Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Warriors Are Best At What?!?!?!?Follow

#27 Dec 22 2007 at 5:35 AM Rating: Default
MY advice for dps warrs. get into a decent guild which already has a tank and just tell them ur dps. i have no problem with it nor do my guild. I think people really do underestimate dps warriors. we arn't just tanks, we have another 2 talent trees dedicated to something else. Anyway, isnt it good to have a decent dps that doesnt die that easily and can hold aggro off of other party members if the main tank fails to?
#28 Dec 22 2007 at 2:06 PM Rating: Decent
xEverblazex wrote:
MY advice for dps warrs. get into a decent guild which already has a tank and just tell them ur dps. i have no problem with it nor do my guild. I think people really do underestimate dps warriors. we arn't just tanks, we have another 2 talent trees dedicated to something else. Anyway, isnt it good to have a decent dps that doesnt die that easily and can hold aggro off of other party members if the main tank fails to?


Yes, that is nice for leveling instances. That will not be the case in heroics and beyond. If I pull aggro in a heroic, the tank better get it back right away or I'm just another greasy smear on the pavement. If it's the wrong mob (those robots in Mech spring to mind), then I'll get one-shot usually.
#29 Dec 22 2007 at 9:11 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
IMO the best party to get, is a party which has a mix of everything

Imagine this:(for example)

1 warrior tank
3 mages
1 healer(doenst really matter which class)


some slight changes to that and i would love it

1 prot pally
3 mages
1 healer anybut priest prefer pally or shammy

thats as my prot pally i love aoe tanking on him. was warrior main but gave that up due to wanting to dps but had morons in groups and bad tanks so i would have to tank. pally just made it easier for mages to aoe than on my warrior. nothing like killing 7-10mobs at once as your lvling up in groups.

i will say this though warrior out threats me on single targets hands down. i have no problem with arms/fury warriors in my groups aslong as they kill the skull first then what ever color mob they like next.
#30 Dec 23 2007 at 10:12 AM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
punkspider wrote:
Quote:
IMO the best party to get, is a party which has a mix of everything

Imagine this:(for example)

1 warrior tank
3 mages
1 healer(doenst really matter which class)


some slight changes to that and i would love it

1 prot pally
3 mages
1 healer anybut priest prefer pally or shammy

thats as my prot pally i love aoe tanking on him. was warrior main but gave that up due to wanting to dps but had morons in groups and bad tanks so i would have to tank. pally just made it easier for mages to aoe than on my warrior. nothing like killing 7-10mobs at once as your lvling up in groups.

i will say this though warrior out threats me on single targets hands down. i have no problem with arms/fury warriors in my groups aslong as they kill the skull first then what ever color mob they like next.


What's wrong with priest healers?
#32 Dec 23 2007 at 11:13 AM Rating: Default
**
510 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
punkspider wrote:
IMO the best party to get, is a party which has a mix of everything

Imagine this:(for example)

1 warrior tank
3 mages
1 healer(doenst really matter which class)


some slight changes to that and i would love it

1 prot pally
3 mages
1 healer anybut priest prefer pally or shammy

thats as my prot pally i love aoe tanking on him. was warrior main but gave that up due to wanting to dps but had morons in groups and bad tanks so i would have to tank. pally just made it easier for mages to aoe than on my warrior. nothing like killing 7-10mobs at once as your lvling up in groups.


That would be amazing, but I would say for leveling up a Restoration Shaman would be the best for that group. He/She would just have to put ES on the pally, the spam a downranked Lesser Heal (and chain heal if a mage pulls agro). I would love to be in a group like that sometime.



Edited, Dec 23rd 2007 2:14pm by Mizzoulover
#33 Dec 23 2007 at 12:00 PM Rating: Default
WarStallion wrote:
Warrior tanks all the way prot pallys are just not the same


It depends on the situation, as has already been stated here numerous times. Of course they're different, that's why there are multiple classes that can tank. If they were all the same then there would be no reason to have multiple classes to tank.

Warriors are better than pallies for single-target aggro, thus making them better raid boss tanks.

Pallies are better for AoE tanking trash mobs, thus making them better for 5-man instances.
#34 Dec 23 2007 at 3:12 PM Rating: Default
MentalFrog wrote:
punkspider wrote:
Quote:
IMO the best party to get, is a party which has a mix of everything

Imagine this:(for example)

1 warrior tank
3 mages
1 healer(doenst really matter which class)


some slight changes to that and i would love it

1 prot pally
3 mages
1 healer anybut priest prefer pally or shammy

thats as my prot pally i love aoe tanking on him. was warrior main but gave that up due to wanting to dps but had morons in groups and bad tanks so i would have to tank. pally just made it easier for mages to aoe than on my warrior. nothing like killing 7-10mobs at once as your lvling up in groups.

i will say this though warrior out threats me on single targets hands down. i have no problem with arms/fury warriors in my groups aslong as they kill the skull first then what ever color mob they like next.


What's wrong with priest healers?


For real. I actually prefer priest healers for 5-mans way over paladin healers. Priests give more useful buffs for tanking, have instant cast HOTs, and have AoE heals. I've had by far the worst experiences with paladin healers. I've had raid geared paladin healers that can't keep the party alive during the bosses in regular Steamvaults.
#35 Dec 23 2007 at 3:16 PM Rating: Good
Lorimath wrote:


For real. I actually prefer priest healers for 5-mans way over paladin healers. Priests give more useful buffs for tanking, have instant cast HOTs, and have AoE heals. I've had by far the worst experiences with paladin healers. I've had raid geared paladin healers that can't keep the party alive during the bosses in regular Steamvaults.


Yeah, that boss can be pretty brutal without any AE healing, especially if the Paladin also has to dispel the DoT/Stun the elemental boss likes to cast. I'm a big fan of Shaman healers, myself - Earth Shield is awesome and Chain Heal is basically brainless and extremely efficient in any AE situation.
#36 Dec 23 2007 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
RPZip wrote:
Lorimath wrote:


For real. I actually prefer priest healers for 5-mans way over paladin healers. Priests give more useful buffs for tanking, have instant cast HOTs, and have AoE heals. I've had by far the worst experiences with paladin healers. I've had raid geared paladin healers that can't keep the party alive during the bosses in regular Steamvaults.


Yeah, that boss can be pretty brutal without any AE healing, especially if the Paladin also has to dispel the DoT/Stun the elemental boss likes to cast. I'm a big fan of Shaman healers, myself - Earth Shield is awesome and Chain Heal is basically brainless and extremely efficient in any AE situation.


I love shammy healers. Especially since my priest is shadow.
#37 Dec 26 2007 at 6:37 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
In raids that is true. A person who is a tank in guild usually has a priority on getting tank gear over DPS warriors and DPS warrior has priority to get DPS gear over tank.
In 5 men instances it is not that simple..
What differs tank and DPS warrior in 5 men instances - usually that one of the is using shield while the other has it in backpack.
10 minutes later they can meet with roles swaped.
I always let all warriors roll for all they need as being a tank is 1 clik away from being a DPS.
The only exception is rolling for weapons - if you have fury gear and fury specc you should leave 2 Hers for Arms warriors and the other way around.


There are so many other items that can be rolled on by different classes, such as neck pieces, cloaks and trinkets and rings. The way I see it is if it will benefit either party member, just roll need on it, regardless. Its quite apparent that in 5 mans the gear you get will be upgraded anyways so if you lose a roll, so what. If a neck piece drops and you(tank), hunter and rogue want it...you should all roll on it, because quite frankly, who says a warrior isn't going to respec back to arms or fury and benefit from the gear? Farming for gold isn't easy when ur prot spec with absolutely no dps gear. I just hate to see people say "Oh well you shouldn't roll on it because its def. hunter gear" or something along those lines.

As for weapons...there is one weapon a tank should shoot for pre kara and thats the Sun Eater. If you get into kara, hope for the King's Defender. If you have either of those weapons, you should at least let dps warriors grab the other weapons if theirs suck.

When it comes to raiding and 2h's, unless your ARMS warrior is specced properly, 2h's are free game to tanks and fury warriors (more common raiding spec imho).

Also, tanks and DPS can't really swap roles if you think about what it takes to tank and what it takes to DPS. If they swap roles, you pretty much just gimped your party.

I laugh at the warrior who says he's dps and does 70k more dmg than me in a whole run, and I'm prot! lol BTW he was 200k - 300k dmg behind the other dpsers, but his gear sucked (which is the point, wartards are very gear dependent!)

#38 Dec 27 2007 at 3:57 AM Rating: Default
**
362 posts
Quote:
I laugh at the warrior who says he's dps and does 70k more dmg than me in a whole run, and I'm prot! lol BTW he was 200k - 300k dmg behind the other dpsers, but his gear sucked (which is the point, wartards are very gear dependent!)

I think I start to understand the reason why DPS warriors are looked down on for 5 mens.

I went yesterday as DPS to normal Mechanar (WTB shards!!! - up to 50 g each on my server). I was PvP specced which happenes rarly as I tend to PvP in my normal 33/28 or 31/30 PvE Arms specces.
I must tell DPS of MS PvP warrior who has no slam specced is not even close to good. Good that I had best gear there so I landed second but to do that I went zerg Swiping Strikes WW rutine which was available only because my gear is not really made for that instance and I had armor and HPs close to our tank...

I can imagine PvP speced warr in blues trying to MS all around.... HE would go just above tank. I bet someone who met such DPSer will think twice before he invites another "DPS" warrior.
So if you are PvP specced and not epic geared - sorry you are not DPSer.

#39 Dec 27 2007 at 9:57 PM Rating: Good
***
1,331 posts
It takes routine and skill, besides good gear to DPS effectively. Knowledge of the class is also important. But I think a rogue in greens, compared to a warrior in greens, the rogue will likely out dps the warrior, simply due to class differences from gear dependency and flat dps vs. scaling dps.

Different classes scale differently. And warriors are the top end of the food chain, IMHO, for gear dependency. Which they equate to being a top end class, for which ever path they choose. But it takes gearing and skill (knowledge of class, proper routine use, knowledge of game mechanics) to achieve this goal.

Warrior DPS is great DPS, in regards to true end game gear and player talent. But if you take the same player and stick them in a fresh lvl 70, who is wearing pre-70 gear or worse, leveling gear. They will undoubtedly suck on dps.

Warriors require true group effort to excel. And since WoW is a MMO, this is usually provided for by just playing well, and tolerance for early warrior suckiness.

Warriors are usually considered a necessary part of raiding. Either by MT or DPS, warriors fill vital roles in game mechanics. A 33/28 Blood frenzy/slam build warrior brings a lot to raids, a 17/44 DPS warrior provides quality dps, while both have the bonus of being able to OT almost anything. I shouldn't have to explain warrior tank ability, they are of the 3 tanking classes, the most versatile (with a few exceptions), IMHO.

So as for what warriors are BEST at? Gear hogging, and math.
#40 Dec 28 2007 at 3:42 AM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
devioususer wrote:
So as for what warriors are BEST at? Gear hogging, and math.


/sig
#41 Jan 01 2008 at 5:28 AM Rating: Default
People doesn't know anything about warriors.

Since Warrior needs only 1 str to get 2 AP Warrior can get fairly easily pretty good AP. We don't have many these kamikaze warriors. Let's say 70lvl warrior who use pure tiger gear about 700 str & 30%40% crit - this kind of setup is not very hard to achieve - does SICK amount of damage, but because everybody think warriors are tankers warriors are every1 #1 target & that's way they prefer stamina over str.

This tiger warrior start the battle. He pop up death wish then reckalness then SS then WW/MS. You can imagine what kind of destruction that will cause.











Edited, Jan 1st 2008 8:30am by SlumpyGiG
#42 Jan 01 2008 at 5:59 AM Rating: Good
***
1,395 posts
SlumpyGiG wrote:
People doesn't know anything about warriors.

...
Wh...
...
Oh I'm loving this already.

SlumpyGiG wrote:
Since Warrior needs only 1 str to get 2 AP Warrior can get fairly easily pretty good AP. We don't have many these kamikaze warriors. Let's say 70lvl warrior who use pure tiger gear

Wait! Stop there... Who the hell uses "of the Tiger" gear a level 70? What level did you say you were? One where you use "of the Tiger" gear perhaps?

SlumpyGiG wrote:
about 700 str & 30%40% crit - this kind of setup is not very hard to achieve

You've got to be kiddin' me? Alright, Starym (a fury warrior in one of the most progressed guilds in the world) has 633 str and 35% crit unbuffed... He's decked out in BT, Hyjal and S3 epics. Do you, even in you wildest imagination, believe that someone could achieve this with mere level 70 greens, which for the record are "of the nubstat"?

SlumpyGiG wrote:
but because everybody think warriors are tankers warriors are every1 #1 target & that's way they prefer stamina over str.

Look, people prefer a certain balance between +str and +stam because stamina gives certain survivability. It doesn't matter if you can dish out loads of damage, if you make a bad pull while soloing and are only wearing +str and +agi gear, you're toast after the mob's critted you a few times.


SlumpyGiG wrote:
This tiger warrior start the battle. He pop up death wish then reckalness then SS then WW/MS. You can imagine what kind of destruction that will cause.

Oh yes. He burns down everything around him in less than 4 sec. And then it's just to stand there and watch your fancy CoolDowns tick off you. WASTE.



Clearly, you are the one who doesn't know anything about warriors. For your information, +agi shouldn't come before +stam in terms of solo gear. You only get +crit from +agi (unlike rogues and hunters, whom actually get +AP). It's much more beneficial to go for +crit rating, +str and +stam, not necessarily in that order.


Until you get this "i hold teh ultimat truth"-attitude out of your head; you should get the hell out of my forum.
#43 Jan 01 2008 at 6:18 AM Rating: Decent
*
78 posts
Quote:
you should try that when facing Moroes in karazhan, ooh you would be more than happy if a priest could shackle one of those pesky casters. ;)

IMO the best party to get, is a party which has a mix of everything

Imagine this:(for example)

1 warrior tank
3 mages
1 healer(doenst really matter which class)

at first sight, this party looks like a DPS powerhouse, actually it is. but there are instances that have magic immune mobs, so you will be lacking melee dps and the healer will run OOM before the tank can take them down(especially when facing a big pull). you can comprensate this with the ability to sheep 3 targets at a time but overall at bosses with special features you need viaration with classes.


I had this party with a priest healer in Heroic BF the other day. Did the instance is about 45 minutes with only one of the mages dying once because of some bad aggro-watching at the fel warriors towards the end. The second boss event was as easy as it could have been when sheeping three out of four of the prisoners. It has got to be said that all of the other members were mostly all epic geared.

IMO, group diversity is overrated.

And btw, the current dps champion in any of my groups is a dps warrior.

http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Kul+Tiras&n=Vorgoz

The only one who has ever been able to match him for dps was this lock, and he's pretty great as well:

http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Kul+Tiras&n=Windulak

Both of these outdpses me by some 4x times, and I have 738 unbuffed AP and 12,26% crit in my tanking gear.
#44 Jan 01 2008 at 1:33 PM Rating: Decent
**
438 posts
I will say that I've been in instances on my hunter where we could not finish befause two of our DPS were melee (rogue and warrior). It wasn't a problem of how much damage was being done, it was just that some bosses in heroics do a LOT of AOE damage, and having your DPS in range of that makes it rough on the healer, especially in a long fight.

In that case, rogues tend to do better melee DPS, and they can CC some mobs, which makes them preferable to a DPS warrior IMO.
#45 Jan 01 2008 at 1:54 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Until you get this "i hold teh ultimat truth"-attitude out of your head; you should get the hell out of my forum.


If I say some 70lvl warlock have corpse camped me it's an ultimate truth. it's like that wanted you it or not, liked you it or not.

Now say me mr.who where I have told I know anything about warrior as you said? I'm here telling my opinions & my own experiences and my experience tells directly that my warrior does crazy damage in at least BGs.

I have seen my post have deleted many times even I have not bahvin aggresvly towards anybody or should I say every1 knows every1 about warriors?. On the contary your post towards me sense some aggressions. Why? Do I done some bad to you? I don't understand.

I write where I want to as long as I behave under rules as I have done it or are you going delete this post too? as Hitler does to jews more brutal way?


Yes it's WARcraft. It teachs people to hate each other.






#46 Jan 01 2008 at 2:41 PM Rating: Good
***
1,395 posts
SlumpyGiG wrote:
If I say some 70lvl warlock have corpse camped me it's an ultimate truth.

Not really no... You could be making it up, in which case it's false, and not an ultimate truth. Or you could assume that it is 70 just because it's ?? leveled and you can't kill it (an example taken purely because I can't believe you have a level 70), in which case it could be level 56, and you could be level 32. However, enough arguing semantics.

SlumpyGiG wrote:
Now say me mr.who where I have told I know anything about warrior as you said? I'm here telling my opinions & my own experiences and my experience tells directly that my warrior does crazy damage in at least BGs.

Saying to all the people who browse forums (whether they know what they're doing of not) that you can achieve higher than end-game content stats with only green gear for your level is not an experience, since it's impossible. It could be an opinion, but it would be wrong. Now, I couldn't care less what damage you think you put out in BG's. As long as you spread misinformation, I will point it out to you in whatever way I see fit.

SlumpyGiG wrote:
I have seen my post have deleted many times even I have not bahvin aggresvly towards anybody or should I say every1 knows every1 about warriors?. On the contary your post towards me sense some aggressions. Why? Do I done some bad to you? I don't understand.

No... I didn't understand much of that either... However, when you start a post by insulting - if not everyone who posts on the forums - then at least everyone who's previously posted in this thread, with saying
SlumpyGiG wrote:
People doesn't know anything about warriors.

I WILL take an aggressive approach, whether you like it or not.

Now... anymore associations to evil dictators, or bad wordgames, will make me go /EMO on my wrists in a bathtub, so please refrain.
#47 Jan 01 2008 at 4:29 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Not really no... You could be making it up, in which case it's false, and not an ultimate truth. Or you could assume that it is 70 just because it's ?? leveled and you can't kill it (an example taken purely because I can't believe you have a level 70), in which case it could be level 56, and you could be level 32. However, enough arguing semantics.


If you read my post very closely I said if.IF. I didn't say it was happend in reality. I have posted about some warlock camped, but I did not mentioned then his lvl. If 70 warlock have camped me it's happened even there are noone proofs. I agree that if I say it's not UT.

Quote:
Saying to all the people who browse forums (whether they know what they're doing of not) that you can achieve higher than end-game content stats with only green gear for your level is not an experience, since it's impossible. It could be an opinion, but it would be wrong. Now, I couldn't care less what damage you think you put out in BG's. As long as you spread misinformation, I will point it out to you in whatever way I see fit.


Now take it easy. This post is so horrible %&%&%%¤. Orginal poster did not say anything about end-game nor 70lvl. He didn't mentioned any level which I 61lvl warrior said my exp about my DPS so far proofing warriors actually can do damage. Yea I have not mentioned any of these green geared DPS or what &&%%% this is?

Quote:
I WILL take an aggressive approach, whether you like it or not.


Do whatever you want but don't wonder why they talk sh*t about you & your reputation.





Edited, Jan 1st 2008 7:30pm by SlumpyGiG

Edited, Jan 1st 2008 7:35pm by SlumpyGiG
#48 Jan 01 2008 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,331 posts
I like pizza. +1
#49 Jan 01 2008 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
***
1,395 posts
devioususer wrote:
I like pizza. +1

No you don't, you like cookies... everybody knows that. Nice try though!

(Sorry, I'm in a bad mood - hung over - so I'm picking fights with everything)
#50REDACTED, Posted: Jan 02 2008 at 1:30 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) btw I like your pages and that is an ultimate fact.
#51 Jan 08 2008 at 12:52 AM Rating: Decent
Fury warriors own in dps, as fury I can outdps mages and most locks np. With a fast, high dps off hand a steady mainhand, I have 3 epics, rest rares, 1 green and yesterday in arca i beat a 70 epic druid in dps by 50/60k, not alot but its still ahead.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 103 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (103)