Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Ghostly Strike Vs. Expose ArmorFollow

#1 Dec 21 2007 at 7:50 AM Rating: Decent
Which do you guys think is better, and why?
#2 Dec 21 2007 at 7:59 AM Rating: Decent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
EA, because comparing two skills that aren't alike in any way is pointless.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#3 Dec 21 2007 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,011 posts
I think he's wondering for talent purposes which to spec in to.

Improved EA if you're Assassination, Ghostly Strike if you're lolsub. Both are useless in a combat build since you've got other finishers to apply anyway.
#4 Dec 21 2007 at 9:49 AM Rating: Decent
Thanks Shao
#5 Dec 21 2007 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
Shaolinz wrote:
I think he's wondering for talent purposes which to spec in to.

Improved EA if you're Assassination, Ghostly Strike if you're lolsub. Both are useless in a combat build since you've got other finishers to apply anyway.



Well... Ghostly Strike isn't a finisher...


If you are in Sub up to that Tier, there is no sense not picking up GS. The utility is amazing. But don't go into Sub just for it. Pick it up if you find yourself in the tree, otherwise, you will live.


Same concept to EA.
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#6 Dec 21 2007 at 11:03 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,011 posts
I didn't mean ghostly strike as being a finisher. Typed that quick, should have said it like this:

Both are useless in a combat build, as with EA you have other finishers you need to apply anyway and you won't be using ghostly strike when you have sinister strike.
#7 Dec 21 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
Shaolinz wrote:
I didn't mean ghostly strike as being a finisher. Typed that quick, should have said it like this:

Both are useless in a combat build, as with EA you have other finishers you need to apply anyway and you won't be using ghostly strike when you have sinister strike.


For utility you would. Not like you can spam it, so if for some reason you had a reason to go to Sub, get it. You aren't going to use it on a mage, but for when you go up against other melee classes, no reason to not hit it before you go toe to toe.
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#8 Dec 21 2007 at 3:59 PM Rating: Decent
24 posts
I thought that expose armor was a worthless talent (unless you're soloing) because it prevents a warrior from using sunder armor, which is a major aggro builder?
#9 Dec 21 2007 at 4:06 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
Well... in PVE... yea.
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#10 Dec 21 2007 at 5:23 PM Rating: Decent
**
279 posts
BitterOldMan wrote:
I thought that expose armor was a worthless talent (unless you're soloing) because it prevents a warrior from using sunder armor, which is a major aggro builder?


In 1v1 PvP it's quite amazing. In the higher armored or longer fights it can prove very useful..and quite frankly exposing a clothie is just brutal. Very good PvP usage outta this talent.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 101 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (101)