Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Frost Raiding ComparisonFollow

#1 Oct 27 2007 at 9:04 AM Rating: Decent
*
60 posts
Has anyone with around 1000 frost damage tested 40-0-21 vs 18-0-43?

I usually raided with 40-0-21 and last night I went with 18-0-43. On boss fights my DPS ranged from low to upper 600s. I feel like it could be much higher and I'm thinking that next time I go I'm going to try the other spec.

What is the definitive frost raiding spec? Don't say 10-48-3 either, I'm trying to stay frost if at all possible. Will I always be behind the fire mages no matter how well I gear myself up?

Thanks guys
#2 Oct 27 2007 at 9:07 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Sephro wrote:
Has anyone with around 1000 frost damage tested 40-0-21 vs 18-0-43?

I usually raided with 40-0-21 and last night I went with 18-0-43. On boss fights my DPS ranged from low to upper 600s. I feel like it could be much higher and I'm thinking that next time I go I'm going to try the other spec.

What is the definitive frost raiding spec? Don't say 10-48-3 either, I'm trying to stay frost if at all possible. Will I always be behind the fire mages no matter how well I gear myself up?

Thanks guys


I haven't really ever tested em, but the math heavily supports 18/0/43 post 850ish damage so long as you have strong control of the elemental.
#3 Oct 27 2007 at 9:10 AM Rating: Decent
*
60 posts
Thats exactly the type of answer I was looking for...

Heres a better question, who has hit the highest sustained DPS as a frost spec? Normal mobs (no curator type) what was your spec and what was the DPS #?

#4 Oct 27 2007 at 4:08 PM Rating: Decent
My best advice is to go to Dr. Boom outside of Area 51 and do your best to do the most dps you can do.

I did about 925 with my gear as 10/48/3
#5 Oct 27 2007 at 9:32 PM Rating: Default
Ehh.. You'll always lag behind fire/arc mages...
#6 Oct 28 2007 at 10:56 AM Rating: Good
I'm pretty new at the game (only 48). I have all my points in the frost tree for now just because I have fun with it. But when it comes endgame and the arc/fire mages are going to do more damage, is there any specific reason to go with a frost build? What are the advantages over said arc/fire?
#7 Oct 29 2007 at 4:47 AM Rating: Good
20 posts
I've been frost from somewhat 32 to 70. Got all my purples and raided a lot too.
What i found out was (prob the same as with fire) that once u go over 800 spelldmg you dont need the arcane tree anymore for more dmg.

My spec at that time was 10/0/51. Very good mana eff and dmg (i'm talking about raiding now) Since the change in artic winds i went 2/0/59 to get the most out of my frost tree concerning dmg. In kara it worked very well, lost of dps and high crits. When you put more point in arcane you lose some dps in the frost tree and some survivability.

Now im 10/48/3 also full epic and the damage is much higher. So yeah you will always stay behind a fire/arcane mage (depends on the player and gear though)

Frost is really good (much better then fire) for arena/PVP. But when it comes to raiding/DMG fire does more dmg
#8 Oct 29 2007 at 6:00 AM Rating: Good
When you say around 1k damage with 40/0/21 I am going to assume you are including mindmastery -- that adds a nice chunk (probably around 150 or so spell damage) once you get above 850-900 spelldamage it is more efficient to go 10/0/51 or 2/0/59 for raiding as the coefficients stack better in favor of the water elemental in pure dps.
#9 Oct 29 2007 at 9:03 AM Rating: Good
***
2,029 posts
Question from the knowledge hungry nonmage: Is it really worth giving up Clearcasting in a 2/0/59 build? In terms of purely raiding, I see about 40 points that actually have an effect on bosses, plus 2 extras to get that deep in the tree, a couple things like Ice Flows and a few AoE-oriented ones that could be taken for Solarian/Tidewalker/Hyjal waves and the like. Since you can get pretty much all of those with a 10/0/51 build, I don't see how a 2/0/59 build would be on par.
#10 Oct 29 2007 at 10:18 AM Rating: Decent
I am a 2/0/59 spec myself. Currently 1072 unbuffed frost damage (a little less if I go for hit cap). I have tried both frost/arcane and deep frost. My personal experience is deep frost has higher DPS output then frost/arcane.

I top our arcane/frost mages in raids (and fire mages for that matter). Was number 3 on VR (behind lock and hunter) and number 1 on High King this weekend. Frost played right with several Winters Chills being put up is devastating.

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Rexxar&n=Xavious

#11 Oct 29 2007 at 7:37 PM Rating: Good
**
794 posts
lsfreak wrote:
Question from the knowledge hungry nonmage: Is it really worth giving up Clearcasting in a 2/0/59 build? In terms of purely raiding, I see about 40 points that actually have an effect on bosses, plus 2 extras to get that deep in the tree, a couple things like Ice Flows and a few AoE-oriented ones that could be taken for Solarian/Tidewalker/Hyjal waves and the like. Since you can get pretty much all of those with a 10/0/51 build, I don't see how a 2/0/59 build would be on par.


not worth it. the moment you start to chain cast, you use a lot of mana rather quickly. without clearcasting, your mana pool depetes faster meaning you evocate earlier which reduces your effectiveness. this is especially damaging for fights that last longer than 10 minutes.

Sephro wrote:
Has anyone with around 1000 frost damage tested 40-0-21 vs 18-0-43?

I usually raided with 40-0-21 and last night I went with 18-0-43. On boss fights my DPS ranged from low to upper 600s. I feel like it could be much higher and I'm thinking that next time I go I'm going to try the other spec.

What is the definitive frost raiding spec? Don't say 10-48-3 either, I'm trying to stay frost if at all possible. Will I always be behind the fire mages no matter how well I gear myself up?

Thanks guys


frozenshadowweave and spellfire are about competitive. The latter being suited for that dreaded fire built you loathe. The first is actually good until you fill your other slots with gear that would give you around 750 spelldmg and above without arcane mind. From then on its more beneficial to hit 17/44 since empowered frostbolt scales a lot better with gear.

Fire starts coming into its own at around 800 fire damage. At that level, a fully scorched up target can be crit for 3.5k per fireball. Last night a kind warlock put up CoE and I saw 4.4k crits (shudder to think what would happen without salvation).

Firemages gave up a lot of survival to become the bonafide glass canon of the mage class. They will be blasting something like 680 to 700 dps (more when u get further down the line in pve).

having said all that, the Black temple fights are not that friendly to fire. spellfire mages resort to arcane there, which is also quite viable even at lower gear levels.
#12 Oct 30 2007 at 3:05 AM Rating: Decent
20 posts
Quote:
Cancerous wrote: not worth it. the moment you start to chain cast, you use a lot of mana rather quickly. without clearcasting, your mana pool depetes faster meaning you evocate earlier which reduces your effectiveness. this is especially damaging for fights that last longer than 10 minutes.


I started raiding as a frost mage. My very first time in kara i had 10/0/51. It worked all right and i liked it. After some fire time i went ack to frost, but this time used 2/0/59. (artic winds was changed in a patch, doing 5% more dmg overaal) I noticed that mana went down a little faster then before indeed. But i didn't have any problems with mana while not having clearcasting, none of the bosses in Kara where a problem, neither was gruul. You are bound to have some mana pots on you. And there are mana gems too. Kinda depends on your gear, if your mana pool is big enough you can manage. It'depends on what works for you and what you like best. What i liked about the 2/0/59 is that is multifunctional. Good for PVE and PVP, water elemental and max dmg and utility out of your frost spells.

Just try both and see what you like best.
#13 Oct 30 2007 at 4:40 AM Rating: Decent
**
391 posts
We attempted Void Reaver last night and I was 40/0/21. Aside from running from the orbs, I was right around 600 dps which I think is alright for where I am sitting as far as gear goes. As far as crits go, I had a 4826 frostbolt crit and I almost shat myself. I didn't think that I could get one that high. That was without any shammy totems. We are trying gruuls tonight. First time since I respecced so we will see how that goes.

-One question I have. If there is another mage with winter's chill stacked, do I get the extra crit chance too?
#14 Oct 30 2007 at 5:15 AM Rating: Good
fuganator wrote:
We attempted Void Reaver last night and I was 40/0/21. Aside from running from the orbs, I was right around 600 dps which I think is alright for where I am sitting as far as gear goes. As far as crits go, I had a 4826 frostbolt crit and I almost shat myself. I didn't think that I could get one that high. That was without any shammy totems. We are trying gruuls tonight. First time since I respecced so we will see how that goes.

-One question I have. If there is another mage with winter's chill stacked, do I get the extra crit chance too?


Yes, it is very similar to having improved scorch stacked.
#15 Oct 30 2007 at 5:48 AM Rating: Decent
**
391 posts
Awesome. Hopefully I can get the magus blade or the dagger off of prince sometime this week. I want to respec back to 10/0/61. I am at 826 damage right now and with the blade will be around 900ish plus I will throw the 40 dmg enchant on asap.
#16 Oct 30 2007 at 10:03 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
Frost is really good (much better then fire) for arena/PVP. But when it comes to raiding/DMG fire does more dmg


Depends on how it's played.. Fire can be surprising in PvP, especially when mixed with arcane.. Not just talking about 3 minute mage either.
#17 Oct 30 2007 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,029 posts
Three 3-minute mages + 2 frost mages = my 5v5 dead before we realized what happened. Charged in, PoM pyro/fbolt me and the healer, mass AoE. I was dead before their models even loaded O.o

40/0/21 or similar actually surpasses 10/0/51 IF you have another mage to stack Winter's Chill AND you have T6 equivalent gear. But then again, at that gear level, Fire is running about 200 paper dps higher.
#18 Oct 30 2007 at 10:17 PM Rating: Decent
**
917 posts
Question please, not related to the OP but with the other posts here:

If I am arcane/fire, some of my damage comes from arcane talents. I plan to respec 10/48/3 after I get 850/900 damage, But, how do I measure that limit? I mean 850/900 purely from equipment or including the damage from arcane talents? If only from equipment, how do I go about figuring it out when I reach the desired switching moment? Do I unequip everything, what damage is left comes from arcane talents, I subtract it from my equiped damage and Im done?
Hope it made sense. Smiley: lol
#19 Oct 30 2007 at 11:10 PM Rating: Decent
**
794 posts
i believe you would have to take 25% of your total int and take off the free spell dmg from your total.

not sure if arcane mind messes this up or not
#20 Oct 30 2007 at 11:17 PM Rating: Decent
**
917 posts
removable intellect...Smiley: eek
#21 Oct 30 2007 at 11:48 PM Rating: Decent
**
794 posts
sorry.... i will explain

when u said arcane talents giving you more spell damage I think you meant Arcane Mastery right?

Thats more spell damage based on 25% of your int. The thing that would skew this could be arcane mind, which boosts ur total int. All that int adds up into a bunch of spelldamage.

If you could discount all that extra spelldamage that came from your int then you will get the spelldamage that your gear is giving you. Or you can do this hard way and just add up all the spell damage manually.
#22 Oct 31 2007 at 12:33 AM Rating: Decent
**
917 posts
thanks Cancerous :) i was just joking on the idea of removable intellect. I appreciate the details Smiley: smile
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 122 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (122)