Quote:
40/0/21 very nice raid spec. I do exceptional damage, (sure not quite as good as fire, but if you know how to play....well I come pretty close to an equally geared fire mage) and I am always near the top of the dps chart (or on top in 5-mans)
40/0/21 is only nice if you have less than 600 or so spell damage. Then deep frost edges it out (either 10/0/51 or 2/0/59). There's a good website that has a place to do spec comparisons
here.
This same topic comes up from time to time about people do amazing/exceptional damage as frost and how they can keep up with equally geared fire mages... It always gets my goat because you are comparing apples to oranges. The set bonus for spellfire is phenomenal where the set bonus for frozen shadoweave just flat out blows chunks. Even if the set bonuses were the same for the 2 armor sets, fire would prevail, but increasing spell damage by 7% of your int is huge in kara where there are a lot of prolonged fights.
It think the *right* answer is that raiding frost is an opportunity cost. Sure, you may be in the 'top 5' of the dps charts... but you are sacrificing damage if you go frost. You might very well be leading the charts as fire. Now, to rationalize your decision by saying you're near that top is just saying you don't want to be at the top.
Quote:
I hate fire, Period.
There are some Pallies that hate healing, period... you know what? If they want to get invited/help their guild out, they spec for the guild. They play for the team. ;-) That shouldn't happen to mages until after Kara, around Mag & Gruul & SSC/TK, but it will happen that your refusal to go fire will hurt the guild by them not being able to dps down some boss.
/dismount soapbox
Personally, I think everyone should try all specs for at least 2 weeks, and if you're in an end-game raiding guild, you should spec for the guild's benefit. I'll probably get flamed for saying that, but that is okay too.
EDIT: Spelling... grrrr
Edited, Jan 9th 2008 8:32am by ktangent