Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Leather?Follow

#1 Jan 26 2008 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
I had been told that Warlock gets leather at 40, now I'm 40 and can't find where to get it.. Can anyone tell me?
#2REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2008 at 4:31 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) lol i hope this is a serious post
#3 Jan 26 2008 at 4:41 PM Rating: Default
If it actually somehow is serious, you cant get leather proficiency for warlocks. You will never wear anything above cloth.

If it isnt serious and (what I believe) is an obvious troll, gtfo my face.

Edit: I just answered to him, and since I believe this is a troll, dont feed this thread anymore with other posts please, if it was sincere question, he has had his answer, if hes a troll he should go away.

Edited, Jan 26th 2008 7:42pm by muffinyumyum
#4REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2008 at 5:44 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) WTF I thought all Locks got plate at 40 wtf haxor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#5 Jan 26 2008 at 7:16 PM Rating: Good
***
2,754 posts
we did back in betas... but not since then
#6 Jan 26 2008 at 8:57 PM Rating: Default
*
158 posts
Ive heard that locks will be able to wear leather in the next xpack.
#7 Jan 27 2008 at 1:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
423 posts
Yeah baby ,S&M
#8 Jan 28 2008 at 7:59 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,754 posts
only the gnome warlocks. high heels, tight black leather with S&M whip
#9 Jan 28 2008 at 8:27 AM Rating: Decent
**
439 posts
Our succy's wear skimpy leather. Isn't that enough?
#10 Feb 11 2008 at 5:47 AM Rating: Default
*
74 posts
Quote:
Our succy's wear skimpy leather. Isn't that enough?


errr... no
#11 Feb 11 2008 at 6:35 AM Rating: Good
***
2,754 posts
we don't need leather. /end
#12 Feb 11 2008 at 6:38 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,069 posts
Jenovaomega wrote:
we don't need leather. /end


True, plus, if you want a warlock with more armor, roll one of those new classes in the expansion.
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#13 Feb 11 2008 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
I have honestly never seen, played or heard of any heavy casting class to ever have the ability to use anything over cloth or the lightest quality armor. What would make WoW any different? I'm perfectly fine with my cloth. Leather just wouldn't seem right on a caster.
#14 Feb 11 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,245 posts
HandsOfDeath wrote:
I have honestly never seen, played or heard of any heavy casting class to ever have the ability to use anything over cloth or the lightest quality armor. What would make WoW any different? I'm perfectly fine with my cloth. Leather just wouldn't seem right on a caster.


Elemental shaman are full casters. Their melee is hardly better than a clothie class's, they are full casters.
#15 Feb 11 2008 at 2:28 PM Rating: Default
**
459 posts
HandsOfDeath wrote:
I have honestly never seen, played or heard of any heavy casting class to ever have the ability to use anything over cloth or the lightest quality armor. What would make WoW any different? I'm perfectly fine with my cloth. Leather just wouldn't seem right on a caster.


Back in EverQuest (which sucks btw) clerics (priests) wore plate armor.
#16 Feb 14 2008 at 10:59 AM Rating: Default
***
2,029 posts
Quote:
I have honestly never seen, played or heard of any heavy casting class to ever have the ability to use anything over cloth or the lightest quality armor. What would make WoW any different? I'm perfectly fine with my cloth. Leather just wouldn't seem right on a caster.

Elemental shammies, Doomkin (basically plate).
#17 Feb 14 2008 at 7:30 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,754 posts
OOMkins are leather with plate armour value. 450% armour increase ftw. they easily have 10k in pve, probably over 15k in pvp gear.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 233 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (233)