Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Hold me!Follow

#1 Jan 30 2008 at 1:21 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
You know, you leave for a few months and things change. You come back and you think "OK things change". You stick around for a while and you realize that change isn't always good.

When I was here for prot advice there was no CapJack, there was Thels and Gaudion. Players who'd studied and extended their class and were at the edge of the game. (I wonder if it's telling that they're gone now. I don't know what happened to Thels but Gaudion rolled another hybrid class and was disillusioned and is now levelling a priest) They were no carebears. It was "ask a decent question and we'll give you an answer" it was "post your build (no armory then) and we'll try to help otherwise we can't be ****** you tool".

No one had Thels' or Gaudion's **** wedged firmly in their mouths. There were no fanbois there were expectations. You had to go some way to at least attempt to understand your class (like reading the stickies) Now? Now this is entirely the capjack fan club. There's very little information here past anything. Heck most of the answers given were penned by those before.

And now Cap is posting stuff to either pad the "zomg I <3 Cap jack!" notch fan club or he's thinking he should be dictating behavior. I suspect the former but it doesn't really matter. Back in the day (6 months ago) we expected people to not post stupid ****. We expected people to ask actual questions instead of "I like ret wat du I du?". You know why? Because we thought paladins should be capabale of thought and effort. At least that was the impression I got. Maybe back then everyone were pricks. Either way it wasn't necessarily a bad thing.

Back then no one accused us of being cesspits of oboards or anything else and lots of people learned the way to ask questions in terms of their deficiencies and in a way that would give them good answers instead of just allowing everyone to suspend thought and paste cliches. They would learn how to ask questions to get useful responses instead of allowing the local denizens to copypasta what we've all said before and what's in the stickies.

Is this really better? Sure, kinder gentler is swell but what does it really do?

You can say that the lawl ret has made this go to hell, I say that the carebear cockmunching has made it even more useless.

I can sum up nearly every post here right now.

Race: Dwarf, BE
AoE wait til reckoning or ret to mash quests
Holy pally stats for Kara? In the sticky
Prot stuff for kara, check out Thels' list (sticky) but zomg Cap you rock
Ret? Well if someone would deign to consolodate their stuff into the more comprehensive thread with gear and stuff there'd be ROOM for a sticky (wait, why didn't Cap, for all his mouthings about ret, nominate a sticky for the ret post again?) Even still, if we wanted (or were allowed) to be honest about that spec instead of needlessly stroking someone until 70 when they realize the bitter truth, we'd be alowed to say ret is broke at end game. Period. Whether you say Lawl Ret or Ret of broke at end game it's the same damn thing.

I'm realizing this place does suck.

But not for the reasons put forth lately.
#2 Jan 30 2008 at 1:41 AM Rating: Decent
**
286 posts
Pics, or it's not going to happen :p

Celcio wrote:
I'm realizing this place does suck.

But not for the reasons put forth lately.

It's better than the shammy forums. At least more than 3 people post here, and most of them are literate.

Still, I miss the forums of old too. Whatever happened to Thels, anyway?

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 4:42am by Vaeliorin
#3 Jan 30 2008 at 1:48 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Vaeliorin wrote:
It's better than the shammy forums.


You know that's where Gaudion is right? Oh god if you've looked that closely of course you do. Poor Gaudion.

Vaeliorin wrote:

Still, I miss the forums of old too. Whatever happened to Thels, anyway?


I dunno but I really, really miss him. Smiley: glare

edit: and I remember you Vaeliorin. You don't post too much here anymore, do you.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 4:59am by Celcio
#4 Jan 30 2008 at 1:58 AM Rating: Decent
**
286 posts
Celcio wrote:
Vaeliorin wrote:
It's better than the shammy forums.


You know that's where Gaudion is right? Oh god if you've looked that closely of course you do. Poor Gaudion.

Vaeliorin wrote:

Still, I miss the forums of old too. Whatever happened to Thels, anyway?


I dunno but I really, really miss him. Smiley: glare

Yeah, I've noticed. Between him and another guy, they've basically convinced me to shelve my shammy (despite her being my highest level character at 63) simply because I figure I'll never get groups to get geared to the point that I can ever get into raids. God, the shammy forums are awful. They've never been great, but now they're even worse. Why is it that most of the people who play shammies seem to be idiots? I don't think I've ever seen worse grammar used anywhere on the internet than the shammy forums.
#5 Jan 30 2008 at 2:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I smell jealousy.

Celcio, this isn't the Asylum, not by a longshot. Stop thinking the rule of indecent behaviour applies here. It doesn't. It's not a flaming match, it's a gaming forum designed to help people. If you miss the sarcasm, the flames and the drama, please go back to the Asylum.

Tired of you asshats leaving the den and trying to convert the rest of the site to your ways.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 11:04am by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#6 Jan 30 2008 at 2:05 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Vaeliorin wrote:
Why is it that most of the people who play shammies seem to be idiots? I don't think I've ever seen worse grammar used anywhere on the internet than the shammy forums.


Oh now now, you must be nice and answer things and stuff. You just should......


Oh god you've gotten the double shaft haven't you - I think (as I mentioned in my edit) I remember you. Didn't you level a couple of paladins?

I have a shammy alt myself, low level fun-time mindless play (enhance leveling spec so FUN in bgs. Yeah, I'm healing. Lemme hit you a sec and get your ganking hide out of my way. OK back to healing). Reading those forums I almost hope I never get her to end game (though, I know I suck, she'll be the only healing class that I actually want to HEAL with. So maybe she'll rock and be a blast.)

edit: quoting > me :(

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 5:08am by Celcio
#7 Jan 30 2008 at 2:07 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
Mazra wrote:
I smell jealousy.

Celcio, this isn't the Asylum, not by a longshot. Stop thinking the rule of indecent behaviour applies here. It doesn't. It's not a flaming match, it's a gaming forum designed to help people. If you miss the sarcasm, the flames and the drama, please go back to the Asylum.

Tired of you asshats leaving the den and trying to convert the rest of the site to your ways.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 11:04am by Mazra


Most of my posts are here in the paladin forums. Most are helpful. You lack history and insight.

Your post is the knee-jerk equivalent of the now-banned lawl ret posts. Please see Cap for your spanking and move along.

edit: in thinking about it I'm pretty sure I haven't posted in the Asylum more than twice in myabe 6 months. Who's got the wishful thinking jealousy thing going now?

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 5:11am by Celcio
#8 Jan 30 2008 at 2:20 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
So you're denying you were ever a regular poster there? Because I do remember otherwise. And once you've been there, on a regular basis, your soul is gone. True story.

No, seriously, I think you're a great poster, but this bashing on CapJack isn't justified. You're insulting Cap when in fact it's his fanclub you should be mad at. This is no different than the CJ happening on other boards. And from what I've read, CapJack knows a thing or two about the class. Gaudion probably does too, but I've only read his stuff on the Shaman board.

And the funny thing is this:

Celcio wrote:
You had to go some way to at least attempt to understand your class (like reading the stickies) Now? Now this is entirely the capjack fan club. There's very little information here past anything.


And yet CapJack was the one to point out that people seeking help about Retribution builds should get a fair answer as well. How does that fit?

Perhaps CapJack is so popular because he's (sorry if I'm mixing up genders here) open-minded and helpful without prejudice? Just a thought. Perhaps because he doesn't go out of his way to flame people? Just a thought.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#9 Jan 30 2008 at 2:27 AM Rating: Decent
**
286 posts
Celcio wrote:
Oh god you've gotten the double shaft haven't you - I think (as I mentioned in my edit) I remember you. Didn't you level a couple of paladins?

I've got a 60 prot pally as well as the 63 shammy. Also a 60 balance druid (and a 42 feral druid). I quit for 6 months (from late May to December of 2007) but I'm back now, though most of my time lately I'm on the Druid forums.

Don't know why, but I'm just not wild about Outlands. Stupid thing is I really enjoy playing the shammy, but with not much hope in terms of end-game it seems like a lost cause.

Still, I'll probably level at least my pally up some more, I'm just frustrated that it's so hard to find decent groups to AoE grind in Hellfire, too many casters around. That, and the only one-hander from the early quest rewards was a sword with a 2.7 speed...the thing is horrible for prot. Guess I'll have to run some instances until something decent drops.
#10 Jan 30 2008 at 2:46 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
Mazra wrote:
So you're denying you were ever a regular poster there?


Not at all. I'm taking umbrage at your immediate dismissal of my opinions because I've posted there. Most of my posts have been on one WoW board or another. The amusing thing is that you post and read there but try to impugne the posts of others that do (well those that you don't agree with, naturally).


Quote:
bashing on CapJack isn't justified. You're insulting Cap when in fact it's his fanclub you should be mad at.


I think I've spread the blame equally. When I first came back I rolled my eyes at the cockmunching here but rolled with it. But when the Cap thinks that he can post stuff and control (particularly funny if if you look for ret post and see his replies prior to his sanctimonious post even funnier if you see that his "short" at best posts are nearly always replies to the people currently going "OMG Jack you are so right!! When I asked questions before I got really short replies" or "I used to post here but I got rude responses thank you for posting this!", but politics and history are based on the short memories of people.) the behavior of all posters. Yeah, then he gets lumped in with his cockmunchers.

Quote:
And from what I've read, CapJack knows a thing or two about the class. Gaudion probably does too, but I've only read his stuff on the Shaman board.
Oddly, so do I. Smiley: wink

And the funny thing is this:

Quote:
Celcio wrote:
You had to go some way to at least attempt to understand your class (like reading the stickies) Now? Now this is entirely the capjack fan club. There's very little information here past anything.


And yet CapJack was the one to point out that people seeking help about Retribution builds should get a fair answer as well. How does that fit?


It would fit better if he'd suggested a sticky for the ret post instead of just talking big about how we should respect ret.

But you misunderstand. This isn'[t about Jack (though I do think he probably now has problems fitting through doors with that head) The thing is that this used to be a place where we demanded that people think and put forth an effort, that we required logic, not just an appearance, and that when we did so we weren't chastised by some tool with a big head and mob behind him.

Gaudion and Thels required nothing from us than a shred of effort. It was an amazingly small price to pay for what we got in return. In return they were sometime snarky, sometimes kind but usually helpful (in a really honest way, not a "well you can put 20 points in each tree and that would work SWELL for you! No, no it's a perfect build! I can't believe we didn't come up with it before! Solidarity to pallies!" way)


It used to be honest here. Now it's just pandering to one thing or another.

That's not Jack's fault necessarily. But with your posts here, Mazra I'm inclined to say you're partly to blame.
#11 Jan 30 2008 at 2:52 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Mmmmmm crit chicken. I always thought it would be a blast to play one but I could never actually level a druid past 20.


Vaeliorin wrote:
Still, I'll probably level at least my pally up some more, I'm just frustrated that it's so hard to find decent groups to AoE grind in Hellfire, too many casters around. That, and the only one-hander from the early quest rewards was a sword with a 2.7 speed...the thing is horrible for prot. Guess I'll have to run some instances until something decent drops.


Slave pens (the light saber), or SL or KoT rep are your options here I think. And yeah, it sort of sucks finding a weapon.

Heh too bad you're not on my server. I have a SPriest just approaching Outland level. A little silence, a little consecrate, a little dots, a little heal, we'd be golden.

edit: quotes still better than me - can I talent to improve that? :(

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 6:06am by Celcio
#12 Jan 30 2008 at 3:01 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Six out of eleven posts in Celcio's Thread made by: Celcio!
#13 Jan 30 2008 at 3:05 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Celcio, that's just how things work. Every forum finds its favorites.

Hell, I had a pretty large fanclub at some point on both the Druid and Main forums. Mostly because I was helpful, but also because I spoke my mind. And I'd like to think I made people smile once in a while as well.

You can't be a sarcastic cold-***** veteran on his high horse and expect people to fall in love with you just because you've played the class more than anyone else. It takes charm, friendliness and a broad sense of humor to achieve that.

This thread proves you lack a couple of those features.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#14 Jan 30 2008 at 3:08 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
Mazra wrote:
Perhaps CapJack is so popular because he's (sorry if I'm mixing up genders here) open-minded and helpful without prejudice? Just a thought. Perhaps because he doesn't go out of his way to flame people? Just a thought.


I don't know or really care if I'm included in the group being ranted at or not, but this quote here is why I like the Cap. I feel he's the most helpful and least apt at put-downs on this forum. Beg your pardon for having respect for such a person.

As far as the Ret thing, it's been said, but I must reaffirm it: those people coming here asking for legitimate advice about Ret should be given the same treatment as those asking for legitimate advice about Prot or Holy. Is that flawed thinking? Sure, Ret isn't viable as a great DPS spec in raids or Arena, and they're better off healing in BGs. But you know what? There's more to this game then raids/BGs/Arena. Many of us will never see the top content. Most of us will never be in the 2k Arena rankings. Some of us probably will never even raid. So, why do some many feel "lawlRet"ing is the only answer that deserves to be given when all somebody wants is to be the best they can be at their chosen class/spec?
#15 Jan 30 2008 at 3:30 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
Maulgak wrote:
Mazra wrote:
Perhaps CapJack is so popular because he's (sorry if I'm mixing up genders here) open-minded and helpful without prejudice? Just a thought. Perhaps because he doesn't go out of his way to flame people? Just a thought.


I don't know or really care if I'm included in the group being ranted at or not


The rant and the direction thereof are Mazra's alone. I'm merely lamtening the good old days. Sure we walked uphill to school both ways in the driving snow, but we were happy to have it.

Quote:
when all somebody wants is to be the best they can be at their chosen class/spec


If someone really wants to be the best at their chosen class shouldn't we tell them what the best is? If they insist on a spec that's not viaable for the task they're ultimately asking for isn't it our duty to tell them before they invest the time?

And shouldn't we require they've put in some thought?

See here's my thing. You look around the boards. Next to hunters, paladins are a top response for "what is the easiest class to play" (some say lock but that's often said that they're hard to play well and they're sort of squishy). I do not want my class to be the new hunter. I want people of my class to encourage by whatever means, the appropriate mindset to succeed in the class.

Just out of curiosity - what do you all think of melee hunters?

But even still the specifics of this is not at all what I'm lamemting. What I'm lamenting is a somewhat ascerbic but helpful group of people that knew exactly the limitations of the class, told it like it was and didn't tell the 400 lb kid that he could absolutely be a jockey next month.
#16 Jan 30 2008 at 3:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Celcio wrote:
If they insist on a spec that's not viaable for the task they're ultimately asking for isn't it our duty to tell them before they invest the time?


Of course it is. I agree 100% with you there.

Holy is the healing talent tree. Protection is the tanking slash passive damage talent tree. Retribution is the direct damage talent tree. Right?

If someone with a Retribution spec asks for help with a direct damage build, advising him to go Holy or Protection would be incorrect as neither of those talent trees will increase the direct damage output more than Retribution. If he was asking for the most useful Paladin build at end-game, feel free to show him the light of the Holy and Protection builds.

The problem isn't that people tell new Paladins what talent builds are most used end-game, because you're all very good at that. The problem is that certain Paladins completely forget that there are situations in the game that call for a Retribution build, such as questing, leveling and PvP that isn't in the Arena.

I mean, I once asked which build was better for level up in Outland, Retribution or Protection. This was before the latest overhaul of the Retribution talents and Retribution was really mana inefficient and weak (or weaker I guess). The response I got was mixed. A lot told me to go Protection and AOE grind. Fair enough, that's a useful suggestion. Some told me to stay Retribution, but spend my points differently. Fair enough, also a good suggestion.

Then someone told me to go Holy, because being a healbot was something I had to get used to eventually. Not fair enough. Not a good suggestion. I didn't ask for the best end-game build. My question was about the Protection and Retribution talent trees.

And I see this happening more and more now. Not just here, but also on the other boards. The amount of end-game raiders and Arena fighters is increasing tenfold. The veterans are all up there and have been there for so long they've forgotten that other players might not share their goals in the game.

I will never have the time to raid and I don't have anyone to do the Arenas with. I do battlegrounds and quests and 5-man instances. When I ask for help with a certain talent tree, it is with those goals in mind - and I make sure to tell the forum posters so they don't start going on about how that talent tree sucks in raids and Arenas. And, yet, it still happens.

That's my main gripe. That people dish out some of their own rage about being stuck in a healbot/tank position end-game on other posters.

Edit: Removed some stuff due to the lack of Retadin bashing threads available, apparently.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 12:55pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#17 Jan 30 2008 at 3:50 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
Personally, and I think any logically thinking person would agree, melee Huntards are pathetic. That said, if someone wanted to be a melee Huntard, sure I'd tell them that's the biggest mistake they could make other than a melee Priest/Mage/Lock, but I'd still answer their question to the best of my knowledge.

The point some of us are trying to make, and it obviously isn't sinking in with anyone, is if someone wants to be a Ret Paladin, why won't you accept that? Or does everyone coming to these boards need to start with, "I know Ret isn't going to be the best way to do DPS, but it's what I want to do: advice please"?

Quote:
If someone really wants to be the best at their chosen class shouldn't we tell them what the best is? If they insist on a spec that's not viaable for the task they're ultimately asking for isn't it our duty to tell them before they invest the time?


Again, it's fine to tell someone that Ret will not be the best way to spec a Paladin, but if that's what someone wants, it is "our duty" to help them be the best Ret they can be.
#18 Jan 30 2008 at 3:58 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
Mazra wrote:
And I see this happening more and more now.


Yeah I think I responded here but in case you didn't see it.


Maulgak wrote:
The point some of us are trying to make, and it obviously isn't sinking in with anyone, is if someone wants to be a Ret Paladin, why won't you accept that?


Yeah actually since my point isn't sinking in either, you too.
#19 Jan 30 2008 at 4:25 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
Celcio wrote:
Yeah actually since my point isn't sinking in either, you too.


So you want proof. And if we find it for you, is it really going to matter? I'm not going to spend my time re-reading posts just to find this "proof" you want, sorry.

About your point though, is it in regards to the "where are these posts?" or the "it's our duty to tell them Ret isn't the best way to play a Paladin"? If it's the second one, yes that has indeed sunk in very deep. The problem is this: when someone asks how they can be a better Ret there is a HUGE difference between 1) "lawlRet", does not answer the question nor is it helpful in any way 2) "Don't spec Ret, it is lame to say the least for end-game DPS" slightly helpful, but still doesn't answer the question, and 3) "Ret DPS isn't viable end-game, but (insert help lines here)" which gets the point across that Ret isn't the way to go AND actually answers the poster's question.
#20 Jan 30 2008 at 4:35 AM Rating: Default
***
3,339 posts
Maulgak wrote:
Celcio wrote:
Yeah actually since my point isn't sinking in either, you too.


So you want proof. Yeah there actually isn't any. We're acting all sanctimonious about an issue that doesn't actually exist. Isn't that awesome! We're still going to follow up with that admission by saying that posts are saying it though because, what the heck. Some idiots actually believe us without proof! Lawl idiots! Oops, i mean, I completely understand what you're trying to do but you're confused. See first you kneel down, and then you open your mouth...


FTFY.
#21 Jan 30 2008 at 4:46 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
Well, I tried asking (legitimately) about your point, and all I got was some childish dribble and "FTFY" which I admit I have no idea what that means. GG
#22 Jan 30 2008 at 5:01 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Maulgak wrote:
The problem is this: when someone asks how they can be a better Ret there is a HUGE difference between 1) "lawlRet", does not answer the question nor is it helpful in any way 2) "Don't spec Ret, it is lame to say the least for end-game DPS" slightly helpful, but still doesn't answer the question, and 3) "Ret DPS isn't viable end-game, but (insert help lines here)" which gets the point across that Ret isn't the way to go AND actually answers the poster's question.


I personally don't see "lawlRet" as a problem. It may not be helpful, but nor is it a direct attack. Should it be rated down? That's in the eye of the beholder. But there is no law that states that every post has to be helpful. Trying to create and enforce such a law would be ludicrous. It removes the fun of the boards. This isn't a job, it's a place of relaxation. As long as a direct attack isn't made, there is no harm in little jabs here and there.

I view forum in-jokes like that as something of a test of temperament of new folks. Those that go ******** when they see em don't really belong here. They're the kind of folks who will go into a PuG, wipe once, and start getting pissy at the rest of the group, and I don't wanna be associated with them.

All the Ret posts get answered in time when someone who has the answers to the subject shows up. Because of that, there really is no harm in someone getting a response of "lawlRet" here and there.

#23 Jan 30 2008 at 5:02 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
Maulgak wrote:
Well, I tried asking (legitimately) about your point, and all I got was some childish dribble and "FTFY" which I admit I have no idea what that means. GG


Well I tried asking for any sort of validatoin for what you're all saying. I guess we're both walking away empty handed.

Oh oops, just me then. Since I reiterated my point just now. Again.

You saying "you don't feel like finding" the proof of the points you've been consistently arguing and the proof that you and others are constantly referring to really just means you can't. There is none. So you're going to try to distract from that by rambling about something else and trying to flick insults. That was my second point.

Is all of this clear enough for you now?
#24 Jan 30 2008 at 5:15 AM Rating: Good
**
277 posts
Wow this subject is apparently shaking up the pally boards...2 long threads about what is essentially the same issue.

These boards have been very helpful to me. The majority of my questions have been answered quickly and clearly by all of you. I appreciate the advice of CapJack, Dilbrt, Celcio, and everyone else. I recently made the mistake of asking a very specific macro question on a different class forum (not naming names)...I was informed that what I wanted was uneccessary and that I should change my playstyle and give up on the macro. It took about 9 posts for someone to even TRY to answer my question. Based upon that overwhelmingly unhelpful response I doubt I'll post on that board again. I don't want this board to turn into that.

I think a lot of people (including some of the veterans) should read and embrace this quote:

“Before you speak ask yourself if what you are going to say is true, is kind, is necessary, is helpful. If the answer is no, maybe what you are about to say should be left unsaid.”


#25 Jan 30 2008 at 5:41 AM Rating: Good
**
881 posts
Mazra wrote:

The problem isn't that people tell new Paladins what talent builds are most used end-game, because you're all very good at that. The problem is that certain Paladins completely forget that there are situations in the game that call for a Retribution build, such as questing, leveling and PvP that isn't in the Arena.


Just needed to be said again....there is more to WOW than raiding and arena
#26 Jan 30 2008 at 6:09 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Celcio, I don't think you've expressed an argumentative point clearly since the last time you asked your mum for tit milk.

I'm not even kidding, half the time I don't even understand what you're saying. You wonder why people like Jack more than you, it's because sometimes you sound like you're speaking in binary.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 95 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (95)