Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Hmmm...Caldone will hate this page...Follow

#1 Oct 22 2007 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
***
2,717 posts
http://okoloth.blogspot.com/
Quote:

Average Base Stats¹
Average Beast Mastery Marksmanship Suvival
Health 8016 8114 7874 8505
Mana 6338 6140 6426 6428
Strength 72 72 72 72
Agility 445 426 436 593
Stamina 423 428 417 436
Intellect 215 202 221 222
Spirit 94 93 94 97
Armor 4995 5061 4897 5373

Average Ranged Stats¹
Average Beast Mastery Marksmanship Suvival
DPS 277.62 283.01 276.23 260.37
Speed 2.31 2.04 2.44 2.46
Power 1599 1369 1726 1615
Hit Rating 72 70 73 78
Crit Chance 20.82 19.86 20.48 27.34


EDIT: The table is about 85% the way down the page.

The table may not work right, but if you follow the columns...notice how BM hunters have more health AND DPS than MM hunters?

Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 11:35am by skribs
#2 Oct 22 2007 at 10:43 AM Rating: Good
***
2,388 posts
Might I remind you that this is base stats and I can almost guarentee you, base stats, I have more health than a BM hunter, they are not taking into account your "trash points" like the ones I have for increased health/trap/dps :P

Now Base stat wise I cannot argue that yes they do have more DPS, but again, that is Base Stats, that is not including playstyle or gear, so that being said I still could out dps you by a long shot, or barely scrimp by depending on the circumstances.

My hunter has sort of been sitting on the back burner, I will have to pull him out and try that Web Stats thingy...


#3 Oct 22 2007 at 10:50 AM Rating: Good
***
2,717 posts
Well...I would assume a BM hunter would scale better than an MM off the tooltip...playstyle aside, an MM is only gonna get slightly better DPS out of multi-shot, where the BM is going to get incredibly higher damage out of the pet and probably will get 3% that is not on the tooltip.
#4 Oct 22 2007 at 11:02 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,388 posts
Quote:
Well...I would assume a BM hunter would scale better than an MM off the tooltip...playstyle aside, an MM is only gonna get slightly better DPS out of multi-shot, where the BM is going to get incredibly higher damage out of the pet and probably will get 3% that is not on the tooltip


Except base stat wise MM hunters recieve a **** ton more RAP than base stats. You have listed as 1700 Base Stat for MM while I am running around with 2100+

The difference between a non MM Multishot and an MM multishot is astronomical. We are talking about going from 1k crit maybe to 2.5k minimum damage if crit. That and in Kara the AOE pulls, Explosive + a NON-INTERUPTABLE Volley makes you not loose so much to the mages while the other hunters are sitting there single targeting everything.

CHeck out Hedeiki (I think that is how it is spelled) in my guild Eternity also Dugerato or something, those 2 hunters are both BM and pretty decently geared, and I still top both of them in the raid.


#5 Oct 22 2007 at 11:13 AM Rating: Good
Caldone the Shady wrote:
Might I remind you that this is base stats and I can almost guarentee you, base stats, I have more health than a BM hunter, they are not taking into account your "trash points" like the ones I have for increased health/trap/dps :P


So you sacrifice maximization for utility; that's great, but only widens the gap, not narrows it. If you make up base health, you lack base DPS, or base mana, or something else. The blog assumes several things, true, but law of averages is still against you, and if you aren't in the 'cookie cutter' you're sacrificing somewhere (the reasons for doing so are irrelevant to this discussion).

Caldone the Shady wrote:
Now Base stat wise I cannot argue that yes they do have more DPS, but again, that is Base Stats, that is not including playstyle


You mean sending pet in, setting up a shot rotation, using Kill Command when available...that sort of playstyle? The same one a BM or SV hunter uses (adjusted slightly for their talents, but still the same concept)?

Caldone the Shady wrote:
or gear


Wait, so someone in all greens won't be able to outdamage you in blues/epics?

NO WAY

Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 3:17pm by Norellicus
#6 Oct 22 2007 at 11:14 AM Rating: Decent
Sorry for double, new post ninja'd in while I was typing.

Caldone the Shady wrote:
Quote:
Well...I would assume a BM hunter would scale better than an MM off the tooltip...playstyle aside, an MM is only gonna get slightly better DPS out of multi-shot, where the BM is going to get incredibly higher damage out of the pet and probably will get 3% that is not on the tooltip


Except base stat wise MM hunters recieve a sh*t ton more RAP than base stats. You have listed as 1700 Base Stat for MM while I am running around with 2100+

The difference between a non MM Multishot and an MM multishot is astronomical. We are talking about going from 1k crit maybe to 2.5k minimum damage if crit. That and in Kara the AOE pulls, Explosive + a NON-INTERUPTABLE Volley makes you not loose so much to the mages while the other hunters are sitting there single targeting everything.

CHeck out Hedeiki (I think that is how it is spelled) in my guild Eternity also Dugerato or something, those 2 hunters are both BM and pretty decently geared, and I still top both of them in the raid.




I sincerely hope you aren't making that statement purely off global damage meters.

Edit: And you have 20 tooltip DPS over Hideaki; it's not surprising that you'd outdamage him one way or another, but he's definitely not BM according to that. >.>

Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 3:21pm by Norellicus
#7 Oct 22 2007 at 11:23 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,388 posts
Quote:
I sincerely hope you aren't making that statement purely off global damage meters.


"not so much to the mages"

Yes you will still loose a sh*t ton of damage to mages when faced with AOE, but you will loose alot less than the other hunters.

Both of their DM's show me on top as well, so not so sure about your "global" statement.

Quote:
So you sacrifice maximization for utility; that's great, but only widens the gap, not narrows it. If you make up base health, you lack base DPS, or base mana, or something else. The blog assumes several things, true, but law of averages is still against you, and if you aren't in the 'cookie cutter' you're sacrificing somewhere (the reasons for doing so are irrelevant to this discussion).


WTF you smoking? My build is a "cookis cutter" build. It is an old one that came out slightly after BC, but it is still a "cookie cutter" build, and might I add I am not sacrificing anything for utility. I have more health and more utility than anybody who would have gone into the other tree so don't start with me, I would really love to know what you are smoking, either that or you need to pull your head out of your *** cause your arguments made no sense whatsoever.

Edit: Apperently Hideaki respeced without letting his class lead know >.<

Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 12:24pm by Caldone
#8 Oct 22 2007 at 11:29 AM Rating: Decent
Caldone the Shady wrote:
Quote:
I sincerely hope you aren't making that statement purely off global damage meters.


"not so much to the mages"

Yes you will still loose a sh*t ton of damage to mages when faced with AOE, but you will loose alot less than the other hunters.

Both of their DM's show me on top as well, so not so sure about your "global" statement.


lol @ saying "I top raid damage" based on global meters that include AOEs.

Edit: And 7/45/9 > 0/43/18 for personal DPS. You gave it up for utility of the traps. That's fine, and I'd probably do it too; it's still a comparative sacrifice.

Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 3:54pm by Norellicus
#9 Oct 22 2007 at 11:41 AM Rating: Good
Caldone the Shady wrote:
CHeck out Hedeiki (I think that is how it is spelled) in my guild Eternity also Dugerato or something, those 2 hunters are both BM and pretty decently geared, and I still top both of them in the raid.


Don't see anyone named Dugerato, but Hedaeki is there but is specced very poorly into MM/BM. Doesn't have a clue about spec/enchants/gems and probably the whole hunter class in general. I should hope you out dps him...
#10 Oct 22 2007 at 12:01 PM Rating: Excellent
**
830 posts
Let's take that table at face value:

BM = 283.01 dps (overall)
MM = 276.23 dps (overall)
SV = 260.37 dps (overall)

So, let's assume a 2 minute fight (120 seconds)

BM = 33961.2 total damage done
MM = 33147.6 total damage done
SV = 31244.4 total damage done

Variance in damage from max:

BM = 0
MM = 813.6
SV = 2716.8

So, you guys are arguing over what exactly? A single Autoshot from a high level MM hunter in a two minute fight? Heck, my 'normal' autoshots can hit 800.

Perhaps you're saying that SV hunters ability to keep multiple targets trapped indefinitely isn't worth a measly 2716.8 damage over a 2 minute fight? Against targets toting 30k+ health it's mostly irrelevant. I'd rather the target be stuck until the group can bring all their might to bear on it rather than worry about fractional dps.

You guys are stoking yourself's silly over DPS and the total variance doesn't even cover the statistical variance of damage in the game per given shot. Over time does it make a difference? Not really, kill a target exactly or by 2k = target still dead. In that fight, with that boss, that's when damage matters and your random factor is well over 10% of the damage per given shot; a variance of 2.4% means diddly squat.

Personally, I admire the SV guys. They forego the ego boosting trip of damage and focus on CC. Yet somehow they are still dealing great damage. Way to go guys.

How about those BM guys, tops in dps with steady consistent work. Always reliable to do great damage when they can leverage that pet against the target. When they can't... well, every spec has its drawbacks. Awesome job figuring out ways to keep that pet in there.

And the lowly Marksman, well, I don't know about anyone else, but I think having a class that can toss massive burst damage at a boss and then dump all that aggro, and not even rely on their pet to do it... well, maybe that has a place too.

Can we bury this stinking pile of !&$# spec-war stuff? It's useless! All specs have their places, all have their utility. All have their own playstyle.

If you want to talk about ways each spec can maximize their damage and still do the other functions of that spec, I'm all ears. Game Balance guys, game balance. If you only look at dps, you'll never find a balance between the specs. Might as well throw out all the specs and make everyone be the exact same.
#11 Oct 22 2007 at 12:10 PM Rating: Good
I agree with you sloshot, and the only reason I persist is because I'm tired of Caldone going "lala, I'm still teh ****, your logic and numbers mean nothing to me!"

Which is fine, he's got the right to play how he wants, but he's ************ everybody by continuing to spout off that he remains the superior choice and people simply haven't realized it yet.
#12 Oct 22 2007 at 12:23 PM Rating: Good
*
121 posts
sloshot wrote:
/snip/
Can we bury this stinking pile of !&$# spec-war stuff? It's useless! All specs have their places, all have their utility. All have their own playstyle.
/snip/

if I believed in god, I'd say 'Halleluyah!'
Shame that there's no possibility for a double or triple rate-up :)

Quote:
I agree with you sloshot, and the only reason I persist is because I'm tired of Caldone going "lala, I'm still teh sh*t, your logic and numbers mean nothing to me!"

just take him with a pinch of salt...
#13 Oct 22 2007 at 12:28 PM Rating: Good
sloshot wrote:
Let's take that table at face value:

BM = 283.01 dps (overall)
MM = 276.23 dps (overall)
SV = 260.37 dps (overall)

So, let's assume a 2 minute fight (120 seconds)

BM = 33961.2 total damage done
MM = 33147.6 total damage done
SV = 31244.4 total damage done

Variance in damage from max:

BM = 0
MM = 813.6
SV = 2716.8



you are as you said taking it at face value but in reality those numbers mean next to nothing.
#14 Oct 22 2007 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
***
2,388 posts
Ok, Hediaki was BM, don't know when he respecced, but I remember the big red kitty last time we were in Kara, from him.

Quote:
lol @ saying "I top raid damage" based on global meters that include AOEs.


WTF?

So I take it you do not include any AOE?

It is not bases boss fight wise off AOE's, we reset before boss and I still top. Degerato or whetever his name was seems to have left the guild but he had several pieces of Tier 4 and I was still beeting him, with him being BM.

Quote:
In that fight, with that boss, that's when damage matters and your random factor is well over 10% of the damage per given shot; a variance of 2.4% means diddly squat.


Sorry, I am talking ~10%

Quote:
And the lowly Marksman, well, I don't know about anyone else, but I think having a class that can toss massive burst damage at a boss and then dump all that aggro, and not even rely on their pet to do it... well, maybe that has a place too.


You are forgetting keeping at least 1 mob CC'd indefinetly, 2 for a short period of time.

Quote:
Can we bury this stinking pile of !&$# spec-war stuff? It's useless! All specs have their places, all have their utility. All have their own playstyle.


Then, might I ask, Why you posted those numbers and start the f-in war in the first place?

Quote:
Which is fine, he's got the right to play how he wants, but he's bullsh*tting everybody by continuing to spout off that he remains the superior choice and people simply haven't realized it yet.


Yeah Ok, I am not saying I am better than everybody, I am saying I have put out the most damage out of any specced hunter I have seen/played with to date, and Until I see otherwise I will remain the spec I am and will continue to say that my spec rules.

It's all personal opinion and nothing has said anything otherwise.

Come on, when I out DPS Kithereyna while she is going balls out and pulling aggro like crazy, that might be saying something.

I will realize it when I have been out-dps'd by another hunter.



#15 Oct 22 2007 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
This is getting stupidly out of hand when people start taking it too personally.

I get the feeling that Caldone's particular brand of self righteousness is alot like my own, for the better part humor. I like to joke alot and one of the best places to start is with yourself, hence my avatar. My friends tease me about having a big head so I put that up to lighten the mood.

If you can't look at it that way then think to yourself every time he refers some newb to his sig as if it were the holy grail of hunters, "man I know I'd rip that guy apart if I ever got to group with him" and then be done with it. No need to get all worked up over it or in my oppinion he's won the more important contest. He's gotten under your skin on the forums :P

Ok. Group hug time is over. lets get back to perusing the forums shall we?
#16 Oct 22 2007 at 1:02 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,388 posts
Quote:
If you can't look at it that way then think to yourself every time he refers some newb to his sig as if it were the holy grail of hunters, "man I know I'd rip that guy apart if I ever got to group with him" and then be done with it. No need to get all worked up over it or in my oppinion he's won the more important contest. He's gotten under your skin on the forums :P


....

TOOK YOU ******* LONG ENOUGH!!!


#17 Oct 22 2007 at 1:07 PM Rating: Decent
Caldone the Shady wrote:
Quote:
If you can't look at it that way then think to yourself every time he refers some newb to his sig as if it were the holy grail of hunters, "man I know I'd rip that guy apart if I ever got to group with him" and then be done with it. No need to get all worked up over it or in my oppinion he's won the more important contest. He's gotten under your skin on the forums :P


....

TOOK YOU @#%^ING LONG ENOUGH!!!




But I'm not the one taking the bait. I just like to banter back and forth about it all but still keep it good natured.....except the "which is the best pet" threads. I enjoy flaying those as much as the next guy :D
#18 Oct 22 2007 at 1:33 PM Rating: Decent
**
830 posts
Caldone the Shady wrote:
Quote:
Can we bury this stinking pile of !&$# spec-war stuff? It's useless! All specs have their places, all have their utility. All have their own playstyle.


Then, might I ask, Why you posted those numbers and start the f-in war in the first place?



I didn't post them to start, the numbers I posted made the point it was useless. The specs are close enough to make them each worthwhile on their own merits thus the difference was negligable. That post I made was WAAAAY down the list and only in response to all the garbage.

Just trying to put things in perspective.

And, just for all you out there:

There is no 'best' spec- period, end of sentence. You can argue this crap all you want but by the time you actually look at the big picture, you're arguing over crumbs.
#19 Oct 22 2007 at 1:35 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,388 posts
Heh, by swearing up and down your DPS is the max with an old spec, it's interesting to see how many people you **** off ;)

Yes I do alot of damage, yes I usually do more than others, but no by any means do I have the best spec, just the one I like the best :D
#20 Oct 22 2007 at 2:09 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Yes I do alot of damage, yes I usually do more than others, but no by any means do I have the best spec, just the one I like the best :D


That should be the end all to the never ending question "What spec is the best for a hunter."





MM is still best tho and I will never respec
#21 Oct 22 2007 at 2:34 PM Rating: Decent
Caldone the Shady wrote:
Heh, by swearing up and down your DPS is the max with an old spec, it's interesting to see how many people you **** off ;)

Yes I do alot of damage, yes I usually do more than others, but no by any means do I have the best spec, just the one I like the best :D


And that's fine, and how it should be. You are unique, your playstyle and talents are what makes you who you are to your raids, and obviously they think highly of you (I honestly do as well, just get a little annoyed at times).

Just please, stop with the "One of these days I'll post damage meters and show all of you how wrong you are, I'm still #1" or "Yeah they may have more tooltip DPS but I'm still better because I have trap-enhancing talents and more health" nonsense. I know people jab at you in jest, but it doesn't sound like you're being silly back; the downfall of the internet, unfortunately. Just..stick to your guns without making yourself sound arrogant, and life will be rosy.

PS: Honestly, I'd respect you just as much (if not more) if you came on here and said "I saw a BM Hunter in my raid yesterday do twice my damage; it was amazing. But I still love MM and will stick with it", because it's what you enjoy doing. It's a game, and there's no reason you should change playing it the way you enjoy simply because some numbers say so.

Ok, I'm done. No more spec nonsense from me :)

Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 6:35pm by Norellicus
#22 Oct 22 2007 at 3:00 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,264 posts
Sloshot wrote:
Can we bury this stinking pile of !&$# spec-war stuff? It's useless! All specs have their places, all have their utility. All have their own playstyle.

If you want to talk about ways each spec can maximize their damage and still do the other functions of that spec, I'm all ears. Game Balance guys, game balance. If you only look at dps, you'll never find a balance between the specs. Might as well throw out all the specs and make everyone be the exact same.


Well put Sloshot, I couldn't agree more.

-Azwing

PS. Those numbers are practically meaningless anyway. Lumping a bunch of level 70 hunters without regard for gear is meaningless. Coming up with an average dps for a spec is also meaningless. Median would be a much better statistic for comparing the populations.

For example: How many of a given spec are fresh 70s and sitting in mostly greens? This highlights the flaw in the methodology and why median is a better statistic to use than mean (average). Drawing broad conclusions about one spec being better than the other based on an analysis with questionable methodology is inherently flawed.

Here's a real-world practicle comment on using this study to say one spec is better than another. If I only put out 276.23 dps in a raid (the number listed for MM spec), I might as well not even go. The last two Gruul's Lair raids I have stats for, my dps averages almost twice that figure. So again, the numbers are basically meaningless. They look scientific, but looks are deceiving.



Edited, Oct 22nd 2007 5:02pm by azwing
#23 Oct 22 2007 at 3:09 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,388 posts
Quote:
I know people jab at you in jest, but it doesn't sound like you're being silly back; the downfall of the internet, unfortunately. Just..stick to your guns without making yourself sound arrogant, and life will be rosy.


If you knew me in real life you woulc call me an arrogant, smart ***, SoB!

Im a Smart *** cause I'm good at it! (besides it's better than being a dumb ***!)

I'm Arrogant because I like pushing peoples buttons!

I'm a SoB because nobody can think of anything else to say when I'm done :)

#24 Oct 22 2007 at 3:41 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,519 posts
I have a dream that my poor little hunter will one day post in a forum where she will not be judged by the DPS of her spec but by the skills of her character!

I have a dream!
#25 Oct 22 2007 at 3:48 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,388 posts
Quote:
I have a dream that my poor little hunter will one day post in a forum where she will not be judged by the DPS of her spec but by the skills of her character!

I have a dream!


Meh, buddy, we all got that dream...

Unfortunatly unless we all got on the PTR and just did a HUGE arena match in STV or something, we could never find out, and even then, people who have been holding pent up grudges would band up with others and just sloughter the same person over and over again...

In other words I would be thoroughly and totally **********
#26 Oct 22 2007 at 9:27 PM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
30 posts
Actually, Caldone, that's a GREAT idea. I can imagine at least a good handfull of the posters are eligible for the PTR anyways.With four copies between two servers, i've got a feeling this could easily work out. I'll start it off.

Tadakatsu, BE Hunter, PvE PTR server. (BM/MM)

That's right Caldone, I have something to say to you...



...I challenge you to a duel!
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 216 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (216)