 6:16 PM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
lawl bodhi.
#12 Jan 30 2008 at 9:22 PM Rating: Good
***
1,503 posts
Quote:
You have never progressed beyond Karazahn. Your arena rating has never gone past 1650. You have repeatedly paraded your ignorance of several aspects of gameplay like a shameless *****. It is not like you reached end game yesterday, you have been there for the last 6+ months with it as your sole focus and that is the best you could accomplish.


Quote:
if anyone is interested: Ret pallies CAN top HK/Dmg meters, return/cap the most flags, cap/hold nodes in BG. Ret pallies CAN make it past 1600 2v2 arena. Ret pallies CAN top the dmg meters in Kara(including healing on Maiden) while OTing(we run with only 1 druid tank currently). i know these for fact because i have done them all. i am far from best player but am proud of my accomplishments and will acheive greater as i go. i still hold to the agreement i had with my guild leader...i will remain Ret until i am no longer viable. enjoy.


could this post be about me? dear bodhisattva, i am not gay. i appreciate the flattery, but we are not going to work. please understand this. ty.
#13 Jan 30 2008 at 10:51 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
I should find a smarter audience.


If it makes you feel better, I got what you were saying. But then again, as primarily a mage and a healadin, my Int score tends to be fairly high.


zepoodle wrote:
lawl bodhi.


This was the proper answer.
#14 Jan 30 2008 at 11:22 PM Rating: Good
bodhisattva wrote:
Taking me seriously will make hair grow on your chest and increase your libido.

Studies were done to prove the truthiness of that claim, they all came back positive.


That's too many fallacies that the human mind can comprehend.

/brainhemorrage
#15 Jan 31 2008 at 1:17 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I should find a smarter audience.


mAYbee u shold. à thinc they're R ótherer 4ms somewhair else.


Quote:
Taking me seriously will make hair grow on your chest and increase your libido.

Studies were done to prove the truthiness of that claim, they all came back positive.



mahbe gittin yur faks mxed up with ur STD tests.
#16 Jan 31 2008 at 1:53 AM Rating: Decent
**
454 posts
The point of my post was not to say that ret is THE best specc out there, just that you were wrong, and I think I proved my point suffieciently. You said ret pallies haven't got above 1650 in arenas - I proved they had. You said they hadn't progressed past kara - I proved they had. Your defence? instead of admitting defeat you go: "But there are holy pallas out there in better gear wha wha wha" Gz to them - but you are still wrong, ret has gone all the way to endgame, take your defeat like a man, would you?

Oh and lay back on the "I'm smarter than you" thing - you don't wanna get me started there. And then again, personal attacks are so utterly childish.

Og ja Mazra, jeg er vældig dansk, og stolt af det ;) Hele Conciliatrix er faktisk dansk.

Edited, Jan 31st 2008 4:53am by krqllebqlle
#17 Jan 31 2008 at 2:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
krqllebqlle wrote:
The point of my post was not to say that ret is THE best specc out there, just that you were wrong, and I think I proved my point suffieciently. You said ret pallies haven't got above 1650 in arenas - I proved they had. You said they hadn't progressed past kara - I proved they had.


I don't think that's what he meant. I think he was talking to each individual ret paladin in here who talks as though they knew what they're talking about, but hadn't experienced things like that.

I could be wrong, though.
#18 Jan 31 2008 at 4:50 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
krqllebqlle wrote:
The point of my post was not to say that ret is THE best specc out there, just that you were wrong, and I think I proved my point suffieciently. You said ret pallies haven't got above 1650 in arenas - I proved they had. You said they hadn't progressed past kara - I proved they had.


I don't think that's what he meant. I think he was talking to each individual ret paladin in here who talks as though they knew what they're talking about, but hadn't experienced things like that.

I could be wrong, though.


You're not though.

But it comes back to the same argument. Quite a few of us who have progressed deeper into the end game have seen Ret. We have quietly hoped that with the recent changes that it might flesh out to be something more than what it is. It hasn't. No matter how much gear you throw on it, its still about as useful as a crit chicken. Which means roll Holy or Prot if you want a raid slot and hope some day people like you enough to let you raid as ret.

PvP Ret is sucking less and with the rise of the hybrid it is holding its own in 3v3's and beyond but still it needs the gear to be useful and right class balance with it. Which looking at some of the forum ret pallies scores seems like they havent gotten yet.

Yet you try to have an honest discussion about it and some scrub who has never gotten anywhere in end game links a guy in armory as if that one guy is representative of the class and somehow on the same level that they are.

So who is right? The scrubs making a lot of generalized statements coming from a position of ignorance since they have never reached either top end game but rather point to the few exceptions who have, or the holier than thou 'look at my Medallion of Karabor' people who are fed up with talking on what they percieve to be another level and go 'lawls ret'. Either way its a ****** way to handle it, but since I have my BT attune I will side with those people since I've spent too many threads slogging through the tripe the average ret scrub on this boards puts out there.

Edited, Jan 31st 2008 7:52am by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#19 Jan 31 2008 at 5:13 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,441 posts
Geez, how many more of these meta-threads do we need exactly? Is it that hard to carve out a general consensus that holy has the most viability through the entire endgame, prot can be raid viable in most of the PvE endgame while requiring a couple further tweaks as well as a broader acceptance, and ret has improved but still needs a lot of fixes?
And conversely, is it that hard to comprehend that the endgame isn't all there is to WoW and outside competitive arena and T5+ raiding, all trees can work to a point?

I remember one note in Cathela's old post which recommended not wasting the board's time with posting about level 60 builds when your toon wasn't even level 20. I think this remains a sane stance to take, but OTOH, answering any question related to levelling or soloing from the perspective of endgame viability is, in practice, of anecdotical use at best.

What's certain, though, is that the multiplication of such e-pissing threads will certainly not contribute in any shape or form to the improvement of the paladin board.
#20 Jan 31 2008 at 6:06 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Bodhi wrote:
So who is right? The scrubs making a lot of generalized statements coming from a position of ignorance since they have never reached either top end game but rather point to the few exceptions who have, or the holier than thou 'look at my Medallion of Karabor' people who are fed up with talking on what they percieve to be another level and go 'lawls ret'. Either way its a sh*tty way to handle it, but since I have my BT attune I will side with those people since I've spent too many threads slogging through the tripe the average ret scrub on this boards puts out there.


Which is it, Bodhi? ********* or retards? You pick.

Quote:
What's certain, though, is that the multiplication of such e-pissing threads will certainly not contribute in any shape or form to the improvement of the paladin board.


/signed

Once everyone here with a rating higher than Scholar has had their little e-flex, we should get back to serious, rational discussion about how to play paladins well. Paladins. Not healadins, or tankadins. We're part of an entire class here, and all this...prejudicial factional bullsh*t is making us look like total ********

edit: silly censors getting in the way of my Tycho quote.

Edited, Jan 31st 2008 9:07am by zepoodle
#21 Jan 31 2008 at 6:58 AM Rating: Decent
**
468 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
I have a 1900+ 2v2.


1900?
Did you recently switch teams? Because the one on the armory sucks.

#22 Jan 31 2008 at 7:07 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,117 posts
It's this kind of pointless bull that I was talking about in my thread from yesterday.

Bodh, I used to have respect for you. But this post was so childish that it hardly deserves a response.

There are sucky players of every race, class and spec. It shouldn't matter where ANYONE is in comparison to another. All are different. Some have more expereince than the other, some have better gear.

This is a game. The choices you make in this game do not largely affect or portray you in real life.
#23 Jan 31 2008 at 7:22 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
ahhhhh new thread same old topic
#24 Jan 31 2008 at 8:54 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
<this post made for earning brownie points Celcio cyborz>


bodhisattva wrote:
Taking me seriously will make hair grow on your chest and increase your libido.


Rwar Bodhi. Wanna come over and comb my chest hair?
#25 Jan 31 2008 at 4:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
554 posts
Lol, well for what its worth I do agree with many of your points...

I just dont like it. Honestly did the devs even mean for Pallys to do more
then heal? One need not to look farther then kara, the first step in raids, where is the ret gear? where is the Tank gear for pallys? My memory is fuzzy, but wasnt most of the tank plate there War only? You dont see much of anything
that isnt healing cuz it seems an afterthought...

Don't get me started on the nerf's for arena "balance" (that I may add really
hurt Pallys for Bg's and pve play in my honest imo) I could rant all day about that.

I consider myself a person with 2 mains, a Pally and a druid. My druid is restro
and my healing for 25 mans is just sick. everything Ive tried fordruids is just well... balanced and sick. On my Pally... it's just argh...

I <3 tanking on my Pally, but I'm no fool, everything in this game was designed around a warrior tank. I do however think that will change in wotlk.
I think you will see everything pretty much tankible by the 3 soon to be 4 tanks in raids, not cuz Blizz wants to, but cuz they really got no choice.
with arena and bg's gear being easier for wars to get plus tanking
being one of the least desired specs, they really got no choice.

Not to mention why should a Druid or Pally spec for tanking just for 5 man instances? I think the devs are slowly relizing this.

Ret deserves a chance to be as viable as any for a raid spot. That however
is up to the devs to fix.
#26 Jan 31 2008 at 8:59 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
Devildawgs wrote:
where is the Tank gear for pallys?


Just to point out while there are no "drops" in Kara that are "Paly tanking" drops, you start getting Tier gear, and then some plans from SSC/TK. Also the Badges received in Kara can go toward great Paly tanking pieces, but yea, it is lacking when compared to Warrior gear.
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 251 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (251)