Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Sticking up for the Big Guy (Rant)Follow

#77 Jan 30 2008 at 3:30 AM Rating: Decent
**
390 posts
Mazra wrote:
My point is that if someone wants to be Retribution, the veterans should respect it and help him be a better Retribution Paladin. Not convert him into Protection or Holy.

I've seen too many regulars put the smack down on newbies who come for advice about Retribution. Why smack a guy around when he asks for Retribution tips? Either help the poster or GTFO. That's the number one rule on all the "serious" forums here and I take it this is a serious forum?

I'm just puzzled we're even discussing this.


/signed

#78 Jan 30 2008 at 3:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,339 posts
Mazra wrote:
I've seen too many regulars put the smack down on newbies who come for advice about Retribution.


I'm actually still trying to find these mysterious posts of which you all speak.

And Poldy - watch it or I'm going to start reading your posts with Alton Brown's voice in my head. And that's going to be creepy.

(I still need to brine some pickles)
#79 Jan 30 2008 at 3:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Celcio wrote:
Mazra wrote:
I've seen too many regulars put the smack down on newbies who come for advice about Retribution.


I'm actually still trying to find these mysterious posts of which you all speak.


I actually wouldn't mind a link myself. Usually the smack is only laid down when someone cops a 'tude. Sure, a sarcastic "lawlret" can be seen, but I can't remember seeing the smack laid when someone asks a genuine question. They're usually gently, but matter-of-factly, told that paladins aren't the class for what they want to do.

Edit:
Quote:
And Poldy - watch it or I'm going to start reading your posts with Alton Brown's voice in my head.


I think I could live with that.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 4:46am by Poldaran
#80 Jan 30 2008 at 4:02 AM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I admit, laying down the smack was a bit strong. I just like the sound of it (laying down the law, etc.).

While trying to find a thread wherein the veterans laid down the smack on someone, I found some nostalgic pieces of history. For instance, the thread where bodhi is thrilled about having gone Retribution and is dealing great combo damage with all the crit talents and Vengeance. Smiley: smile Or an old thread where someone is commenting on the power that is the Protection/Retribution build.

I agree 100% with you when you say that the Paladin class is a less than fortunate class to be playing if you are aiming for a DPS spot in end-gaming raiding these days. Crusader Strike isn't exactly all that.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#81 Jan 30 2008 at 4:17 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Mazra wrote:
I admit, laying down the smack was a bit strong. I just like the sound of it (laying down the law, etc.).

While trying to find a thread wherein the veterans laid down the smack on someone, I found <nothing of the sort>.


So... no one can actually find anything that validates the existence of this thread then?
#82 Jan 30 2008 at 5:43 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,503 posts
Quote:
So... no one can actually find anything that validates the existence of this thread then?


are you kidding me? its like someone putting their finger one inch from your face and repeating 'i'm not touching you, i'm not touching you'. then when mom comes in, he says 'what did i do?'

its more of an undertone. its strange how the threads with 'Ret...' in the title seem to get the most views, yet rarely do you get anything constructive to read. then you also get alot of misinformation regarding the spec and playstyle from people that have never played as one.
#83 Jan 30 2008 at 6:35 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
tommyguns wrote:
its strange how the threads with 'Ret...' in the title seem to get the most views


Drama gets views.
#84 Jan 30 2008 at 7:17 AM Rating: Good
Look at my sig for the counterargument to my own argument
#85 Jan 30 2008 at 9:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Mazra wrote:
My point is that if someone wants to be Retribution, the veterans should respect it and help him be a better Retribution Paladin. Not convert him into Protection or Holy.


Why?

If a Rogue asks what's the best way to PvE DPS as Shadowstep, he'll get smacked down before he takes two steps... and with good reason. If a Mage asks what the best DPS rotation is as 61 Arcane he'll get the same treatment.

What makes Ret special compared to all the other bad talent builds? That some people are passionate about it? Well, okay. That doesn't make it good. That makes them misguided.

If someone asks you what is the best brand of bleach to mix into cereal, is your response going to be "Tide!" or "I wouldn't do that"? There's nothing wrong with discouraging people... let's go with 'heavily discouraging' people from making a mistake, even if the response is outside the parameters of their original question.
#86 Jan 30 2008 at 9:28 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,117 posts
You make Retribution appear to be the equivalent of dog sh*t.

Not every spec is perfect, and some aren't exactly viable, but if someone wants to spec that way, then let them do it. I find all three trees to be great, and Holy is definately more viable, but you should give others facts without the personal opinion.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 12:28pm by Dathur
#87 Jan 30 2008 at 9:45 AM Rating: Excellent
i find ret very fun to play, despite its short commings. Isnt that what video games are all about?

oh wait, i have to impress other people on the internet with my leet dps. people i will never meet. impress them with sh*t that doesnt even exist.

alot of people will argue that being the best is also pretty fun, but also, being better then the unskilled or unknowledge with an underdog class/spec is also pretty damn rewarding.

what Bleach in your cerial???

Ret is not that bad, no class/spec is that bad. Maybe in upper tier raiding, or 2000+ arena they are too mediocre to be seen. but in the other 80% of the game, they are just as good as any given the right information.

information most people insist on not giving. rather they bash someones consepts of a charactor in a game that appeals to them.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 9:50am by RuenBahamut
#88 Jan 30 2008 at 9:54 AM Rating: Good
The RuenBahamut of Doom wrote:
i find ret very fun to play, despite its short commings. Isnt that what video games are all about?

oh wait, i have to impress other people on the internet with my leet dps. people i will never meet. impress them with sh*t that doesnt even exist.

alot of people will argue that being the best is also pretty fun, but also, being better then the unskilled or unknowledge with an underdog class/spec is also pretty damn rewarding.

what Bleach in your cerial???

Ret is not that bad, no class/spec is that bad. Maybe in upper tier raiding, or 2000+ arena they are too mediocre to be seen. but in the other 80% of the game, they are just as good as any given the right information.

information most people insist on not giving. rather they bash someones consepts of a charactor in a game that appeals to them.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 9:50am by RuenBahamut


Thank you for proving my point.

You're playing a bad talent spec. Admittedly it's a bad talent spec you find enjoyable, but it's still bad. You're the Druid asking the best way to tank as a Moonkin and the Fire Warlock. It can be fun, it's a novelty, but it's still... bad. Consider steering people into a decent spec as a public service.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 12:54pm by RPZip
#89 Jan 30 2008 at 10:02 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,117 posts
There isn't just one way to play this game, and you can do it however you want to. My guild takes me in as a Retribution Paladin for SSC and TK, and we're donig very well for a guild that's only existed for a month.

No, I don't do amazing DPS, but it's not bad DPS. I also bring utility with my judgements (which increases total raid dps by about 200-300), restores tons of mana to DPS, etc. etc. etc. As said, it's certainly not THE best spec, but I'm certainly pulling my weight in the raid.
#90 Jan 30 2008 at 10:58 AM Rating: Decent
or, sence you seem to miss the point of this thread and my post, RP.

consider giving people the information they ask for. let them make their own decisions and opinions. fun is the aim here, and with helpful responses they can have it with Ret too, once they get to 70 and join a raiding guild, they will sacrifice what they will for advancement, then.

lawl ret is great and all, even funny, but the point is that it never answers the questions people have.
#91 Jan 30 2008 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
RPZip wrote:
Mazra wrote:
My point is that if someone wants to be Retribution, the veterans should respect it and help him be a better Retribution Paladin. Not convert him into Protection or Holy.


Why?


Because you're not paying their monthly fee and if you can't respect individuality and free will, "helping out" here isn't your thing.

If the person asks for the best end-game Paladin build for healing, go ahead and convert away.

RPZip wrote:
If a Rogue asks what's the best way to PvE DPS as Shadowstep, he'll get smacked down before he takes two steps... and with good reason. If a Mage asks what the best DPS rotation is as 61 Arcane he'll get the same treatment.

What makes Ret special compared to all the other bad talent builds? That some people are passionate about it? Well, okay. That doesn't make it good. That makes them misguided.


The Rogue example you're giving isn't the same as the one I'm giving. To bring out the Rogue analogy, my example is of a Rogue player who asks for the best Shadowstep build in terms of damage and then he's told by the veteran Rogue posters that he should spec Combat Swords instead.

Retribution isn't special. If I see someone asking for advice on how to optimize their Panzerkin, I don't tell them to roll a Warrior or respec Feral. Why not? Because obviously he wants to be a Moonkin tank. Fair enough, so let's start from there.

I won't even get into the last part of your post because it's just wrong.

RPZip wrote:
There's nothing wrong with discouraging people... let's go with 'heavily discouraging' people from making a mistake, even if the response is outside the parameters of their original question.


Oh my god, RP. Okay, I lied, I will get into the last part of your post. What the hell? I'm sorry, but someone put a 'Kick me, I'm an elitist ***' note on your back. Want me to get it for you? Seriously, you have no business discouraging people from the playing the game the way they want. If they're making a mistake, let them learn it by trying, just like we did back when we started.

I see that your Warrior is Fury spec'd, so you obviously didn't listen to the mob telling you to go Protection, because that's all Warriors are good at end-game.

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 8:30pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#92 Jan 30 2008 at 11:51 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Quote:
Seriously, you have no business discouraging people from the playing the game the way they want.


Except in a group setting, you do. When numbnuts over there is speccing like a tard and bringing the group down it's my business.

Go play solo, go tri-spec, gear in whites and greens. i dont give a crap.

Show up to a BG (real BG, not AV) like that and im going to be pissed. Might as well be afk imo.

Now, what an individual deems a bad spec is up to the individual but the point remains, it is our business when it effects ANYTHING we do.
#93 Jan 30 2008 at 12:04 PM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
KTurner wrote:
Quote:
Seriously, you have no business discouraging people from the playing the game the way they want.


Except in a group setting, you do. When numbnuts over there is speccing like a tard and bringing the group down it's my business.

Go play solo, go tri-spec, gear in whites and greens. i dont give a crap.

Show up to a BG (real BG, not AV) like that and im going to be pissed. Might as well be afk imo.

Now, what an individual deems a bad spec is up to the individual but the point remains, it is our business when it effects ANYTHING we do.


Smiley: lol

Yeah, and you should stick to single player games, or LAN with RPZip. You two would make an excellent team. In a closed environment.

This game is for everyone, not just the hardcore players who can't stand to lose. Wake up and smell the roses. If winning is such a big ordeal for you, this isn't your game. Go play The Witcher, Fable or some other single player RPG. You need to learn and accept the fact that online you don't choose your company, at least not all the time.

You do have options, though. Preview someone's talents before joining up with them. Will severely reduce the amount of times you accidentally group up with an "off-spec freak." Join AV as a group. All you need is 39 people who don't mind your attitude. Should be easy. RPZip will make it 38.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#94 Jan 30 2008 at 12:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Mazra wrote:
RPZip wrote:
Mazra wrote:
My point is that if someone wants to be Retribution, the veterans should respect it and help him be a better Retribution Paladin. Not convert him into Protection or Holy.


Why?


Because you're not paying their monthly fee and if you can't respect individuality and free will, "helping out" here isn't your thing.


"***** you, I'll do what I want" works both ways, Cartman.

Besides, the 'you're not paying my $15/mo' argument works up until you have to do anything with that player. If you're playing poorly (awfully, etc), you're ruining the enjoyment of the $60/mo of the other four poor saps in your group.

If you play solo and never interact with other players, have the time of your life playing as 0/0/0 for all I care.

Quote:

RPZip wrote:
If a Rogue asks what's the best way to PvE DPS as Shadowstep, he'll get smacked down before he takes two steps... and with good reason. If a Mage asks what the best DPS rotation is as 61 Arcane he'll get the same treatment.

What makes Ret special compared to all the other bad talent builds? That some people are passionate about it? Well, okay. That doesn't make it good. That makes them misguided.


The Rogue example you're giving isn't the same as the one I'm giving. To bring out the Rogue analogy, my example is of a Rogue player who asks for the best Shadowstep build in terms of damage and then he's told by the veteran Rogue posters that he should spec Combat Swords instead.


"Help me improve my Rogue's damage" becomes "Spec Combat Swords". "Help me improve my Paladin's damage" becomes "You really can't improve it, it's a dead-end spec. If you want better damage you need to reroll". I'm failing to see any disconnect.

Quote:
Retribution isn't special. If I see someone asking for advice on how to optimize their Panzerkin, I don't tell them to roll a Warrior or respec Feral. Why not? Because obviously he wants to be a Moonkin tank. Fair enough, so let's start from there.


"Plz hlp me i seem 2 do porly on teh metars in HEROics and Kara as ret wut am i doing wrong" equals "Plz hlp me i seem 2 do porly on teh tanking with my moonkin in HEROics and Kara wut am i doing wrong".

Quote:
RPZip wrote:
There's nothing wrong with discouraging people... let's go with 'heavily discouraging' people from making a mistake, even if the response is outside the parameters of their original question.


Oh my god, RP. Okay, I lied, I will get into the last part of your post. What the hell? I'm sorry, but someone put a 'Kick me, I'm an elitist ***' note on your back.


Is this the first post of mine you've read? Well, let me tell you, you're in for a real treat! I bring you only the finest brands of 'Never being wrong' and 'Being better than you' at no extra cost!

Quote:
Seriously, you have no business discouraging people from the playing the game the way they want. If they're making a mistake, let them learn it by trying, just like we did back when we started.


That's a brilliant idea.

We shouldn't give people any advice. Ever. At all. Let them figure it all out on their own.

We should delete this site and WoWWiki right now.

It'll be great!
#95 Jan 30 2008 at 12:25 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Mazra wrote:

This game is for everyone, not just the hardcore players who can't stand to lose. Wake up and smell the roses. If winning is such a big ordeal for you, this isn't your game. Go play The Witcher, Fable or some other single player RPG. You need to learn and accept the fact that online you don't choose your company, at least not all the time.

When 9/10 or 14/15 of the people in your battleground have a clue in terms of spec/gear and then there is that odd man who's a dumbass in the same terms i dont think anyone would be out of line saying that person is a burden and a complete waste of space. Are they out there? yes. Do i accept it? yes. Still pisses me off. I dont have the best gear, i dont have the best skills. But i at least try to spec/gear in a way that will help me and my fellow players the most. Unfortunately skillz arent as handicapped accessible as a good spec and good gear in this game and thusly i am very forgiving of people who just arent good. Sometimes that cant be helped.

Quote:

You do have options, though. Preview someone's talents before joining up with them. Will severely reduce the amount of times you accidentally group up with an "off-spec freak." Join AV as a group. All you need is 39 people who don't mind your attitude. Should be easy. RPZip will make it 38.


First, you do that for pugs on my server and you will be sitting around for a week. Gotta deal with it. Its a shame it could be so easily fixed if the person had gotten some decent guidance at some point.

Second, av is ****.

All i know is that if i played wow and never visited a forum i would be some major scrub. Im glad im not and i would never want to advise somebody into purposefully gimping themselves or their team/guild/friends. Since this thread stemmed from "lawl ret" im going to say this: I agree with the reasoning behind "lawl ret", i mean i know the posters here and i know where they are coming from, but i also think there are better ways to convey the same message without making the person feel attacked or mocked. Same goes for any thread on any subject.
#96 Jan 30 2008 at 12:40 PM Rating: Good
i really dont know how many times people are going to miss the point.

there is nothing wrong with giving people advice about not specing ret. its the manner in which its done with no info to back it up or in the hate full way its done.

Further, after (or before) you give your advise about not spec'ing ret. you could at least answer their questions with the same insight you used to tell them it was a bad idea in the first place.
#97 Jan 30 2008 at 12:43 PM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Edit: Slow posting is slow. This post is a response to RPZip's post above.

AH! But there's a difference between giving advice and telling people they suck if they spec a certain way. Never said I was against giving advice, but converting people into something they don't want to be, just because it's how you do things. That's bad. And not helpful at all.

As for off-spec players becoming your business when you interact with them. There are a lot of options available in the game that allows you to thoroughly screen a player before putting him in your group and putting your virtual life in his hands. That looks just as dorky as I imagined it would, by the way.

No one's forcing you to group up with Mr. 1/30/30. If you do end up in a group with him, he's not really the one to blame. I'm using Examiner so I don't know what the default UI command is, but inspect the guy and click on his talents tab. That's right, new feature. Works for enemy characters as well, for your information.

Ps. I'd rather be in AV with a good Retadin than a poor Holy..adin? Protection Paladins are only good for tanking Drek and Galv, anyways. Smiley: tongue

Edited, Jan 30th 2008 9:54pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#98 Jan 30 2008 at 1:19 PM Rating: Good
a) People come to this forum asking EXPERT advice on how to spec or play a class.

b) EXPERTS are almost always people that have an abundance of experience with the game, which most often directly translates into raiding and/or arenas.

c) People that have the time, interest, and mental fortitude to be EXPERTS (read: experimentation, research, and discovering all the finer points of min/maxing) identify that Retribution is going to be mediocre no matter what you do, thus making the research futile. (You can polish that **** all you want....)

Which leads to

d) There are very very few EXPERTS, but a large amount of those who would be, if they didn't already know better.

I guess I'm saying I see both sides of the argument. There is a decided lack of expert advice, but it shouldn't be substituted with sometimes mocking suggestions about how the question is moot in the first place.
#99 Jan 30 2008 at 5:07 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
wow, i missed alot being at work all day.

first, Ret is arguably the pally dps spec. Moonkin is arguably NOT the druid tank spec and Shadowstep is arguably NOT the raid dps spec for rogue. second, not everyone is farming TK/BT/Hyjal and competing at 2400 arenas, just the contrary. lastly, if Ret was not viable i would not have kept the spec throughout Kara/SSC/Gruuls. actually, Kara without a Ret pally is less of a treat for my guild. and i do spec Prot as needed.

i keep playing my epic'd pally over my epic'd mage because it is more fun, i can produce equal or greater results, and generally makes runs smoother.


if anyone is interested: Ret pallies CAN top HK/Dmg meters, return/cap the most flags, cap/hold nodes in BG. Ret pallies CAN make it past 1600 2v2 arena. Ret pallies CAN top the dmg meters in Kara(including healing on Maiden) while OTing(we run with only 1 druid tank currently). i know these for fact because i have done them all. i am far from best player but am proud of my accomplishments and will acheive greater as i go. i still hold to the agreement i had with my guild leader...i will remain Ret until i am no longer viable. enjoy.
#100 Jan 30 2008 at 6:23 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
KTurner wrote:
Now, what an individual deems a bad spec is up to the individual but the point remains, it is our business when it effects ANYTHING we do.


How does someone you will never meet in game have any bearing on anything you do?

The RuenBahamut of Doom wrote:
Further, after (or before) you give your advise about not spec'ing ret. you could at least answer their questions with the same insight you used to tell them it was a bad idea in the first place.


QFT - the point we are trying to make, that obviously no one wants to give any heed to. Instead, they keep lowering Ret to a level far lower than it really is: how can you possibly compare Ret to a melee Hunter or any other completely retarded idea in this game? Ret may be bad, but it's not THAT bad.
#101 Jan 30 2008 at 8:51 PM Rating: Good
**
286 posts
Maulgak wrote:
Instead, they keep lowering Ret to a level far lower than it really is: how can you possibly compare Ret to a melee Hunter or any other completely retarded idea in this game? Ret may be bad, but it's not THAT bad.

Actually, I finally figured out melee hunters. If you look at the survival tree in that old talent thing that Jack posted in that other thread, that's exactly what it's for. Even has melee specialization as one of the talents. All these melee hunters just haven't realized they've changed the talents since then. :)

(Okay, okay, just trying to add some levity...this place is getting all depressing and heavy lately.)
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 201 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (201)