Bigdaddyjug wrote:
I have a shaman I levelled from 1-70 as mostly ele ( a little bit of enhance early on but this was before dual-wielding shamans and enhance got boring) and another I levelled from 1-45 purely as enhance.
So you've leveled two Shaman to 70, Enhancement both times... I'm curious how this leads you to believe that you've leveled "mostly ele" and that you're justified in calling Elemental a viable leveling spec from 1-70. Could you be more specific on what "mostly ele" details for you? From the way you're talking, it sounds like you were around at least 40 both times before you respecced, which is not leveling 1-70 as "mostly ele".
Quote:
Maybe you should stop talking out of your...rear, and not assume that you have more experience than everybody else.
I've also leveled two Shaman. The one I leveled to 40 as Elemental I quit playing because I didn't want to melee either but leveling as Elemental was way too painful. The second time I bit the bullet and just leveled Enhancement. It was still painful until 40 (this was before the 2.3 buff to Enhancement), but immeasurably less so. And it was also immeasurably
faster. I can only imagine how much faster and easier it is now with Shamanistic Rage at 20.
Quote:
And telling somebody that hates melee to roll a lock or mage. Come on man. Ele shaman is a fine spec as is boomkin for druids. If you want to have an elemental shaman at 70, you may as well level as it and learn as much as you can about the spec.
You don't have to like what I have to say, but that doesn't make it wrong.
Rogues that want to be Assassination or Subtlety still level Combat. Warriors that want to tank still level Arms or Fury. Druids level Feral. Priests that want to heal still level Shadow. Are you noticing a pattern here?
There's no reason
not to level with your class' fastest leveling spec. You'll spend
far more time from 60-70+ in Outland than you will leveling from 1-58. You're only making it that much harder on yourself and making it take that much longer to play what you really want to by refusing to do so.
Quote:
Edit: If you haven't noticed, there's not really a whole lot of cloth or leather with +dmg at low levels. Blizz just doesn't itemize items with more than 1 or 2 +spell damage until they the level 30 range (the dagger from SM is what I'm thinking of).
Immaterial. Melee classes get all the AP and crit they need from str and agi until Outland, which is
readily available on numerous pieces of rare leather and mail in dungeons. Conversely, int does not translate directly into more spell damage. You get a
little bit of spell crit out of it, but certainly not enough to villify your crit-reliant mana efficiency.
Quote:
... you will see that it is quite easy to stack a few hundred spell damage and a some decent spell crit in Outland before you even leave HfP.
Right. Which would mean you're in Outland... which means you'll have Water Shield in four or five levels tops (assuming you go at 58)... so... why are we not waiting until Outland and Water Shield again?