Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Shadowstep PvE?Follow

#1 Jan 13 2008 at 4:21 PM Rating: Default
Hey all,

Lvl 52 Rogue here, im getting kinda bored with Combat Spec, so i've tried to come up with a build, looking for some high burst damage, so ive gone with Shadowstep, I don't really wanna hear 'stick with combat swords' or 'combat swords is the best/fastest', just suggestions, thanks :)

Also ive got 2 swords atm, is it possible to use shadowstep without daggers?

http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/rogue/talents.html?0253001050000000000000000000000000000000000005002530032301213501351

Cheers, Speed



Edited, Jan 14th 2008 1:14am by Speedburst
#2 Jan 13 2008 at 10:51 PM Rating: Good
*
207 posts
You don't have to use daggers with a shadowstep build build, any weapon will do. (just don't take any talents that rely on dagger based attacks like imp ambush and such) However, you're going to miss out on any weapon specialization talents within the combat tree (other than daggers) if you choose to do so.

As for the burst damage capabilities of ShS... I honestly wouldn't know since I haven't played with it too much
#3 Jan 14 2008 at 2:14 AM Rating: Default
ty for your help jon, seriously everyone..

STOP BEING FOLLOWERS..

Everyone saying that Combat Swords is better is most likely a follower who hasn't even played a rogue before.. (lol), respec'ing to ShS build was the best thing i have ever done for this rogue, NO the damage does not suck, its only a little lower than SS and thats because i havent gotten any of the assasination crit talents yet, the CP regen is awesome..again without the assas talents to increase the rate.. besides the fact that Shadowstep is the fun most thing i have ever come across :D

/endrant

Speed
#5 Jan 14 2008 at 2:30 AM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Sorry but you're wrong. Its a proven fact that Combat Swords does more DPS than any other build for PvE.

A. Neither of you are 70, so you really can't talk.
B. Sure cite examples where you did more DPS, unless you had identical/equivalent gear to the other player, and have the exact same skill as the other player then it doesn't mean jack sh*t.
C.Trying to do the best DPS you can, I.E trying to play to the best of your ability is not being a follower.

If you want to do ShS for fun, feel free, but it will not do the same DPS as Combat Swords.

No, ShS does not suck nearly as bad as it used to, thats because it been getting buffed over the past few patches.

Combat Swords is still better. This is not my personal opinion, this has been determined by many Rogues over the course of many tests and data collections.

So unless you can give complete statistical proof that ShS is better then Combat Swords please shut the @#%^ up.

EDIT: Forgot to mention, ShS is burst damage, not sustained. Thus it doesn't matter how high your crits are, you still aren't doing as much Damage over the course of a boss fight, or dungeon.

EDIT2: And to Speed, yes of course, anyone who plays as Combat Swords clearly has never played Rogue before. Check the Elitist Jerks forums, or even these forums and ask how many of the high level raiders play Combat Swords when they aren't experimenting for sh*ts and giggles.

EDIT3: Also, if you're gonna use that build it could be better, drop Remorseless attacks for Murder. Lose a point in initiative for Ghostly Strike.

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 5:31am by GodOfMoo

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 5:33am by GodOfMoo

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 6:05am by GodOfMoo
#6 Jan 14 2008 at 12:30 PM Rating: Decent
i'm combat maces and you will NEVER do as much damage as me. combat swords statistically IS the highest dps. i'm combat maces for some pvp on the side. shs is intriguing, i might ***** around with it at some point. but i DO NOT expect to be doing more damage. i expect to be doing at least 5% less damage....you miss out on too many key talents going that far into sub. like precision or those 3rd tier assassination talents that can really shoot your damage up. maybe when the level cap goes to 80...
#7 Jan 14 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Speedburst wrote:
STOP BEING FOLLOWERS..

Stop thinking that being a "rebel" by speccing into a sub-par talent build makes you cool, original, unique, or special.

Quote:
Everyone saying that Combat Swords is better is most likely a follower who hasn't even played a rogue before..

Have you?
Quote:
(lol)

This is about the point in your post where I really did start to laugh.

Quote:
respec'ing to ShS build was the best thing i have ever done for this rogue

"This" rogue? Do you have other rogues? It's interesting that you wouldn't refer to your rogue as "your" rogue. I smell an eBayer (or a *********

Quote:
NO the damage does not suck

Compared to Combat Swords, yes, it does.

Quote:
its only a little lower than SS and thats because i havent gotten any of the assasination crit talents yet

Combat Swords gets all of those crit talents as well.

Quote:
the CP regen is awesome

Yes, Initiative and Hemorrhage will yield better CP generation than Combat Swords. Now compare ShS to Mutilate. Game, set, match.

Quote:
..again without the assas talents to increase the rate..

See above.

Quote:
besides the fact that Shadowstep is the fun most thing i have ever come across :D

This is just about the only reason that any rogue should ever spec into ShS. For any other reason, there's a better build. This is also a huge problem in my eyes, that our "PvP" tree is laughable compared to any other spec, even in PvP. Nerfing Hemo and buffing ShS and Sinister Calling slightly won't make ShS any less of a "neat trick" that's easily ignored and painfully neglected.

Quote:
/endrant

/endpwn
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#8 Jan 14 2008 at 2:11 PM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
With the buffs to hemo and step the difference between step and combat swords isn't nearly as big as you would think. Latest spreadsheet estimates(using my gear - S2 swords, t5/t4 gear) a 20/0/41 build about 3.5% behind combat swords build(and that's gemmed for combat not sinister calling) also includes hemo debuff so say a 5man. Raid buffed the difference is smaller as deadliness and SC scale extremely well with buffs, down to a 2.5% difference.

I lvled as step before the buff(11 months ago, lol) and it was extremely effective and gives you more options(prep, etc), but combat is still the best soloing spec, there in no substitute for BF+AR and comparing solo builds(no hemo debuff added) combat wins by about 15%.

The real problem with shst build is the lack of hit rating, but this can be helped by changing the spec slightly to 11/9/41 and picking up 2 in imp SnD and 2 in precision. This brings the difference down to 1.2% for raid buffed comparison.

Conclusion: combat is the better all around build, shst is a great 1v1 build and performs nearly as well in certain raid situations but requires optimum buffs to keep up with a pure combat build.
#9 Jan 14 2008 at 4:17 PM Rating: Decent
to mahlerite:

thanks for being wrong. you don't even get improved dual wield with the spec that you suggested. there is no way that you are right. you are correct that one of the main problems with the shs build is hit (i myself suggested this and you RESUGGESTED this down below), it does not make up for lethality, etc...it is gimp! do you know how much extra hit rating is needed to make up for that 3%, do you know how much worse your combat cycles are going to be only taking 2/3 imp slice and dice? give up defending it.

also, you say it's a good 1v1 build. agreed, but this person is leveling up and shouldn't be concerned with this. all i can say is have fun with your inefficient spec, and enjoy being lower on the damage meter to someone who doesn't want to play a gimped out rogue...

and to any response you have, idc because i know in my heart of hearts that you are wrong.
#10 Jan 14 2008 at 4:36 PM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
Combat swords isn't, in fact, any "better" than shadowstep, muti or whatever.

It is, in fact more efficient at killing mobs and getting your xp/hour up unless you totally ***** up your attack rotation. I personally prefer this playstyle for soloing and for 5-mans. My regular team seems pretty happy with it as well.

The "best" build is the one you enjoy playing. It's a game, right? Meant to be enjoyable?

(and... done beating a dead horse)
#11 Jan 14 2008 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
to mahlerite:

thanks for being wrong. you don't even get improved dual wield with the spec that you suggested. there is no way that you are right. you are correct that one of the main problems with the shs build is hit (i myself suggested this and you RESUGGESTED this down below), it does not make up for lethality, etc...it is gimp! do you know how much extra hit rating is needed to make up for that 3%, do you know how much worse your combat cycles are going to be only taking 2/3 imp slice and dice? give up defending it.

also, you say it's a good 1v1 build. agreed, but this person is leveling up and shouldn't be concerned with this. all i can say is have fun with your inefficient spec, and enjoy being lower on the damage meter to someone who doesn't want to play a gimped out rogue...

and to any response you have, idc because i know in my heart of hearts that you are wrong.


Except he probably has more experience with deep Sub than you, I'll take his word over yours any day. ShS/Deep sub isn't that horrible of a spec if you can gear yourself properly for it, you'll never be as competitive as a Combat Swords Rogue, but you shouldn't be that far behind either. I am willing to guess around 100-150 DPS lost personally to somewhere around 50 DPS gained for the melee DPS. You probably make up more ground once the threshold for Dirty Deeds (I think thats the talent) is met.

And therion, so basically what you are implying that instead of doing more damage you want to do less damage because you feel or want to be a certain a spec other than Combat.

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 7:45pm by ElementHuman
#12 Jan 14 2008 at 5:37 PM Rating: Default
***
3,909 posts
I'm pretty sure he can play whatever ******* spec he wants without being stupid. You can't call someone stupid because they made a choice you don't like. That's like "Woah, you eat light rye bread instead of wholemeal. You're a total health food nub."
#13 Jan 14 2008 at 6:27 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,550 posts
No, we aren't saying he is stupid for doing ShS. It's his choice, and hell, I've thought of doing it too.

We are saying he is stupid for ignoring every piece of data that has been collected over the years that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Combat Swords=best DPS.

Also calling him stupid for the extremely sub-par quality of his post.
#14 Jan 14 2008 at 7:22 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
The funny thing is that the OP hasn't actually stated anywhere that ShS is better than Combat Swords. You've reached that conclusion all by your lonesome. In fact, you've told him to spec combat swords, which

Quote:
I don't really wanna hear 'stick with combat swords' or 'combat swords is the best/fastest', just suggestions, thanks :)


he actually asked you not to do.

Whether or not combat swords does more damage (which it does) is irrelevant, because he's just stated right there that he wants a change from combat swords.
#15 Jan 14 2008 at 7:29 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
The funny thing is that the OP hasn't actually stated anywhere that ShS is better than Combat Swords. You've reached that conclusion all by your lonesome. In fact, you've told him to spec combat swords, which

Quote:
I don't really wanna hear 'stick with combat swords' or 'combat swords is the best/fastest', just suggestions, thanks :)


he actually asked you not to do.

Whether or not combat swords does more damage (which it does) is irrelevant, because he's just stated right there that he wants a change from combat swords.


Actually if you read and follow the thread properly you can see how we got to this point, basically his questioned was answered right away, but he then did his little rant as a final reply in which certain wrong details were placed i.e. -
Quote:
Everyone saying that Combat Swords is better is most likely a follower who hasn't even played a rogue before..


So I ask of you to read more than just the original post before you post yourself...
#16 Jan 14 2008 at 7:43 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
zepoodle wrote:
The funny thing is that the OP hasn't actually stated anywhere that ShS is better than Combat Swords. You've reached that conclusion all by your lonesome. In fact, you've told him to spec combat swords, which

Quote:
I don't really wanna hear 'stick with combat swords' or 'combat swords is the best/fastest', just suggestions, thanks :)


he actually asked you not to do.

Whether or not combat swords does more damage (which it does) is irrelevant, because he's just stated right there that he wants a change from combat swords.

The OP is a mouth-breathing, degenerate mutant who possesses about as much understanding of rogue mechanics as a blind man does of the rainbow. Just because he doesn't want me to tell him to stick with Combat Swords doesn't mean I can't, just like saying that all proponents of Combat Swords are "followers" doesn't make it true.

Being a pedantic prick is my job, and only when it's funny. GTFO.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#17 Jan 14 2008 at 7:53 PM Rating: Decent
what the hell do i care if you take his word over mine for being deep sub. you're damn straight he has more experience than i do at that, i'm not a scrub. i'm not going to gimp myself and my raid and pick something that's only going to give me kicks and giggles.

edit:

and i like how in the end you sided with me anyway--thanks for arguing with me for the sake of nothing lol.

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 10:54pm by lessonsinlogic
#18 Jan 14 2008 at 8:06 PM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
Quote:
And therion, so basically what you are implying that instead of doing more damage you want to do less damage because you feel or want to be a certain a spec other than Combat.

What I was trying to say -- unclearly, sorry -- is that if playstyle is the most important thing then no spec is necessarily "better" or "worse." That aspect of game play is personal choice. That's all I meant.

Combat has been clearly proven to be more efficient (that's the key word) for those of us that place the importance on higher dps and getting every last bit of xp/hour. I dig smacking mobs, ruling the damage meters and scoring huge crits. My regular team seems to like it too. That's what makes playing this rogue fun for me.

But if Speedburst wants to Shadow Step his way to 70 because it's more fun for him... well, then, good for him. Not everyone thinks efficiency = fun.

Hope that clears up my previous post. Thanks and be well,
#19 Jan 14 2008 at 9:35 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,550 posts
I suppose its leftover from FFXI, but I find myself a little insulted when someone doesn't bring their best.

It doesn't matter if you are working your *** off, if you are using a spec that you know is not as good in groups as another. You are purposely gimping the group.

Now, going ShS instead of Combat swords won't fail the group, assuming you bring your A game. But you still aren't preforming to the best of your ability.

If he wants to level with it fine, but if he does any serious PvE at 70 he should go to swords.
#20 Jan 14 2008 at 11:31 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Not everyone thinks efficiency = fun.


Sorry for making the big arguments guys.. This is kinda what i was trying to say, before leveling used to be a little boring doing the same, Spam SS, Slice and Dice, Spam SS a little more, eviscerate etc etc., now i actually want to level my rogue because of the amazing move (IMO) called Shadowstep.

Speed
#21 Jan 15 2008 at 3:08 AM Rating: Good
Speedburst wrote:
before leveling used to be a little boring doing the same, Spam SS, Slice and Dice, Spam SS a little more, eviscerate etc etc., now i actually want to level my rogue because of the amazing move (IMO) called Shadowstep.

Wait, so you felt things were too repetitive when you used the same four or five abilities a lot... And respecced to focus on using one ability over and over?
#22 Jan 15 2008 at 3:36 AM Rating: Default
Quote:

Wait, so you felt things were too repetitive when you used the same four or five abilities a lot... And respecced to focus on using one ability over and over?


Lol, brings me back to my first point.. i get 2 combo points from using Cheap Shot, so im using Kidney Shot alot more, so im using more moves than combat..
#23 Jan 15 2008 at 5:12 AM Rating: Default
I don't get all bent around the stat sheets and all that mess, however, I can offer some insight from experience in both deep Combat and deep Subtlety. As far as ShS goes, I find it pretty useful in battlegrounds (basic honor farming) as well as straight up farming (rep, grinding, etc). The improved attack power, agility,and dirty deeds go a long way on heavy burst damage. Preparation helps a ton too when you take on one too many mobs and need an extra vanish or evasion. In all honesty, it really just makes those endeavors more "fun" if you will. As far as 5 mans and raiding goes, yea ShS is "ok" if you stack on tons of hit rating, but I did more consistent damage and missed less as Combat swords. In addition, you can replace some hit rating gems (from the boosted hit chance from precision) with others with stats you are lacking on. Precision, dual weapon spec., imp. slice and dice, AR, BF, etc.. are key components for keeping my dps up and continuous. In my personal opinion, I say just play whatever you think is fun; it is just a game afterall. However, if you have a certain goal you want to reach, its best to explore what other players have done and are doing that pertain to what you're looking to accomplish. If you want to have solid dps, I'd vouch for Combat swords. If you like having a bag of tricks with some nice burst damage, I'd say go for ShS. Both can be highly effective for different purposes, as long as you have the gear and stats (hit rating for dps) that are needed.
#24 Jan 15 2008 at 5:35 AM Rating: Decent
*
210 posts
i really dont care which is the best, use what you want to.. but be aware, might cost you a raid spot.

also the damage really isn't that different, i've switch to pvp on my rogue from raiding and my guild dragged my *** into a raid the other night cause they were short a melee. the raid is all sitting in kara/t4/ssc/tk gear, the other rogues were around 2k buffed maybe hitting 2200ap, im sitting there with 274hit and 2800ap, with some proc's im at 3300ap.

thats a lot of ap for the others to make up on me.. long story short 2nd in dmg over a warlock with a boomkin, sprist and elem shaman.. dont over look dirty deeds on long boss fights.. you could spend 2minutes on a boss 35%-0 2mins of 20% more damage, it adds up.

swords is nice, but i loved 11/27/23 this was such a nice build for raiding and would destroy swords. then PoS blizzard had to nerf hemo.


last thing once you get even further in end-game your crit starts getting up there but 25% is pretty easy to get without malice.. so further more i really could see a -/21/40 build owning other rogues. put the one point in BF for more haste or 1 in sword.... for that 1% chance of extra hit, id take the BF.
you'd see some nasty numbers with that.. BT 26crit 4kAP with a few procs, DWspec
just shooting the siht tho.. maybe not who knows until someone actually tries it and stop going on info that could be 2years old.
#25 Jan 15 2008 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
Lessinlogic? wrote:
Quote:
to mahlerite:

thanks for being wrong. you don't even get improved dual wield with the spec that you suggested. there is no way that you are right. you are correct that one of the main problems with the shs build is hit (i myself suggested this and you RESUGGESTED this down below), it does not make up for lethality, etc...it is gimp! do you know how much extra hit rating is needed to make up for that 3%, do you know how much worse your combat cycles are going to be only taking 2/3 imp slice and dice? give up defending it.

also, you say it's a good 1v1 build. agreed, but this person is leveling up and shouldn't be concerned with this. all i can say is have fun with your inefficient spec, and enjoy being lower on the damage meter to someone who doesn't want to play a gimped out rogue...

and to any response you have, idc because i know in my heart of hearts that you are wrong.


Read a little closer next time, i wasn't supporting the build nor would i use it outside of kara or pvp, just pointing out what the latest spreadsheet #s say with my current gear.

I'll reiterate: the latest spreadsheet(at rogue.raidcal.com) indicates the difference between combat swords and an 11/9/41 step build is less than 2% with the same raid buffs. The hemo debuff is estimated at 125dps, the spreadsheet 'assumes a 1/7th uptime for one Rogue and that the raid crit rate is about 25%. Also, armor is taken into account.' With 420 extra dam possible from every hemo an extra 125dps seems very reasonable.

You also posed several questions:
-3% more hit is aprox 47 more hit rating. Hit rating is not as important for a step build as it doesn't rely on combat potency procs for energy.
-Lethality is crap dam(aprox an extra 2% more dam RAID BUFFED for any non crit build, ie non-dagger/fist) there are better places for 5 talent pts in a trispec or step build.
-Cycles would be 2s/5r with 2/3 in imp SnD with the 2pc t4 set bonus, without the t4, 3s/5r. Cycles are actually much easier with a hemo spec, as there aren't any 'suprises' in energy regen as the build has no combat potency.
#26 Jan 15 2008 at 12:48 PM Rating: Default
The Demea of Doom wrote:
zepoodle wrote:
The funny thing is that the OP hasn't actually stated anywhere that ShS is better than Combat Swords. You've reached that conclusion all by your lonesome. In fact, you've told him to spec combat swords, which

Quote:
I don't really wanna hear 'stick with combat swords' or 'combat swords is the best/fastest', just suggestions, thanks :)


he actually asked you not to do.

Whether or not combat swords does more damage (which it does) is irrelevant, because he's just stated right there that he wants a change from combat swords.

The OP is a mouth-breathing, degenerate mutant who possesses about as much understanding of rogue mechanics as a blind man does of the rainbow. Just because he doesn't want me to tell him to stick with Combat Swords doesn't mean I can't, just like saying that all proponents of Combat Swords are "followers" doesn't make it true.

Being a pedantic prick is my job, and only when it's funny. GTFO.


*cough cough* you forgot pontificating ^^
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 170 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (170)