I saw Skribs post his ideas for WotLK talent tree's in his thread.
I like the idea and I want to see what other people can come up with too.
The site: Unleashed Gaming
My talent tree
Skribs talent tree
Now, go make a talent tree! ;)
Note: please do it serious though, super overpowered talent tree's arent fun imo.
Edited, Nov 26th 2007 2:52pm by Aethien
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- WotLK Talent tree ideas.
WotLK Talent tree ideas.Follow
Hmmm...I like some of your talents, but here's a few issues I have with it...
1. The last 2 tiers of your trees do not correspond with the way blizzard runs them. The second-to-last tier always consists of only a 5-point talent, and the last tier is always a 1-point talent. You have a couple of extra 1-point talents in the 10th tier, as wella s some extra points. Of course, blizzard could drop the format, too.
2. In the first two tiers of survival you appear to have some spelling errors. I'll chalk it up to the late night posting.
3. The 41-point BM talent seems a bit OP to me. That means that when you cast BW, (assuming pre-BW a 65/35 split in damage) you go from 124% to 176.5% damage done. That's an increase in over 52% damage. The variance could be split further in other ways, 75/25 would still be a change from 120% to 157.5% (37.5% difference) and if it's 60/40 it would go from 126% to 164% difference (38%). So...I think it should be revised to some degree.
Uh, nuetral comments:
1. Your marksman tree seems to be buffed for PvP to some extent, although I can see ripping shots being left out of most PvP builds. In PvE I can see it used, although since you didn't buff PvE much I don't see it being used.
2. It looks like what you did is simply build onto the existing builds, rather than changing them like I did (except for a few key talents).
Good Comments:
1. I really like what you did with the higher-end BM tree (except for the 51-point talent).
2. Good use of the chance-on-hit sort of things, I'm not too good with those.
3. WHERE DID YOU GET THE FRICKEN AIMED SHOT ICON? Lol I looked all over and couldn't find it.
1. The last 2 tiers of your trees do not correspond with the way blizzard runs them. The second-to-last tier always consists of only a 5-point talent, and the last tier is always a 1-point talent. You have a couple of extra 1-point talents in the 10th tier, as wella s some extra points. Of course, blizzard could drop the format, too.
2. In the first two tiers of survival you appear to have some spelling errors. I'll chalk it up to the late night posting.
3. The 41-point BM talent seems a bit OP to me. That means that when you cast BW, (assuming pre-BW a 65/35 split in damage) you go from 124% to 176.5% damage done. That's an increase in over 52% damage. The variance could be split further in other ways, 75/25 would still be a change from 120% to 157.5% (37.5% difference) and if it's 60/40 it would go from 126% to 164% difference (38%). So...I think it should be revised to some degree.
Uh, nuetral comments:
1. Your marksman tree seems to be buffed for PvP to some extent, although I can see ripping shots being left out of most PvP builds. In PvE I can see it used, although since you didn't buff PvE much I don't see it being used.
2. It looks like what you did is simply build onto the existing builds, rather than changing them like I did (except for a few key talents).
Good Comments:
1. I really like what you did with the higher-end BM tree (except for the 51-point talent).
2. Good use of the chance-on-hit sort of things, I'm not too good with those.
3. WHERE DID YOU GET THE FRICKEN AIMED SHOT ICON? Lol I looked all over and couldn't find it.
So http://www.war-tools.com/?p=vt&i=43818 isn't too OP is it?
skribs wrote:
Hmmm...I like some of your talents, but here's a few issues I have with it...
1. The last 2 tiers of your trees do not correspond with the way blizzard runs them. The second-to-last tier always consists of only a 5-point talent, and the last tier is always a 1-point talent. You have a couple of extra 1-point talents in the 10th tier, as wella s some extra points. Of course, blizzard could drop the format, too.
2. In the first two tiers of survival you appear to have some spelling errors. I'll chalk it up to the late night posting.
3. The 51-point BM talent seems a bit OP to me. That means that when you cast BW, (assuming pre-BW a 65/35 split in damage) you go from 124% to 176.5% damage done. That's an increase in over 52% damage. The variance could be split further in other ways, 75/25 would still be a change from 120% to 157.5% (37.5% difference) and if it's 60/40 it would go from 126% to 164% difference (38%). So...I think it should be revised to some degree.
1. The last 2 tiers of your trees do not correspond with the way blizzard runs them. The second-to-last tier always consists of only a 5-point talent, and the last tier is always a 1-point talent. You have a couple of extra 1-point talents in the 10th tier, as wella s some extra points. Of course, blizzard could drop the format, too.
2. In the first two tiers of survival you appear to have some spelling errors. I'll chalk it up to the late night posting.
3. The 51-point BM talent seems a bit OP to me. That means that when you cast BW, (assuming pre-BW a 65/35 split in damage) you go from 124% to 176.5% damage done. That's an increase in over 52% damage. The variance could be split further in other ways, 75/25 would still be a change from 120% to 157.5% (37.5% difference) and if it's 60/40 it would go from 126% to 164% difference (38%). So...I think it should be revised to some degree.
2. actually, it was early morning posting for me... posting from work and i had to hurry when i started doing the SV tree, didnt check for spelling errors later...
3. yeah, i was afraid that it would be OP, but i really like the ghost pet idea so i'll have to figure out a way to make it work.
Quote:
It looks like what you did is simply build onto the existing builds, rather than changing them like I did (except for a few key talents).
Quote:
WHERE DID YOU GET THE FRICKEN AIMED SHOT ICON? Lol I looked all over and couldn't find it.
Its also the icon for various polearms, so INV > Spears.
Edited, Nov 27th 2007 8:37am by Aethien
Hmm, I am hoping that Blizzard at level 80 for the BM tree will add Tame Dragonkin as its final talent, but doubt that will happen.
skribs wrote:
So http://www.war-tools.com/?p=vt&i=43818 isn't too OP is it?
Love the "Beast Without" BM spec, lol.
Yeah, the tame dragonkin idea is good. To have a dragon as a pet, that would be sweet.
No offense, but i think most dragonkin in WoW are ugly as hell.
The only ones that are neat are the "normal"flying dragons.
Oh, and dragons are highly intelligent beings, probably even smarter then the average humanoid.
Thus, you wont ever have one of them as pet.
The only ones that are neat are the "normal"flying dragons.
Oh, and dragons are highly intelligent beings, probably even smarter then the average humanoid.
Thus, you wont ever have one of them as pet.
So very true. The only good looking Dragons in this game have the Onyxia/Nefarian model. And Dragonkin as pets? Wouldn't fit the lore for one thing, not to mention that the ones you mostly deal with isn't exactly nice creatures to begin with.
Those trainer fellows in Blade's Edge Mountains annoyed me endlessly for that very reason.
Those trainer fellows in Blade's Edge Mountains annoyed me endlessly for that very reason.
You screwed counterattack a bit because you took out the parry talent -_-.
Recent Visitors: 61
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (61)
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- WotLK Talent tree ideas.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC