Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Imp. Hunter Mark vs. EfficiencyFollow

#1 Jan 30 2008 at 2:37 PM Rating: Decent
So I respecced for level 70 BM becoming pretty much the cookie cutter BM spec, however I really felt efficiency would be better for me than imp hunter mark. I thought that hunters generally concluded the AP bonus from imp HM wasn't that great. Am I wrong? I'm going to be doing nearly all 5 mans for a while, I don't know when I'll get around to getting kara keyed much less actually going to kara since its my third 70.
#2 Jan 30 2008 at 2:43 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
unless you run with a lot of melee imp mark is not worth it at all. Even then, you only want one hunter to spec it, and it should probably be a SV hunter who can get mana efficiency from SV talents.

It's pretty much useless for 5 mans.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 4:44pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#3 Jan 30 2008 at 4:12 PM Rating: Decent
Ok, this confuses me. Doesn't using Imp Hunter's Mark give your pet a big increase in AP? As a BM hunter I want my pet to put out as much damage as possible. Is the AP my pet gains really that small to warrant taking efficiency?
#4 Jan 30 2008 at 4:27 PM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
In a raid, the AP would be benefiting your pet, but the melee DPS would be using it just as much. If there is a survival hunter in your raid, they will have TotH, which is their mana regen talent, so most of them will spec with Imp. Mark, but I feel that if you are going to be running 5 mans, you will be better off with Efficiency, as you will be getting out more DPS then the bonus that you will be giving tot the melee DPS and your pet.
#5 Jan 30 2008 at 5:18 PM Rating: Decent
**
666 posts
Speaking as SV spec, I wouldn't invest into this talent just because of the fact it doesn't scale like the normal hunter's mark does. The more you hit the target with ranged attacks the AP adds up on the hunter's mark only for the ranged, but not for the melee.

110 added AP is nice, especially when combined with our already great Expose Weakness, but I personally prefer Efficiency over Imp. Mark. We may not go through mana as fast as the other spec's, but we definitely go through it. Efficiency combined with Thrill of the Hunt just makes it easier on us.

Imp. Hunter's Mark is more of a raid talent then anything else, and only preferred when you have a lot of melee within the raid. As it stands my raids have more casters, making Imp. Hunter's Mark a bit of a waste. Would it help? Sure, but I'm not about to sacrifice Efficiency for it, especially when I do other things aside from raiding.

*Edit* Just a quick note to add, Efficiency reduces our cost of shots by 10%, but Thrill of the Hunt gives us back 40% of the mana cost when we crit with one of our shots. However this is the BASE cost of the spell. Meaning if Aimed Shot cost 200 Mana normally, Thrill of the Hunt will give you back 80 mana. With Efficiency though, this makes your Aimed Shot cost from 200 to 180, when you crit with Aimed Shot you still receive that 80 mana back. Within 2 crits you've just received 160 mana back, 20 short of another Aimed Shot. If you crit a third time you've just spent 540 Total Mana, and received back 240 of that mana.

This works particularly well with Multi-Shot, because if all 3 shots crit, you receive mana back for all 3 shots. So again, taking the same math, Multi-Shot costs you 200 (Base), so 180 (w/ Efficiency), if you crit you get back 80 mana, if all 3 crit, you get back 240 mana (in otherwords you just gained 60 mana back).

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 5:24pm by Joobishwun
#6 Feb 01 2008 at 11:05 AM Rating: Decent
**
250 posts
I did the unthinkable and took both. I still out dps pretty much everyone in my guild and we came damn close to clearing ZA last night. Also, I'm pretty sure I'm the only hunter in the guild that has Imp. mark. It helps the pet and the tanks hit harder so I feel it is worthwhile.
#7 Feb 01 2008 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
***
1,264 posts
Like Joobishwun said, I think consensus is that Imp HM is a raid buff. It does help your pet a little, but it's really more for raid melee dps. If you have the talent points to spare, it's not necessarily a bad idea to put points in Efficiency and Imp HM, but if it's an either/or situation then I'd say go with Efficiency. 10% mana cost reduction really adds up in longer fights.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 88 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (88)