I just begin WOW with a couple of friends and I have a few question concerning the warrior wich I can't find answers on the stickies.
1-I'm currently lvl 37 human warrior arms spec and I'm planning to level with arms/fury until 70 and then switch to prot and do instances alot to get good gear to eventually begin PVP by switching back to arms. I'm just wondering if I should switch to protection before 70 or I will need ito tank instance before?
2- do you think (after I'll get my gear in instances) that a fury build is better than arms for arena and PVP in general? I see every topic in here saying DPS warrior=fury warrior, but the problem is the difficulty it takes to get the right stuff (24%miss chance with DualWield) compare to arms where you just need a good weapon for MS to be good.
3- my goal is to get gladiator armor with PVP and craft a deep thunder with my master hammersmith, I wanna know if :deep thunder+ mace spec5/5 =10% chance to stun? If yes I'll go that way, but i'm wondering if a lionheart could be better with sword spec? if someone tried the 2 I'll like his answer before choosing hammersmith/swordsmith.
4- need coments on this build : http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/warrior/talents.html?050250213020150220010000505010400521205000000000000000000000000000
I just change some points from the standard 31/30 build to get slam.
5- almost every PVP build I saw have imp. overpower and imp intercept, but don't have tcatical mastery. I just don't understand how they fight. Charge in with battle stance, switch to berserker stance and fight....but if the guy dodge? overpower? if you have 50 rage and the ennemy dodge, you'll loose 40 rage from switching stances. and if you don't switch stances, why even put points in overpower? or am I totally off? warriors fight with battle stance and switch to bererker for interept when the ennemy flee?
Edited, Jan 5th 2008 10:50pm by Bababeast
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- Some questions
Some questionsFollow
Bababeast wrote:
I just begin WOW with a couple of friends and I have a few question concerning the warrior wich I can't find answers on the stickies.
1-I'm currently lvl 37 human warrior arms spec and I'm planning to level with arms/fury until 70 and then switch to prot and do instances alot to get good gear to eventually begin PVP by switching back to arms. I'm just wondering if I should switch to protection before 70 or I will need ito tank instance before?
2- do you think (after I'll get my gear in instances) that a fury build is better than arms for arena and PVP in general? I see every topic in here saying DPS warrior=fury warrior, but the problem is the difficulty it takes to get the right stuff (24%miss chance with DualWield) compare to arms where you just need a good weapon for MS to be good.
3- my goal is to get gladiator armor with PVP and craft a deep thunder with my master hammersmith, I wanna know if :deep thunder+ mace spec5/5 =10% chance to stun? If yes I'll go that way, but i'm wondering if a lionheart could be better with sword spec? if someone tried the 2 I'll like his answer before choosing hammersmith/swordsmith.
4- need coments on this build : http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/warrior/talents.html?050250213020150220010000505010400521205000000000000000000000000000
I just change some points from the standard 31/30 build to get slam.
5- almost every PVP build I saw have imp. overpower and imp intercept, but don't have tcatical mastery. I just don't understand how they fight. Charge in with battle stance, switch to berserker stance and fight....but if the guy dodge? overpower? if you have 50 rage and the ennemy dodge, you'll loose 40 rage from switching stances. and if you don't switch stances, why even put points in overpower? or am I totally off? warriors fight with battle stance and switch to bererker for interept when the ennemy flee?
Edited, Jan 5th 2008 10:50pm by Bababeast
1-I'm currently lvl 37 human warrior arms spec and I'm planning to level with arms/fury until 70 and then switch to prot and do instances alot to get good gear to eventually begin PVP by switching back to arms. I'm just wondering if I should switch to protection before 70 or I will need ito tank instance before?
2- do you think (after I'll get my gear in instances) that a fury build is better than arms for arena and PVP in general? I see every topic in here saying DPS warrior=fury warrior, but the problem is the difficulty it takes to get the right stuff (24%miss chance with DualWield) compare to arms where you just need a good weapon for MS to be good.
3- my goal is to get gladiator armor with PVP and craft a deep thunder with my master hammersmith, I wanna know if :deep thunder+ mace spec5/5 =10% chance to stun? If yes I'll go that way, but i'm wondering if a lionheart could be better with sword spec? if someone tried the 2 I'll like his answer before choosing hammersmith/swordsmith.
4- need coments on this build : http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/warrior/talents.html?050250213020150220010000505010400521205000000000000000000000000000
I just change some points from the standard 31/30 build to get slam.
5- almost every PVP build I saw have imp. overpower and imp intercept, but don't have tcatical mastery. I just don't understand how they fight. Charge in with battle stance, switch to berserker stance and fight....but if the guy dodge? overpower? if you have 50 rage and the ennemy dodge, you'll loose 40 rage from switching stances. and if you don't switch stances, why even put points in overpower? or am I totally off? warriors fight with battle stance and switch to bererker for interept when the ennemy flee?
Edited, Jan 5th 2008 10:50pm by Bababeast
1) you can main tank everything up to regular level 70 instances, and offtank kara/some raids without speccing to prot.
2) arms is the far better build for 2v2 and 3v3 arena and PvP in general because of huge burst damage and the mortal strike healing debuff. fury can be used in 5v5 and BG's with some success, depending on how much havoc you can cause before you get noticed and focus fired upon.
3) deep thunder + mace spec roughly equate to 9% chance on hit to stun (4% from deep thunder and 5% from mace spec?). the consensus is that the stun effect > all. however, lionheart and sword spec are THE best choice for effectiveness in both PvP and PvE... the extra hit proc is not subject to diminishing returns like stun, it can crit, and it has its obvious PvE benefits. mace spec may be the best 2h spec in PvP, but by far it is the worst PvE 2h spec.
would comment on the rest but gtg =)
What Froman said, adding :
4) Im pretty sure MS + slam dont go along pretty well, you will most likely not be standing still in BG's/Arena to slam all the time, and you will use your rage for MS, instead grab improved MS.
Also, 2h build with no Two handed weapon specialization? What in God's name is wrong with you?!
Oh and WoW.com's Talent viewer sucks, wowhead's one is better, prettier, faster, and has the last rank of the talent skills.
5) I really have no idea either, although I would think battle stance-charge-thunderclap-berserk stance-berserker rage-etc, would work, not sure.
4) Im pretty sure MS + slam dont go along pretty well, you will most likely not be standing still in BG's/Arena to slam all the time, and you will use your rage for MS, instead grab improved MS.
Also, 2h build with no Two handed weapon specialization? What in God's name is wrong with you?!
Oh and WoW.com's Talent viewer sucks, wowhead's one is better, prettier, faster, and has the last rank of the talent skills.
5) I really have no idea either, although I would think battle stance-charge-thunderclap-berserk stance-berserker rage-etc, would work, not sure.
Recent Visitors: 33
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (33)
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- Some questions
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC