Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

....o man, keep this please!Follow

#52 Nov 04 2007 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
5 min cycles on PTR against servant of grol, so the fight was like 99.9% < 35% so dirty deeds was doing its thing the entire fight for Hemo.

19/42 combat vs 31/30 AR+Deadliness (just to keep in line with RP's math from before.)

Hemo

SS

6/31/24 Hemo test <-- edited in. This gives me one murder, and 5/5 malice to up the crit. If you notice that is a pretty generous test considering the critrate was near 40%. But that just means my tests are only so accurate, still the results remain the same.

SS outdamages hemo by a fair amount. 269 DPS : 246 DPS in fact. Factor in additional damage to white hits and you might get close, maybe. But then again thats with a target at < 35% the entire fight!

The fights started with AR then ended when AR came back up, and it also seemed the hemo test had double mongoose up quite a bit.

also shows combat potency > hemo for energy management since i was able to get off 5 more SSs, which cost more energy. Though, this is only as conclusive as one 5 minute test can be.

Im gonna try one more combo.... brb

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 9:31am by KTurner

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 10:11am by KTurner
#53 Nov 04 2007 at 9:57 AM Rating: Good
**
341 posts
So in your test, ss looses to Hemo in terms of damage and energy usage.

Isn't that going against every bit of math in this thread?
#54 Nov 04 2007 at 10:02 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
hemo loses to SS is what i found
#55 Nov 04 2007 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
***
1,463 posts
I think that is what he meant. Since we have been talking about hemo being the new uber-super-duper(ah I remember naming my secret of mana characters super,duper,group) rogue talent. Even beating SS without the buff.
#56 Nov 04 2007 at 10:13 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
yeah, funny that 19/42 combat SS hit harder than 30 sub hemos. So i dunno. Personally im going to stick to combat next patch. Not that its necessarily better, but im finally getting the hang of it and aint gonna change yet.
#57 Nov 04 2007 at 11:43 AM Rating: Good
My math was for Combat Hemo, which would be this one.

You don't get AR. You get Relentless Strikes and Ruthlessness, which have a bit more of an effect than AR does. The test is skewed because of Serrated Blades, unless I miss my guess - the ArPen isn't going to function correctly on mobs of that level, especially if it bottoms out (can't go below zero armor). You're also basing it off of a 100-attack sample size, which is... no. Two more crits and the damage difference reverses itself. It also fails to take into account the extra Rupture damage, but that's a bit tangential to the direct Hemo:SS comparison.
#58 Nov 04 2007 at 11:50 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
I dont think its that skewed, if anything its skewed heavily in favor of Hemo, and SS still performs better.

And yes, its purely SS vs Hemo, nothing else was used. just spammed hemo/ss.

edit: heh just noticed my SS test had me at >42% crit lol. I will try a larger sample later, how does 500 sound, RP?

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 12:18pm by KTurner
#59 Nov 04 2007 at 1:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Kinda confused Ken...

I see your Hemo damage at 764dps, and your SS at 755dps.

Granted, that's dirty deeds, so it's fair to say that SS would do more damage overall, since the target (in pvp or pve) spend more time out of DD range then in it...

But still, that's pretty damn close, considering all the extra trick (Better Stealth, Prep, Ghostly Strike (Which does hit harder then SS) and better Rupture) that Hemo has over pure combat.

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 4:29pm by Tyrandor
#60 Nov 04 2007 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
***
1,538 posts
Not a very fair test. The build you'd use for a Hemo PvE build would be 11/27/23. Relentless Strikes generates more energy than AR + Prep. Also, a big part of this build's DPS is improved rupture damage. In my tests, I had Hemo beating SS by about 80 DPS without Dirty Deeds, using a 1s/5r cycle.

Going to pop on and see what kind of DPS I get with a proper 11/27/23 build.

Edit: 1136.9 DPS with 11/27/23. That's about 10% higher than Combat Swords, which is a rather significant increase. Hemo was 73,809 damage of 348,624, or 21%. Adjusting that for Dirty Deeds, we get 61,507 damage, which is a difference of 12,302. The new percentage is 18.3%. Increasing that by the 7% average you get out of Dirty Deeds, we have 65,812 damage, for a total damage of 340,627. The new adjusted DPS is 1080. This is about 40 DPS higher than my Combat Swords tests. Keep in mind that this is without any buffs whatsoever, other than poisons. With raid buffs, the damage gap will be much, much higher.

11/27/23 simply outperforms Combat Swords in every aspect. More DPS, more control, more utility.

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 5:01pm by Nooblestick
#61 Nov 04 2007 at 3:06 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Kinda confused Ken...

I see your Hemo damage at 764dps, and your SS at 755dps.

Granted, that's dirty deeds, so it's fair to say that SS would do more damage overall, since the target (in pvp or pve) spend more time out of DD range then in it...

But still, that's pretty damn close, considering all the extra trick (Better Stealth, Prep, Ghostly Strike (Which does hit harder then SS) and better Rupture) that Hemo has over pure combat.

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 4:29pm by Tyrandor


That DPS on the meter includes everything, so the white damage (also effected by dirty deeds AND hemo debuff) did make up for it overall, i was talking SS dps vs Hemo dps, and hemo was about 24dps lower.
#62 Nov 04 2007 at 3:11 PM Rating: Excellent
**
341 posts
Quote:
11/27/23 simply outperforms Combat Swords in every aspect. More DPS, more control, more utility.


Quiet Nooble, you are tempting the nerf gods.

Their wrath we are all to familiar with, and it would be best to avoid their notice on this one.
#63 Nov 04 2007 at 3:28 PM Rating: Good
***
1,538 posts
ArundelvalEstar wrote:
Quote:
11/27/23 simply outperforms Combat Swords in every aspect. More DPS, more control, more utility.


Quiet Nooble, you are tempting the nerf gods.

Their wrath we are all to familiar with, and it would be best to avoid their notice on this one.

Upon further review, Hemo actually gave me negative DPS and deleted all my epics.
#64 Nov 04 2007 at 3:29 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,538 posts
KTurner wrote:
the white damage (also effected by dirty deeds

No, it's not. Special attacks only.
#65 Nov 04 2007 at 3:35 PM Rating: Excellent
**
341 posts
Nooblestick wrote:
ArundelvalEstar wrote:
Quote:
11/27/23 simply outperforms Combat Swords in every aspect. More DPS, more control, more utility.


Quiet Nooble, you are tempting the nerf gods.

Their wrath we are all to familiar with, and it would be best to avoid their notice on this one.

Upon further review, Hemo actually gave me negative DPS and deleted all my epics.


Thanks nooble, I hadn't laughed that hard in a very long time.

Off topic: What is the post count for two stars?
#66 Nov 04 2007 at 3:43 PM Rating: Good
KTurner wrote:
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Kinda confused Ken...

I see your Hemo damage at 764dps, and your SS at 755dps.

Granted, that's dirty deeds, so it's fair to say that SS would do more damage overall, since the target (in pvp or pve) spend more time out of DD range then in it...

But still, that's pretty damn close, considering all the extra trick (Better Stealth, Prep, Ghostly Strike (Which does hit harder then SS) and better Rupture) that Hemo has over pure combat.

Edited, Nov 4th 2007 4:29pm by Tyrandor


That DPS on the meter includes everything, so the white damage (also effected by dirty deeds AND hemo debuff) did make up for it overall, i was talking SS dps vs Hemo dps, and hemo was about 24dps lower.


There's no possible reason for SS to do more autoattack damage than Hemo does other than variation due to a smaller sample size, though.
#67 Nov 04 2007 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
***
1,538 posts
ArundelvalEstar wrote:
Off topic: What is the post count for two stars?

250? You got it either way.
#68 Nov 04 2007 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Nooblestick wrote:
KTurner wrote:
the white damage (also effected by dirty deeds

No, it's not. Special attacks only.


Hmm, i hadnt noticed that, but you are correct.
#69 Nov 04 2007 at 8:11 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
1k for 3 stars! u can do it!
#70 Nov 04 2007 at 8:57 PM Rating: Decent
*
51 posts
Sorry, I've not replied on this board, but midterms are coming up again. I'll try to keep this brief as I notice my posts tend to be very long winded, but I hope they are nonetheless informative.

The short of it is that after hearing that hemo is now normalized I did some recalculating. At 1700 AP and with the same weapon hemo only falls 68 damage behind talented SS, and with only 2 charges going off it outdamages SS by 4, though you'll probably get at least 3 or 4 further widening the damage gap.

I'm glad to hear hemo is now normalized, as now you don't need a nigh unattainable weapon to make it pretty good. But if I went hemo, I think I'd go fists, as I think the higher crit rate would be offset some of hemo's shortcomings (ie: lack of lethality) somthing along the lines of this:

http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/rogue/talents.html?0053201000000000000000053050020050105000000000502530002301210000000

It has the synergy as a Bleed 'em Out Rogue. I think these talents will do better at maximizing damage output, and providing some more utility, but I suppose more testing instead of math would have to be done to be sure.

Edited, Nov 5th 2007 1:33am by FelRogue
#71 Nov 04 2007 at 10:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Why would you take 2/2 Dirty Deeds instead of finishing off sword spec for a pve build...?
#72 Nov 04 2007 at 10:38 PM Rating: Decent
*
51 posts
My bad, the link did not update properly so I've edited the post. It's supposed to be a fist spec anyway. But in either case, you still want 2/2 dirty deeds because in 2.3 that talent increases the damage of all special attacks against enemies with less than 35% health, and this helps close the gap between SS and Hemo in a long boss fight.

It's personal preference really, but I'd rather give up the pleasant surprise 5% extra swing for a wider crit range. Despite the poor itemization, good fists will be easier to come by al a Battlegrounds/Arenas come 2.3. And I didn't pick up weapon expertise since, as far as I know, this only adds to crit rating and not hit as of last patch and even then only adds .4% crit with 2 talents. If that's true then Weapon Expertise = Not that Good.
#73 Nov 04 2007 at 10:47 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
Quote:
Why would you take 2/2 Dirty Deeds instead of finishing off sword spec for a pve build...?


id rather do 10% more damage during the last third of a boss fight, then 1% sword proc myself
#74 Nov 04 2007 at 10:53 PM Rating: Decent
*
207 posts
I am noticing that Sword spec is factored into all these calculations. Is hemo not viable when using maces or fists? I am always looking for the max damage raid spec, would hemo mace outperform combat daggers?
#75 Nov 04 2007 at 11:22 PM Rating: Decent
*
51 posts
Actually, my calculations do not account for armor mitigation, crit, or additional swings. As for some of the tests done above, they are live tests. My best guess would be that since there tends to be more swords than maces or fists, most rogues use the specialization for the best non-dagger weapon they have on hand. That's not to say that maces and fists would do bad, but given that mace specialization gives no bonus damage via talents, we can safely eliminate maces as being #1 damage contender as compared to swords and fists.

As I said before, I would go fists, personally, for reasons I've already stated, but I am going to have to do a lot of BG's in order to have them in time for patch 2.3's release.

In the end you should pick the weapon that suits your tastes.
#76 Nov 04 2007 at 11:26 PM Rating: Decent
*
207 posts
Huh? Patch 2.3 adds 5% crit damage for maces.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 202 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (202)