Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Some days, I really hate BlizzardFollow

#1 Dec 09 2007 at 11:24 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,538 posts
Today is one of those days. I just read something that made my eye start twitching and my brain implode. It was Blizzard's justification of the Hemo nerf. Allow me to quote that for you.

Quote:
We realise that there are some confusion regarding the Hemo change, and that many of you feel that the damage reduction is too much. The developers felt that Hemo was overpowered. Pretty much every rogue was switching to Hemo because of this, so they made the change to tone it down somewhat. The developers want the subtlety tree to be a good support tree instead.

Seriously, what the ****? This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Let's examine the sequence of events leading up to this.

1. Rogues complain about having only one tree useful for any situation, Combat.
2. The devs respond by buffing Hemo. It opens up interesting hybrid specs and Rogues everywhere rejoice at having a little leeway when choosing a spec.
3. Less than two weeks later, Blizzard sees that lots of Rogues are using Hemo, and uses this to determine that it's overpowered.
4. Blizzard CM spews garbage from his mouth trying to explain why this nerf happened.

Seriously. My mind cannot get a grasp on this. Rogues didn't want to be full Combat for every application, so Blizz buffs hemo. People use hemo, so Blizzard nerfs hemo. Good ******* job Blizzard. Crack team you have working for you.

RandomDev wrote:
OH SWEET JESUS! ROGUES AREN'T ALL FULL COMBAT ANY MORE! NERF IT QUICK!


Aside from this being incredibly stupid, that last little bit has got me twitching and muttering obscenities every few seconds.

Quote:
The developers want the subtlety tree to be a good support tree instead.

******************* This has only two possible meanings. A, it's supposed to be a group/raid support tree. B, it's supposed to support our other trees and help us do more damage or survive longer. Let's examine both possibilities.

A. Well, seeing as there are exactly zero group buffs available to Rogues, much less the Subtlety tree in particular, this is just ********* Hemo could qualify if you were retarded, but even a halfwit can see that sacrificing more DPS than you give to the group is a bad decision. This obviously cannot be true.

B. Well, in 2.3, Subtlety became exactly this. Many people specced into Subtlety to support Combat and Assassination. This is what caused Blizzard to nerf us, so this obviously can't be their motivation. On a side note, if this is true, it means they don't care if deep subtlety sucks or not, because they don't want you to make this your main tree.

You do the math. If A is false, and B is false, then Blizzard is full of ****. I'm ******* tired of this attitude of "We never make mistakes, and if we have made them before, we have already corrected them." This public response to the outrage over the Hemo nerf is absurd. It's an outright lie, and as such, it shows that Blizzard doesn't give a **** about what we think.

Christ I need a drink.
#2 Dec 09 2007 at 11:56 PM Rating: Good
The new specs are only interesting because they're different. There's nothing inherently more interesting about every Rogue being some variant on Hemo than there is with every Rogue being some variant on Combat, which is something that would have been more apparent in like... a week, even had this change not been announced.

Having every single good spec involve Hemo is a little odd. They probably should have left the damage where it is but nerfed the debuff, but instead they lowered the damage and upped the debuff to compensate raid-wise.
#3 Dec 10 2007 at 12:08 AM Rating: Good
**
349 posts
Quote:
The developers felt that Hemo was overpowered. Pretty much every rogue was switching to Hemo because of this


I was planning to switch to Hemo. But not because Hemo being overpowered, but Muti being underpowered.

After a hemo-nerf, every rogue will switch back to combat. And then what? Something like: "The developers felt that Sinister Strike was overpowered. Pretty much every rogue was switching to Combat." And hey, nerf SS.

And WTF. Almost any class has 1 tree that's used the most. So when is Blizz gonna nerf frost mages?

#4 Dec 10 2007 at 12:33 AM Rating: Good
***
1,463 posts
Frost Mages, Arms/Fury Warriors, Discipline Priests, Resto Shamans, Holy Paladins, Resto Druids, SL/SL Warlocks, Markmanship Hunters... What is left?

Rogues are the only ones now? And I know many mutilate rogues, combat rogues ar/prep rogues that all do arena...
#5 Dec 10 2007 at 1:06 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Any DPS class really does have a choice for arena, especially locks, hunters, and rogues.

Shamans do too, as both resto and elemental are very highly regarded by high-end arena teams.

Oh yeah, and disc is a really bad spec for arena; most are going to be shadow or holy/disc.

Edited, Dec 10th 2007 1:13am by Theophany
#6 Dec 10 2007 at 1:58 AM Rating: Good
*
194 posts
Disc has become the best spec for arena if you have ~300 resilience.

That's when having focused will beats out having blessed resilience.

Most shadow priests are switching to disc because shadow has become horribly gimped unless you have a pure cc team to keep everyone else off of you.
#7 Dec 10 2007 at 2:37 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
churler wrote:
Disc has become the best spec for arena if you have ~300 resilience.

That's when having focused will beats out having blessed resilience.

Most shadow priests are switching to disc because shadow has become horribly gimped unless you have a pure cc team to keep everyone else off of you.

You're TOTALLY RIGHT.

http://www.geekboys.org/arena/index/2/all/priest/all/all/

Oh, wait. That says that you're completely wrong.
#8 Dec 10 2007 at 3:19 AM Rating: Good
***
1,463 posts
Theophany the Sly wrote:
churler wrote:
Disc has become the best spec for arena if you have ~300 resilience.

That's when having focused will beats out having blessed resilience.

Most shadow priests are switching to disc because shadow has become horribly gimped unless you have a pure cc team to keep everyone else off of you.

You're TOTALLY RIGHT.

http://www.geekboys.org/arena/index/2/all/priest/all/all/

Oh, wait. That says that you're completely wrong.


According to that, approximately half of the top priests play UNTALENTED, including the highest ranked priest.

Now that must be leet skills there.

But it might be right...we will have to have a discussion about that, but I am still strongly supporting disc for my priest in 3v3. I like the added bonuses and his role in the team is more suitable for that build...
#9 Dec 10 2007 at 6:16 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
guys seriously, you dont think hemo NEEDED the change? 110% 42 debuff is that offensive? it shouldnt out-DPE, out-CP gen, out-control, AND out-macestunprocwtfpwn our other move choice

and considering getting hemo ALSO gets you right next to prep, our BEST talent pvp-wise straight up... hemo should only be as good as a 3/3 agression 0/5 lethality ss, maybe less to compensate the extra cp gen

played at 100% 10 debuff, this is still a godsend for me.... just realise when **** needs adjustment, i know rogues need and want a solid pvp build... but the current ar/prep hemo outclasses everything so much that theres little argument against it as the best.... it just shouldnt be like that i think =\
#10 Dec 10 2007 at 6:42 AM Rating: Default
29 posts
Can't Blizz make a decision ans stick with it for a season? Damn, Blizz waffles as much as some political candidates!!!
#11 Dec 10 2007 at 8:31 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,538 posts
mongoosexcore wrote:
guys seriously, you dont think hemo NEEDED the change? 110% 42 debuff is that offensive? it shouldnt out-DPE, out-CP gen, out-control, AND out-macestunprocwtfpwn our other move choice

Hemo didn't out-DPS Combat. It was slightly inferior, now it's even more inferior. CP generation and control are what it's always been good for, so yes, it should.

Quote:
but the current ar/prep hemo outclasses everything so much that theres little argument against it as the best.... it just shouldnt be like that i think =\

This isn't about AR/Prep, this is about Hemo. There are other ways to balance AR/Prep. Nerfing hemo ruined other builds that weren't overpowered in the least.

RPZip wrote:
The new specs are only interesting because they're different. There's nothing inherently more interesting about every Rogue being some variant on Hemo than there is with every Rogue being some variant on Combat, which is something that would have been more apparent in like... a week, even had this change not been announced.

The reason every Rogue was Hemo was because they were tired of Combat and wanted a change. This trend would have changed soon enough, and we'd have a fair mix of hybrids and combat specs.

Anyway, this thread wasn't about the nerf, it's about their justification for it. They buffed something to where it was useful, then nerfed it to where it wasn't because we used it, and call that balance. Next time we get a buff, everyone make sure not to take advantage of it, lest it be deemed overpowered.
#12 Dec 10 2007 at 8:52 AM Rating: Decent
*
57 posts
I know exactly what you mean, if i had a rage bar my rage would be at about 100 now.

Im so tired of being combat, i was observing the hemo build a little bit and deciding if i would go for it or not... oh well, back to teh good ol' combat build then.

Maybe all rogue developers have a warrior/mage/other rogue hating class :\





P.S. oh BTW i hate warriors, World of roguecraft? suree. World of WARRcraft?
#13 Dec 10 2007 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
Quote:

The reason every Rogue was Hemo was because they were tired of Combat and wanted a change. This trend would have changed soon enough, and we'd have a fair mix of hybrids and combat specs.

Anyway, this thread wasn't about the nerf, it's about their justification for it. They buffed something to where it was useful, then nerfed it to where it wasn't because we used it, and call that balance. Next time we get a buff, everyone make sure not to take advantage of it, lest it be deemed overpowered.


I didn't say it was logical per se... but meh.

Most classes have a PvP tree and a PvE tree(s), although obviously most classes hybridize to some degree. I think the intention was to make Hemo better for raids (unclear if they did this, since I haven't run the new debuff numbers) and worse for PvP, which is... odd, but sure.

Arena-wise, nearly every Mage is Frost, nearly every Warriors is MS (they'd better be) and nearly every Warlock is Demo.

PvE-wise, nearly every Mage is Fire, nearly every Warrior is Fury and nearly every Warlock is full Affliction or Destruction.

They buffed a talent, and every Rogue went from whatever spec they were using before to getting Hemo _in both PvE and PvP_. So, they panicked and reverted the changes somewhat. It'd be like if they changed one talent and all of the sudden every single Mage in the game went Arcane, since they removed the cooldown from PoM. Not saying that makes it right, but that's where they're coming from.
#14 Dec 10 2007 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
***
1,875 posts
Quote:
Hemo didn't out-DPS Combat. It was slightly inferior, now it's even more inferior. CP generation and control are what it's always been good for, so yes, it should.


i thought you said yourself 11-27-23 or w/e tested better then full combat? if you took that back at some point then retract that portion

Quote:
This isn't about AR/Prep, this is about Hemo. There are other ways to balance AR/Prep. Nerfing hemo ruined other builds that weren't overpowered in the least.


name 1 other good way of balancing ar/prep that doesnt consist of taking ar out of prep entirely

and the whole point of why i said that is because at least before the choices were mace combat OR ar/prep OR combat mutilate

when hemo got buffed, there was no reason to not be it outside of hardcore mutilate-renataki burst kings or shadowstep utility guys

this will draw it back closer where it isnt so clear-cut, which is a good thing



im all for buffs to moves that need it... but when its so obvious everyone specs to it because of how awesome it is.... theres just a lack of style the games classes should have

case in points, frost = only pvp for mages... but which is your flavor? imp cs? impact molten armor ********* or every damn point frost for pure dmg?

when hemo ar/prep is widely regarded as the way to pvp, wheres the choice? your weapons? EVERYONE knows maces are best for pvp..... perhaps in the talents you take? riposte or no riposte, then its like what? deadliness or malice? its just not enough of a difference, i like it mutilate and ar/prep and fullcombat all have their advantages and disadvantages... i dont ever wanna see 1 of them be so good the advantages of the others arent enough to even make you blink twice before you drop 50g

ya know?
#15 Dec 10 2007 at 2:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
You're TOTALLY RIGHT.

http://www.geekboys.org/arena/inde...st/all/all/

Oh, wait. That says that you're completely wrong.


Because of course, the stats gathered in the first 2 weeks of a new seasons are an ironclad indication of what is best right?

Hell, Druids were still deep in obscurity 2 weeks in S2! Look how that turned out by the end of that season! But had we been going with your mentality Theo, we'd have been yelling druids were useless 2 weeks out of the gate.

I'm a firm believer that Disc is much more powerful then Holy and that baring some very specific team matrix, shadow priests are a dying breed.

Quote:

The reason every Rogue was Hemo was because they were tired of Combat and wanted a change. This trend would have changed soon enough, and we'd have a fair mix of hybrids and combat specs.


You honestly believe that?

You guys are pretty whismsical and seem to believe everybody else is. I can assure you the main reason people went Hemo was because it kicked ***, and 'being bored of combat' was a distant secondary reason.

And as the weeks would have progressed, the few remaining combat and muti rogue left would have eventually switched over.


Quote:
guys seriously, you dont think hemo NEEDED the change?


It needed a change, yes - I don't think hemo should be the king of pve dps - Combat should be. When Rogues using Warglaives comment that they're getting huge dps upgrade by going hemo instead of combat... there's a balance problem.

But I don't like the ramification this change has on pvp, where I finally felt we had reached the power level we were supposed to be at. The nerf is not a good change overall. If we end up going back to combat for both pve and pvp... the situation is the same (1 spec rules all), except we've just gone back to our lackluster pre-2.3 power level.

Quote:
They buffed a talent, and every Rogue went from whatever spec they were using before to getting Hemo _in both PvE and PvP_. So, they panicked and reverted the changes somewhat. It'd be like if they changed one talent and all of the sudden every single Mage in the game went Arcane, since they removed the cooldown from PoM. Not saying that makes it right, but that's where they're coming from.


The logical choice would have been to make combat (or even assassination) more interesting for pve...

Edited, Dec 10th 2007 6:19pm by Tyrandor
#16 Dec 10 2007 at 2:40 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,006 posts
The Dev's wording is a little off - but we've already established that AR/Prep with hemo shall remain good and strong for pvp, even after the nerf. This change shuffles the pve kids back into combat, but the pvp kids aren't quite locked into combat with them.

QQ Moar!!!
#17 Dec 10 2007 at 3:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Odds are I'll still be 33/28 for pvp and just go back to good old 18/43 for pve.

It's still a flat out nerf thought to our pvp abilities, one that I don't believe was necessary.

The fact that this nerf to rogue is coming in the same patch as a buff to mages makes me rather glad my Mage is getting geared up nicely (264 resi now...).

Edited, Dec 10th 2007 6:06pm by Tyrandor
#18 Dec 10 2007 at 3:13 PM Rating: Decent
*
57 posts
RPZip wrote:
Quote:

The reason every Rogue was Hemo was because they were tired of Combat and wanted a change. This trend would have changed soon enough, and we'd have a fair mix of hybrids and combat specs.

Anyway, this thread wasn't about the nerf, it's about their justification for it. They buffed something to where it was useful, then nerfed it to where it wasn't because we used it, and call that balance. Next time we get a buff, everyone make sure not to take advantage of it, lest it be deemed overpowered.


I didn't say it was logical per se... but meh.

Most classes have a PvP tree and a PvE tree(s), although obviously most classes hybridize to some degree. I think the intention was to make Hemo better for raids (unclear if they did this, since I haven't run the new debuff numbers) and worse for PvP, which is... odd, but sure.

Arena-wise, nearly every Mage is Frost, nearly every Warriors is MS (they'd better be) and nearly every Warlock is Demo.

PvE-wise, nearly every Mage is Fire, nearly every Warrior is Fury and nearly every Warlock is full Affliction or Destruction.

They buffed a talent, and every Rogue went from whatever spec they were using before to getting Hemo _in both PvE and PvP_. So, they panicked and reverted the changes somewhat. It'd be like if they changed one talent and all of the sudden every single Mage in the game went Arcane, since they removed the cooldown from PoM. Not saying that makes it right, but that's where they're coming from.



Thats right i know, but alot of rogues switch to this hemo build just out of curiousity (did i write that wrong?) so did i... i think its waaay to early to judge if everyone is going to stay that way.

Well i think that other classes needed to be fixed first before they change the talents of a rogue ,cough* warrior cough*

thats my opinion
#19 Dec 10 2007 at 3:21 PM Rating: Decent
*
155 posts
For those of you looking for the actual post in question by the CM on the oboards here it is:

http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=1905630623&pageNo=1&sid=1#11

If this isn't allowed/wanted I'll remove the link later.
#20 Dec 10 2007 at 3:33 PM Rating: Good
*
194 posts
Theophany the Sly wrote:
churler wrote:
Disc has become the best spec for arena if you have ~300 resilience.

That's when having focused will beats out having blessed resilience.

Most shadow priests are switching to disc because shadow has become horribly gimped unless you have a pure cc team to keep everyone else off of you.

You're TOTALLY RIGHT.

http://www.geekboys.org/arena/index/2/all/priest/all/all/

Oh, wait. That says that you're completely wrong.


You play your class, I'll play mine.

You need statistics from 2.3 data.

For example:

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Ner%27zhul&n=Jasi

The Ming of the priest world.

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Tortheldrin&n=Lettuceheal

One of the top people on your list.



Edited, Dec 10th 2007 6:35pm by churler
#21 Dec 10 2007 at 6:39 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
churler wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
churler wrote:
Disc has become the best spec for arena if you have ~300 resilience.

That's when having focused will beats out having blessed resilience.

Most shadow priests are switching to disc because shadow has become horribly gimped unless you have a pure cc team to keep everyone else off of you.

You're TOTALLY RIGHT.

http://www.geekboys.org/arena/index/2/all/priest/all/all/

Oh, wait. That says that you're completely wrong.


You play your class, I'll play mine.

You need statistics from 2.3 data.

For example:

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Ner%27zhul&n=Jasi
The Ming of the priest world.

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Tortheldrin&n=Lettuceheal

One of the top people on your list.


Edited, Dec 10th 2007 6:35pm by churler

Uh, you realize Ming isn't that good at all and is generally laughed at by rogues worldwide, right?

If you wanted to show that you know the rogue class, name Neilyo, Nitrana, or Xecks.
#22 Dec 10 2007 at 6:40 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,011 posts
Ming's only being laughed at right now cause he was wrong. Said daggers would make a triumphant return in season 3... lol.
#23 Dec 10 2007 at 7:05 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,538 posts
He's laughed at in general. He's a pompous asshat who thinks he's above everyone else.
#24 Dec 10 2007 at 7:13 PM Rating: Good
*
194 posts
Did you see the Neilyo post on the general forums?

He has skill and all, I've watched his videos, but he has some severe nerd temper tantrums and his grammar/spelling is extremely poor.

Also, on the number 1 on the 5v5 list off of geekboys (Viven) is also Discipline. The Merciless Gladiator title must mean something.
#25 Dec 10 2007 at 8:02 PM Rating: Good
****
8,779 posts
Quote:
He's laughed at in general. He's a pompous asshat who thinks he's above everyone else.


^

this is something of another example of blizzards backasswards way of balancing talents. they usually do this when the alternative (make something better instead) would result in taking something thats for the most part balanced and making it stronger to the point of being imba.
#26 Dec 10 2007 at 8:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Much better to make a blanket nerf all over, right? :(
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 62 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (62)