Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Shamans terrible at PVP?Follow

#1 Jan 03 2008 at 5:51 PM Rating: Decent
38 posts
I have heard you guys say your real bad at Pvp and want to know why. I have seen these shamans in Bgs just rip up. Enh shammies are crazy jumping round windfurying and i just cant get there health down. And i have jumped a few shammies and after a while i have to turn and run (i know embarrassing.)And Ele shammies are pretty damn good too, i think forst shock is a good cc spell and it hurts like hell aswell :).
So could yout tell me why there bad in Pvp? lol
#2 Jan 03 2008 at 9:16 PM Rating: Decent
44 posts
I think we're pretty decent at PVP, but others who say we're bad at it will probably cite our lack of any real CC as a reason.
#3 Jan 03 2008 at 10:43 PM Rating: Decent
**
427 posts
They're talking about Arena, not BGs.
#4 Jan 03 2008 at 11:05 PM Rating: Good
32 posts
Hi there...

I want you to keep an open mind when you read this.

We not terrible or bad or anything... The word "Very Limited" comes to mind. CC is a problem and you will see thats mostly the case for why people say we are bad at PVP.

When you look at the other classes and think what do each of those classes have to get out of a sticky situation and then you ask yourself "What can shamans do?" I know what all the non experienced shamans are going to say... "Use frostshock and Earthbind" Now, thats not really a CC effect now is it? Compare those two skills to the other classes CC effects and see how imbalanced it is. The scales tip heavily to the other side(s).

Enchancement shamans can be kited silly. Elemental shamans have a problem of survivability. The only class I see thats got some potential is Restoration (Im playing a resto shaman atm), but now the reason I say Resto is "ok" is because of Earth Shield. Take ES away and we fall like a sack of potatoes. Any class that can take that away gets me everytime.

I hope this post answers your question you asked and that you have a more clear picture of shamans in PVP :P
#5 Jan 03 2008 at 11:30 PM Rating: Decent
**
514 posts
When I get jumped on in world pvp..... I usually dont bother to fight back. Just prepare to die quickly and then login another toon so that the fella camping your corpse waste his time waiting.

There is no way to get out.... and people who ambush u are well prepared to kill u.

In BGs... when I was enh...... I get kited. I do useful DPS against mobs in AV though. As Ele, I'm more successful if I managed to stay in the backline. But smart opponents usually aim for us 1st. We do too much DPS to be ignored, and we get killed easily (Yes, I often get warriors charging me and rogues change target midway once they see a chain lightning).

It was so much different when I was playing my warlock... hehehe. Few dare to ambush me. Those who did find out the hard way that warlocks not to be messed with. LOL. In BG... HoT, deathcoil, etc. Muahaha. Nevermind. I love playing my warlock when it comes to PVP.

But I like being my shaman better... dont know why. Maybe I prefer playing a versatile support class that make others do their job even better.

#6 Jan 04 2008 at 12:23 AM Rating: Decent
**
821 posts
Elemtal Shamans are just plain wicked at PvP.
Especially Tauren with warstomp. Just get yourself the s1 gear
and the Insignia and you´ll be a formidable foe.
#7 Jan 04 2008 at 4:40 AM Rating: Decent
I am an elemental shaman. Now while i do very well at BGs (usually top) see here--
http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee92/catherinebeattyping/WoWScrnShot_122207_092728.jpg

i still get frustrated even in BGs. Whenever and ms warrior comes close to me i take my hands off the key board because i know im dead, same for rogues and pallys in most cases. Arena is a place about good CC and face melting DPS, if you dont have both you're screwed. Thats why you see a lot more shamans in 5v5. Group pvp is where we excell because we can go unoticed in all the anarchy of a BG.

Edited, Jan 4th 2008 7:41am by Draeneipally
#8 Jan 04 2008 at 4:54 AM Rating: Decent
38 posts
Ok guys thanks for sharing. Im looking into making a ele shaman alt, they have a good variety of spells and good damage. I like a class thats the under dog so shammies sound good :).Maybe in the expansion you guys will get a bit of cc.
#9 Jan 04 2008 at 12:34 PM Rating: Good
21 posts
Think of it this way

If you get the jump on someone, you can usually take them down extremely quickly.

But if you don't, you are not going anywhere.
#10 Jan 04 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Decent
Lower to mid level, good enhance shammy can be a beast- I'm guessing you are around lvl 50 or so, which is kinda the peak of enhance shammy. At 70, and especially in arena, it takes an extremely good player to make enhance work, thats why you see so many more resto and eles at 70.
#11 Jan 04 2008 at 2:04 PM Rating: Good
*
92 posts
Enhancement Shamans and Elemental ones do crazy dps and with the right gear are very hard to take down. Simply put I wished I rolled a Shaman instead of a Paladin... Do it!!!!!
#12 Jan 04 2008 at 9:34 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
ChevalSA wrote:
We not terrible or bad or anything... The word "Very Limited" comes to mind.

There's no point in mincing words. We do suck in PvP when compared to other classes.

Oakenwrath wrote:
Elemtal Shamans are just plain wicked at PvP.
Especially Tauren with warstomp. Just get yourself the s1 gear
and the Insignia and you´ll be a formidable foe.

You'll be a formidable foe to people whose gear isn't as impressive. Compared to any equally-geared opponent, if equal skill is assumed, the Shaman should lose almost every time.

Tobiasmm wrote:
If you get the jump on someone, you can usually take them down extremely quickly.

Immaterial.

Benzzo wrote:
At 70, and especially in arena, it takes an extremely good player to make enhance work, thats why you see so many more resto and eles at 70.

Being a "good player" has absolutely nothing to do with it. Enhancement Shaman especially simply do not have the tools to compete in the arena. You don't see them because people who play to win know not to bother with them, and those that just love the build will never amount to any significant rating no matter how hard they try.

Killerheals wrote:
Enhancement Shamans and Elemental ones do crazy dps and with the right gear are very hard to take down. Simply put I wished I rolled a Shaman instead of a Paladin... Do it!!!!!

You haven't got a clue.

Edited, Jan 5th 2008 12:34am by Gaudion
#13 Jan 05 2008 at 2:38 AM Rating: Good
*
135 posts
Quote:
Being a "good player" has absolutely nothing to do with it. Enhancement Shaman especially simply do not have the tools to compete in the arena. You don't see them because people who play to win know not to bother with them, and those that just love the build will never amount to any significant rating no matter how hard they try.

Armory 'push'

but, even though it hurts to say, gaudion IS right.
Enhancement...sucks for arena.
Sure, it can have its uses, but almost every single time a warrior is simply a better choice.
The most important reason for this, is that we are too kitable and don't have any cc(or means to break CC)

1. first of all, as soon as someone kites us, were doomed.
Frostshock only has 20 yards, so a mage or hunter(Or warlock, or priest, or elemental shaman)can just keep out of our frostshock range and slowly kill us.
Your just hopeless unless you get help.

2)lack of CC, and vulnerabilty(sp?) to it.
Simple enough, shamans, probably as the only class, dont have ANY form of cc.
Not one, over all our three trees.
On top of that, we also don't have something that breaks CC.

Imo, blizzard should add another 41 enhancement talent.
Make it so, that shamanistic rage and the other(beastly rage?)stand next to eachother.
Both need dualwield(or was stormstrike the required one, don't remember out the top of my head).
As soon as you put your point in the one, the other grays out and you can't select it anymore.

The skill would be something like this :
Beastly rage
??? mana
2min cooldown.
lasts 30 seconds? i think thats too long...how long is tbw?
You enter a beastly rage, making you unstoppable unless killed.

When your under effect of beastly rage, you cant be slowed or CC'ed.
Yes I stole it from hunters, bite me:P
#14 Jan 05 2008 at 3:24 AM Rating: Default
**
821 posts
Quote:

You'll be a formidable foe to people whose gear isn't as impressive. Compared to any equally-geared opponent, if equal skill is assumed, the Shaman should lose almost every time.


i do really well vs casters and hunters equally geared, it´s warriors and rouges who trouble me.
Dropping totems for me or WF for a warrior in group, and we all know what a does when he´s got WF totem.

Edited, Jan 5th 2008 6:28am by Oakenwrath
#15 Jan 05 2008 at 6:28 AM Rating: Good
*
135 posts
Quote:


i do really well vs casters and hunters equally geared, it´s warriors and rouges who trouble me.
Dropping totems for me or WF for a warrior in group, and we all know what a does when he´s got WF totem.

We're talking about arena here.
In arena, you either need a way to migate damage, or be mobile.
As shamans, the first one isn't a good option(in most cases, doable if you are resto but I still wouldn't advise it).
So, we have to either hug pillars, or keep moving.
That's the totems main problem(aside from its incredibly low health.), it won't go with you if you move.
Your warrior friend isn't going to stand and hit things from next to your totem either, no, he'll be charging the socks of everyone on the opposing team.
So, good luck keeping a WF totem on him.
#16 Jan 05 2008 at 7:01 AM Rating: Default
**
821 posts
oh are we talking about arena? since when is arena the only viable pvp?
to me arena is a very enclosed and narrow form of pvp where you play with pre-set teams and preparation in a pre-set arena.

even though the warrior might/will move out of range wich is 30 meters, the WF buff will be still active for yet another 10 seconds enough for it to procc twice.

and of course name the something ingame which you can´t do anything about, it´s like starcraft every thing you do can be countered somehow. It just is untrue that a shaman is horrible at pvp.

Once thing a shaman can do really well is keeping the healers really busy with chainlightng and the occasional lightning overload procc setting back their (and everyones elses cast for whom it hits) casts and disrupting them with earthshock, dispelling their hots and shields.


Edited, Jan 5th 2008 10:04am by Oakenwrath
#17 Jan 05 2008 at 7:17 AM Rating: Good
***
1,233 posts
Oakenwrath wrote:
even though the warrior might/will move out of range wich is 30 meters, the WF buff will be still active for yet another 10 seconds enough for it to procc twice.


The buff 'pulses' from the totem every 2-3 seconds refreshing it and only lasts for 8 seconds when it doesn't get refreshed.

Oakenwrath wrote:
and of course name the something ingame which you can´t do anything about, it´s like starcraft every thing you do can be countered somehow. It just is untrue that a shaman is horrible at pvp.


Of the 4 healers shamans lack 3 very important things that they all have. Mobility, Dispel resistance and pure CC.

I bolded Mobility because it is so important. Arguably, Paladins are also not very mobile because they, like us, are forced to stand still to cast spells, however they get blessing of freedom or judgement of justice to help them with that. I believe paladins are much better at movement than any shaman.

Dispel resistance is huge, especially being in any BG where your earthshield just disappears every few seconds. Even Gift of the Naaru (the only heal over time available to Shamans and it's only for Draenei) can be purged. All totems have 5 hp and are killed instantly by rank 1 spells. All 3 other healers get some resistance to that via talents and we don't. That sucks.

CC. Paladins get a 5s stun, Druids get roots and cyclone, Priests get fear and silence (if specced for it). We only have good slowdown effects in Frost shock and earthbind, but no way for us to get out of movement impairing effects save the trinket. And only Taurens get a stun (2s) on a longer cooldown then Paladins' Hammer of justice.


It's not that Shamans can't be or aren't good at PvP, just of the 4 available hybrid or healing classes, we have large setbacks that they do not.
#18 Jan 05 2008 at 8:34 AM Rating: Default
**
821 posts
see while the others HoT i dispell 2 buffs at the same rate...did i not ask you to name me one thing that can´t be countered someway or the other?

fine so i have 2-3 dds having a go at me, than i´ll just stand still and heal myself as my dd-friends have a go at their healer. and i know that you know how long it takes to beat a healer down, especially one wearing mail and earthshield.

as i said, name me one thing that cannot be counteracted someway or the other.
I used to do abit of arena 3 on 3 with a heal-shaman, and he was just not getting down if they focused on him, actually that usually made us win.
#19 Jan 05 2008 at 11:34 AM Rating: Decent
Well the fighting style you just mentioned...itz alot like how a mage has to fight and they do pretty well, grant it they have mana shield and such as well as frost nova. I am currently rolling an ele shaman and I believe that there is alot of potential. It feels alot like a mage, damage being mainly in the instants. Shamans can easily tear through other casters, having shocks that interrupt spellcasting and the grounding totem. They are the ultimate anticaster, up there with warlocks imo. They do lack in cc which is a big issue; however, the damage is there. Now that combination you spoke of "frostshock and earthbind" is not considered a cc effect but it would go well in stalling long enough to get your cds on shocks and bolts, which is all the difference. *shrug* i guess it is a matter of opinion and perspective
#20 Jan 05 2008 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:

fine so i have 2-3 dds having a go at me, than i´ll just stand still and heal myself as my dd-friends have a go at their healer. and i know that you know how long it takes to beat a healer down, especially one wearing mail and earthshield.


What kind of retarded 3 DPS team are you playing that can't take down a Shaman?
ES is on a timer now, and you certainly can't expect to get free casts off with 2 or 3 people on you. Furthermore, you don't expect top teams to let their healer die (if they even have one), and you don't expect teams to always just focus on one person right? Seriously, what kind of competition are you going against here?

Paracleets already listed the problems with Shamans in Arenas; its the combination of lack of CC and the ease in which Shamans are CC-ed that makes them poor choices for Arenas.
#21 Jan 05 2008 at 1:02 PM Rating: Default
**
821 posts
ah so we are starting to insult each other now, hmm?
what kind of retarded shaman are you playing if you go down that easily?
#22 Jan 06 2008 at 5:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,233 posts
Oakenwrath wrote:
ah so we are starting to insult each other now, hmm?
what kind of retarded shaman are you playing if you go down that easily?


Looks like you're the one who's doing the insulting.

I've been resto on 2000+ rated teams in Season 2. I get taken down in less than 30 seconds by good teams in both 3v3 and 5v5. There is no reason for you to call anybody else here worse than you at PvP when you have no credentials or as far as we know any knowledge. I'm sure 6 months ago I would have done excellent in the gear I have now, but the game has changed, other classes got buffed, their gear scales better and Shamans got left behind.

I got 3 other 70s that I far prefer PvP with than my Shaman, and it for damn sure isn't a lack of good gear or skill.
#23 Jan 06 2008 at 8:05 AM Rating: Default
**
821 posts
read the ******* post above mine, momo.
thats the insulting part.
30 seconds, hm? thats a damn long time for your team to take out their healer.
#24 Jan 06 2008 at 8:46 AM Rating: Good
*
135 posts
I don't get why your still trying.
We, have both theorycrafting and armory ratings behind us.
There are probably about 10(Not enitirely sure) enhancement shamans in high rated arena teams.
Elemental is a bit more popular, but it still isn't close to for example mages.
Resto is pretty populair, but its a healing spec, what do you want.
Of ALL WoW, shaman is the LEAST played class.

Pvp=arena.
Blizz balances the classes from a 5v5 arena perspective(the pvp-balances).
If you are talking about dueling, or world pvp, You may be right, but who the hell cares about that?
Sure, its fun, but you can't reach anything with it.
Same goes for BG, your dependant on a team of random people.
Arena, is the new esports of WoW.
When we're talking about pvp, were talking about arena.

Shamans are underpowered.
You can't get around it, we could use a buff.
Sure, resto and elemental are still ok, and enhancement...too i guess.
But were still not on par with say priests or druids.
Simply, because we both lack a cc and a cc-breaker.
One of those would be enough.
Everyone knows that its simple to keep a shaman CC'ed the most part of the match, and then nuke thr rest of their team down.
The only thing we have, is our trinket.
That's it.
#25 Jan 06 2008 at 10:12 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
NeroSeekerOfSouls wrote:
Pvp=arena.
Blizz balances the classes from a 5v5 arena perspective(the pvp-balances).

That's what they claim, anyways. I still don't buy it.

Quote:
If you are talking about dueling, or world pvp, You may be right, but who the hell cares about that?
Sure, its fun, but you can't reach anything with it.
Same goes for BG, your dependant on a team of random people.
Arena, is the new esports of WoW.
When we're talking about pvp, were talking about arena.

Shaman can actually be fairly effective at 5v5 and BG's.

In 5v5 we're more or less glorified Heroism/Bloodlust bots, but we can still be highly effective if we're Elemental or Restoration and allowed to live/kept alive long enough.

BG's are just one big cluster!@#$, which is why it's the one and only place that Enhancement Shaman can make a showing in end-game PvP.

3v3 and 2v2 Enhancement is no longer an option. Elemental really isn't much of one either. The best of the best can still make it to 2000+ rating, but to be perfectly honest most of that has to do with the quality of your teammate(s), your teamwork, and coordination. There isn't a lot that Shaman as a class bring that another class can't easily do and then some, and sooner or later your lack of CC, mitigation, mobility, and inability to deal with incoming CC is going to stonewall your progress.
#26 Jan 06 2008 at 2:33 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,233 posts
Oakenwrath, it is obvious to me that you cannot read so I will help you out a little.

ElementHuman wrote:
What kind of retarded 3 DPS team are you playing that can't take down a Shaman?


Referring to the other team being morons and/or terrible players.

Oakenwrath wrote:
ah so we are starting to insult each other now, hmm?
what kind of retarded shaman are you playing if you go down that easily?


Then you made a direct attack against him.


Oakenwrath wrote:
30 seconds, hm? thats a damn long time for your team to take out their healer


30 seconds from the gates opening. A couple stuns, silences and dispels and I'm toast.

Guadion wrote:
There isn't a lot that Shaman as a class bring that another class can't easily do and then some, and sooner or later your lack of CC, mitigation, mobility, and inability to deal with incoming CC is going to stonewall your progress.


Exactly.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 75 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (75)