Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

We had a prot in our raidFollow

#1 Oct 29 2007 at 10:25 PM Rating: Decent
We did Vashj (vials) with our new protection paladin (twistedpower, decent gear, look him up) and I didn't notice any problems, so that was good. Then we didn't have enough to head into BT, so we went to TK, and man did his AoE tanking shine. Especially on the bird packs right before Al'ar. He also tanked the adds on Al'ar flawlessly, as was his adds on Solarian. I was quite impressed, which if you know me, means a lot seeing as how much I knock protection.

At the same time, I still don't think any protection paladin can get the TPS that our warrior main tank does (averages 1000 TPS), so while it was amusing, and he'll be great in Hyjal, I still would never make a paladin a main tank.
#2 Oct 29 2007 at 10:35 PM Rating: Good
***
2,717 posts
I think I've finally pinned it down...I've known it for a while really but finally thought of the simplest way to say it...warriors are best at tanking bosses, druids are best at off-tanking a single target, and paladins are best at tanking trash and multiple adds. Is that a fair way of putting it?

Lol sorry to kind of jack your thread dilbrt, although it is pertinent.
#3 Oct 29 2007 at 10:43 PM Rating: Excellent
No, I agree. I don't consider you jacking my thread at all. That was kinda my point, you just went a little further than I did.
#4 Nov 01 2007 at 3:34 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Dilbrt wrote:
At the same time, I still don't think any protection paladin can get the TPS that our warrior main tank does (averages 1000 TPS)


I was always under the impression that getting threat wasn't the problem with paladin tanks, it's the lower health and lack of special mitigations, like shield wall, etc, that made it tougher for paladins to tank bosses (if threat was the problem they'd be sub-optimal on multi-mobs too wouldn't they?).

But then again I took a break for a while, did something change?
#5 Nov 01 2007 at 3:42 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I was always under the impression that getting threat wasn't the problem with paladin tanks, it's the lower health and lack of special mitigations, like shield wall, etc, that made it tougher for paladins to tank bosses (if threat was the problem they'd be sub-optimal on multi-mobs too wouldn't they?).


yes and no. my main is only 47 warrior and 29 alt pally but i can tell you already pally handles adds alot easier. with the aoe of pally prot spec so 90% more threat i feel it does more threat than warrior's TC. i dont know though i dont really do the math stuff. but another thing is it's aoe where TC is a max of 4 mobs then you have to demo shout and sunder armor on adds and keep TC on them . where as pally you get threat from aoe and your Damage shield aura seeing it's holy damage does extra threat also. and then later on i think ya get some shield spell sorta the same i dont know havent read too much on pally yet. and yes pally's tend to have less hp from what i hear and less avoidance stuff as warrior so that also plays a role.
#6 Nov 01 2007 at 4:23 AM Rating: Decent
**
274 posts
All other things being equal, single target aggro for paladins and warriors is roughly the same. (the robot trash near VR I routinely spike to 1800tps when I have a shammy in my group).

With the upcoming changes to prot, the only reason to bring a warrior is you think shield wall and last stand are worth a blessing for the entire raid and a judged seal.
#7 Nov 01 2007 at 6:40 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Just had a talk on the realm forum about Prot pallies. The third and fourth ranked alliance guilds on the server feel that they are pointless to have, that Warrior/Druids are better.

I tried to make the argument that having at least 1 prot pally per raid force is a good idea since they fill a very important niche and worse comes to worse can throw a healing set on and heal on fights where they aren't needed. The other guilds didn't agree.

I didn't feel like mentioning that my guild has cleared through SSC/TK in 1/3 the time that it took them to progress through it mainly due to having prot pallies for trash like in the eye (the birds you mentioned) or even tanking stuff like the spawns from Alar, Tidewalker, Solarian, etc.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#8 Nov 01 2007 at 7:33 AM Rating: Default
I'm not really talking about tanking trash... when it comes to trash, paladins will always win out, I'm talking on bosses.

I've never seen a complaint against a paladin tank about mitigation. Health, sure, but not mitigation.
#9 Nov 01 2007 at 12:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
274 posts
Exactly. And once 2.3 comes out the health thing won't matter. And the nice thing about 10% stamina is that it scales with better gear. (where as the health difference between warriors and pallies is fixed).

I made some rough calculations, and I think about 1100-1200 stamina is the point at which a paladin will overtake a warrior in HP with gear being equal (of course they have a rifle and some better itemization).
#10 Nov 01 2007 at 3:56 PM Rating: Default
I can't speak for alliance, but there will NEVER be a time where a blood elf paladin will overtake a tauren in health (and most guilds use a tauren for their main tank).
#11 Nov 01 2007 at 4:51 PM Rating: Decent
Tauren get an additional 5% HP to their max, but even that is surmountable at some point, in theory.
#12 Nov 01 2007 at 7:59 PM Rating: Decent
**
554 posts
Just remember that Pallys have MTed every raid boss in BC now.
From what I've read, the problems were not Pallys them selves but breaking
people out of thier mindset, that Pallys cant tank 5 man, heroics, Kara, Gruul,
Mag, SC,Tk... ect... You get the point.





#13 Nov 02 2007 at 1:17 AM Rating: Decent
There are few fights which are IMPOSSIBLE for Paladin to tank, but not too many. Reliquary of Souls, whichever phase it is where you need to spell-reflect, and that mana drain boss at Hyjal(Hell, we killed him again last night and I can't remember the name.)


But otherwise, Paladins are just fine for tanking bosses. At least come next patch. ^_^


And I tank on trash/adds for my guild, and strap on my old healing gear when I'm not needed as a tank.
#14 Nov 02 2007 at 4:14 AM Rating: Decent
**
274 posts
Mimickins, King of Bards wrote:

But otherwise, Paladins are just fine for tanking bosses. At least come next patch. ^_^


This is the condescending attitude I hate. (irony to be realized shortly) Using the words "just fine" reeks of ignorance and malice to me. We don't tank "just fine." We tank exceptionally well and bring utility to the raid. And my hypothesis has long since been it is only the truly talented prot paladins that go onto raiding (because the bad ones are harassed by peers to go holy), where as any douche bag scrub warrior can tank mediocre against pretty much anything.

Consequently, all other things being equal, the warrior may be better in some cases. But all things are not equal. The average IQ of a prot pally in a raid is easily 2 standard deviations higher than their warrior counterpart.
#15 Nov 02 2007 at 6:25 AM Rating: Default
*
237 posts
newfangle wrote:
The average IQ of a prot pally in a raid is easily 2 standard deviations higher than their warrior counterpart.


LMAO!
#16 Nov 02 2007 at 11:13 AM Rating: Default
newfangle wrote:
Mimickins, King of Bards wrote:

But otherwise, Paladins are just fine for tanking bosses. At least come next patch. ^_^


This is the condescending attitude I hate. (irony to be realized shortly) Using the words "just fine" reeks of ignorance and malice to me. We don't tank "just fine." We tank exceptionally well and bring utility to the raid. And my hypothesis has long since been it is only the truly talented prot paladins that go onto raiding (because the bad ones are harassed by peers to go holy), where as any douche bag scrub warrior can tank mediocre against pretty much anything.

Consequently, all other things being equal, the warrior may be better in some cases. But all things are not equal. The average IQ of a prot pally in a raid is easily 2 standard deviations higher than their warrior counterpart.


I wish blizzard still had the old class description page. In that description it listed paladins as off-tanks, not main tanks. I don't care if you're the best in the world, there will always be certain situations that a paladin tank will not work, and there will never be a situation where a warrior tank will not work. By that fact alone, I stand by my claim that while paladins are good on trash mobs they are, have been, and most likely always will be inferior main tanks.
#17 Nov 02 2007 at 11:22 AM Rating: Default
So much hate on these forums... why dont we all calm down and get a big great hug?! :D





P.D: Gogo Tankadins (Sry dilbrt ^^)
#18 Nov 02 2007 at 12:06 PM Rating: Decent
**
554 posts
Dilbrt wrote:
newfangle wrote:
Mimickins, King of Bards wrote:

But otherwise, Paladins are just fine for tanking bosses. At least come next patch. ^_^


This is the condescending attitude I hate. (irony to be realized shortly) Using the words "just fine" reeks of ignorance and malice to me. We don't tank "just fine." We tank exceptionally well and bring utility to the raid. And my hypothesis has long since been it is only the truly talented prot paladins that go onto raiding (because the bad ones are harassed by peers to go holy), where as any douche bag scrub warrior can tank mediocre against pretty much anything.

Consequently, all other things being equal, the warrior may be better in some cases. But all things are not equal. The average IQ of a prot pally in a raid is easily 2 standard deviations higher than their warrior counterpart.


I wish blizzard still had the old class description page. In that description it listed paladins as off-tanks, not main tanks. I don't care if you're the best in the world, there will always be certain situations that a paladin tank will not work, and there will never be a situation where a warrior tank will not work. By that fact alone, I stand by my claim that while paladins are good on trash mobs they are, have been, and most likely always will be inferior main tanks.


Betcha cast one hell of a flash light 40 yards away in heavy armor eh Dilbrt?

I'm sorry Tankidins can hold up to your high standards, and in truth your
right about some things, any fool can see that they never designed raid
content with Palidin OR druid tanks in mind. But the fact of the matter is, there is no single Raid boss in BC that hasent been MT by a palidin. It can be done, it just predijucial mindsets that prevent it.
#19 Nov 02 2007 at 12:34 PM Rating: Decent
A paladin has MT'd everything? Show me the Kaz'rogal MTing then, I'd love to see it. Prejudiced? Maybe, but I have a lot higher regard to players that play to their class' strenghts rather than try to do the thing the class is weaker at. Paladins make great trash/off-tanks, but they have no business being main tanks, period.
#20 Nov 02 2007 at 1:06 PM Rating: Decent
http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html;jsessionid=D53911CC7F62AD7BCFC8F321A3284150?topicId=2649579728&sid=1

Ask him. Apparently it was a pain early on but there has to be a trick to it. As far as videos go, it seems like a rare enough feat that there simply are none.
#21 Nov 02 2007 at 1:08 PM Rating: Decent
No business being main tanks?


Oh, how ignorant.


I'm not saying that they can tank everything, I know they can't, but you just cannot go around saying that Paladins cannot be Main Tanks, when they sure as hell can.(Again, in encounters where its not impossible, f.ex Kaz'rogal like you mentioned)


Illidan has been MTd by Paladin. Archimonde has been Mt'd by Paladin to 15%. Kael'thas has been MT'd by Paladin. Vashj, again, MT'd by Paladin. Need me to go on?
#22 Nov 02 2007 at 1:41 PM Rating: Good
***
1,441 posts
For some reason I have that notion that equating MT with Primary Boss Tank is holding onto an entirely wrong mindset simply because boss tanking is the prestige aspect of tanking.

If we started framing the debate around specializations like AoE tanking, high-damage tanking, fast-damage tanking, off-tanking, mage-tanking (and I'm sure I'm leaving a couple out here), I'm convinced we could come up with a thought model which matches individual situations with each classes' capabilities a lot better, and start using the right tool for specific situations.

Just as the healing debate is way too much crystalized around the prestige position of main tank healer, more finesse might actually be an advantage. After all, is there really a point having the so-called "warrior MT" tank packs of trash mobs when a pallie could do the job faster, better and safer? Aside from the stupid old habit that the "official MT" tanks everything from instance door to full clear?
#23 Nov 02 2007 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
**
274 posts
Dilbrt wrote:

I wish blizzard still had the old class description page. In that description it listed paladins as off-tanks, not main tanks. I don't care if you're the best in the world, there will always be certain situations that a paladin tank will not work, and there will never be a situation where a warrior tank will not work. By that fact alone, I stand by my claim that while paladins are good on trash mobs they are, have been, and most likely always will be inferior main tanks.


Paladins are far different now than when Blizzard first wrote that stuff, as I'm sure you fully realize. So we can simply discard that comment and assume it has been lost in a vat of rendered pork fat.

There will always be situations where tankadins are at a disadvantage, sure. Just as there will always be situations where warrior tanks (especially since they suffer from mass player-retardation in general) suck the royal pair. But you are seemingly making the assertion that paladins are inferior in general. This is where I have a gripe, and every body of evidence points towards you being in the wrong here.

But regardless, actions speak louder than works. When 2.3 comes out, I will happily pick up my 6 new badge items and roll through Zul Aman carelessly smashing through wave after wave of aoe trash pulls. While the warrior tanks are trying to coordinate the traditional kind of CC (and not the newfangled kind, also known as continuous consecration). And besides, in a 10-man setting it is simply a foolish idea to bring a warrior tank. They offer so little to a raid anyways.

So anyways, my crude, offensive posts generally lead towards one clear, unadultered thesis. Prot pallies poon noobs. Warrior tanks are like Grandma's meatloaf.

Edited, Nov 2nd 2007 8:04pm by newfangle
#24 Nov 02 2007 at 6:02 PM Rating: Decent
There was a moonkin that tanked Gruul, by your reasoning, moonkins are now main tanks.

Just because someone CAN do it, doesn't mean they SHOULD.
#25 Nov 02 2007 at 7:17 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
After all, is there really a point having the so-called "warrior MT" tank packs of trash mobs when a pallie could do the job faster, better and safer? Aside from the stupid old habit that the "official MT" tanks everything from instance door to full clear?


i'm only 47 warr and 29 pally but how does the raids work in wow. i raided in eq and we had normaly 2-3 off tanks just to rush to boss or pick up the adds that would spawn with the named the mt or second mt would stay on boss all the time. is raiding in wow that much diff from eq? but haveing mt tank door to finish even not tanking the adds from bosses.
#26 Nov 02 2007 at 9:04 PM Rating: Good
***
1,859 posts
I'm definitely not an expert in raiding, and I've never played EQ so I can't directly compare, but I'd say that the different raid encounters are handled slightly differently.

Some guilds will use a single MT, usually a Warrior, who will remain MT for the entirety of the run, as mentioned, from the beginning till the instance is cleared. In some cases, the MT will be able to take on the boss' adds and sometimes an off-tank will have to take care of them.

The point that was made is that a Prot Pally is infinitely better for dealing with multiple mobs at once while a Warr is more suited for a bigger, single target. That being said, it does not prevent any of them to do what they're less good at. Warrs will be able to do the same pulls so easily mastered by Prot Pallies, but will require some more CC to make sure the situation remains safe. Likewise, a Prot Pally will be able to tank a bigger, single target, but he may require more healing or some such. (Like I said, I'm definitely not a pro in that regard)
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 162 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (162)