Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Elitist Not-WarlocksFollow

#127 Dec 12 2007 at 1:28 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,571 posts
Please dont threat us like we are all some inferior beings because we find succubus useful in some situations.

You take joy in optimizing, somebody else takes joy in making gold, someone else takes joy in making alts... as long as you show some respect for different views on the game than yours none will complain or rate you down (I never did anyway).

All kind of people with good and horrible equipped toons come to these forums and ask questions or give advices if they think they know something.
Some people dont have time or means or luck to equip their toons better. Some people are at the stage of game where they need succubus.

None is preaching or saying she is elite, but almost everyone but you here has manners in expressing opinions and respect for other posters.
What gives you right to act like you are any kind of elite yourself?

#128 Dec 12 2007 at 2:10 AM Rating: Good
You realise it's a game, right?

A bit of fun to fill in some of the spare time?

A nice challenge when there's nothing better to do?

I'm 31. Was I 12-16 then yeah, maybe I'd be doing as you do on a more full time basis. After all, what else is there for a teenager to do these days? (in England at least...)

As it is, I get home from work, assuming I don't have other plans, log in for a couple of hours after dinner, maybe play a bit longer over weekends before going out / 'chores' (I hate that word) etc.

It's an escape, not a friggin' job.

So for those of us who view it the same, a conversation about the usefulness / preferability of using a succy in instances is quite valid.

#129 Dec 12 2007 at 2:53 AM Rating: Default
**
821 posts
uhm wait, i am 27 and hava a bachelor in computer science and a girlfriend and i go out on a **** every now and then, i have friends, i go on hollydays i do everything "normal" people do as well, but i take joy in optimizing things ans succu-cc still is one very bad option.
And what certainly takes the my joy away is beginners in instanzes.
#130 Dec 12 2007 at 3:18 AM Rating: Good
That wasn't a direct comparison, Oaken.

It was an illustration of a DIFFERENT view of playing WoW.

You ain't better, I ain't better - we're different. That's all.

As fo rthe succy thing, it's a bad option if you have other CC options. If you don't it's viable. Now, you may be lucky enough to be in a sizeable, active guild where groups can be put together properly.

For those who rely on PuGs, you HAVE to master your succy-cc to maximise your chances of completing an instance.

And based on your posts that really isn't a problem for you, is it, relying on PuGs.
#131 Dec 12 2007 at 4:15 AM Rating: Decent
**
423 posts
Inoperante wrote :
Quote:
As fo rthe succy thing, it's a bad option if you have other CC options. If you don't it's viable. Now, you may be lucky enough to be in a sizeable, active guild where groups can be put together properly.

For those who rely on PuGs, you HAVE to master your succy-cc to maximise your chances of completing an instance.


QFT.


Edited, Dec 12th 2007 7:28am by shoarmakip

Edited, Dec 12th 2007 7:29am by shoarmakip
#132 Dec 12 2007 at 6:16 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
As fo rthe succy thing, it's a bad option if you have other CC options. If you don't it's viable. Now, you may be lucky enough to be in a sizeable, active guild where groups can be put together properly.

For those who rely on PuGs, you HAVE to master your succy-cc to maximise your chances of completing an instance.

/signed
As for the OP, there is no I in the word team, group, 5-man, you get the point. So you can QQ all you want about it, or start thinking outside the box. It's quite simple, if you want to stop having ppl leave the group you are in, or kicking you... L2P nice with others. Or just keep on keepin on and see what happens when u grab a pug and start teh "me dps lock! me only kill!" I wouldn't invite you to run DM with my alt if you had that attitude, let alone do a 10 man or 25 man. But either way, Bliz got there $15 for the month right? :)
#133 Dec 12 2007 at 7:17 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,571 posts
Oakenwrath wrote:

And what certainly takes the my joy away is beginners in instanzes.


I am sure you had a lot of despise for your own self when you were one of such beginners then.
Or you are trying to tell us that you discovered WoW, popped into it, got to 70 in 2 days and started raiding on the 3rd?

Even the God himself needed full 7 days to make the world you know.

I could justify your behavior towards beginners that "take away your joy" (what are you doing around those beginners anyway, who asked you to step down from your throne?) only if you Ebayed fully epicced out level 70 and never had a chance to try and be a beginner yourself. Did you?

#134REDACTED, Posted: Dec 12 2007 at 7:43 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) yes i found a way to level from 1-73 within 2 hours just by soloing ragefire chasm.
#135 Dec 12 2007 at 9:10 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,571 posts
Well you certainly act here on forum like you did.

Some people just dont want to understand how little tolerance and manners can do wonders.
*sigh*


#136 Dec 12 2007 at 10:26 AM Rating: Decent
Meh, this thread made some amazing turns.
This is just my point of view.
5 minutes ago i checked all the time i spend last year playing and researching WoW. Surely i'll hit full month till the end of 2007. I think most of you have same or near amount of time too. So let me say that: if i spare 1/12 of my life for something, it's surely important for me. It's pointless to state if i'm mature person or teenager. The final result is same. May be WoW isn't the best RPG ever, but surely it's unbelievable addictive. So my conclusion is: if you spare such amount of time on something (call it hoby, call it entertainment, call it relaxing time, call it whatever, including addicted :) you have full rights to make statements about it. If someaone disagree of that, i'll only say: this is just my point of view, this is just your point of view, go through it.


http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-...mp;n=Coruin
#137 Dec 12 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
**
357 posts
We have 2 people saying seduce is absolute crap in instances.

One has been 70 for a long time, raids, has the uber gear and probably runs heroics with his guild. My guess, pali tank, mage, hunter/rogue. Running in a group like that the succubus is pointless.

The other is a fresh 70, just starting heroics and probably under-geared due to the limit being lowered to honored. Pugs most of the time and probably ends up with a dps warrior(they're always in lfg)another form of cc(mage/hunter/rogue), and a druid/warrior tank who are all probably geared the same as him.

So my question to you Oaken, is how do you get through a regular 5 pull in a heroic with a lock that won't use seduce, a dps warrior, and a fairly fresh tank who can't hold any more than 2 with only 1 person on cc?

As I said before, i'm here to learn to play the class the best I can. You are saying succubus is crap but not telling us what you use/do, instead your calling us all trash for using her. Or that's how it comes off and then people get pissy and rate you down.

The whole RL arguement is void because (I'd hope) we all have real lives. Yet we all play the game and like to play well. For some of us that's learning to master the succubus in 5-mans, for you Oaken it's not. I guarantee if you explained how to be just as effective in regular groups like the one I mentioned above with out using Succubus instead of just calling everyone a noob this whole *****-slapping fest wouldn't be going on.
#138 Dec 12 2007 at 12:11 PM Rating: Good
***
1,571 posts
CoruinMK wrote:
So my conclusion is: if you spare such amount of time on something (call it hoby, call it entertainment, call it relaxing time, call it whatever, including addicted :) you have full rights to make statements about


One thing is making statements as your opinion, another thing is saying "even your urge to discuss such a fcuking issue, shows me where you are ingame.at the very fcuking bottom."

Its rude. Its insulting. It just shows that person that can write something like that has no manners and therefore has yet to learn proper behavior on a public forum.

It has nothing to do with game, opinions, points of view or playing warlock; just plain old home training and proper attitude towards people you communicate with.

#139 Dec 12 2007 at 12:43 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,729 posts
I just have to say that I agree with CCButch here, if you have all the CC you need, then yeah, Succy CC is the worst possible choice. However, let's take Slabs as an example, you know, the room before the boss that Mind Controls everyone. There's a couple 6 Mob pulls in there. When I run with my guild we usually have a Warrior Tank, Priest Healer, Me, My G/F Hunter and one other person, let's say a mage, for good CC.

Six Mobs, one Demon, the rest are Humanoid. Banish the Demon and down to five, Mage and Hunter CC two of them, three left.

What's the best plan of action?

1) 3 mobs beat on the tank and risk Priest getting Healing Aggro

2) Bust out VW/Felguard to Off-Tank one and risk Priest getting Healing Aggro

3) Seduce one until the first 2 are dead?
#140 Dec 12 2007 at 2:13 PM Rating: Decent
I think some people have had bad experiences w/ certain warlocks trying to seduce-cc -- and they assume it doesn't work. They're not sophisticated enough to know that the lock who gave them a bad experience just didn't know what he was doing.

It takes a little skill to cc w/ the succubus. You can't just hit the button and focus 100% on shadowbolting or whatever.

You have to keep an eye on the target - you have to multitask between your dpsing role and monitoring your seduced victim. You have to know what can go wrong (usually the mob breaks seduce and kills your pet before you can get off a second seduce). You have to know how to deal with this - i.e. get it mad at you so it comes at you instead of killing pet - or you deathcoil it for a short duration fear to give pet a chance to land second seduce, whatever.

A good lock can cc just fine w/ the succubus.
#141 Dec 13 2007 at 3:31 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Funny how you "conveniently" left out http://www.wowwiki.com/Crowd_Control#Warlock, where Voidwalker isn't mentioned at all...

Funny how you have no idea how to read a thread, before responding.
My comment was in response to the "these classes have no crowd control"-- which was completely untrue, based on the spell list and the Wow Wiki pages. For me to include the warlock link would have been redundant, because warlocks ARE crowd control, among other things. No sh*t, of course warlocks have crowd control, what the @#%^ did you think was meant, when all of us were talking about FEAR AND SEDUCE.

Quote:

Which of these does the Voidwalker have?

Going on the previous discussion, which you missed, we were talking about crowd control. Going by the definition I mentioned that I was using, the voidwalker has crowd control; "Suffering" and "Tourment" being those.
Creating more threat than you do is just as affective at keeping a target off of you, as Seduce or Fear. The only difference being, managing threat is probably more complicated.
If you are going to tell me that something like Suffering is not a form of crowd control, then you have a rather narrow idea of what that means.

This is not about "voidwalker is not crowd control". The problem is, some people manage crowds in different ways; and those people think one way is better than another. There is no general CC minion or CC class. Until there is, then it is bullsh*t that some players think their way is the best, just because it works for them.
I started this thread, because some of those people were crabby and ignorant about how some warlocks like to play, regardless of my telling them how I would before joining a group. There is absilutly no reason to exclude the use of any one minion under most circumstances, because if the group is working together, it wont matter a whole lot.

Edited, Dec 13th 2007 6:32am by sederix
#142 Dec 13 2007 at 3:48 AM Rating: Decent
**
423 posts
Well,vw cant hold a mob for 12sec ,in heroic at least,seduce can.
And if you think healer should heal your void when he is lolofftanking then you are really really wrong.

I guess you will see for yourself,during time,that you were mistaken.Void is for solo farming\questing\bg,sometimes\arena start if you have fel domination for bubble.and thats it.
#143 Dec 13 2007 at 4:02 AM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
I am really amazed at the tone some people have in these forums. I keep wondering if they talk like that to strangers or people they meet for the first time. If not, why do it here?

Is it really so hard not being condescending? Is it really neccessary to call people something other than the name they present themselves with?

I'm getting too old I guess.
#144 Dec 13 2007 at 4:14 AM Rating: Decent
**
423 posts
Quote:
I am really amazed at the tone some people have in these forums. I keep wondering if they talk like that to strangers or people they meet for the first time. If not, why do it here?


RL and Internet Forums have NOTHING in common.Unfortunately.
Would be nice if 20-30 of us can get together on coffe or smth,discuss this irl ,id sure like to see oaken calling me\us fcuking ******* irl


Edited, Dec 13th 2007 7:19am by shoarmakip
#145 Dec 13 2007 at 4:51 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,571 posts
Thmpax wrote:
I am really amazed at the tone some people have in these forums. I keep wondering if they talk like that to strangers or people they meet for the first time. If not, why do it here?

Is it really so hard not being condescending? Is it really neccessary to call people something other than the name they present themselves with?

I'm getting too old I guess.


Personally I try to restrain myself even more in online communication than I do IRL. I can see directly if stranger I talk to on the street gets offended and can explain or apologize if necessary.
Online I might deal with sensitive people that I cant really *see* being hurt, so I try to keep that in mind and be nice.

There are consequences we have to deal with when being rude to people on the street, there are none for being rude to people in virtual world.
Only those with strong principles that dont come from fear of punishment but from inbuilt personal responsibility towards others can maintain sort of behavior that will not offend or hurt even virtual people.
And of course, they simply have to care about somebody else but themselves.

Only my opinion.... and yes, I am probably getting old too.

#146 Dec 13 2007 at 5:58 AM Rating: Good
***
1,729 posts
Quote:
"Suffering" and "Tourment" being those.
Creating more threat than you do is just as affective at keeping a target off of you, as Seduce or Fear.


First off, Suffering and Torment are not CC, they are taunts. Taunts move you up on a mobs threat list yes. The problem being, the healer will still get threat due to healing on an off-tanked mob. It still will on a CCed mob too, difference being, the CCed mob will not turn to the healer until it's CC wears off. If the healer gets enough aggro while something is off-tanking it, thenit goes right to her. This can become a problem real fast, especially in a heroic where that healer will die in one hit. If you were Seducing, properly, you'd see the timer about to run out, move away from said mob, drop a searing pain on it, then re-seduce before it gets to you.

Also, VWs die in instances. If your off-tank dies, your screwed, if your healer is healing him, and not the Main Tank, that's a waste of mana, mana that wouldn't have been spent if you were using real CC, if your using health funnel to heal your VW, then your not at your max DPS potential, pull doesn't go down fast enough and your screwed. The point is, there are just too many things that can go wrong in a VW Off-Tank situation,that don't go wrong in a Succy Seduce Situation IF you know what your doing.

#147 Dec 13 2007 at 6:10 AM Rating: Decent
**
357 posts
Quote:
I told them before starting, as I usually tell a group I dont start, that I was DPS not CC


Quote:
For me to include the warlock link would have been redundant, because warlocks ARE crowd control, among other things


This made me laugh. Both said by Sederix(don't know how to do the "Sederix said" thing)

#148 Dec 13 2007 at 6:45 AM Rating: Good
*
73 posts
Here i come and thought this thread might have something useful about locks. I have no idea on how a warlock should do when it comes to heroic instances. But as a rogue, even i have to sacrifice my dps in order to make things go the way it should go. I would gladly throw a blind if it can help the healer, using my 5 cp to KS a mob, just to get those secs, that might save one person, hell even evasion tanking if needed.
Bottomline is that we all have to do some sacrifices if we want things go the way we want. So seederix if you want to do DPS and nothing more, why then did you roll a warlock? Why do you bother with pve? Im just curious and if im not asking then i wont get any answers.

Edited, Dec 13th 2007 3:52pm by Livies
#149 Dec 16 2007 at 4:43 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
Well,vw cant hold a mob for 12sec ,in heroic at least,seduce can.
And if you think healer should heal your void when he is lolofftanking then you are really really wrong.

It's a good thing I never mentioned being ready for Heroics, or terribly caring about it, because you would have a point in that case.
And, are you directing this at me? I never said anything about healers healing any minion of mine. In fact, I tell them NOT to. If they do so, then that is the healer's fault, not mine, because I love me some Health Funnel.

Quote:

First off, Suffering and Torment are not CC, they are taunts. Taunts move you up on a mobs threat list yes.

I have to disagree with you, there.
If crowd control is a means by which one immobilizes or directs the attacks of a target or targets, then taunting can be one of them.
When I was doing Mauraudon with two others a couple weeks ago, I used to use Suffering to keep all the threat. They were safe to attack, and were not attacked themselves. I cant do the exact same thing in an Outland instance, but if I am using felguard or voidwalker, at least one target is busy and not attacking the rest of us-- which is exactly the point of Seduce.
It's not a science, but it can be affective.

Quote:
Also, VWs die in instances. If your off-tank dies, your screwed, if your healer is healing him, and not the Main Tank, that's a waste of mana, mana that wouldn't have been spent if you were using real CC, if your using health funnel to heal your VW, then your not at your max DPS potential, pull doesn't go down fast enough and your screwed. The point is, there are just too many things that can go wrong in a VW Off-Tank situation,that don't go wrong in a Succy Seduce Situation IF you know what your doing.

What you are saying can apply to any situation, in that case.
I would have to Health Funnel ANY minion, if I did not have time to make another. If the healer is stupid enough to waste their mana on the minion, and not me, then that is the healer's problem. There is a thread in the Priest forum, called "Your Pet is not at the Top of My List of Priorities" that might amuse you.
I would not be at my "max DPS potential" if I was Seducing, either. Remember, the times I have done that, I fell right to the bottom of the list. This is not an uncommon problem.
There are lots of things that can go wrong with Seduce-- it only lasts 15 seconds, and causes a lot of threat, for example. There are lots of things that could go wrong if I chose any other minion, or any other party member.
If in the case I am using a minion as a means of CC, I would use a combination of Health Funnel, Drain Life and a series of DOT spells; just as if I were soloing/questing. That usually works well, and is less of a hassle for the group's healer. The elitist-non-warlocks are the only ones who complain the most; most people do not care, and are generally satisfied with the not dying.
The "point" is that anything can happen, and it is a matter of working together and knowing how to work with what you have. Suckybitch is not the end all of minions, and is one of the least preferred instance minion (at least according to the recent poll). Lots of people have gotten along without Seduce, even before it was not allowed in Heroics.

Quote:
This made me laugh. Both said by Sederix(don't know how to do the "Sederix said" thing)

Sederix also made the implication that you have trouble reading everything he said, before you replied.
#150 Dec 16 2007 at 10:49 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,571 posts
Quote:
I would not be at my "max DPS potential" if I was Seducing, either. Remember, the times I have done that, I fell right to the bottom of the list. This is not an uncommon problem.


That can only be a problem for those that have no experience with seducing.
My only loss of DPS is the one that comes from having pet alive and not +15% shadow damage buff from sacced one.
Otherwise I keep up all the DPS I can with lousy gear for my spec at this moment. Seducing something has almost nothing to do with it, it makes me loose maybe 5 casting seconds in entire instance.

Quote:
There are lots of things that can go wrong with Seduce-- it only lasts 15 seconds, and causes a lot of threat, for example.


Only things that can go wrong with seduce are "resist" and "break", in both cases you simply seduce again. Considering that my succubus with my measle 7k mana pool can seduce 6-7 times until OOM..... that should be enough for your party to kill whatever had higher priority and get on your target.

As far as threat goes, you are the one that decides on that. You use your toolbar to manage aggro of your seduced target.

Quote:
If in the case I am using a minion as a means of CC, I would use a combination of Health Funnel, Drain Life and a series of DOT spells; just as if I were soloing/questing.


But you are going to find out that you can not act in groups and instances just as if you are soloing.

#151 Dec 16 2007 at 4:31 PM Rating: Default
35 posts
Out of all these post no one has said use COS before you sedduce gives you aggro and keeps your succy alive longer because she doesn't get hit and you don't get hit cuz shes in between you and the mob, and she always gets the target sedduced before it reaches you. Plus it helps her sedduce better because seduction is a shadow spell, oh and also to the OP, your the reason most demo locks are shunned nowadays.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 145 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (145)