Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Get to level 25 before posting/ asking questions on forums..Follow

#1 Oct 25 2007 at 12:52 PM Rating: Default
**
747 posts
Don't ask questions that can be answered by reading the games instruction manual, or should be blatantly obvious to you if you've gotten to lvl 25 with almost any class.

I say this because it's become far too frequent for people to ask incredibly obvious questions about game mechanics that they would know about if they just played the class long enough to understand how it plays and works in groups or in solo play.

So please, before you post or ask a question, read the game manual, go to worldofwarcraft.com, come here and READ THE STICKY.......just ANYTHING to show that you're willing to actually put some time into playing your class correctly before pawning your problems, ridiculous questions, or otherwise useless time wasting babble onto this community of people who are here to help you.

Don't take advantage of that help.....just READ some of the other threads to find out what kind of abuse you'll receive if you don't heed this advice.

Happy hunting.
#2 Oct 25 2007 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Eh, setting a level requirement on asking questions isn't really a good idea. There is alot of information that isn't stored in stickies or manuals that can still be wanted/needed by even experienced players. Granted, certain questions would be classified as a Crime against Humanity, but not all are.

I myself posted a question in the Priest forums a while back, when my priest was merely level 21. I had planned to PvP a bit at 29 to gain the PvP items and the Trinket, and couldn't find decisive information on a healer's build nor itemization. I backed my post up with several choice builds I had made myself, my reasoning, and the thoughts I had made on +healing vs Intellect at that level and so on and so forth. It was well received, and should I see a similar post here on these boards, I would'nt mind even a little bit.

Alot of posts are good, well thought out, researched posts. And level isn't a requirement for any of the above.
#3 Oct 25 2007 at 1:18 PM Rating: Decent
**
747 posts
Thank you for taking me so literally North.....you make me feel stupid without ever really insulting my intelligence.

Well I hope the point I was trying to make is still able to be picked up on.
#4 Oct 25 2007 at 1:24 PM Rating: Excellent
So you are saying "Read the sticky or the OSite before posting"?
#5 Oct 25 2007 at 1:27 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,388 posts
Wow...

I didn't think North had that kind of talent in him...

Smiley: bowdown
#6 Oct 25 2007 at 9:20 PM Rating: Good
Ahh, the roller coaster...

See, for some time I thought the posters here were overly harsh to people asking certain questions. Then I started to see what they meant about the same dumbass questions being asked over and over again. Now I'm sort of getting back to the notion that yes, there are some dumbass questions asked repeatedly and yes, sometimes the people asking the questions need a kick in their dumb *** to knock some sense into them, but then...well, allow me to illustrate.

Back when I used to play FFXI, my gf expressed an interest in playing. She's not a gamer by any stretch of the imagination...at all. She just wanted to give it a go because it was one of my hobbies and she wanted to understand it a bit better. I geared up one of my alts and spent time with her teaching her how to play as she went. She would get so happy when she killed a mob or otherwise accomplished something most experienced gamers would consider trivial. I thought it was cute...I mean, who doesn't like to see their significant other enjoying themselves? Throughout the entire process of teaching her how to play, I made a point of not being critical of her mistakes. It was supposed to be fun. Consequently, I came to dread when she leveled to the point that grouping would be the only way to gain reasonable xp.

That day came, and for her first couple of parties I sat with her coaching her along so that she could make a reasonable contribution and hopefully avoid the ire of some of the elitists running through the lowbie grouping area on their 7th job. She had a very good time, and a couple of days later she decided to log on and try to get a group while I was at work. I came home minutes after she logged off and she was almost in tears because of the way she had been treated in the party. She had made a number of mistakes, and I understand fully how frustrating it is if you're even a semi-skilled player and someone in your group makes mistakes that grinds your progress to a halt. Nevertheless, these people had said some pretty cruel things to her and she more or less stopped playing the game.

Keep in mind, a big part of the thrill she got out of the game was from chatting with random people she came across in towns and the starter leveling areas. She was always very friendly and actually wound up making a number of friends over the course of the couple of weeks she played before she started grouping.

She went from very much enjoying the game and really enjoying herself to feeling so shamed and disappointed that she never wanted to play again. She joined the group knowing that she wasn't a strong player but she was quite serious about wanting to do her part in the group. She already felt terribly when she realized she had made a mistake that created downtime for the party.

Ya, those of us who have been around teh intarwebz for a while know that if you don't grow a bit of a thick skin, you don't get much enjoyment out of any online interaction. But let's set aside the conventions we've come to accept as just part of the wild, wild intarweb. A kind, sensitive human being had a form of entertainment that she truly enjoyed ruined for her by a bunch of cruel, thoughtless, elitist pricks. Emboldened by the safety that comes from interacting with people hundreds of miles away, comments like, "you're ******* stupid" and "you have no business playing this game"...inexcusable, especially in a lowbie area.

So why the drawn out QQ story for my gf? Because it illustrates the point that just because not everyone does things the "right" way straight out of the gates doesn't mean they're stupid, thoughtless, lazy, or otherwise lacking. Honestly, if you truly believe that shaming and invalidating people for posting relatively inoccuous questions is the right way to go, you might want to ask yourself what you are missing in your life that compels you to try and take people down a notch whenever the opportunity presents itself.

Maybe I had a set of blinders on when I started posting here, but I haven't really noticed the clique that haunts this sub-forum until recently.

I hope you're proud of yourselves. Creating elitist rules and enforcing them while ever so subtly stroking your e-peens is really the path to enlightenment. Feeling powerful and important at the expense of other people is the most noble of pursuits, I suppose.
#7 Oct 25 2007 at 11:01 PM Rating: Decent
AureliusSir wrote:
Honestly, if you truly believe that shaming and invalidating people for posting relatively inoccuous questions is the right way to go, you might want to ask yourself what you are missing in your life that compels you to try and take people down a notch whenever the opportunity presents itself.

Maybe I had a set of blinders on when I started posting here, but I haven't really noticed the clique that haunts this sub-forum until recently.

I hope you're proud of yourselves. Creating elitist rules and enforcing them while ever so subtly stroking your e-peens is really the path to enlightenment. Feeling powerful and important at the expense of other people is the most noble of pursuits, I suppose.

First bolded part: Show me a method that will avoid "shaming and invalidating" people, without turning this board into yet another "lol Aimdcrit 5k pwnt" or "how i feed pet??????" infested rathole, and I'd be happy to join in. Also, I suggest you take a closer look at the posters I find annoying and ask yourself if they should really be classified as people altogether.

Second bolded part: Great, another smacktard that rages against some unspecified secret club that doesn't actually exist. I've posted the way I do since before you even got that high horse you've been prancing around with lately. For the rest of the audible regulars, I can only think of one I don't outdate by quite a long time. There is a difference between a... how did you put it... "clique that haunts (insert location here)" and people who merely have similar opinions or views. The fact that you are fairly alone in throwing your nose in the sky at the rest of us doesn't exactly make the rest of us some kind of mason conspiracy. It just makes you the odd one out.

Not to mention that I am NorthAI. I am not Skribs, Caldone, Ahtein, Sloshot or any other poster. I am fairly sure the rest feels the same way. Lumping us together just because you haven't found any real support yet is just another **** poor attempt to be the righteous crusader of the Hunter forums. Want to have a target for your ire? Point someone out, and show some bloody balls instead of going out against some faceless and nameless threat. Call me out, if you feel so strongly about it. I can assure you, you are not up to the task.

As for the rest, you have been more than happy to try enforcing your own little rules and regulations when it comes to this forum. Don't say this, don't post like that. Hypocrisy is a *****, ain't it? So far, I haven't even seen a single rule being put into place, other than a strong desire for people to read the sticky or try to do a minimum of research before spouting drivel. Stroking my E-peen? Pathetic. You are leaning on crutches that burned to ash within the graveyards of 4chan and /b/ a long time ago. Sneering at "E-peens" is a pitiful last resort, if anything.

Your post would have made sense, and I would applaud it if you hadn't gotten up on that horse, and your attempts to **** on the regulars here wouldn't have done much more than amuse me if they hadn't been delivered with that arrogant sneer of yours. In conclusion, grow a fUckin' pair and take on specific posters or amend your statements to sound less like an arrogant little pisser with an internet hero complex. If either of these two sound unappealing, then just sod off.

That attitude of yours is getting annoying.
#8 Oct 26 2007 at 12:29 AM Rating: Good
Sweet, merciful grumble-cakes, North. I was just about to post basically the same thing and you've beaten me to it!

I agree that being an ***-wad to just anyone is stupid. There are some great debates and valid new-player questions that come out on this forum. But when people keep coming back with "H0w Do get petz?? I want a lvl 40 panda to kIll wt!!! Lawwlll!!!!" Or, perhaps, just "hey, everyone. I'm lazy. Build my character for me" ....

Well, do we really want to say, "Ahh, I see the mistake, old chap. There is actually information about this already - which you already know, since you know enough to ask - and it's all contained in a large, bold note at the top of the forum, which you seem to have missed. By accident, I'm sure. I don't mean to suggest that you're lazy in any way because that would be rude. Ought you to, perhap, take a gander at said data and see for yourself?.... When you're ready?.... Unless.. You'd much rather stay here and make us do your work?... Oh, ok, sir. I'll go do that for you. May I do your homework for school while I'm at it?"

NorthAI wrote:
I myself posted a question in the Priest forums a while back, when my priest was merely level 21. I had planned to PvP a bit at 29 to gain the PvP items and the Trinket, and couldn't find decisive information on a healer's build nor itemization. I backed my post up with several choice builds I had made myself, my reasoning, and the thoughts I had made on +healing vs Intellect at that level and so on and so forth.

I wish every new question asker did this. I wouldn't mind it in the slightest. Sure, bring questions about talents and character building but put thought into it yourself before posting. We're not lackeys (apart from North's minions, of course) and we want to encourage people to think about the game. Rather than continue to play as mindless "I R Huntar!!kekekeke" drones all their lives.

And I completely agree with North's response about the clique statement. I mean, come on, Aurelius. Are you freaking serious? There just might be cases where North, skribs or Caldone, etc, have agreed with something I've said. But I'm willing to bet that they don't see my avatar and just blindly think, "Wow! I'm sure to agree with everything in this, cause it's Smallsword." And I sure as all sticky f*ck won't smile and nod at them, for who they are, even if they post retarded zombie slurry. If you disagree, you disagree. This is not some tween movie like Bratz with pink skirts, a campus **** and dark whispers about bloody murder and stealing the recently-deceased's clothes and accessories.

There has been a real "holier than thou" attitude from you, Aurelius and it is a big dump of hypocrisy. Just because some posters here (strongly) encourage the use of individual thought and research and vehemently discourage brainless hick-spawn from posting again before they actually think things through a bit, it doesn't make them the bane of all things bright, lovely and holy. And it certainly doesn't make anyone else more pure. So, you want to stop people from patronising dipsh*ts by spending your time patronising them. That's like a father using the "I'm going to sleep with your girlfriend to show you why having sex with her at your young age is wrong" school of applied parenting.

(edit: spelling)

Edited, Oct 26th 2007 8:32am by Smallsword
#9 Oct 26 2007 at 6:02 AM Rating: Excellent
**
747 posts
In my defense, I never directly insulted or belittled anyone, I simply said that you should have a little bit of experience in how to play the game before you start asking questions because experience with a game allows someone to learn about, through interaction with other players and simply playing the game, how the mechanics work and how progress is made.

Also, WoW is a VERY straight forward and simple game to learn from because of the plethora of quests that are designed to teach you everything there is to know about your class and the game itself starting from teh second you make your first character. Being a 2 year FFXI veteran myself, that game is not forgiving or helpful in any way as far as teaching you your role in groups or how to play your class, and for the most part people in the FFXI community are more forgiving for stupid questions in the forums because they are completely unwilling to spend the time to teach while in a party.

Back on topic.... posting and asking questions is part of our free speech and answering those questions is coming from our passion to help those who truly need help. Some of the questions around here do NOT come from people who need help, they need a babysitter or just a simple tutorial of the class basics because they either 1)Don't want to put the time into finding the information themselves.. 2)Skipped every tutorial quest there was in this game that was designed to teach them how to play.. 3) Are really too inexperienced to be asking questions about aspects of the game that they won't understand anyway or 4) just plain stupid.

My apologies for offending anyone, I am not inteding to cause tension or strife among this community, I am simply asking that you do what I did. Read, play and experience enough of the game to make educated, well thought out and valid contributions to this forum and to your game experience, because otherwise you're not just doing a disservice to everyone you come in contact with, you do a disservice to yourself by creating a scenario where you make yourself look foolish.

So, as I said before, READ THE STICKY, do your quests, read the manual or simply read the forums or google your question, it's answered somewhere, I promise. That is until they change something in the game anyway.
#10 Oct 26 2007 at 7:18 AM Rating: Good
**
405 posts
I disagree with the main point of the thread, and feel free to smack me down as a result.

If a level 25 player comes in here asking stupid questions, they've at least stumbled in the right direction--better to end up here than the "official" WoW hunter forums, where misinformation and even dumber posts abound.

It's easy enough to refer someone to a sticky. You've wasted the time to read their question; don't waste any more than you have to responding (if at all). A simple "Please read the sticky at the top of this forum" will suffice. If they don't even deserve that response, don't respond; they'll figure it out.

And to that point, no one is obligated to read every thread on this forum, and I'm sure the posters that are the most frustrated with newb threads can pick them out from the topic title without even trying. Just don't read it; save yourself a headache and an extra thirty seconds.

I'd prefer the dumb question askers to end up here--and perhaps gain some knowledge by being referred to the sticky (or getting frustrated with the lack of responses to their thread that they search the forums themselves)--than to wittle their way to 70 never knowing anything. Case in point: I ran heroic Mechanar yesterday with a warlock who knew NOTHING about how to play her class. And she was running HEROICS! Maybe she should have started asking questions when she was 25.

My point is this: Let them post their dumb questions. You know how to spot them; don't read them. If you do, you don't have to respond, or you can simply refer them to the sticky.
#11 Oct 26 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Decent
Herbnosis wrote:

My point is this: Let them post their dumb questions. You know how to spot them; don't read them. If you do, you don't have to respond, or you can simply refer them to the sticky.
Which will in turn fail to teach them how they would have actually gotten an answer. A quick, decisive blow to the head has taught people for milennia "Don't do this!". Merely ignoring them wouldn't teach them anything, and would merely reinforce the way of said poster. I am not being cruel... okay, I'm being cruel... but it is in the interest of said moron to learn how aid is to be procured online.
#12 Oct 26 2007 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
The Smallsword of Doom wrote:
But when people keep coming back with "H0w Do get petz?? I want a lvl 40 panda to kIll wt!!! Lawwlll!!!!" Or, perhaps, just "hey, everyone. I'm lazy. Build my character for me" ....


AureliusSir wrote:
...yes, there are some dumbass questions asked repeatedly and yes, sometimes the people asking the questions need a kick in their dumb *** to knock some sense into them...


That was taken from the first paragraph in my original response to this thread. Are you sure you didn't just skim my post to a get the basic gist of what I was saying and ignore the details?

As for the, "There is no clique," response, you all could well be right, but take a look at the flow of so many of the posts here and tell me it's unreasonable to come to the conclusion that there's a bit of a clique at play:

OP: <question>

North/Caldone/Skribs/et al: <scathing rebuff>

North/Caldone/Skribs: "Harr harrr harr that was such a brilliant rebuff. You're so evil."

North/Caldone/Skribs: "Yes, my sheer evilness knows no bounds."

North/Caldone/Skribs: "Your evilness inspires me. Will you take me to the evil temple and teach me your ways?"

And on and on and on. Basically, anyone posting a question one of them doesn't approve of is shamed into submission and then has their thread derailed with a bunch of repetetive, droll nonsense that might be amusing if it wasn't done at the expense of someone else.

The latest was the post from the person wanting to know how to teach their pet shadow meld. If they were bombing around Darkshore and saw someone with a stealthed pet and then asked in /1 how to get it, there are enough smacktards who play that having someone say it's a quest isn't unheard of. Or it could have been someone with the ghost saber who just didn't give them enough information. The first response in that thread (sending them to Thunder Bluff) believe it or not, would be entirely plausible to someone new to the game. If they had leveled a Druid up to 10 prior to this, talking to them about how the N.Elves and Tauren had forged an Alliance would make absolute sense, because at level 10 every Druid gets a spell that teleports them to Moonglade where...*gasp*...N.Elves and Tauren are getting along.

Not only that, out of all of the Horde starting areas, Mulgore is the easiest to get to with little/no opposition from opposing faction NPCs. (I just rolled a Tauren rawrkitty a couple of weeks ago.) So you get someone who departs Astranaar for a jaunt across the Barrens, down past Camp Taurache (sp?) and into Mulgore. Would take what...maybe 20-30 minutes on foot? Then how long might they run around Thunder Bluff looking for the N.Elf NPC?

In other words, the response was false, but very easy for a newer player to not pick up on it. I would hope that not everyone here is so narrow as to think that just because it would seem ludicrous to them, when you start with a semi-plausible story, throw in some NPC names for good measure, and exclude the truly outrageous components that would make it easily identifiable by anyone as crap, you're being an @#%^. You're being selfish. You're trying to be funny and impress your friends and you don't really give a @#%^ about how it impacts the person who asked the question in the first place.

Quote:
But I'm willing to bet that they don't see my avatar and just blindly think, "Wow! I'm sure to agree with everything in this, cause it's Smallsword." And I sure as all sticky f*ck won't smile and nod at them, for who they are, even if they post retarded zombie slurry.


Nobody likes being accused to being a member of a clique. My experience in the school environment, in the work environment as a manager, and as a volunteer crisis counsellor is that nobody who is part of a clique ever acknowledges it because they don't see it that way. It's the people outside that say, "Woah...could ya'll stroke each other a little more at our expense, please?" The clique invariably denies any of it. They're comfortable in their clique. They're happy in a mutually supportive environment and running with some folks that support them in the exclusive and/or poor treatment of others makes them feel powerful.

That's basically what a clique is. An exclusive group of people that refuse to accept the presence of others unless those others meet subjective and often unrealistic criteria. Those who don't meet that criteria are not only excluded, but frequently treated very poorly. Does that sound familiar to you?

Some of the people in this forum are out of control. My hope would be they take a moment to evaluate some of their responses to others honestly and without being defensive about it. Moderate your own contributions and slow the @#%^ down with the responses that scream louder than anything, "HAHHA!! We're cool and you're not!"


Edited, Oct 26th 2007 8:57am by AureliusSir
#13 Oct 26 2007 at 7:51 AM Rating: Decent
**
405 posts
I should have been slightly more clear--not everyone should ignore dumb posts, only those who get frustrated with dumb questions. Someone else WILL answer that question, or refer them to the sticky.
#14 Oct 26 2007 at 7:54 AM Rating: Good
**
356 posts
NorthAI the Hand wrote:

First bolded part: Show me a method that will avoid "shaming and invalidating" people, without turning this board into yet another "lol Aimdcrit 5k pwnt" or "how i feed pet??????" infested rathole, and I'd be happy to join in.


Well, tkasomething manages without having to mock and belittle anyone who asks a question that's already been answered, or asks about gear in the regular instead of the gear channel, etc. But since it isn't part of a full WoW site, its situation is a bit different.

Let me make an analogy to the way people like you respond to stupid questions: there's another board I read in which people posting stupid stuff get set upon like hyenas to zebras. Such that when someone makes a dumb post, someone may comment "oh great, another zebra". And they get torn to shreds.

Except that what counts as 'dumb' on that forum is stuff that is *blatantly* offensive bullsh*t. Here it's as simple as posting a question whose answer might be buried on page 5 of the outdated, disorganized sticky thread.

There's a big difference between tolerating questions from newbies and pointing them to the answer, or answering their question, and insulting and mocking them. You, and other people, I think have made the tone of this forum a somewhat nasty and cruel one. And I don't think that keeping things kind and civil would make this forum descend into a morass of idiocy.

I'm not trying to say we should have any rules or regulations. But I think that probably is how it now seems from an outside point of view.


Edited, Oct 26th 2007 11:56am by seroster
#15 Oct 26 2007 at 7:57 AM Rating: Excellent
**
830 posts
I think Katchii retracted the lvl 25 bit thingy there Herb... it was an idea but wasn't posted in such a way to present itself that way.

That triggered AureliusSir's response, which was better than his previous attempt at Crowd Control of this forum, and made me totally feel sorry for his GF. It really illustrated some very true axioms though:

1. Murphy's Law rules even on the internet.
2. People think that because they can hide behind a keyboard and an alias that they can be AH's and get away with it. (applies to the game and the forums)
3. Memory is short and when we forget that we were once beginners, we have no sympathy for those that are currently beginners.
4. The billionth post of "How do I..." will cause even the most saintly of us to grab a cleaver and start wailing away on that person.

I'm not sure there's really a set of 'rules' that can be made because, here, rules just seem to be broken. I'd say the best rule is, don't make a rule, but then, in 5 minutes, that rule would be broken.

A good rubrick might be:

-Get your ducks in a row first and know of what you speak before you ask.
-Use clear, concise, and correct language to present your conundrum to the forum.
-If you are totally new, don't just hop in the scalding water, tip your toes in the stickies and understand that "Every Question answered here" might just answer your question. Then you might have others NOT contained in there and follow the first two items before asking them.
-Lastly, don't attack, and don't take every post as an attack. Thick skin should be accessoried with a gentle tongue.
#16 Oct 26 2007 at 8:10 AM Rating: Decent
NorthAI the Hand wrote:
Your post would have made sense, and I would applaud it if you hadn't gotten up on that horse, and your attempts to **** on the regulars newer posters here wouldn't have done much more than amuse me if they hadn't been delivered with that arrogant sneer of yours. In conclusion, grow a fUckin' pair and take on specific posters have some self respect and consideration for newcomers or amend your statements to sound less like an arrogant little pisser with an internet hero complex. If either of these two sound unappealing, then just sod off.


c wut I did thar?

Right back at ya, North. Otherwise, don't try to hold me accountable to a standard of behavior that you ignore in your interaction with others.
#17 Oct 26 2007 at 8:49 AM Rating: Good
AureliusSir wrote:
c wut I did thar?

Right back at ya, North. Otherwise, don't try to hold me accountable to a standard of behavior that you ignore in your interaction with others.
I was going to reply to your more lengthy post, but this will have to do as I am heading to bed. Let's clarify one thing: There's a major difference between new posters and retarded posters. This is common to any major interaction online, that doesn't really require split second speed. An effort made in creating a sentence. Punctuation. Format. These things are necessary for anyone else to be able to quickly ascertain the nature of the post.

Secondly, a certain amount of effort made in finding out for themselves. This is also a staple on any forums such as these, to avoid a swarm of "how do I ******?" questions which would have been answered by a very quick use of either the search bar which stands out to our left, or by reading a sticky/game manual/following the bloody tutorials.

Third, don't bloody expect anyone to leap to your service if you don't fulfill the first two requirements. If you don't, and get snapped at, it is your own fault. This is not rocket surgery, and it doesn't require more than a token amount of effort. If you don't feel like doing this, I am well within my rights to take the effort of correcting your mistakes.

I hold you accountable, as a regular poster with foreknowledge of how internet relations work, to stop sounding like a stuck up prig who can't stand the sight of honest criticism.

My standards of behaviour are actually quite high. But they don't apply to people who fail to make even the slightest effort to learn something for themselves. My self respect is actually quite high, as any former Army soldier can attest to.

And don't even try to tell me that my interaction with others fail to meet my own standards. I have been harsh in alot of posts, very true. But I've yet to see any mention of the four out of five posts where the OP hasn't broken the first two unwritten rules of the internet in general. Funny, how one out of five posts are the ones I hear about all the time.

AureliusSir wrote:

That's basically what a clique is. An exclusive group of people that refuse to accept the presence of others unless those others meet subjective and often unrealistic criteria. Those who don't meet that criteria are not only excluded, but frequently treated very poorly. Does that sound familiar to you?

I changed my mind, I have to adress this one too. Exclusive group of people, huh. Yeah, I guess any regulars would be part of that. If that's a clique, I've been part of at least five since I first learned to speak, at any given time. If that's the definition, anyone who agrees on anything is a clique. Refuse to accept the presence of others unless unrealistic criteria is met. Unrealistic? Is it unrealistic to require a minimum of research, or a minimum of effort made in writing a post? Is it unrealistic to ask someone to read a sticky named "Every question answered here"?

Give me a break. Your clique **** is not only getting old, it is a poorly thought out attempt to group up individual posters to make the "frightful, horrible posters of the Hunter forum" seem like some kind of massive entity to be defeated. As I said, single out the posters, and you just might be taken a bit seriously. As it stands, you sound like an enraged cyberpolice trying to enforce your own standards and values onto what is essentially far beyond you to moderate.

AureliusSir wrote:
And on and on and on. Basically, anyone posting a question one of them doesn't approve of is shamed into submission and then has their thread derailed with a bunch of repetetive, droll nonsense that might be amusing if it wasn't done at the expense of someone else.

The expense of someone who failed to even attempt making an effort. They don't deserve to have their threads become anything but a place of semi-amusement by those who enjoy these forums. Take a look at new posters with actual questions, that warrants anything but scorn. There are actually quite a few of them, and they are welcomed with open arms.

And yes. I do so enjoy shaming people. I enjoy making them cry, if I could pull it off. I so love to see someone go into a hissyfit or post-fed rage due to something as simple as words on a page. Discriminatingly, of course. I choose my own targets carefully. Those who deserve it, or fails to meet the exceedingly low expectations of this and other forums. But I won't deny it. I get a warm fuzzy feeling inside from doing it. And nothing you say, could ever dissuade me from verbally assaulting someone who deserves it.

And that's where you fail to understand this, and possibly other forums. Those who annoy me, deserve my wrath. Don't like it, rate me down and rant away just like I do to the newbtards (not to be confused with newbie) that fails to meet said expectations. The only difference would be that I enjoy that too.
#18 Oct 26 2007 at 8:50 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
My general approach to new posters asking questions that could be answered with minimal research is to answer it if I know the info off the top of my head, and then refer them to the new sticky. Which is finished and really needs to be redone and stickied. Mulgrin, I've seen you posting, where's that at?

I think we can be a bit too extreme sometimes. My rule is to answer them but also make sure it's clear that they should have checked the sticky. Then if they get mad in the second post they are fair game.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#19 Oct 26 2007 at 8:58 AM Rating: Decent
sloshot wrote:

A good rubrick might be:

-Get your ducks in a row first and know of what you speak before you ask.


That would be nice. In a lot of cases, however, I think people ask questions who not only don't have their ducks in a row, but don't know that they don't have their ducks in a row. A couple of days ago, one of the regulars here posted a brief comment that even they had never read the sticky. I've read the sticky. It's got a lot of useful information. It's well organized. Unfortunately, it's relatively long and lacking a clear index. In other words, you have to pretty much read the whole thing (not a reasonable expectation, especially when it's broken up between responses the way it is) or at the very least, skim through it for the answer to your question. In other words, you can't expect everyone to read through it all before they ask a question.

So how does that work? How can someone who has never read the sticky join in and shame people into doing it? Well, it makes sense that if you spend enough time reading through the Hunter forums here on Alla, you're going to pick up on a lot of information. So someone who has been around for a while who hasn't read the sticky will eventually pick up on most (of not all or more) of the sticky's content. Not everyone does that, however. I can point to an entire guild (the guild that I just recently left to start my own after having been with them for almost my entire time in WoW thus far) full of people that make very little use of forums. They'll Thottbot this or that, but when it comes to reading up on things like how to improve their performance with a particular class, etc., it's just not something they do. I read through the forums because it's something to read, much like someone might read a magazine or a trash novel. It has certain benefits.

Quote:
-Use clear, concise, and correct language to present your conundrum to the forum.


Agreed.

Quote:
-If you are totally new, don't just hop in the scalding water, tip your toes in the stickies and understand that "Every Question answered here" might just answer your question. Then you might have others NOT contained in there and follow the first two items before asking them.


Like I mentioned above, there is a lot of great information in the sticky, but it is far from user friendly.

Quote:
-Lastly, don't attack, and don't take every post as an attack. Thick skin should be accessoried with a gentle tongue.


Agreed. Sometimes it's just blatantly obvious that a post is an attack. My concern is that the attack is not justified nearly so often as some folks might let on.

Edited, Oct 26th 2007 10:04am by AureliusSir
#20 Oct 26 2007 at 9:19 AM Rating: Default
**
747 posts
2 Things

Aurelius...shut up, your all too evident holier than thou attitude is both self serving and time wasting. Lead by example, not by preaching your psycho babble. We all know how to interact with human beings, some of us are just nicer than others, but HUMAN interaction is quite different than INTERNET interaction. Forums are not happy places filled with cotton candy and bubble gum, they are fountains of knowledge that happen to be supplied by people who have played the game long enough, read enough information or asked enough questions to be educated and only ask that people read the information and ask valid questions. Other than that, we're intolerant human beings who don't like wasting time answering questions or in my case pretending to care (i've been on these forums for about 2.5 years now and only have about 180 posts at this point), but lately my desire to help people has taken on more of a "cruel to be kind" flavor and I have therefore been more inclined to answer stupid questions with equally stupid and or cruel answers. I'll admit I can be a jerk, but whatever you do, no NOT come in here pretending to have the authority to say how people can or cannot speak or act. You are not God, you are not the devil, you are not our parent or our guardian OR our mentor. Say what you want, no one has the right to say it right or wrong.

Second, READ THE STICKY!!!! and filter through all the posts that have been de-railed or are now otherwise meaningless...such as this one, sadly, because of one or more people being totally up in arms about something that they know damn good and well is a worthwhile point, but don't like the way the poor, innocent, delicate, sweet, (insert nauseating adjective) Newbs/Noobs are being treated.



Edited, Oct 26th 2007 1:21pm by Katchii
#21 Oct 26 2007 at 9:29 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,388 posts
Quote:
So how does that work? How can someone who has never read the sticky join in and shame people into doing it? Well, it makes sense that if you spend enough time reading through the Hunter forums here on Alla, you're going to pick up on a lot of information. So someone who has been around for a while who hasn't read the sticky will eventually pick up on most (of not all or more) of the sticky's content.


Now see, here is the thing. When I sssssstted here on the forums, I didn't start asking stupid questions that were found in the sticky, that is the difference. Had I done so I would have been flamed into oblivion. I stayed silent for about the first 6 MONTHS just reading, everything but the sticky cause I couldn't make myself read something that dull and boring.

I only started piping up here at the beginning of this year, yet I have been a member of the forums for 2 years now, so don't pull your self righteous bullsh*t on me. I did my research without haing to read the sticky, and was still able to ask/answer inteligent questions.

Yeah I got no problem with people that do not read the sticky. Here is my Beef which you fail to see:

IF THE ANSWER IS IN THE GOD DAMN STICKY I TELL THEM TO READ IT!!!

The same question does not need to be repeated numerous times if answered in the sticky.

So please, get off your high horse and sit your *** back down in the mud, you are really starting to annoy me.

Quote:
Aurelius...shut up, your all too evident holier than thou attitude is both self serving and time wasting. Lead by example, not by preaching your psycho babble. We all know how to interact with human beings, some of us are just nicer than others, but HUMAN interaction is quite different than INTERNET interaction.


Katchi, <3 that summed it up for me, sorry I didnt see your post first >.<



Edited, Oct 26th 2007 10:30am by Caldone
#22 Oct 26 2007 at 9:43 AM Rating: Good
NorthAI the Hand wrote:
I was going to reply to your more lengthy post, but this will have to do as I am heading to bed. Let's clarify one thing: There's a major difference between new posters and retarded posters. This is common to any major interaction online, that doesn't really require split second speed. An effort made in creating a sentence. Punctuation. Format. These things are necessary for anyone else to be able to quickly ascertain the nature of the post.


I fully agree, North. I fully agree that people who spew drivel in a posting pane and then expect to be taken seriously need a bit of a wakeup call. You can't tell me that every poster who asks a question here demonstrates only minimal skill/effort in the written literacy department. It's the overly harsh responses to people who post highly readable questions who are mistreated simply because someone felt like answering the questions was beneath them.

Quote:
Secondly, a certain amount of effort made in finding out for themselves. This is also a staple on any forums such as these, to avoid a swarm of "how do I ******?" questions which would have been answered by a very quick use of either the search bar which stands out to our left, or by reading a sticky/game manual/following the bloody tutorials.


Maybe things work differently in the UK, North. Here in North America, progressive groups are trying to pull people out of manuals and directories and reinforcing respectful information by saying basically, "If you have a question, please don't hesitate to ask." Sure, some people still ride their dinosaurs to work and fill out invoices on stone tablets, but the social convention of handing people a mammoth stack of reading materials and treating them like a scrub until they've memorized them all just doesn't work. It's being phased out. On the level of cognitive/social psychology is the understanding that just because something has "always been done" a certain way, doesn't immediately justify that way is right or effective.

Quote:
Third, don't bloody expect anyone to leap to your service if you don't fulfill the first two requirements. If you don't, and get snapped at, it is your own fault. This is not rocket surgery, and it doesn't require more than a token amount of effort. If you don't feel like doing this, I am well within my rights to take the effort of correcting your mistakes.


The question becomes, North, who are you to define these requirements? Who is anyone else to? If Allakhazam, Defender of Justice, doesn't come down with an edict that says so, it's not your place to be creating requirements of anyone.

I assume your response to that will be to label me a hypicrite. Something along the lines of, "Aren't you trying to create your own set of requirements?" If you read closely, you'll notice that I've said sometimes being a bit harsh with people is the only way to bring them around. You'll also notice I've said that lately I've seen it spiral out of control, which is what often happens when people see certain behaviors are now socially acceptable but don't quite grasp the boundaries of those behaviors yet.

Quote:
I hold you accountable, as a regular poster with foreknowledge of how internet relations work, to stop sounding like a stuck up prig who can't stand the sight of honest criticism.


There's an incredibly distinct line between honest criticism and being a grade A asshat. That's my entire point.

Quote:
My standards of behaviour are actually quite high. But they don't apply to people who fail to make even the slightest effort to learn something for themselves. My self respect is actually quite high, as any former Army soldier can attest to.


Then no, your standards of behavior are not quite high. They're subjective. Your self respect is not as high as you might want it to be, or you wouldn't create such a negative perception of yourself in these forums. You boast of your reputation as an *******...that's not self respect. That's telling people you're something socially unacceptable and proud of it. There's no respect for yourself in any of that.

Quote:
And don't even try to tell me that my interaction with others fail to meet my own standards. I have been harsh in alot of posts, very true. But I've yet to see any mention of the four out of five posts where the OP hasn't broken the first two unwritten rules of the internet in general. Funny, how one out of five posts are the ones I hear about all the time.


Wow...so now not only are they required to read the sticky before they post in order to avoid your wrath (and the wrath of others), now they're expected to know and observe the unwritten rules. Try to be a bit more realistic in your expecations, please.

AureliusSir wrote:
I changed my mind, I have to adress this one too. Exclusive group of people, huh. Yeah, I guess any regulars would be part of that. If that's a clique, I've been part of at least five since I first learned to speak, at any given time. If that's the definition, anyone who agrees on anything is a clique. Refuse to accept the presence of others unless unrealistic criteria is met. Unrealistic? Is it unrealistic to require a minimum of research, or a minimum of effort made in writing a post? Is it unrealistic to ask someone to read a sticky named "Every question answered here"?


If the sticky were more user friendly, it would be realistic to carry a reasonable expectation that folks would read it. For most people, clicking on a sticky with no useful index and then having to read through pages upon pages of "stuff" if they have any hope of finding an answer to their question is not realistic. It's not by any stretch of the imagination unrealistic to refer them to the sticky, but the venemous tripe could be left out in a lot of cases.

Having said that, it says very close to the top of the sticky that certain questions will be met with nastiness. "What is the best <anything>", "What is a good pet?" etc. are not kosher questions to ask. There are a lot of questions asked here that fall well outside those basic guidelines, however, that certain people have given themselves liberty to rip apart. That is what I take issue with.

Quote:
Give me a break. Your clique **** is not only getting old, it is a poorly thought out attempt to group up individual posters to make the "frightful, horrible posters of the Hunter forum" seem like some kind of massive entity to be defeated. As I said, single out the posters, and you just might be taken a bit seriously. As it stands, you sound like an enraged cyberpolice trying to enforce your own standards and values onto what is essentially far beyond you to moderate.


And your, "These are the reasons why it's ok for me to be a prick" excuses are getting old. So where does that leave us?

Quote:
And yes. I do so enjoy shaming people. I enjoy making them cry, if I could pull it off. I so love to see someone go into a hissyfit or post-fed rage due to something as simple as words on a page. Discriminatingly, of course. I choose my own targets carefully. Those who deserve it, or fails to meet the exceedingly low expectations of this and other forums. But I won't deny it. I get a warm fuzzy feeling inside from doing it. And nothing you say, could ever dissuade me from verbally assaulting someone who deserves it.


And why is that, North? What is it about making feel bad that is so appealing to you? Is it because you don't feel all that great about yourself so bringing people down to your level in your own eyes makes you feel less alienated? Is it because you feel a lack of control and mastery over yourself in everyday life that you chose to compensate by finding a sense of power here?

My sense is that your cruel response to others has nothing to do with them, and everything to do with you.

Quote:
And that's where you fail to understand this, and possibly other forums. Those who annoy me, deserve my wrath. Don't like it, rate me down and rant away just like I do to the newbtards (not to be confused with newbie) that fails to meet said expectations. The only difference would be that I enjoy that too.


Those who annoy you...deserve your wrath...why? Because you're perfect? Because you like and fully expected to be treated like **** by the people you annoy? If you really did, you wouldn't be defending yourself to me. You'd be thriving on my criticism of some of the behavior in this forum. You'd be begging for more. But you're not. You're basically saying, "This is how I do things, and if you don't like it sod off." You're maintaining a double standard, North. It's ok for you to be cruel and disrespectful to people who annoy you based on your criteria of annoying, but something about you entitles you to exemption from your own standards?

I'd like to clarify...I'm not singling you out. I'm responding to what you're posting. Any of the others who have repeatedly treated newcomers poorly would be receiving similar responses. My purpose is not to cut you down, but to examine the logic behind your decisions, and there doesn't seem to be very much reason at all to why you do what you do. At least, nothing I'd expect you'd be proud to admit.
#23 Oct 26 2007 at 9:52 AM Rating: Decent
Katchii wrote:
2 Things

Aurelius...shut up,...

blah blah blah

...but whatever you do, no NOT come in here pretending to have the authority to say how people can or cannot speak or act. You are not God, you are not the devil, you are not our parent or our guardian OR our mentor. Say what you want, no one has the right to say it right or wrong...


Hold on...one second.

I have no authority to say how people can or cannot speak or act?

You're right. You are absolutely, fully, fundamentally right. And so my question to you is, if that is authority that I lack, do I lack that authority because it's me, or because nobody has the right to tell people how they can or cannot speak or act? And if nobody has the right to tell people how they can or cannot speak or act, is there a difference between saying, "Don't do that" and treating them in such a way as to discourage them from doing it? Control is control is control whether it's spoken directives you expect people to follow or you will create consequences for them, or just jumpind directly to the consequences.

Spare me your pathetic hypocricy. I have no entitlement to voice a contradictory opinion of how some people here treat newcomers, but you have the the right to tell me how I should respond to the people behaving shamefully? Will you kindly make up your mind?
#24 Oct 26 2007 at 9:59 AM Rating: Good
**
830 posts
AureliusSir wrote:

In other words, you can't expect everyone to read through it all before they ask a question.


Why not? I did. The sticky STILL helps me even to this day. Chock full of good stuff. If you're in a rush for an answer, Google it. It'll be out there someplace.

AureliusSir wrote:

Like I mentioned above, there is a lot of great information in the sticky, but it is far from user friendly.


That's something that is being addressed right now. The old sticky is still friendly enough to be understood by anyone with a 4th grade education. You just have to invest time to read it and understand it. That is what many of the 'clique' are asking for, sometimes in abrasive terms, and I can understand the request. Like Caldone, I hung out for a while and then decided to hop in.

So, rather than slap everyone that might be in what you are calling a clique, which gets you nothing but grief, let people be and post how they will and guide those that you feel are worth it yourself. They will look up to you and get the answers they need. They will probably not like other posters but that's what those posters want, not to be liked by those people. Live and let live and get on with the task of being a contributing member of the forum.
#25 Oct 26 2007 at 9:59 AM Rating: Good
Caldone the Shady wrote:
Now see, here is the thing. When I sssssstted here on the forums, I didn't start asking stupid questions that were found in the sticky, that is the difference. Had I done so I would have been flamed into oblivion. I stayed silent for about the first 6 MONTHS just reading, everything but the sticky cause I couldn't make myself read something that dull and boring.


So why would you jump the bandwagon and start telling people to do something you yourself were not willing to do?

Quote:
I only started piping up here at the beginning of this year, yet I have been a member of the forums for 2 years now, so don't pull your self righteous bullsh*t on me. I did my research without haing to read the sticky, and was still able to ask/answer inteligent questions.


That's brilliant. Now, the options for a newcomer have expanded to:

A) Read the sticky you yourself weren't willing to read or
B) Spend months lurking in the forums to pick up the information you now have at your disposal.

Holy ****...I can see Fortune 500 companies jumping to adopt your method of bringing people up to speed on how best to do whatever it is they want to do. A new wave of motivational speakers will sweep the nation chanting the mantra, "Don't ask question. Be a good little peon and become an expert through osmosis!!"

Quote:
IF THE ANSWER IS IN THE GOD DAMN STICKY I TELL THEM TO READ IT!!!

The same question does not need to be repeated numerous times if answered in the sticky.


Would that be the same sticky you didn't want to read because it was "dull and boring"?

Quote:
So please, get off your high horse and sit your *** back down in the mud, you are really starting to annoy me.


Why is it that when I'm critical of your behavior (and the similar behavior of others) I'm on my "high horse", but when you're critical of the newcomer it's OK.

Spare.

Me.

Your.

Double.

Standards.

And.

Hypocritical.

BS.

Savvy?
#26 Oct 26 2007 at 9:59 AM Rating: Decent
*
146 posts
Again, why are people so sensitive anymore? Do you really need to QQ everytime someone posts something you view as negative Aurelius? I come here and get a laugh once in awhile. Most flaming posts by these guys are at least well written and more often than not point the OP to go to a specific place to find the information. Do they feel a wee bit stupid after a verbal beatdown? Probably, but I bet they also learn to do a little research before they blindly post after that.


« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 188 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (188)