Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

+spell damage and SoCFollow

#1 Jan 14 2008 at 6:49 AM Rating: Good
**
277 posts
Just a quick question.

I had a tankadin tell me a couple of days ago that Seal of Command no longer received any benefit from +spell damage. He then proceeded to tell me that with this change, I was better off using Seal of Righteousness at all times...even while using my 3.6 speed Oathkeeper.

This goes against everything I have learned from these boards. And I am pretty sure that this is incorrect since my SoC still hits for more than my white damage whenever it procs. If this change was made wouldn't it make SoC worthless?

I didn't see anything in the patch notes about any changes....anyone know about this? Or was this guy misinformed.
#2 Jan 14 2008 at 7:10 AM Rating: Good
*
127 posts
They were probably talking about this change from the latest patch, which does not actually affect SoC.

Quote:
Crusader Strike (Retribution) now causes 110% of weapon damage and no longer gains any bonus from spell damage.


#3 Jan 14 2008 at 8:09 AM Rating: Excellent
**
648 posts
yeah, SoC still benefits from 20% spell damage. Crusader strike was the only one that changed. if you use JoC much that still benefits from 43% of your spell damage too. are you holy or ret though? if your ret spec the change to crusader strike doesn't mean switch to abilities that do use spell damage. It means we can stack more AP and not worry about stacking spell damage more. Strength/AP will still boost your overall dps more. If you're holy you should be using improved SoR anyway, since you'll have less str and more spell damage.
#4 Jan 14 2008 at 8:31 AM Rating: Good
**
277 posts
Thanks guys. I don't even have Crusader strike. This guy must have misread the patch notes.

I'm using a Holy/Ret build at the moment until I finish all quests and switch into Holy/Prot spec for permanent healing. So 2 full sets of gear. One for healing and one for 2H dps.

Yeah, Yeah...crazy. (Everyone keeps telling me that) But I'm still a new 70 and it's working for me at the moment. I anticipate finsihing up all the quest lines in the last two zones during the next 2 weeks and then settling into a healbot role.

#5 Jan 14 2008 at 9:31 AM Rating: Good
**
648 posts
Paladense wrote:
Thanks guys. I don't even have Crusader strike. This guy must have misread the patch notes.

I'm using a Holy/Ret build at the moment until I finish all quests and switch into Holy/Prot spec for permanent healing. So 2 full sets of gear. One for healing and one for 2H dps.

Yeah, Yeah...crazy. (Everyone keeps telling me that) But I'm still a new 70 and it's working for me at the moment. I anticipate finsihing up all the quest lines in the last two zones during the next 2 weeks and then settling into a healbot role.



to be honest, the biggest problem with holy/ret specs is that holy and ret pallys deal damage in very different ways. holy pallys deal primarily spell damage while rets deal mostly melee based damage. the first 2 tiers in ret have some good talents to boost holy damage, but beyond that your return on investment is minimal unless you're going all the way down the tree. if you're looking to solo a little faster, i'd recommend benediction for cheaper seals/judgments, improved SotC, and improved judgment. talents beyond that would be better spent in improved SoR and improving your healing.

i do reccomend 2 sets of gear. one for healing and one stacking as much +spell damage as you can.

#6 Jan 14 2008 at 10:27 AM Rating: Good
**
277 posts
I never solo with this character. I'm always teamed up with a warrior. I think I only have 16 points in Ret and the rest is in Holy. I put just enough in for Imp. SoCr and SoC to make my 2-hander somewhat functional. I focus on melee damage and keep my mana for the occassional "oh-sh*t" heals. So far I am enjoying my current build and the warrior/pally duo is a force to be reckoned with. I know my build will become 100% useless once I run out of quests and change my focus to instance healing. But i'm going to enjoy it while I can.
#7 Jan 14 2008 at 11:15 AM Rating: Decent
**
648 posts
i can't make you change obviously. just so you know where i'm coming from i have 2 pallys at 70. my first is holy and my second is ret. before i got my ret to 70 i played around with how to deal damage on my holy pally. for a little while had 16 in ret like you do. wanted that 5% crit and SoC. in the end i settled on the 51/0/10 build that i was talking about. my holy is still that way. with a simple gear change i can either heal in heroics/kara or dps in regular 70 instances keeping up with most non-raid geared dps'ers.

we had a shaman switch from elemental to resto to be another healer for kara, and while he was still working on his gear and learning to heal in 70's i would go as dps and backup healing when necessary. i can't tell you how to play, but i cn tell you that as a primarily holy spec pally, your best bet for maximizing your dps is to rely on SoR and spell damage not melee damage. upside of this is when i need to cast that emergency heal it will still hit hard enough to make the difference without killing my mana pool. my ret will cast that heal if necessary, but to use SoC and CS effectively you need to stack melee stats which will be less compatible with your spec and not allow you quite the healing utility. i vendored Oathkeeper long ago in favor of a spell damage 1h and shield for more dps (trust me it does work that way for holy) and better survivability.

on the other hand i love swinging a big 2h'er as a pally... thats why i rolled a ret pally too. wanted to make another pally to be prot, but i think that'd be too many pallys haha. so i'm starting to level a warrior to tank with.
#8 Jan 14 2008 at 12:02 PM Rating: Good
**
277 posts
I'm always open to advice Toolofjesus. I hope I didn't make you think I wasn't willing to listen. I will definitely be switching over to a one-hand and shield in a week or two. And will switch to using SoR as my mainstay. But I'm milking my 2-h for all it's worth before I make the switch. I've been using this strategy for about 9 levels now. And it works like a charm for me. I don't have survivability issues since I duo with the warrior. He can pull aggro and I can fall back to healing whenever necessary. And I have enough mana and +heal/dmg gear on to heal through 90% of the stuff without switching to healing gear...because he always seems to be getting himself in trouble and needs me to save the day. Plus with all those points in Holy...even my worst heals aren't too bad.

You may be correct about me getting more dps out of a one-hander with my Holy build. I'm just not quite ready to go that route yet. I'm set in my ways :-)

I'm curious why you went 51/0/10 though. Everyone has told me that the shield skills from protection are far more important for a Holy pally than the skills from Ret. Doesn't the lack of those skills impact your survivability in heriocs? Not knocking you or anything...I'm genuinely curious.
#9 Jan 14 2008 at 3:26 PM Rating: Decent
**
300 posts
Quote:
I'm curious why you went 51/0/10 though. Everyone has told me that the shield skills from protection are far more important for a Holy pally than the skills from Ret. Doesn't the lack of those skills impact your survivability in heriocs? Not knocking you or anything...I'm genuinely curious.


51/0/10 is a shockadin set up. Unlike the traditional 40/0/21 build, this one leans more towards healing than damage.

As for shield skills in prot, it won't help much even if you are getting hit in heroics (which you shouldn't). That's the tank's job. To be honest, neither of the tier 1 defense skills are that great.
#10 Jan 14 2008 at 3:35 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Quote:
yeah, SoC still benefits from 20% spell damage.


Actually since JotC is Holy Damage SOC get 29% spell coefficient.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#11 Jan 14 2008 at 3:52 PM Rating: Good
Paladense wrote:
I'm curious why you went 51/0/10 though. Everyone has told me that the shield skills from protection are far more important for a Holy pally than the skills from Ret.


As a holy paladin, if you're taking damage letting redoubt proc, then either you're doing something wrong, or your tank is. Shield talents benefit protection paladins, and POSSIBLY people in PvP, but they should never come into play in an instance, heroic, or raid for a holy paladin.
#12 Jan 14 2008 at 4:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
If you are a PvE only pally 51 Holy is as good as anything.

Lot of Pallies go Holy/Prot for PvE goodness and to augment PvP play. On vashj I know having Guardians favor means I can solo BoF a tank during root. Some guilds use a shammy to deal with that, but hey when you dont have a shammy every week it will do just fine. The other pallies who didnt have it had to stack rotations to be safe.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#13 Jan 14 2008 at 6:03 PM Rating: Decent
**
648 posts
Paladense wrote:
I'm curious why you went 51/0/10 though. Everyone has told me that the shield skills from protection are far more important for a Holy pally than the skills from Ret. Doesn't the lack of those skills impact your survivability in heriocs? Not knocking you or anything...I'm genuinely curious.


before i started playing with the holy/ret builds i was 50/11/0 for instance healing. when i get my other healers in my guild to a point where we can get a Kara group together i'll probbly switch back to kings. honestly kings is the only thing in prot i'd want. first and scond tier is pretty well useless for me in PVE. if it wasn't for kings i'd stick with my 51/0/10 spec. those 10 points in ret allow for more dps for less mana.

edit: that extra dps is really only useful in solo play and if played well, regular instances. i don't really recommend trying to be holy dps for much else... thats what ret is for.

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 9:07pm by toolofjesus
#14 Jan 16 2008 at 7:45 AM Rating: Default
i will no longer read anything toolofjesus writes untill some changes are made.


Quote:
on the other hand i love swinging a big 2h'er as a pally... thats why i rolled a ret pally too. wanted to make another pally to be prot, but i think that'd be too many pallys haha. so i'm starting to level a warrior to tank with.


i want this quote to be changed to.

Quote:
on the other hand i love swining a big 2h'er as a pally... thats why i rolled a ret pally too. wanted to make another pally to be prot, but i'm holding off for a few days cause i want to gear ret some first. then i'll make a prot pally cause tankadins are the best pallies in the game.


once that is changed then i will listen to you : P
#15 Jan 16 2008 at 10:34 AM Rating: Decent
**
648 posts
punkspider wrote:
i will no longer read anything toolofjesus writes untill some changes are made.


Quote:
on the other hand i love swinging a big 2h'er as a pally... thats why i rolled a ret pally too. wanted to make another pally to be prot, but i think that'd be too many pallys haha. so i'm starting to level a warrior to tank with.


i want this quote to be changed to.

Quote:
on the other hand i love swining a big 2h'er as a pally... thats why i rolled a ret pally too. wanted to make another pally to be prot, but i'm holding off for a few days cause i want to gear ret some first. then i'll make a prot pally cause tankadins are the best pallies in the game.


once that is changed then i will listen to you : P



lol, good changes there punk... i get enough people questioning my sanity for having 2 pallys already... while i'd love another, it would settle it that i've lost my sanity.... hmm, perhaps... actually punk, i've gone the easy way for prot and i'm just farming prot gear on my healadin and when i get a full set i'll be able to respec when needed. but who knows maybe i'll eventually level up my third pally, apollos, as a skinner/enchanter to make use of the aoe farming though. we'll see. i want to level up another class first though for some more variety.
#16 Jan 16 2008 at 11:21 PM Rating: Decent
**
286 posts
Meh, don't feel bad about having 2 pallies. I've got 2 pallies and 2 druids. Basically...I just don't really like any of the non-hybrid classes. I must be able to heal...and I can't stand playing a priest (I've tried...like 4 times, and I can't even get one to level 10.)

Granted, one of the pallies and one of the druids is still low-ish, but my balance druid is in OL, and my prot pally will be there soon. Oh...and then there's my shaman (who's actually my highest level char, even though I'm loathe to play her right now because I need about 400 thorium to get my blacksmithing to 300 :( )
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 165 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (165)