Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Why take mage?Follow

#52 Oct 16 2007 at 11:34 AM Rating: Decent
zxcy wrote:
You billy are not the sharp one. What I meant is the same gear level, not the actual gear. How you ever achieved sage i do not know.

And as for blizzard admitting it part, someone link it from a forum to allakhazam regarding the 2.3 patch. I will try to find it, it may take a while, because it was a couple of weeks ago. Thats where I got this infromation from.

It went a something like this: In the test realms blizzard tested mages in full spellfire and spellstrike gear, and came to the conclusion that they were too powerful and therefore nerfed them. But blizzard was wrong and their calculations too, and they nerfed us too hard, and therefore other classes are going to out damage us.

And that is why we are getting the coefficient taken away, to boost our damage by like 7%. There you have it they nerfed us, and they nerfed us to hard. Now we are getting our buff. I will try to find the post where it came from.

P.S. Im not just talking about warlocks im talking about other dps classes too.


Oh, of course, I knew about that one, I didn't know if you meant some other post specifically stating that. I understand the way that they got the damage outputs and how mages were OP because of the discrepancy in gear between kara and spellfire/spellstrike/etc. Okay, we are cool now, I wasn't sure that is the one you were speaking of.

I have also read that rogues (assuming they can go all out the entire time) will outdps almost every class because that is really all they are... dps (and the occasional kick to stop a cast, that doesn't have much impact at all in their fighting), and a lock uses the majority of their casts to be instants and make it an unfair argument especially when considering multiple targets (like I pointed out before). In straight single-target combat it becomes much closer, if not the mage will rise above because of the ability to chain cast, where for example with Gruul a lock can put three dots up on Gruul during the silence and shatter, where mages are SoL (along with Boomkins/etC).
#53 Oct 16 2007 at 11:52 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,262 posts
Here's the post with the interesting WWS info.

Thought I saw this on elitistjerks too... but perhaps my memory is going bad.
#54 Oct 16 2007 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
Sorry for getting into this debate and using cap locks earlier but I thought it was necessary to tell everyone that mages are on the bottom of the damage meters. Glad were cool now Anobix.

And ktangent thanks for bringing up that post and doing the hard work.
#55 Oct 16 2007 at 12:11 PM Rating: Decent
I guess lucky me for playing on European servers, considering I NEVER saw that 10% coefficient nerf except for some talents calculator (Thottbot and the american WoW website). The 2.3 patch will be a good up in DPS for mages that's a fact. On the other topic, mage having a lower DPS output than all DPS clases is a big statement even if Blizz said so on their own forum. I frequently had one of the best DPS in Kara, I know it's not the best source of DPS capabilities but the guild I started raiding with was cleaning Kara with two teams for quite a bit of time and I a HL raiding newb yet I still achieved greatly and was once or twice top DPS on Malchezaar.
#56 Oct 16 2007 at 9:32 PM Rating: Decent
linkdiablo wrote:
I guess lucky me for playing on European servers, considering I NEVER saw that 10% coefficient nerf except for some talents calculator (Thottbot and the american WoW website). The 2.3 patch will be a good up in DPS for mages that's a fact. On the other topic, mage having a lower DPS output than all DPS clases is a big statement even if Blizz said so on their own forum. I frequently had one of the best DPS in Kara, I know it's not the best source of DPS capabilities but the guild I started raiding with was cleaning Kara with two teams for quite a bit of time and I a HL raiding newb yet I still achieved greatly and was once or twice top DPS on Malchezaar.


As far as I know it doesn't matter if you are on European or American servers... they all run the same patch, your side has the damage coefficient as well.
#57 Oct 16 2007 at 10:24 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Anobix wrote:
As far as I know it doesn't matter if you are on European or American servers... they all run the same patch, your side has the damage coefficient as well.


Indeed. They never changed the tooltip on either side. EVERYONE got the coefficient nerf.


Rogues do more DPS later on because of how autoattack scales with haste rating, from what I understand. The jump in DPS from no haste rating to w/ haste rating is huge.
#58 Oct 16 2007 at 11:22 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
On a more serious note, people take us because we make our own water+food, duh. Oh, and in 2.3 the dmg coefficient will be gone, so look forward to seeing mages doing about 10% more damage... thus likely out dpsing a warlock and more evenly, if not surpassing rogues. Oh, and about mana efficiency... that is what shadow priests are for. We also have a nice ability to stop doing damage after casting much faster than warlocks do incase of aggro wipes.


5%, and it won't make you top of the meters if the rest of their dps are playing properly.

Quote:
Try picking up 2/5 T5 and trying Arcane.


2/5 T5 AND the lightning capiitator. And then you have to regem and pick up MSD, oonly to have it nerfed next patch and fire buffed.

Arcane is not all roses, either - you become a slave to your mana bar and casting cycle. It weakens you where you are strongest - killing adds. Shorter range etc - I can't say I;m a fan, although the more involved gameplay almost made up for it.
#59 Oct 16 2007 at 11:42 PM Rating: Good
**
794 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Anobix wrote:
As far as I know it doesn't matter if you are on European or American servers... they all run the same patch, your side has the damage coefficient as well.


Indeed. They never changed the tooltip on either side. EVERYONE got the coefficient nerf.


Rogues do more DPS later on because of how autoattack scales with haste rating, from what I understand. The jump in DPS from no haste rating to w/ haste rating is huge.


of this i understand that haste for melee is getting an adjustment. Procs will also be adjusted to work with "hasted" attack speed and not just base weapon speed. Think of this as "un-normalization" of normalization. A toned down proc rate and adjusted haste effect will cut down their dps gained with haste gear.

Kave, the 5% we are talking about is coefficeint damage not base damage. As it is mages are scaling for 5% less. There is a post of stats based on BT/Hyjal raids on the percentage of dps dealt. Warlocks deal 105% of mage dps while mages deal 95% of warlock dps. The 5% should put us back on par.

Nevermind the MSD nerf, arcane should still be a respectable spec. The only thing that MSD changed was that it made AM spam an option. An entire spec and its play style was derived off the proc of one meta gem and 2 trinkets. With the meta gem being the most integral part of making AM spam competitive. Conversly, I would think it is high time we got over ourselves and stop thinking that its #1 or fail QQ QQ QQ. I mean what is most important is that we are playing the game and content is being overcomed. If we were to move back to the old days, the warlocks might as well stop coming to raid. Just a thought.
#60 Oct 16 2007 at 11:50 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
cancerous wrote:
of this i understand that haste for melee is getting an adjustment. Procs will also be adjusted to work with "hasted" attack speed and not just base weapon speed. Think of this as "un-normalization" of normalization. A toned down proc rate and adjusted haste effect will cut down their dps gained with haste gear.


I knew that it's going to get adjusted(or did it already?), but I was unaware of any effects on procs based on the new weapon speed.
#61 Oct 17 2007 at 4:49 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Kave, the 5% we are talking about is coefficeint damage not base damage. As it is mages are scaling for 5% less. There is a post of stats based on BT/Hyjal raids on the percentage of dps dealt. Warlocks deal 105% of mage dps while mages deal 95% of warlock dps. The 5% should put us back on par.


You haven't got a clue what you're talking about. What Blizzard is doing is removing the TEN percent coefficent tax which results in an increase in dps equal to about FIVE percent of current dps when spamming fireball. I, unlike you, know what I am talking about.

Quote:

Nevermind the MSD nerf, arcane should still be a respectable spec. The only thing that MSD changed was that it made AM spam an option. An entire spec and its play style was derived off the proc of one meta gem and 2 trinkets. With the meta gem being the most integral part of making AM spam competitive. Conversly, I would think it is high time we got over ourselves and stop thinking that its #1 or fail QQ QQ QQ. I mean what is most important is that we are playing the game and content is being overcomed. If we were to move back to the old days, the warlocks might as well stop coming to raid. Just a thought.


Respectable? Of course, but in my view inferior to what deep fire will be. And yes, I understand the principles of AM spam, which is why I see the MSD change as a substantial.

As for the last part... Need I even bother replying? Your logic is laughable. If all that mnatters is that content is being overcome, then Naxx and the days of 1 warlock for CoE would be fine as well. Besides which, you'd get two warlocks, one for CoS and one for CoE nowadays anyway, as shadowpriests are so popular. We should strive to be on par with warlocks in single target dps, as their AoE capabilities are vastly superior, as is their multiple target dps.

I apologize for the somewhat aggressive tone but I'd appreciate it if you didn't try and correct someone when you have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks.
#62 Oct 17 2007 at 6:16 PM Rating: Decent
**
794 posts
Kave,

I will take your points given that you are waay deeper into raiding than I am atm. We are just beginning to scratch SSC and TK whereas you are way deep into it. Like I said in my post, I do not actually raid to top dps meters. If that was the case, then my RLs would have no motivation to pick me at all when I was without my complete spellfire set. Even then they are several dpsers in my guild now who out gear me and do better in certain cases.

Your statement about how the un-nerf will not put mages back on the top of the meters again kinda came across as saying "I must be #1 dmg or Blizzard is doing something wrong". It is this what triggered my statement. There is this o-board like sentiment that mages need to be top and warlocks are replacing us. What should be important is that mages are filling in a role that is needed for raiding. We are filling an important role, yes some of the warlock stuff is too powerful in their own right. Warlocks who have the skills to do those things go places while the ones who don't continue to struggle. In fact, I am happy that warlocks are given an important role to fill in raids now. The part where they outdps us is in part caused by stagnant talents, poor itemnization and no cross raid synergy.

In most cases, mages are not even synergising with each other. Warlocks are allowed to feed off each other's crit shadowbolts. Its the synergising part that needs to get fixed, not warlock damage. I just see it that way. no offense taken. =)
#63 Oct 18 2007 at 1:09 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,602 posts
whats funny is that theres a rogue thread talking about how mages are replacing them in raids...

the wording is the exact same as why mage?
#64 Oct 18 2007 at 1:45 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,293 posts
I still really miss the "lol, 3k ignite ticks" made the mages very synergetic (sp?) and was really fun aggro wise. Making sure that you dont grab the next igite stack and/or stop DPSing or else you would be pasted.

Still cant believe they took that out, okok it was OP, but i thought it was brilliant synergy, maybe they could put it back in somsort of nerfed form.

I decided raid priest now bc they took out "our" ignites. That was the only fun thing about raiding with mages imo, made it exciting.
#65 Oct 18 2007 at 2:20 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Tenjen wrote:
whats funny is that theres a rogue thread talking about how mages are replacing them in raids...

the wording is the exact same as why mage?


We're getting another infestation of Oboard trolls. Time to fumigate again.
#66 Oct 18 2007 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
And yet if you look at end game dps, rogues rape mages on the damage meter.
#67 Oct 18 2007 at 5:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
794 posts
Sjans wrote:
I still really miss the "lol, 3k ignite ticks" made the mages very synergetic (sp?) and was really fun aggro wise. Making sure that you dont grab the next igite stack and/or stop DPSing or else you would be pasted.

Still cant believe they took that out, okok it was OP, but i thought it was brilliant synergy, maybe they could put it back in somsort of nerfed form.

I decided raid priest now bc they took out "our" ignites. That was the only fun thing about raiding with mages imo, made it exciting.


I would like to see this mechanic make a come back in the style of Imp.shadowbolt. Yes I am going to mention that blasted Tier 1 talent again. Ignite should make the next 3 to 4 fireballs hurt more. It will only last 10 seconds or when 3-4 fireballs hit. This combined with the DoT which belongs to the individual mage. I am sure this can be a happy middle ground.

For fire mages, a dream talent can be when I crit I generate a temporary aura that enhances mana regen to my party for say.... 10 secs. This would help other mana users and create a niche opening for mages to be mana batterys but not as powerful as a spriest.

For frost mages, a similarly themed talent can occur somewhere deep in the tree as well. Instead of crit, maybe when the water elemental is activated it gives a small brilliance aura to the party till it deactivates.
#68 Oct 19 2007 at 10:27 AM Rating: Decent
Most of you are right.. mages and locks both have their rolls in the game. I have both.. and I love playing my lock.. in the same way I love playing Eddie Gordo in Tekken. But there's times I'd also like some more challenge in my gameplay.. so that's why I'll chose another class to play as well. Like Eddie.. I can give my GF my lock, show her 3-4 buttons to push.. and she'll do just fine. So love your locks.. I sure do.. when I'm bored or too drunk to actually play somthing challenging.
#69 Oct 19 2007 at 12:26 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,602 posts
Quote:
Quote:
whats funny is that theres a rogue thread talking about how mages are replacing them in raids...

the wording is the exact same as why mage?



We're getting another infestation of Oboard trolls. Time to fumigate again.


huh?

ive never been to the o boards. How am i trolling?

No really. This has been going on since the beginning, probably even beta if thats possible. Its hilarious. Class A posts how the other class (of course called B ) is doing so much better and how terrible their state is. While class B has also posted the exact same thing.

Many, hell most, guilds seem to have priority on mages over rogues. Something to do with more utility and AOE [amongst a whole list of other things]
#70 Oct 19 2007 at 1:41 PM Rating: Default
*
101 posts
Personally I think you Mages are mad because us Warlocks get a nice hawt succubus to keep us company and all ya'll get are a bunch of sheep.


Less QQ more Pew Pew KTHXBAI <3
#71 Oct 19 2007 at 10:38 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Tenjen wrote:
huh?

ive never been to the o boards. How am i trolling?


I never said you were. I was responding to your question. You see, around here, we try to limit the amount of Oboards style whining about classes and how they compare to one another. Discussion is encouraged, but whining is discouraged with extreme prejudice.

I'm just saying we need to step up the whining discouragement a bit.


Edit: Oh, and Skargg, at 97 posts, I hope you're not too attached to your sage status, trolling like that.

Edited, Oct 20th 2007 12:39am by Poldaran
#72 Oct 19 2007 at 10:48 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,602 posts
AH ok. Peace.

AHEM

o damn wait what did i want to say...bioshock is so distracting.
#73 Oct 20 2007 at 2:05 AM Rating: Decent
*
101 posts
Oh no,I'm afraid I don't really hold too dear to my status on this board,it is after all, a forum board on the internet.I do apologize for my post,I meant no harm it was just in fun after all,I forgot how such threads were such serious business.

Please do forgive me,I will not interfere when the adults are speaking again.

/bow
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 86 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (86)