Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Playing with a druid...advice?Follow

#1 Dec 24 2007 at 11:57 AM Rating: Decent
**
501 posts
Just looking for a bit of advice from the seasoned druids here. I'm going to be playing a chracter with my lady, because we wanted to have something to level up together when we're bored. I have my warrior, and she has her hunter, but those get boring from time to time. I'm playing a rogue, and she's going to be playing a druid. My question is, what would the spec of choice be for her? I looked over the sticky, and thought that feral would probably be the most effective. 2 stun locks, 2 bursts of damage. It seems like with that combo we would rip through things fairly quickly. I'll be speccing combat as I level, for what it's worth. Am I thinking correctly, or would you guys have any other suggestions for her?
#2 Dec 24 2007 at 12:25 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,793 posts
You could prolly get by Feral on her Druid up until Outlands, where Resto would start to pay off dividends in instance groups, and duoing Group quests. She'd be much better geared for Resto from quest rewards starting at 60, then she would be converting at 70, and since Rogue is a big hitter, you wouldn't miss a Feral's output that much in comparison to having practically unlimited endurance in healing.
#3 Dec 24 2007 at 1:43 PM Rating: Decent
*
89 posts
I think Feral would be your best bet as like you said, you would just rip things apart. What makes a druid an excellent soloer will work to your benifit also. You both DPS the living snot out of mobs, and while running to the next one your druid pops some HoT's on you both before switching back down to all fours to commence with the DPSing.

Also, I don't know if you plan on only duoing, or if some grouping is in your future. It is always handy to have a main party role in such cases. Being that Feral really has no problem main healing up until outland, (and even there with the right skills) It will be much easier to put a group together if you already have a Tank/healer. I lvled Feral 1-70 so I am not too sure about the other side of the table but I would assume a resto spec would have a tougher time tanking, than a Feral spec has healing. Just make sure she accumulates a spare set of gear for whichever if her offspec.


Edit: I wrote this quick, and the typo fairy pounced on me.

Edited, Dec 24th 2007 4:45pm by XAtherianX
#4 Dec 24 2007 at 11:24 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,717 posts
If you want, since you're melee, if she goes with a balance build or a balance/resto hybrid (such as the dreamstate build) then she can still DPS and heal (granted not tank so much) and you'll end up "tanking" on the duo part. Depends on what she wants to do, though. (She can still stealth up to targets, and if NE can stealth while casting).
#5 Dec 25 2007 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
****
4,074 posts
I think questing with a rogue and a feral druid would be really fun. Fights are over in under 2 seconds. For the very occasional fight that isn't, she can pop out and heal you. It's all win.

But as others have mentioned, any spec that sounds fun to her would work. And you can both sneak up on everybody, which is a nice bonus.
#6 Dec 25 2007 at 9:34 PM Rating: Good
****
8,779 posts
honestly, go feral. she *could* do resto, and as long as you two level together itd be great, but feral lets her kill stuff quickly whether or not youre by her side.

itll be just as viable in outlands too thanks to tanking being about as important as healing. whats more, if you help her get a set of healing gear, she can pretty much heal any non-heroic outlands instance. some (like shattered halls) either require a lot of CC or a backup healer of some kind, but the rest are easily handled (having some practice healing helps a lot).

feral would prolly be the most fun/fast, but resto can be fun too. it all depends on how you play it. with a resto druid at your side, you can be ridiculously reckless, and recklessness = good times....as long as you dont mind the odd repair bill.
#7 Dec 28 2007 at 10:42 AM Rating: Decent
I am now lv 50 druid and i found that feral was the best choice up until about lv 40. after that it just started to get boring so i respecd to boomkin and i can tell you it was a major improvement. (more dmg and all around fun) but i plan to respec to resto at 60 just because thats what we druids are commonly expected to be endgame.
#8 Dec 28 2007 at 11:53 AM Rating: Decent
**
391 posts
eldinjohn wrote:
I am now lv 50 druid and i found that feral was the best choice up until about lv 40. after that it just started to get boring so i respecd to boomkin and i can tell you it was a major improvement. (more dmg and all around fun) but i plan to respec to resto at 60 just because thats what we druids are commonly expected to be endgame.


If you want to stay boomkin, stay boomkin. Don't respec because that is what is expected of you. If that were the case, you would never see any shadow priests, arms/fury warriors/enhance or elemental shamans. Play what you have fun with. You can still get gear.
#9 Dec 28 2007 at 12:33 PM Rating: Good
**
817 posts
eldinjohn wrote:
I am now lv 50 druid and i found that feral was the best choice up until about lv 40. after that it just started to get boring so i respecd to boomkin and i can tell you it was a major improvement. (more dmg and all around fun)
Don't say that like it's consensus or common knowledge that moonkin deal more DPS than level 40+ ferals, nor that it's more fun. If you like and are specifically talking about doing ranged/magic damage, then sure. Since I myself greatly prefer melee action, feral never got boring, and if I was still level 50 I'd gladly enter into a damage output competition.

eldinjohn wrote:
but i plan to respec to resto at 60 just because thats what we druids are commonly expected to be endgame.
We druids are also commonly expected and recruited to be tanks, and are acknowledged as perfectly viable for melee DPS especially where an off-tank might be needed. From what I've read Moonkin that want to do high-end PVE have to overcome some reputation and itemization issues, but some claim to have success in that role. Respec resto if ya wanna, but don't blame it on "common expectations."
#10 Dec 29 2007 at 3:03 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I am now lv 50 druid and i found that feral was the best choice up until about lv 40. after that it just started to get boring so i respecd to boomkin and i can tell you it was a major improvement. (more dmg and all around fun) but i plan to respec to resto at 60 just because thats what we druids are commonly expected to be endgame.


there arn't enough balance druids in the world... don't spec resto just because thats what everyone else is doing... if everyone was to just follow the crowd then they would just do what they are expected to do... warriors would only tank... druids and priests would only heal... mages would only be vending machine taxies(ok... they basicaly are now anyway...) rogues would only be twi... nvm... the game would be boring... doing what you want is what makes you unique, make your own choices without bothering about what other people think or do...

this post has been brought to you by Blashca. "what do you mean its not a hat?"
#11 Dec 29 2007 at 3:11 AM Rating: Good
****
8,779 posts
the days of druids expecting to heal are dead and gone. druids are very viable tanks, great melee dps, and very good nukers, while also being top healers.....when specced and geared accordingly. anyone who says otherwise needs to pull their heads out of their asses and start breaking down some stereotypes.
#12 Dec 29 2007 at 3:46 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
the days of druids expecting to heal are dead and gone. druids are very viable tanks, great melee dps, and very good nukers, while also being top healers.....when specced and geared accordingly. anyone who says otherwise needs to pull their heads out of their asses and start breaking down some stereotypes.


i myself am a balance druid... the question i am usualy asked is are you feral or resto... balance is never in the question... once they know im balance im basicaly just told to heal...
#13 Dec 29 2007 at 5:02 AM Rating: Good
****
8,779 posts
that my friend, is why i dont pug.

alternatively, you can build the party. if you invite everyone else, then you can set your own agenda.
#14 Dec 29 2007 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
that my friend, is why i dont pug.

alternatively, you can build the party. if you invite everyone else, then you can set your own agenda.


eh, i dont particularly want to be waiting around for an hour or more trying to get a group together... thats why i dont realy run instances anymore...
#15 Dec 30 2007 at 5:59 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
327 posts
My own Druid is only lvl 54 and Feral but I wanted to make a comment to the person who said Druids are just expected to heal at end-game. The best healer in my raid guild is a Resto-Druid, one of our best tanks is a Feral Druid, and one of our best DPS is a Balance Druid. In fact the Balance Druid ranked 2nd in damage against Gruul.

If you have the gear to fit your spec there is no limits to what a Druid can do. They can tank, heal, or DPS. The only other class that can do that is a Paladin. So do whatever ya want with your Druid...They are truly the jack-of-all-trades
____________________________
Oxide Vanwen

Server: Ultros

Free Company: Terra Sails

The Paragon of White Mage Excellence From Final Fantasies XI - XIV
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 39 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (39)