Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

2.3.2: Death of the Arena RogueFollow

#27 Dec 15 2007 at 10:19 AM Rating: Good
Tyrandor wrote:
Oh granted, some class have it worse then we do (But shaman? Come on, you guys are a superb 5v5 class, part of the best composition possible)


Well...

In Another Thread, I[/quote wrote:
I think it's a difference in interest between hybrid and the more specialized classes, actually.

Rogues (and Warlocks, Mages, Warriors, Hunters) don't really care if there's more than one viable tree. Having all three trees viable in PvP or PvE would be nice, but the bigger concern is that there is at least _something_ you can spec to and do well in either PvP or PvE. Respeccing for serious PvP (or PvE) is a fact of life and it's something most people are okay with. It'd be nice if every tree was equally special and strong, but they're not, and we're okay with that. The bigger concern is that there's an option for both PvP and PvE that doesn't make us feel like we're trying to tear down a wall with a paper clip.

Hybrids (Paladins, Priests, Druids, Shamans) are much more concerned with this. As a general rule, even if you have to respec what's a decent set of PvE gear for your class is a decent set of starting PvP gear. Damage is damage, after all, and you use stuff you get in PvE to offset your PvP gear until you get enough honor/arena points to replace them. You have to respec; you don't have to regear. An Enhancement Shaman or Retadin probably doesn't _have_ backup Elemental or Holy gear to switch to when they want to go PvP; they can either go as a bad spec, or with terrible gear. Obviously once they get enough PvP gear it may not matter, but starting out is incredibly rough.

Hence... the hybrid classes want their hybrid specs to be PvP viable as well, and the more specialized classes who can cross-pollinate gear even if they do have to respec every week look at them like they're nuts. "What do you care if Ret is good? Holy is amazing in Arenas!" Except the Retadin doesn't have the gear to _go_ Holy... and thus, the breakdown in communication.

Conversely, Rogues would rather have one PvP spec that just _works_ rather than three viable specs but non-ideal, which is why this is so frusturating. They're applying the hybrid design balancing to specialized classes that don't need it.


Also;

Quote:


The real problem is that we damn near have a nobility system, where some class are the nobles that dominate at everything, while other scrap by to even make it into a decent spot.


The victim complex does not look so good on you.
#28 Dec 15 2007 at 11:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Oh granted, some class have it worse then we do (But shaman? Come on, you guys are a superb 5v5 class, part of the best composition possible), but that doesn't mean all is good and peachy.

Shaman are "superb" in 5v5 because we're Heroism/Bloodlust bots. That is our job. Pop Heroism/Bloodlust, and then try for the love of God not to die.
#29 Dec 15 2007 at 11:08 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,048 posts
Gaudion wrote:
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Oh granted, some class have it worse then we do (But shaman? Come on, you guys are a superb 5v5 class, part of the best composition possible), but that doesn't mean all is good and peachy.

Shaman are "superb" in 5v5 because we're Heroism/Bloodlust bots. That is our job. Pop Heroism/Bloodlust, and then try for the love of God not to die.

Not quite. You might want to try playing/watching some high-rated 5v5 before you say stuff like that. Smiley: tongue
#30 Dec 15 2007 at 3:38 PM Rating: Excellent

Quote:
The victim complex does not look so good on you.
\

This change has me way to upset to take the high road and put a strong front, saying we'll adapt and everything will be fine.

It truly won't.
#31 Dec 15 2007 at 3:45 PM Rating: Good
*
194 posts
Shammies are one of the best counters to priests. Rargh.
#32 Dec 15 2007 at 4:02 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
It's all about the Arena ratings, baby. Amirite?

The classes are no longer defined by how well they perform in a raid, but how well they perform during 30 seconds of head-to-head combat in a closed environment. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, least of all Tyrandor, that some classes will do poorly in such settings while others will do better.

It's the rock, scissor, paper system all over again, just with different colors. Instead of being good at sustained DPS, or HPS, or tanking, you need to be good at burst DPS, or HPS, or CC.

I mean, ****, I could take the Rogue class to any other place in the World of Warcraft and explain how they're the most annoying, hard to kill, sneaky sons of ******* ever created. Everything has to be about the Arena, doesn't it? Because it's the new purple.

Two years ago it was raiding, then world PvP, then raiding again with the new end-game and then battlegrounds with the improved honor system. Now it's the arena system...

I mean, ****! What'll it be next year? Complaints about how your newly created Warrior who wtfowned in the Arena is now sucking *** compared to other classes in leveling speed? How everyone got to 80 before you did?

Seriously, this whining has got to stop. Coming from me, that's serious business, man! I'm tired of people analyzing, optimizing and calculating everything in this game. You're burned out on it, okay? Go play something else and come back in a few months when you miss the game for what it is.

This whole analyzing who's the best and **** is what's breaking the game. People forget to have fun and become so obsessed with what's overpowered and what's not that they ruin it for the rest of us.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#33 Dec 15 2007 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Gaudion wrote:
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Oh granted, some class have it worse then we do (But shaman? Come on, you guys are a superb 5v5 class, part of the best composition possible), but that doesn't mean all is good and peachy.

Shaman are "superb" in 5v5 because we're Heroism/Bloodlust bots. That is our job. Pop Heroism/Bloodlust, and then try for the love of God not to die.

Not quite. You might want to try playing/watching some high-rated 5v5 before you say stuff like that. Smiley: tongue

So should you.

churler wrote:
Shammies are one of the best counters to priests. Rargh.

How exactly do you figure that? I hope you've got a better reasoning than, "Shaman can Purge."
#34 Dec 15 2007 at 7:44 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Gaudion wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Gaudion wrote:
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Oh granted, some class have it worse then we do (But shaman? Come on, you guys are a superb 5v5 class, part of the best composition possible), but that doesn't mean all is good and peachy.

Shaman are "superb" in 5v5 because we're Heroism/Bloodlust bots. That is our job. Pop Heroism/Bloodlust, and then try for the love of God not to die.

Not quite. You might want to try playing/watching some high-rated 5v5 before you say stuff like that. Smiley: tongue

So should you.

churler wrote:
Shammies are one of the best counters to priests. Rargh.

How exactly do you figure that? I hope you've got a better reasoning than, "Shaman can Purge."

1800 5v5 last season before pve scrubs tanked my team, as well as watching matches online.

You obviously suck at shaman.
#35 Dec 15 2007 at 7:51 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
purge for one, windfury last resort weapon, earth shock as a interrupt healing priests lack, better healing per mana ratio, the 'healing has spell dmg' helps resto shams more then healing priest, disc priests best weapons can all be purged (under ps itll just take a few trys)

i dont know about shadow, but resto sham vs healing pri any spec ill bet gold on the sham any day (equal skill equal gear)
#36 Dec 15 2007 at 8:06 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Actually a shaman to drop wf and either drop a warrior or to heal is pretty much the biggest reason to bring an ele shaman; resto shamans are best in 3v3 where they're not needed for damage and they're viable as a counter to rogues and hunters with poison cleansing totem.
#37 Dec 15 2007 at 8:20 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
purge for one, windfury last resort weapon, earth shock as a interrupt healing priests lack, better healing per mana ratio, the 'healing has spell dmg' helps resto shams more then healing priest, disc priests best weapons can all be purged (under ps itll just take a few trys)


o.O

The resto shaman strengths are Bloodlust, Earth Shocks, Earthbind, Purge, Windfury/Grounding and the ability to do decent damage. Their weaknesses are no useful friendly dispels (read as: Need to be able to remove either Magic or Curses), extreme vulnerability to dispel effects, no non-timered instant heals (Renew, PW:S, Lifebloom etc) therefore being easy to lockout and lack of CC or escape tools.

Priests get Mass Dispel, mana burn (which benefits from +DMG, which is a _huge_ boost), extremely potent defenses once a certain Resilience level is met, resistance to dispels (dispel resistance plus the huge number of stacking buffs they gain when under attack), fort/shadow prot for their group and a decent defensive or offensive CC, and a moderate ability to avoid lockouts via Renew, PW:S and CoH if specced that way. Their weaknesses are cloth (especially at lower resistance levels, but much less of an issue once the stacking -damage buffs from Resil start to apply), poor damage-dealing ability against non-mana using classes and a fairly long timer on their escape tool.

Priests win in every catergory except possibly Bloodlust, and in anything but a hard burn setup the Priest wins every time.
#38 Dec 15 2007 at 9:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
I mean, @#%^! What'll it be next year? Complaints about how your newly created Warrior who wtfowned in the Arena is now sucking *** compared to other classes in leveling speed? How everyone got to 80 before you did?


The game changes and evolves, and so do people's want and need from it.

That's a good sigh, not a bad one.

The day people stop whining, is the day they stop caring. Much worse of an alternative.

Quote:
This whole analyzing who's the best and sh*t is what's breaking the game. People forget to have fun and become so obsessed with what's overpowered and what's not that they ruin it for the rest of us.


That's an old argument, and just has dumb now as it was then - winning is fun.

Most people aren't happy with being mediocre. I'm glad for you if you're an exception there Mazra, but I don't enjoy sucking.
#39 Dec 15 2007 at 10:51 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,538 posts
People care about what gets them the best gear. Right now, that's arena. Being at a disadvantage at arenas puts you at a disadvantage at everything else, which is why people whine about Arena.
#40 Dec 15 2007 at 11:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
@RPZip

i was talking 1v1 fight, not arena usage

Quote:
churler wrote:
Shammies are one of the best counters to priests. Rargh.

How exactly do you figure that? I hope you've got a better reasoning than, "Shaman can Purge."


1v1 counter ftw, i dont high end arena enough to assist this thread... but i know 1v1 enough ^_^
#41 Dec 16 2007 at 12:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Hello all, first post on the forums here (at least first I can remember), but I have a 70 MS warrior named Aresvas (formerly a tank... don't have enough time to raid regularly anymore, so I spec'd MS for ***** and grins.)
Mostly I was reading this thread cause I have a 70 frost mage friend (alliance side... /sigh) who wants me to 2v2, and was thinking of lvling a rogue to do it with, and was looking into builds and ran into the 2.3.2 destruction of HARP rogues, and this thread.

First, two replies:

MAZRA. Goodness... just... goodness. Turns out there's a focus in the game: new stuff with the best gear. Cause, they're new, something different to do, and we'd like to be able to do it, and get teh 1337 epix amirite? And I will QQ about how everyone got to 80 before me because warrior's suck at soloing in anything less than T5 fury gear. "Rogues are the sneakiest..." Isn't that what rogues do? Are you trying to say that because rogues are good at World PvP they SHOULD get rocked in arenas? That everyone should have to have 4 70s to Raid, World PvP, BG, and Arena? ***** that.

Second, I must respond to RPZip (when you quoted yourself). And I'm gonna bottom line here cause i'm WAY too long: warriors shouldn't be on your non-hybrid list, and most hybrid classes have all their specs viable in PvE and PvP, especially since 2.3.

As far as the HARP nerf goes, I've always thought shadow step was kinda cool, if only in idea and not in practice. IMO, spec sstep and wreck clothies for awhile, could be fun.
Also, I've been stun-locked to death by a rogue before, might wanna give that a try... Personally I'm kinda leaning towards a mutilate build to use with my frost mage partner: any suggestions on what that build should look like?

Just my 2cents... well... actually i prolly gave y'all like tree fitty, but whatcha gonna do?

<3 to all of those who read all of this, and my apologies; my understanding to those of you who did not (cause srsly, this thing is way too long).

Questions? Thoughts? Comments? Hopefully I'll remember to check back in on this again >.< Sorry for the length, had a lot to say apparently :-\


*Edited for content, and to try to shorten it :( I promise to sleep before my next post >.<*

Edited, Dec 16th 2007 4:19am by Epitheron
#42 Dec 16 2007 at 12:44 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
wall of ******' text crits my eyes for c-c-c-c-c-c-c-combo breaking over 900 damage

ahem.

didnt read, just skimmed.... about the druid gear

resilience is vs crits, not crushing blows... so defense is needed to a point i believe? and is the arena set high on dodge? thats a big thing too pve....

im pretty sure thats why for twin sets
#43 Dec 16 2007 at 12:52 AM Rating: Decent
I'm aware: again, my apologies on the length. :'-(

Defense is against crits, not crushing blows. Crushing immunity only comes from Shield Block unless the boss hits faster than like 5 hits per six seconds or something, I forget the numbers. Druids aren't crushing immune and neither are pallies (yet), which is why warriors are still MTs. Arena set isn't terribly high on dodge, but you could still def. do PvE DPS in pew pew kitty mode and PvP as feral (with the same spec, i might add). Plus it's loaded with agi. which = dodge (to an extent). But my point was; druid "hybrid" classes DON'T necesarrily have to have more than one set of gear to tank and PvP: but they don't have to have more than one spec. Warrior tanks (a non-hybrid class, supposedly), need a new spec, AND new gear, hence my issue with his grouping warriors into the "one gear set" category. (fyi, i <3 droods, don't nerf them)

Edited, Dec 16th 2007 3:08am by Epitheron
#44 Dec 16 2007 at 1:14 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,538 posts
Epitheron wrote:
Druids aren't crushing immune and neither are pallies (yet), which is why warriors are still MTs.

Actually, Pallies make very good MTs, and are better at bosses with a high chance of a crushing blow (like Tidewalker). Their shield block type ability lasts 8 charges, which means if they get stunned for a little bit, they don't eat a bunch of huge hits in a row like a Warrior could.

#45 Dec 16 2007 at 2:09 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:

Actually, Pallies make very good MTs, and are better at bosses with a high chance of a crushing blow (like Tidewalker). Their shield block type ability lasts 8 charges, which means if they get stunned for a little bit, they don't eat a bunch of huge hits in a row like a Warrior could.


If you're stunned, there isn't anything you can do no matter what class you are. You don't block, parry or dodge while stunned so it's possible (and quite likely) to eat a Crushing Blow.

With that said, Paladins are better at avoiding Crushing Blows than Warriors are. Warriors can take four hits every ten seconds and still be CB immune; Paladins can take eight.

Quote:

RPZIP; good lord, you're still reading? God bless you... anyways. My point here about needing to have anoter gear set is: it's biased. Warriors don't need a new gear set? el oh el? Go spec MS in your tank gear and see how hard you hit with that 2h. Just because the retadin was too stupid to pick up some holy gear while raiding / instancing / leveling; too bad. Prot warriors have to pick up DPS gear somewhere along the line. And I'd like to point out that post 2.3, the Ret tree is quite PvP viable... My point is: their hybrid specs ARE PvP viable!

Ret pallies are everywhere, so are Spriests and Enh. Shaman. Not to mention droods in all their forms (balance is raiding again? abbbbuuuaaahhhh???). I'd also like to point out that with the recent buff to Ret, EVERY paladin spec is now PvP AND Raid Viable. You can tank, and you do DPS as prot, so you can farm AND PvP in tank spec (hard as hell to kill). Ret does dmg, so you can raid as a retading, farm as a retadin, and PvP as a warrior with a heal button and repentance. Holy Pallies; srsly, if you don't know what they can do, just... /shoo. Holy pallies may have some trouble farming, I don't know personally, but i've heard shockadins can do pretty well for themselves).

But as a prot warrior I say to you: Don't QQ to me about gear sets. Nature Resist, Shadow Resist, Fire Resist, Arcane Resist, Prot Gear, and Farming gear take up a HELL of a lot of space. L2Deal, or reroll. Part of being able to PvP and PvE well is finding the gear to do it; Locks, mages, rouges and huntards got lucky cause they DPS, but they still need Resil. gear to be viable in PvP / Arenas. Part of the game is finding the gear for what you want to do. If you want to always use the same gear and build for everything you do... roll a hunter. Otherwise, get out your DPS gearz or your healing set, and come farm with me, we got some **** to gather...


Split that up into this new invention we like to call 'paragraphs' so I could read it. The problem isn't the post length, it's that you don't separate anything so we get eyestrain just glancing at it.

Warriors are somewhat unique in the context of this discussion because while we're a hybrid in terms of PvE we're not in PvP, since... tanking doesn't work. Skimming the rest of the post, I didn't say they were any more _accurate_, only that's where the breakdown in communication seems to come from. It really doesn't matter to me if Paladins could go PvP with all three specs or only with one, it does matter to them.

And bank space? Really? I've got enough space to still have full Tier 2, my partial Tier 2.5 and Tier 3, a ton of weapons and misc. items from MC->Naxx, Tier 4 and 5 as well as off-spec pieces from those instances, every melee weapon from Tier 4 instances and most of Tier 5 (only missing the Rod of the Sun King since we've never had one drop anyway), even some outdated Tier 6 equivalent stuff, a full Nature, Frost, Shadow resist set, tanking gear, a huge stockpile of tokens and such and I still have slots to throw BoE stuff that I could ship to my alt. It's really not a big deal.
#46 Dec 16 2007 at 2:32 AM Rating: Decent
I jst clicked your profile link RPZip, and saw a warglaive of azzinoth, and... just wow.

*post officially hijacked, my bad*
#47 Dec 16 2007 at 3:42 AM Rating: Default
***
1,606 posts
Hehe, yeah I got sick of the constant buff this nerf that crap with rogues. The $700 in proceeds from selling my account bought me a new 40" Samsung 1080p LCD and CoD4. Kinda sucks to see rogues nerfed again though.... hopefully they wont nerf my M16... :)
#48 Dec 16 2007 at 3:57 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
LordMeridus wrote:
Hehe, yeah I got sick of the constant buff this nerf that crap with rogues. The $700 in proceeds from selling my account bought me a new 40" Samsung 1080p LCD and CoD4. Kinda sucks to see rogues nerfed again though.... hopefully they wont nerf my M16... :)

I'm sticking to mut from now on; we're never nerfed or buffed, just left alone to play in our sandbox.

And my sandbox is currently fun with my druid partner.
#49 Dec 16 2007 at 7:12 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,606 posts
I never had more fun on my rogue then when I was playing mute. If it wasn't for raiding, I would have stayed mute forever. The rapid CP generation and big numbers just made it worth it! Was a great jack of all trades built too!
#50 Dec 16 2007 at 7:57 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,602 posts
Buff head or nerf wall?

Quote:
I never had more fun on my rogue then when I was playing mute. If it wasn't for raiding, I would have stayed mute forever. The rapid CP generation and big numbers just made it worth it! Was a great jack of all trades built too!


lip quiver*

BAWLS [cries] LOUDLY*

with much despair and regret*
#51 Dec 16 2007 at 3:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Epitheron wrote:
MAZRA. Goodness... just... goodness. Turns out there's a focus in the game: new stuff with the best gear. Cause, they're new, something different to do, and we'd like to be able to do it, and get teh 1337 epix amirite? And I will QQ about how everyone got to 80 before me because warrior's suck at soloing in anything less than T5 fury gear. "Rogues are the sneakiest..." Isn't that what rogues do? Are you trying to say that because rogues are good at World PvP they SHOULD get rocked in arenas? That everyone should have to have 4 70s to Raid, World PvP, BG, and Arena? ***** that.


I guess my post could be boiled down to: STFU and l2p. I just thought I'd blow some extra letters on it.

It's fine that people want to play the Arena. Hell, I want to play the Arena, I'm just currently in the process of gearing up for it. It's not that I have a problem with the Arena, or with World PvP, or with the Battleground system, or with raiding. Heck, I'd like to do it all. I've got a problem with people who expect their class of choice to be the best at everything, even when they roll a new class. It's a paradox. All classes can't be the best at everything. It can't be done.

Rogues suck at some things, just like Druids suck at some things. Warlocks suck at something else, just like Warriors suck at something. Rock, scissor, paper. I thought people knew that by now. It's only been the mantra on these boards for, like, two years or so. With the slight change that Warlocks are no longer mushrooms in the equation.

Clicky me.

You even beat Hunters. Unless they nerf you drastically, like, removing your arms or something, you'll still have a chance at getting the phat lewt.

And Tyrandor, I thought you knew that sucking doesn't depend on what class you're playing, but rather how well you play any class against an equal opponent. In fact, the more a class gets buffed in comparison to other classes, the more the player of said class can suck without it showing.

It's an old Chinese proverb, I think.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 113 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (113)