I can't seem to equip a sword in my Rogue's off hand. Which is odd, because I was able to do it a week ago.
It's kind of annoying because I just had an alt make the swords and enchant them before mailing them to my Rogue so he can duel-wield them. Is this is a bug or is there something regarding one-handed swords and the off hand that isn't letting me do it?
The item in question is nhah.
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- Swordsies
SwordsiesFollow
Main hand only wsord
Edit: It's a sword not a wsord >_<
Edited, Dec 18th 2007 1:56am by FinalRare
Edit: It's a sword not a wsord >_<
Edited, Dec 18th 2007 1:56am by FinalRare
Huh.
That is incredibly infuriating. I went and spent money on mats to get those enchanted.
That is incredibly infuriating. I went and spent money on mats to get those enchanted.
zepoodle wrote:
Huh.
That is incredibly infuriating. I went and spent money on mats to get those enchanted.
That is incredibly infuriating. I went and spent money on mats to get those enchanted.
"Wah, I'm mad because I'm a moron and don't read."
Quote:
"Wah, I'm mad because I'm a moron and don't read."
"Wah, I'm mad because I've been flamebait for so long that everyone has picked up on my tricks and stopped periodically validating my flagging self-esteem."
Edited, Dec 18th 2007 7:07am by zepoodle
That was a relatively good counter-flame. Theo-esque even, aimed at Theo. Rate ups to both of you. Keep it going.
I'm inclined to agree with Theo here. It clearly says Main hand only. You not only ignored that when you enchanted it, but ignored it even when there was a problem. Did you think "Main Hand" was some kind of special effect?
No, I just didn't know what that part of the weapon description meant. More importantly, I confused it with "One-Hand." Even more importantly, I didn't actually read it because I assumed a weapon called "Iron Shortsword," being a sword, would behave in the same way as other swords I had encountered in the past.
I'm not disputing the slapping-myself-in-the-face aspect of my query here. It's just really annoying that it was a waste of money. Sort of like an "Aha. That's why Cruel Barb is so awesome for a Rogue" moment.
Guess it's my bad for assuming that a one-handed weapon is a one-handed weapon. Whoops! Won't do that again!
I'm not disputing the slapping-myself-in-the-face aspect of my query here. It's just really annoying that it was a waste of money. Sort of like an "Aha. That's why Cruel Barb is so awesome for a Rogue" moment.
Guess it's my bad for assuming that a one-handed weapon is a one-handed weapon. Whoops! Won't do that again!
zepoodle wrote:
No, I just didn't know what that part of the weapon description meant. More importantly, I confused it with "One-Hand." Even more importantly, I didn't actually read it because I assumed a weapon called "Iron Shortsword," being a sword, would behave in the same way as other swords I had encountered in the past.
I'm not disputing the slapping-myself-in-the-face aspect of my query here. It's just really annoying that it was a waste of money. Sort of like an "Aha. That's why Cruel Barb is so awesome for a Rogue" moment.
Guess it's my bad for assuming that a one-handed weapon is a one-handed weapon. Whoops! Won't do that again!
I'm not disputing the slapping-myself-in-the-face aspect of my query here. It's just really annoying that it was a waste of money. Sort of like an "Aha. That's why Cruel Barb is so awesome for a Rogue" moment.
Guess it's my bad for assuming that a one-handed weapon is a one-handed weapon. Whoops! Won't do that again!
It is a one-handed sword. It goes in one hand.
It does behave like a sword, because it is a sword.
**** happens lol I did the same thing once a while back and felt incredibly dumb for spending the 40G.
Quote:
It is a one-handed sword. It goes in one hand.
It does behave like a sword, because it is a sword.
It does behave like a sword, because it is a sword.
Yes. It is a one handed-sword in that it goes into one specific hand, namely the right one, and is different to a One-Hand sword, which is used in one of either of the two hands. Hence the initial confusion.
I haven't mistaken a one-handed sword for a Macedonian sarissa. I've mistaken a weapon that goes only in the right hand for a weapon that goes in the right and also the left hand.
Really, I don't know why we're still talking about this. There's more productive things we could be doing, like molesting a housecat. That's not even very productive, and it's still more productive that what we're doing right now.
Quote:
There's more productive things we could be doing, like molesting a housecat. That's not even very productive, and it's still more productive that what we're doing right now.
If that isn't sig-worthy, I don't know what is.
Edited, Dec 18th 2007 11:45am by DarkcydeIntensity
DarkcydeIntensity wrote:
Quote:
There's more productive things we could be doing, like molesting a housecat. That's not even very productive, and it's still more productive that what we're doing right now.
If that isn't sig-worthy, I don't know what is.
Edited, Dec 18th 2007 11:45am by DarkcydeIntensity
You don't.
FletusSanguine wrote:
That was a relatively good counter-flame. Theo-esque even, aimed at Theo. Rate ups to both of you. Keep it going.
No, it really wasn't that good.
I didn't even try to flame him. I just called him a moron.
Most of the regular posters here can tell you that's about a 6 or 7 out of 10 on the "oh damn rofl, theo just flamed someone"â„¢ scale.
I'd have to Agree with that Theo, I thought you were actually kind of Tame about that bit.
Old age isn't affectin ya is it?
Old age isn't affectin ya is it?
Someone shut this thread down!
RuinatorVek wrote:
I'd have to Agree with that Theo, I thought you were actually kind of Tame about that bit.
Old age isn't affectin ya is it?
Old age isn't affectin ya is it?
No, but I was still hungover at that point.
I drank so much on my birthday that I was drunk until 10 or 11am the following day; yesterday.
Just let the thread die, flamebait.
Er, you know flamebait isn't a poster, but rather a post, right?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
Tend to agree with Theo on this one. And calling someone "flamebait" doesn't make up for the fact that you disregarded reading. If you're new to WoW that's fine, but expect to take a little heat when you post a question you should have been able to figure out in 10 seconds on your own.
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Er, you know flamebait isn't a poster, but rather a post, right?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
MAYBE THIS POST IS FLAME BAIT YOU LITTLE ****
The concept of flamebait isn't really THAT difficult.
MYteddy wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Er, you know flamebait isn't a poster, but rather a post, right?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
MAYBE THIS POST IS FLAME BAIT YOU LITTLE sh*t
OMG TEDDY! IM GONNA FLAME YOU SO HARD!!!
.....POOPHEAD!
Yeah you're scared now!
RuinatorVek wrote:
MYteddy wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Er, you know flamebait isn't a poster, but rather a post, right?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
MAYBE THIS POST IS FLAME BAIT YOU LITTLE sh*t
OMG TEDDY! IM GONNA FLAME YOU SO HARD!!!
.....POOPHEAD!
Yeah you're scared now!
I hope you see this NO U
cuz I'm doing it as hard as I can.
MYteddy wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Er, you know flamebait isn't a poster, but rather a post, right?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
I myself am not flamebait, nor are my posts. They're flames.
Your posts, if they were written to get a rise out of me and provoke a flame, would be flamebait.
Got it?
MAYBE THIS POST IS FLAME BAIT YOU LITTLE sh*t
ZING
oh wait
Keep talking. Flamebait.
Recent Visitors: 145
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (145)
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- Swordsies
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC