Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Sticking up for the Big Guy (Rant)Follow

#27 Jan 28 2008 at 6:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Dilbrt wrote:
You could have just cut to the chase and directed this at me, I know you wanted to.


Not just you, there are lot's of people I've seen this from.

Dilbrt wrote:
Are you or is anyone else going to add a question to the FAQ "Why shouldn't you spec ret?" Hmm? I haven't seen a single person write a guide saying something to that effect, and I am pretty dang well sure no one will have the gumption to actually put it in the legit guides.


1.1.7 and 2.1.3 in the FAQ. I don't go over all the details, but I do mention Retributions lack of dps and contributions at end-game.

Bodh wrote:
I will tell a guy who is brand new and wondering about the class the stark and unarguable truth that end game, Paladin is the worst Melee dps class in the game. If he truly wishes to DPS then he would do himself a favour to look at a rogue or even a Warrior first.

If a Ret who playing with undergeared, poorly specced players in the earliest steps of end game wishes to make a claim of Ret dps leetness I will more than happily point out a world of knowledge, both personal and beyond, that shows exactly how Ret is an unviable raiding class.

Play what you play and enjoy it. But when people ask for information, or provide information that comes from a very clear ignorance of the game then I will always be hear to do what I do. As the sig says, I often don't do it nicely.


Bodh, I fully understand that. Like I said, if someone wants to make claims or is asking about Ret-viability DPS, go ahead and rip him a new one. But I just don't think it's necessary when they are asking for help.

Anyway, this whole thread is reminding me of an intervention. People coming out talking about how they've been abused and others just brushing it off "it's only a joke, we don't mean it"
but the bruises are there.... the bruises are there

It's just a problem that I've been noticing and I just wanted to address it. It may shoot down my popularity a bit, I wasn't trying to point fingers at anyone in particular. I'm pretty sure I've done it a few times too, it's just some of the posts like the one Maul put up and the one raisen put up that made me start thinking.
#28 Jan 28 2008 at 7:15 AM Rating: Good
**
468 posts
CapJack of the Seven Seas wrote:
Dilbrt wrote:
Are you or is anyone else going to add a question to the FAQ "Why shouldn't you spec ret?" Hmm? I haven't seen a single person write a guide saying something to that effect, and I am pretty dang well sure no one will have the gumption to actually put it in the legit guides.


1.1.7 and 2.1.3 in the FAQ. I don't go over all the details, but I do mention Retributions lack of dps and contributions at end-game.


Oh yeah...he's got the gumption
#29 Jan 28 2008 at 8:06 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
CapJack of the Seven Seas wrote:
/rant

I have been on these forums for a while now, and there has always been one tune that has never changed.

"Ret Sucks"
"Lawl Ret"
"OMG You specced Ret, you suck!"

etc... etc...

It has been getting worse and worse lately, and it really is starting to get old to me and I think a lot of people on these forums.

The fact is there are many many potential Paladins who look at these forums looking for advice. They may be starting out, they may be end-game, who knows. Looking at the FAQ, it's been viewed over 5,000 times, many of those views are from people who have never posted on here, and may never will. These forums are here to be helpful for the most part, and putting someone down about their spec, especially if the info you are giving them isn't relevant, is not helpful.

How many times has this happened? (or at least something like it)

"What kind of weapon should I be using at 48? I'm ret and want to get the most dps out of it."

Response:
"Lawl Ret"
"Ret really isn't viable end-game or at PvP, you should just respec now to save yourself the trouble later"
"Haha look at the Retnoob"
"Just use whatever you are using now and you can get the Ice Barbed Spear at level 51"

One of these is helpful, the others are uninformative, informative about something he didn't ask for, or just hurtful. It really happens too much around here. You are NOT playing their chars. They may really enjoy dpsing as a ret, and just don't like playing any of the other dps classes. It does happen, and just because you don't understand it doesn't mean you have to constantly bash it, especially to people here.

If they ask about ret viability end-game, go ahead and give them the facts. There's no need to be rude or insulting about it. If they decide to be asshats about it, then go ahead and rip them a new one, hell I'll join ya. But some people really don't look at statistics and videos and just want a quick simple answer. One that they can go "Oh ok" and move on.

A Retribution FAQ has been added here, and it's really something that will be very helpful to retribution paladins who are devoted to their spec. They may already be well aware of the short-comings of ret, but they don't need it repeatedly shoved in their face. ToJ put a ton of work and time into it, and it wouldn't hurt to just pat him on the back, appreciate that he enjoys the spec, know that he's wrong when it comes to 25-mans, and move on.

All I'm saying is, let's just show a little Paladin solidarity here. You may not like ret, or think that it's useless, but you don't have to be antagonistic about it. Just answer the question and move on.

/rantoff


I seem to recall a post by you saying you had to rate up somebody for everytime they said "lol ret" or something.

And i agree with your post. I rate it all down, of course somebody keeps rating it back up just further encouraging it.

I dislike ret and think the people who use it make it out to be better than it is, but i like to think i put some effort into my replies.


Edited, Jan 28th 2008 8:16am by KTurner
#30 Jan 28 2008 at 8:11 AM Rating: Good
**
468 posts
There’s Ret bashing on every forum that’s just the way it is. It used to irritate me but anymore I find it entertaining and that’s the main reason I read these forums. I think Bhodi and Dil act like di*kheads but more times than not they know what they are talking about. They’ve both had some great lines and analogies in the past that have made me LOL. Drama, sarcasm, humor these forums have it all

Edited, Jan 28th 2008 12:50pm by chood
#31 Jan 28 2008 at 10:29 AM Rating: Good
chood wrote:
There’s Ret bashing on every forum that’s just the way it is. It used to irritate me but anymore I find it entertaining and that’s the main reason I read these forums. I think Bhodi and Dil act like di*kheads but more times than not they know what they are talking about. They’ve both had some great lines and analogies in the past that have made me LOL. Drama, sarcasm, humor these forums have it all


This post makes me happier than a tick on a fat dog.
#32 Jan 28 2008 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
21 posts
Upon reading this thread a question/point came to mind. On all raids the overall raid DPS is the big factor in how fast the raid goes. Has anyone done a comparison of the overall damage contribution to a raid of a DPS class at about 1000 DPS which is T4 gear lvl( hunter, mage etc ) and T4 Ret pally. To do this accuratly you would need to add in the damage increases from Sanc Aura and Imp SoC which would be +5% damage from melee and +3.5% from caster applied to the whole raid. If there are 15 DPS class toons in a raid and the average increase is about 4.25% then about about 650DPS is added passivly by the ret pally, now I am sure they can do 500DPS so that would seem to be a at least as good as a reg DPS class as they also bring along a blessing. If the mobs are non critable then this amount would be less and I am not sure how many mobs are uncrittable. I don't play a ret pally but have wondered about this.


Kang
#33 Jan 28 2008 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
KANGURAN wrote:
Upon reading this thread a question/point came to mind. On all raids the overall raid DPS is the big factor in how fast the raid goes. Has anyone done a comparison of the overall damage contribution to a raid of a DPS class at about 1000 DPS which is T4 gear lvl( hunter, mage etc ) and T4 Ret pally. To do this accuratly you would need to add in the damage increases from Sanc Aura and Imp SoC which would be +5% damage from melee and +3.5% from caster applied to the whole raid. If there are 15 DPS class toons in a raid and the average increase is about 4.25% then about about 650DPS is added passivly by the ret pally, now I am sure they can do 500DPS so that would seem to be a at least as good as a reg DPS class as they also bring along a blessing. If the mobs are non critable then this amount would be less and I am not sure how many mobs are uncrittable. I don't play a ret pally but have wondered about this.


Kang


In theory, you could add in what a person gave to other to a ret paladin. Using that theory you would also have to add in BM hunter's damage, enhancement shaman bonuses, possibly warlock curse of shadow, mage's scorch, boomkin crit... There are lots of other classes that give bonuses to the raid. It would be extremely difficult to measure what those classes actually added, and I PROMISE you most raid leaders don't give a rat's *** what you do to boost X, Y, Z player, they care where you measure up on the DPS charts. I'd love to be able to quantify raid utility, but to my knowledge its not possible. In the ultra-trimmed down 25 man raids, people rely on actual quantifiable stats to determine who they can replace to make the raid better, and ret comes up short.
#34 Jan 28 2008 at 11:03 AM Rating: Default
*
92 posts
"Lol Ret" Now I say this out of experience, I've tried leveling as Ret from about 1-50 because someone told me it was the "ideal" leveling spec. It sucked! Truth is maybe I diddn't know how to play it, maybe I did but when I specced Prot and started AoE grinding everything went MUCH FASTER!

Granted Ret is a little better with the new patch so for giggles I respecced to Ret at level 66 and omg did I type wtf!!11 Lets just say I hearthed to Silvermoon and was done with it. My Paladin reached 70(using Prot) and recently respecced Holy. Now I dont really like healing but the healing mana efficiency of Paladins just blew me away! I'm never respeccing again.
#35 Jan 28 2008 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
im a lvl 68 BE ret pally nd im chaging spec to holy because everyone says that i wont get anywhere in arena teams. its a bit of a **** take IMO.
#36 Jan 28 2008 at 12:17 PM Rating: Good
**
638 posts
/signed

Thank you Cap'n Jack!

I have to say, the (relative) civility and helpfulness of this board is what drew me here and what keeps me here. All of that seems to disappear the moment anyone mentions ret.

I leveled up as a holy paladin, and I'm specced so far into holy now that I'm essentially useless for anything besides a healing role. Hey, I like it, it's my character, and one thing I seem to be really good at. I've had tons of people look at my gear and my build and tell me both suck, but I've never had anybody run with me in a raid or instance group and tell me I can't heal. I don't know why anybody thinks it's hard or slow to level a holy paladin - by the time I got a few talents (and especially Verigan's Fist), I could level just fine. Heck, I could kill lots of things other classes at my level couldn't - spellusers come up with a lot of "resists" when fighting things higher than their level, and melee fighters run out of ways to heal themselves. I just hunker down doing my tiny bits of white damage and saving my mana to heal, and fighting mobs several levels above me I could usually manage to die slower than they did.

I tried leveling a ret paladin and I sucked. I could not dps my way out of a paper bag, and I couldn't heal myself, much less a group. But I've played with ret paladins in raids, groups, and BG's that absolutely rock, so I'm pretty sure it's the way I play, not the spec. The most fun I ever had on a battleground was following a ret pally around keeping him alive. That was in the grand old days of 40 hour AV's, and I don't think either of us died once during the whole fight.

I've run with prot paladin tanks, never played prot, but a good tank is a good tank. If nobody else gets killed until the tank dies, I figure the tank is good and whatever class and spec he's playing is good. And I've healed some damn good pally tanks.

I think it would be really fun to design some experiments to test raid utility, and settle a few of these questions. First, you'd need to find people that were really good at their classes - or at least thought they were. Then put together a 24-person raid, add a ret paladin, and use a strategy that makes full use of him. See what the dps and healing stats of the party look like as a whole. Run it again with a BM hunter, fury warrior, enhancement shaman, etc. My nagging suspicion is that in most fights, it won't make much difference at all. In some fights, however, there will be that one ability that makes the whole thing just doable. For example, I never bother judging a seal onto a boss in a boss fight. For me, that's an extra second I could actually be doing something useful, and with resealing and judging I lose two seconds out of thirty plus the mana involved. And our raids usually have two holy paladins. With a ret paladin in the mix, that's three seals that could be running on the boss, where now we have none. There is the extra aura, an extra lay on hands, the cleanses, the DI, the bubble (just think of the Illhoof fight - a bubble means you don't need to transfer either the heals or the dps to the demonic chains!). I'm sure good people in all the other class off-specs would be able to develop their own best way to use their talents. And the question, especially in the 25 person raids, becomes not which one is best, but which ones will make it impossible to win.

But like Cap'n Jack says, let's get out of this "Ret sucks! Ret rocks!" pissing contest. Different people have different playstyles, and if someone tells me they could level up much faster as a ret paladin, I'm not going to tell them it's all BS just because I couldn't do it. And I'm not going to be taking any ret paladin's word about how hard it is to level holy, regardless of how great he is or how much damage he can do. I know better, because I leveled holy. I'll be just as happy to hear how great ret paladins can be in raids as I was to hear how great holy paladins could be, but I too am a little tired of hearing so much mud flung whenever ret paladins are mentioned. If I wanted that, I've got a presidential race to watch.
#37 Jan 28 2008 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
fledarmus wrote:
I think it would be really fun to design some experiments to test raid utility, and settle a few of these questions. First, you'd need to find people that were really good at their classes - or at least thought they were. Then put together a 24-person raid, add a ret paladin, and use a strategy that makes full use of him. See what the dps and healing stats of the party look like as a whole. Run it again with a BM hunter, fury warrior, enhancement shaman, etc. My nagging suspicion is that in most fights, it won't make much difference at all. In some fights, however, there will be that one ability that makes the whole thing just doable. For example, I never bother judging a seal onto a boss in a boss fight. For me, that's an extra second I could actually be doing something useful, and with resealing and judging I lose two seconds out of thirty plus the mana involved. And our raids usually have two holy paladins. With a ret paladin in the mix, that's three seals that could be running on the boss, where now we have none. There is the extra aura, an extra lay on hands, the cleanses, the DI, the bubble (just think of the Illhoof fight - a bubble means you don't need to transfer either the heals or the dps to the demonic chains!). I'm sure good people in all the other class off-specs would be able to develop their own best way to use their talents. And the question, especially in the 25 person raids, becomes not which one is best, but which ones will make it impossible to win.


Dilbrt wrote:
In theory, you could add in what a person gave to other to a ret paladin. Using that theory you would also have to add in BM hunter's damage, enhancement shaman bonuses, possibly warlock curse of shadow, mage's scorch, boomkin crit... There are lots of other classes that give bonuses to the raid. It would be extremely difficult to measure what those classes actually added, and I PROMISE you most raid leaders don't give a rat's *** what you do to boost X, Y, Z player, they care where you measure up on the DPS charts. I'd love to be able to quantify raid utility, but to my knowledge its not possible. In the ultra-trimmed down 25 man raids, people rely on actual quantifiable stats to determine who they can replace to make the raid better, and ret comes up short.
#38 Jan 28 2008 at 1:13 PM Rating: Good
**
343 posts
I believe that Captian Jack has a point, as do many others.

Ret is down talked. I've never played ret and love my prot so I'll stay there. I've never played holy either.

Quote:
The fact is there are many many potential Paladins who look at these forums looking for advice.


That's why I come here, as many others. It sure has made my experience in playing better. And honestly, I don't remember one Prot crack being made on any of my threads...

Quote:
the others are uninformative, informative about something he didn't ask for, or just hurtful.


I love a good joke same as the next. And a crack or two is fun, but why not actually add some viable advice in with that. I joke ingame all the time about how I can't kill. I couldn't kill a rat, but he could beat on me for the next year and I still won't die... I'm a tank, it's what I do.

Yeah, Pallys can't dps. Never have and probally never will. It's in the FAQ. It's not our roll and shouldn't be made so. But if you choose to take the Ret path, drink a lot and maybe it will improve your dps by seeing double #'s on the screen. And please feel free to come to THESE forums for advice. Those who can give it usually do, and those who don't and actually leave a post, well they need to get a girl mate. TOO much time on their hands. I'd rather be playing (or getting laid) than typing out something that is souly made to make someone feel bad about the game (as most people play games for fun).

As said, Captian's got a point. Maybe a little harsh. But I agree. For those just telling a joke, again... try and add something usefull afterwards. If all you want to do is people bash, get a life, get a different forum, get some help.

#39 Jan 28 2008 at 1:43 PM Rating: Decent
*
120 posts
Here comes some experiences Pre-2.3:

The other day I helped a protection warrior friend getting Honour Hold revered so we got a holy priest, a mage, him and me out of the guild and then we went on the looking for group ui.
Being a respected officer in my guild, everybody always attends me nicely.

Now we got one shadow-priest from the looking for group ui.
*He notices sancity aura* lol dpspally.
Me: Want to bet I can outdamage you?
he: No, it's not that, it'sj ust you are so useful as healer or as tank (We had both a good tank and a good healer), you're so wasting your character.
Me: Look fellow, I'm helping a guildy to get HH revered for the key so he can get his nightbane urn. it's a NORMAL instance and we already have a tank and a healer.
Now, are you taking on that bet or would you prefer being kicked from the group?
He: lol, take it easy, I'll take that bet.

*sigh* I have to take it easy?
Anyways, after the second boss I did 8% more dps than him and strangely, he mysteriously Dc'ed after the second boss.

Later I see the prick on the official realm forums making a post ''Lol, look at this nub warrior, how'd he got to 70?!1''. I replied: Should i post a pick of me outdamaging you by 5 miles while saying ''loldpspally'' at first sight?''.

Somehow it's always shadow priests.
I was helping a friend with a group quest, spamming general found us a shadow priest and I was just telling my friend that I got 2nd on damage in Gruul's lair.
shadow priest: Lol, must've been a crap raid.

We finished the quest which needed us to kill 5 elites and I post recount.
Lol, I'm first on damage done, must've been a crap group.
Shadow priest: Ye, but I give mana etc etc.
Me: look fellow, How'd you know that my last raid didn't all have shadow priests? You are just an (...).

*sigh* some people, Even if you prove them wrong tenfold...
#40 Jan 28 2008 at 1:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:


In theory, you could add in what a person gave to other to a ret paladin. Using that theory you would also have to add in BM hunter's damage, enhancement shaman bonuses, possibly warlock curse of shadow, mage's scorch, boomkin crit... There are lots of other classes that give bonuses to the raid. It would be extremely difficult to measure what those classes actually added, and I PROMISE you most raid leaders don't give a rat's *** what you do to boost X, Y, Z player, they care where you measure up on the DPS charts. I'd love to be able to quantify raid utility, but to my knowledge its not possible. In the ultra-trimmed down 25 man raids, people rely on actual quantifiable stats to determine who they can replace to make the raid better, and ret comes up short.


Actually, people care quite a bit about Raid Utility. I mean, hell... people bring Enhancement Shaman and Rogues sure as hell place higher on the DPS meters. People bring Survival Hunters and Arms Warriors, Shadow Priests and Feral Druids, Affliction Warlocks and Moonkin Dru... okay, so most utility classes are accepted, altough not all.

When was the last time you saw a Shadow Priest place #1 on the DPS charts? They don't, unless the rest of the raid is awful or there's a huge gear gap. What they do do is bring immense raid utility - 5% magic damage, another 10% Shadow Damage, plus a lot of free healing for their group and that whole 'mana battery' thing.

Ret brings a lot of DPS utility. It's just that a) There are already usually too many people in melee (and melee groups) for a Retadin to slot in, and b) Their utility is fairly weak. Any Paladin can autoattack between heals to reapply Seals without Crusader Strike. It's helpful, but it doesn't strictly add anything in the way that Shadow Priests or Enhancement Shaman do.

What they do need is better utility than they have, or better damage (most likely better utility). At the moment there's very little reason to replace a Rogue or other melee hybrid with them, so they end up doing inferior damage and providing mediocre utility. Some level of independence from Windfury Totem would help them immensely as well, of course - they could then slot into a different group, like a Feral Druid/Hunter group, much more easily.
#41 Jan 28 2008 at 2:15 PM Rating: Decent
(saving space not quoting)

But that's my point RPZip. There are times when you go "Gee, we're having to do this boss without a shadow priest, we can do it but it's going to SUCK" Shadow priest has actually gone beyond moderate raid utility to essential raid necessity. Enhancement shamans with their melee buffing totems have also become a stable of pretty much every single raid I've ever been in. I have NEVER seen a raid go "gee if we only had a ret paladin..." At least classes with lesser raid utility (feral druid, SV hunter) can actually do good DPS in a raid to make up for their small utility, and their small utility makes up for the minor DPS they lose by going that spec. Ret cannot.
#42 Jan 28 2008 at 4:21 PM Rating: Decent
**
286 posts
Simskin wrote:
I couldn't kill a rat, but he could beat on me for the next year and I still won't die... I'm a tank, it's what I do.

Not that this is at all relevant, but it reminded me of something funny. I was playing my boomkin, and had just gotten the staff from the level 50 druid quest (having never used a staff in the past), was fighting furbolgs in Winterspring, and I failed to kill a totem when I hit it. I did 3 damage.

Needless to say, that caused much laughing to ensue when I mentioned it.

Anyway, sorry for the off topic.

Lawl Balance?
#43 Jan 28 2008 at 4:35 PM Rating: Decent
I will not argue with anyone because I have been argueing on the shammy forums for a while and know that it gets nowhere. Instead I'll say Bravo Cap I'm glad someone sees that happens(not just these forums but ingame as well).
#44 Jan 28 2008 at 4:43 PM Rating: Good
Dilbrt wrote:
(saving space not quoting)

But that's my point RPZip. There are times when you go "Gee, we're having to do this boss without a shadow priest, we can do it but it's going to SUCK" Shadow priest has actually gone beyond moderate raid utility to essential raid necessity. Enhancement shamans with their melee buffing totems have also become a stable of pretty much every single raid I've ever been in. I have NEVER seen a raid go "gee if we only had a ret paladin..." At least classes with lesser raid utility (feral druid, SV hunter) can actually do good DPS in a raid to make up for their small utility, and their small utility makes up for the minor DPS they lose by going that spec. Ret cannot.


I think the ideal solution would be to change the way Seals work. Make them stronger, but turn them into Weapon Buffs. It'd negate Windfury + Seal of Whatever, but it'd make Retadins a lot more viable if you stuff them into a misc. group (example: BM Hunter plus Feral Druid). Buff their group utility a bit as well (Imp. Sanctity -> 3% more damage, maybe 4%) and you're set.
#45 Jan 28 2008 at 8:55 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,503 posts
heres the bigger problem, and the root of all this:
we all know the spec needs adjusting. the spec even HAS been adjusted, back n forth, up and down, and back again. but the spec needs a true final adjustment. it needs a focus, some of which was given in 2.3

3 yrs! 3 yrs it took to get any kind of push for the Ret tree. part of that is the lack of support from fellow pallies. it almost seems like other pallies wish to hinder any kind of Ret revival. no other class is like this. its actually quite the opposite. usually when one spec is in need, the whole class cries together. everytime you hear a Ret pally ask for a break, he gets ************ and told to heal. not gonna make any progress with that kind of support.

Blizz probably doesn't want pallies as endgame dps but they sure do a good job of teasing the idea.

#46 Jan 28 2008 at 9:29 PM Rating: Good
tommyguns wrote:
heres the bigger problem, and the root of all this:
we all know the spec needs adjusting. the spec even HAS been adjusted, back n forth, up and down, and back again. but the spec needs a true final adjustment. it needs a focus, some of which was given in 2.3

3 yrs! 3 yrs it took to get any kind of push for the Ret tree. part of that is the lack of support from fellow pallies. it almost seems like other pallies wish to hinder any kind of Ret revival. no other class is like this. its actually quite the opposite. usually when one spec is in need, the whole class cries together. everytime you hear a Ret pally ask for a break, he gets ************ and told to heal. not gonna make any progress with that kind of support.

Blizz probably doesn't want pallies as endgame dps but they sure do a good job of teasing the idea.



And?

Pre-TBC, the following specs were 100% worthless in any serious content.

Feral Druids
Balance Druids
BM Hunters
Arcane Mages
Protection Paladins
Retribution Paladins
Shadow Priests
Assassination Rogues
Subtlety Rogues
Elemental Shaman
Enhancement Shaman
Demonology Warlocks
Affliction Warlocks
Arms Warriors

You really think Retadins are the only spec that was bad for a long time?
#47 Jan 28 2008 at 9:51 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,503 posts
point is: they all got their place, most when BC hit. Ret still doesnt get any love, just a mish mosh of half-thought talents and spells. hell even the Enh shammies got their +spell fixed.

Edit: its so bad, that every week i need to check my ability tooltips to make sure they still do the same thing from the week before.

Edited, Jan 29th 2008 12:54am by tommyguns
#48 Jan 29 2008 at 1:31 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
tommyguns wrote:
Edit: its so bad, that every week i need to check my ability tooltips to make sure they still do the same thing from the week before.


It's cute when people are naive enough to think Blizz will actually fix tooltips when they make changes. Smiley: wink

Edit: Oh, and Zip, I love my moonkin. Both of them(the one I raid with in 25 mans and the one we do ZA with). I love them lots. Granted, I'm a mage and a crit *****.

Edited, Jan 29th 2008 2:33am by Poldaran
#49 Jan 29 2008 at 1:53 AM Rating: Good
***
1,180 posts
A little background on me: I've played my paladin almost exclusively as holy, I levelled up as holy, raided as holy, have tanked a few instances as prot and never had more than 12 points in the retribution tree.

Paladin (and melee dps in general) is not something I've really been interested in, I have my mage or hunter for that.

I don't post in retribution threads, but if I gave advice on rer=tri at end game it would probably be that it will be very difficult to get into a good guild and you'll have to work hard to gear yourself up for it.

I'd imagine the 'ret sucks' camp do it because of ignorance/prejudice or laziness.

It is possible to calculate a ret paladins contribution to the raid, but as it's not as transparent as other classes plusses I'd imagine most people don't even bother to try.

A comparison probably would not be that difficult if you wanted to put the time into it (I can't say I'd be fussed, but it would be relativeley simple for someone motivated to do it).

For example, shadowpriests return x amount of the damage they cause to their group as mana regen.

This bored person over at elitist jerks has worked out ideal mp5 for various classes/specs from a ret pala keeping up JoW. Yes your holy paladin could do this, but it a) means one more person in melee range (if you take a ret paladin one would assume it is instead of another melee dps), and also one of your healers then has to focus on whatever happens in melee range (generally different to what happens at range) and avoid any knockbacks/silences, move with the boss where necessary and try to heal aswell. If JoW falls off then they have to spend time to reapply it, which is time not spent healing.

We've never had a ret paladin seriously interested in raiding (the one we did have didn't want to spend time gearing up and our only other one is an alt) so I've not tested this out in practice.

But assuming you have 3 paladins you could have JoCrusader (imp giving +3% crit to all), JoW and JoL. So you could work out amount of expected heatlh + mana return for your raid set up, the +crit is slightly harder as various classes get bonuses from crits, but you could be lazy and work out a base damage increase and then there's the measly 2% damage for all those grouped with the ret pala from imp sanct aura.

Personally I'm too lazy to work all that out, but still wouldn't be adverse to having a well motivated ret paladin in a raid with me.
#50 Jan 29 2008 at 5:09 AM Rating: Good
As I read this thread I can’t help feeling a little depressed.

I’ve been playing WoW (and reading these forums) for almost exactly a year now; my first ever MMRPG and by my own admission “I suck!” I could blame equipment. My PC is old and my broadband connection is JUST over 0.5mbps, but in reality I am less capable and slower than either. I will never be a member of a high flying raid guild or a top arena team and I will (probably) never walk around in all-epic gear.

But you know what? I couldn’t care less. I am enjoying the whole experience.

I have about 20 characters on three servers; none of which are above lvl42. I’m currently levelling my first Shaman (35) and a Pally (23) on my first PvP server. I’m following Jack’s ret/holy levelling build at the moment, but I don’t know what I will eventually do with him. I’ll probably become a healer, but I’ve got three Priests; one in each discipline and I’ve never tried tanking, so I may go that way. Reading this though I may just go for the Ret route, or even a shockadin?

My (rather long-winded) point is that it doesn’t matter. You pay’s your money and play the way you want to. If someone wants to play a ret Pally for the experience, or to see where they can take the build, so what? Whatever floats your boat as they say.

My vote goes with CapJack. A little light-hearted ribbing is all part of the experience; but when someone asks for help with a ret build they probably know its limitations and reputation. Don’t they deserve the same respect as everyone else? You never know, if Blizz ever does fix Ret, those persevering Retadins could become kick-*** exponents of the build!
#51 Jan 29 2008 at 7:16 AM Rating: Good
***
1,117 posts
Cap, I agree whole-heartedly.

I'm sick of people bashing on others because they don't like a certain spec.

I've played all three specs in end game content, and have the experience to know that they all bring things to a raid/group. In no way is one better than the other, except in purpose.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 278 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (278)