Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Spell haste vs crit?Follow

#27 Jan 12 2008 at 2:02 PM Rating: Decent
**
821 posts
so be a good loser and quit giving sh*te to people who might get trapped into thinking that the bull you write might have anything to do with reality.

-correction: you are just 10 spelldamage short since your fel armor gives you 130 spelldmg i believe.


i really wanna see you whoop out your t6 gear, so you have the stats you claim you
got.

I am surely not creating a straw mans argument here, you just use plain fictive figures, claiming you´ve got these kind of stats.

Demonology is superior to Destro in t5 content.

As i said i´ll wws you anytime in ssc/tk.

i am really thankfull about what you taught me, but i fear this time you are wrong, especially since you´ve never really gave it a real try.

Edited, Jan 12th 2008 5:30pm by Oakenwrath
#28 Jan 12 2008 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,754 posts
i never claimed i had these stats. as i said. i was using the stats YOU provided. only reason i said "you and me" in the examples was simply for examples. MY stats outside raid buffs are about 24% crit, 202 hit, 1140 +dmg. but those wouldn't be viable for an 'equal' comparison in dps with different specs compared to your gear. so i took the stats you gave for the example.

demo ISN'T superior to dest in T5 content. it isn't superior in any content other than for tanking. also WWS your next raid. i'm more than happy to link mine and you'll see me up at the top. as DEST

also i never said i had any T6 and you are creating a strawman arguement, heck the fact you said you're not is obvious that you don't even know what it means. so i'll educate you.
it's when someone attacks part of the opositions arguement in an attempt to deface their credibility.

also just because i haven't given it a try doesn't mean i haven't researched into it and looked at the findings of others who HAVE checked it out. oh and as i've said. they've all come to the conclusion that demo is the worst dps from the lot. the only reason you seem to be doing well is most likely 'cos you know how to play and the rest of your locks arn't 'amazing' players. heck it's why i beat the better geared locks in my guild. 'cos even though they out gear me and are 0/21/40 spec. they don't realise that you need dots.
#29 Jan 12 2008 at 9:00 PM Rating: Good
**
821 posts
Quote:
i have 7.17% spell haste, that's like 130 rating. hit cap. 26% crit.


...

Quote:
also just because i haven't given it a try doesn't mean i haven't researched into it and looked at the findings of others who HAVE checked it out. oh and as i've said. they've all come to the conclusion that demo is the worst dps from the lot.


thats why there are thousands of posts all around different forums of people who say that demo is superior...i guess it´s really shortsighted people who think big numbers = big dmg...
#30 Jan 12 2008 at 11:20 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,754 posts
k. find me posts of people saying demo is > than dest. ive yet to see any and i'm a fan of the O forums, here and elitist jerks. also i do have 7.17% haste. forgot to add that and when i done the maths. we both had that too
#31 Jan 13 2008 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
**
514 posts
Jenovaomega wrote:
remember, i'm the lock king on here. call me an arrogant ****, stubborn etc... but you know you can't disagree when it comes to the fact that i'm right about warlocks.


/wave

destro>demo for raiding. Sorry, but thats just the way it is Oaken.

Do the WWS Comparison, assume that you both have the same benefits and roughly the same gear. Post an armory link of your char when your actually in your raiding gear. Until then, lets just stop.

Spell Hit>Haste>Dmg>Crit as 0/21/40.
#32 Jan 13 2008 at 2:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
821 posts
lol how almost all my posts got rated down.
Priest, Jenova i guess none of you have ever seen a demo-lock in action in a raid enviroment.

Topped dmg-meter again through tk today(except kael, whom we attempted the first time today)

Edited, Jan 13th 2008 5:03pm by Oakenwrath
#33 Jan 13 2008 at 4:20 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,754 posts
yes i've seen plenty of demo locks in raids. most going demo to lower the respec cost from having to tank leo

/wave priest
ok, i'll change it. me, priest and loki are the 3 heads of the lock king.. or some strange monster thing.

oaken. i've looked through your armory link in your comment. tbh from what i've seen. other than Agréas, you out gear all the other casters, and he is still only very close behind you. not an equal. no wonder you're top dps (i don't know about melees 'cos well.. i don't know their stats)
#34 Jan 13 2008 at 4:59 PM Rating: Decent
**
821 posts
guess you didn´t look close enough...have a look at schnabel, friana and look at the hunters, just to name a few
Have a look at the warlock den posts where there are plenty of demo-locks doing mh/bt and saying on many encounters raid-demo reigns surpreme.
Just installed wws can´t wait until next wednsday.

Edited, Jan 13th 2008 8:06pm by Oakenwrath
#35 Jan 13 2008 at 10:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,029 posts
Gear doesn't, by any means, make the player either. If you're a particularly exceptional player and everyone else is good, well, that's a big difference. I had a hunter in my guild with almost all blue gear pumping out 1000dps on Gruul when we first started him; the hunters in my guild now, in near-full epics, are pushing 700dps.

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 12:58am by lsfreak
#36 Jan 13 2008 at 11:56 PM Rating: Good
**
821 posts
of course mono-causal explanations tend to be more wrong than others like: "it´s your gear" or "you $uck"

Playing raid-demo requires actually some skill and some micromanagement. its a bit different than doing 4 hours/night 11111111111111111111.
#37 Jan 14 2008 at 3:41 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,754 posts
oaken. as i said. "i don't know melee" though i probably should of wrote "i don't know physical". i've no idea about hunters

also i had looked at schnabel. his damage is low as is his mp5. only stat he has that's a comparison is the +hit and similar with friana. his +dmg isn't equal to yours (when i checked you didn't even have a pet out, let alone any buffs. so no DK but he had full raid buffs) and his crit is very low, even for an afliction lock. they're no comparison to your gear, no joke from the casters you are the best equiped in your guild.

post edit
dest specs don't just do "11111111..." anyone who believes dest spec are purely just SB nuking has the entire spec completely wrong and so is why they're doing poor damage as the spec.

Edited, Jan 14th 2008 6:42am by Jenovaomega
#38 Jan 25 2008 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
*
159 posts
So those two are going at it again....Anyways as per the OP's question. Me personally, I'd keep the 17 crit over the haste. With 15.77 equalling 1% increase to your spell casting speed, I doubt you'll notice much of a difference except on bosses, and even then it should be rather small. But like a previous person said you'll need to equip quite a bit of it to see a difference. But I wouldnt bother with it too much unless you plan on getting more of it.


Another way to look at it though would be to get a dps logger like recount. Then you could look and see how many times your casting all of your spells in a raid and then you can see it in black and white how much it will improve your casting. Just a thought.

#39 Feb 04 2008 at 5:36 PM Rating: Default
**
648 posts

Jenova,

regarding the CoD issue where you think a Destro lock (0/21/40) outdamages an Affliction lock (UA/Bane),

you need to consider into your equations that an Affliction Warlock will have stacked Spell Damage, whilst a Destruction Warlock will be stacking other things such as Spell Crit and Spell Haste - not to mention his need to have more Spell Hit.

So although it's true that comparing these two types of Warlock with equal gear will result in the Destruction Warlock doing slightly more damage with CoD.
In practise - when comparing two warlocks with the same level of gear progression, you will find that the Affliction Warlock will usually hit for more with CoD.

This is just theory anyway - because most of the time warlocks are having to throw up CoS/CoE/CoR.

Regarding your other point :
Quote:
anyways the 'toping dps meters' arguement is a flawed one to start with. i'm in a new guild that raids hjal/bt. I top the dps meters above the other locks. YET they all out gear me? want to know why i beat them? because i know more about the class and so i use the correct spell rotation. all the other 0/21/40 locks in my guild just purely do their curse + SB. I include a dot in the equation and hey presto. I win the dps race.


... out of interest, which dot is it you are refreshing ? You are aware there is a point at which a 2 second corruption does less damage per unit-cast-time than shadowbolt ?



#40 Feb 04 2008 at 11:36 PM Rating: Decent
**
514 posts
kbd wrote:

you need to consider into your equations that an Affliction Warlock will have stacked Spell Damage, whilst a Destruction Warlock will be stacking other things such as Spell Crit and Spell Haste - not to mention his need to have more Spell Hit.



Nono, an affliction warlock needs just as much hit from gear as a Destro lock does.

Oakenwrath wrote:
lol how almost all my posts got rated down.
Priest, Jenova i guess none of you have ever seen a demo-lock in action in a raid enviroment.

Topped dmg-meter again through tk today(except kael, whom we attempted the first time today)


I guess youve never actually seen a WWS link? I'm not asking for one again.
Quote:
Do the WWS Comparison, assume that you both have the same benefits and roughly the same gear. Post an armory link of your char when your actually in your raiding gear. Until then, lets just stop.
#41 Feb 05 2008 at 12:11 AM Rating: Default
**
648 posts
Quote:
Nono, an affliction warlock needs just as much hit from gear as a Destro lock does.


Yesyes, a destruction warlock who does not benefit from suppression in anyway is more likely to be stacking hit rating than an affliction warlock.

I realise that you're trying to be a smarta$$ and most likely going to come back and try to trump me by explaining that suppression only affects affliction spells and that an affliction warlock will still need as much hit rating as possible because he uses Shadowbolt and Immolate as part of his spell cycle.

I'm well aware of this - but that is not my point. My point is that Destruction warlocks place a much greater emphasis on hit rating than affliction warlocks. Affliction warlocks can use 202 hit but the penalty of being under the hit cap is not as great for them as the penalty for destruction warlocks.

My point still stands - Jenova needs to factor into his equations the likely scenario that Affliction Warlock is going to have greater spell damage than the Destruction Warlock.

EDIT :

How are you finding BT by the way Jenova - I'll tune in for an update.




Edited, Feb 5th 2008 4:05am by kbd
#42 Feb 05 2008 at 5:29 AM Rating: Good
***
2,754 posts
by the time you're regularly raiding SSC/TK. all locks, regardless of spec, need 202 +hit. suppression is NOT a viable alternative.

also kbd, the idea that afliction locks stack more damage than dest is a myth. there isn't really any gear that provides a sizable +dmg increase without providing the required crit as well for a dest lock, and the few pieces that there are (shadow feet, back etc..) a dest lock would also want these seeing as there's more than enough crit on other gear.

in the end the only locks to have a sizable increase in damage are demo locks, and their CoDs actually do less damage than both afliction and dest locks.
#43 Feb 05 2008 at 8:47 AM Rating: Default
**
648 posts
Quote:
also kbd, the idea that afliction locks stack more damage than dest is a myth


Nono !! you need to go talk to a shadow-priest if you want to find out how many items there are with a higher budget spent on pure damage as opposed to combined crit/haste/damage etc/.

I realise why I haven't visited these boards for so long now. Seriously - you're wrong and you need to venture further than this little fish pond to find that out.

Now, when the guild you just joined which is "raiding BT/MH" actually kills a single boss in BT (yes I did check wowjutsu), you can ask some of the shadow priests about their itemisation. I guess we have to allow a little "poetic license" with your claims as usual.

Regarding the 202 hit cap - you've not managed to distract from my point. An affliction lock will suffer less of a penalty from not having lots of hit rating than a destruction lock - and as a result will be *less likely* to have to sacrifice straight damage for hit rating. Sure - when a lock reaches the end of his journey (aquiring gear) he will have more hit than he needs - but most locks are not there - and you are a long long long way from it.


EDIT : I speak from personal experience - when we had more locks than needed in raids - we allowed the affliction lock to have the freedom of placing CoD as his CoD had the highest damage - because he had stacked straight dmg.

The End.


Edited, Feb 5th 2008 11:52am by kbd
#44 Feb 05 2008 at 10:13 AM Rating: Decent
**
514 posts
kbd wrote:
Quote:
also kbd, the idea that afliction locks stack more damage than dest is a myth


Nono !! you need to go talk to a shadow-priest if you want to find out how many items there are with a higher budget spent on pure damage as opposed to combined crit/haste/damage etc/.

I realise why I haven't visited these boards for so long now. Seriously - you're wrong and you need to venture further than this little fish pond to find that out.

Now, when the guild you just joined which is "raiding BT/MH" actually kills a single boss in BT (yes I did check wowjutsu), you can ask some of the shadow priests about their itemisation. I guess we have to allow a little "poetic license" with your claims as usual.

Regarding the 202 hit cap - you've not managed to distract from my point. An affliction lock will suffer less of a penalty from not having lots of hit rating than a destruction lock - and as a result will be *less likely* to have to sacrifice straight damage for hit rating. Sure - when a lock reaches the end of his journey (aquiring gear) he will have more hit than he needs - but most locks are not there - and you are a long long long way from it.


EDIT : I speak from personal experience - when we had more locks than needed in raids - we allowed the affliction lock to have the freedom of placing CoD as his CoD had the highest damage - because he had stacked straight dmg.

The End.


Edited, Feb 5th 2008 11:52am by kbd


We have been farming BT since thanksgiving, and I fail to see how shadow priest itemizations have anything to do with affliction hit vs. destro hit. Except for the Tier pieces, our shadow priest are wearing the exact same thing that we are. I think you fail to realize that over 50% of an affliction locks damage still comes from SBs. Therefore, it is just as important for him to be at 202 hit, as a destruction lock.

How about an example? give us a piece of BT gear that has more +dmg than its counterpart with no hit/crit. Thats what your saying, the higher damage items go to affliction warlocks, and the rest to destro. Thats......I cant think of a good word, so I'll just say DUMB. Have you even seen the 4 piece T6? and if youve done the math behind it, youll realize that it benefits destro locks more than affliction. So by that logic, all tier pieces go to destro locks instead of affliction too, right?
#45 Feb 05 2008 at 10:50 AM Rating: Good
***
2,029 posts
Quote:

Nono !! you need to go talk to a shadow-priest if you want to find out how many items there are with a higher budget spent on pure damage as opposed to combined crit/haste/damage etc/.

Huh? The best spriest gear is the same gear as any mage/UA lock/destro lock would take. Maybe a slightly higher emphasis on haste post-2.4 as UA locks, and we get to keep our stupid FSW boots. There's a handful of differences, LoCE versus VotSW for example, but the effect on +dmg is practically nonexistant.

Quote:
An affliction lock will suffer less of a penalty from not having lots of hit rating than a destruction lock - and as a result will be *less likely* to have to sacrifice straight damage for hit rating.

An idiot who stacks +dmg because he doesn't benefit as much from +hit is still an idiot.

The only major differences between the best destro gear and the best affliction gear is a few points due to destro's love of haste. They'll both be grabbing mostly the same gear, they'll both be gemming it for pure +dmg. And with 2.4's GCD reduction from haste, afflic might start looking more and more into haste, lowering the nearly-nonexistant gap in +dmg even further.
#46 Feb 05 2008 at 10:57 AM Rating: Decent
**
821 posts
I think the question we are discussing is not "what is the preferred raid-specc" but it´s "what is the preferred (best?) raidspecc at what stage of raiding?"

For early to raiding(karazhan, gruul, magteridhon, and early ssc) affliction reigns surpreme due to surpression.

For mid to end raiding you have multiple choices between deep affliction (UA 41/0/20), Affliction with ruin if you have got enough crit (40/0/21) and of course once you got 2 pieces of the t5-set you can go raid-demo (6/44/11) which is in my experience and opinion the heaviest dps hitter before you get t6 equipment.

Which bring us into end game raiding-farming, which means you are farming for the end-game gear and already have some of it (t6), than destro will be the best specc.
#47 Feb 05 2008 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,029 posts
Oaken, get with the program. This thread hasn't been on-topic for weeks :P

Destro doesn't need T6 to be best, it can pull ahead as soon as ZA/Gruul if they gear themselves up well. Hell, we've had a destro lock in pure Kara and crafted gear pushing 1300dps, and the ZA/early-T5 one pushing 1600dps on some fights (1800dps on Kazzak O.O)
#48 Feb 05 2008 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
**
821 posts
guess you are using some odd damage meters, than.

Destro isn´t viable as long as you ain´t somewhere around 170+ hit, at leas 1000spelldmg and around 20% crit untalented. Show me how you get that stuff together in early t5. Where a descent UA played lock would´t own a (at that stage) wannabe destro-lock.

Non-crit Sbolts as destruction-specced warlock in pre/end t5 content are pathetic and the items will just not be available to have decent (hit/+dmg/crit) destro stats to sustain constantly high dps. Of course you can always have a crit-streak, but other than that you´ll lose massive dps compare do UA or Demo.

Edited, Feb 5th 2008 2:16pm by Oakenwrath
#49 Feb 05 2008 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
***
2,754 posts
kbd, you do also realise that crit is actually useful for afliction locks seeing as you still have the ISB talent...
going for pure +dmg gear isn't worth it. the loss of about 10% crit at the gain of about 100-150 damage really isn't worth it. think about the raid dps too. end result. lock gear doesn't vary much once you hit T5
#50 Feb 05 2008 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,029 posts
Wolindrax, he trades out for the Prince cloak, hit trinket, and CE ring if I'm not mistaken for bosses. It might be CE ring + shards ring instead of the hit trinket, I can't remember for sure. No T5-level gear except for the belt (available without ever raiding), shoulders, boots.

EDIT: And Bane, he's at the gear level where destro is barely better dps than UA but he got pissed off at getting constantly killed on Leo. Those two locks never place lower than 5th, and are more often than not first and second.

Edited, Feb 5th 2008 1:22pm by lsfreak
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 235 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (235)