Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

I know nothing about PvP, but...Follow

#1 Oct 09 2007 at 4:21 AM Rating: Decent
**
755 posts
... this pinged my 'freaky' radar. According to this, the current highest rated rogue in the world is, uh, Hemo Smiley: eek

According to a later post, around 60% of Korean rogues are sub. Anyone care to speculate why this is? Like I said, I know next to nothing about PvP, but I do read around my class, and guess this is pretty rare/ unusual.

As I understand it, rogues in 5v5 are more for utility than anything else, so a giant 5v5 rating on a rogue says more about his team than him, or am I talking out of my ***?
#2 Oct 09 2007 at 4:27 AM Rating: Decent
**
349 posts
The One and Only Eschatologist wrote:

According to a later post, around 60% of Korean rogues are sub. Anyone care to speculate why this is?


It's called Mass Hysteria.
#3 Oct 09 2007 at 4:39 AM Rating: Decent
The One and Only Eschatologist wrote:
... this pinged my 'freaky' radar. According to this, the current highest rated rogue in the world is, uh, Hemo Smiley: eek

According to a later post, around 60% of Korean rogues are sub. Anyone care to speculate why this is? Like I said, I know next to nothing about PvP, but I do read around my class, and guess this is pretty rare/ unusual.

As I understand it, rogues in 5v5 are more for utility than anything else, so a giant 5v5 rating on a rogue says more about his team than him, or am I talking out of my ***?


Like one of the posters already stated, TBC hasn't been out that long in Korea. With fresh 70's, sub wasn't really terrible. It was the addition of resilience that killed the sub tree in PvP.

On another note, I finally had the pleasure of running SLabs with a lolstep rogue last night. Might I say that the DPS from that build is horrid to say the least. The pally tank had more damage done than he did, by 7%. I had more than double what he had.

I was going to laugh at him, but apparently he had already put me on ignore...imagine that.
#4 Oct 09 2007 at 5:35 AM Rating: Decent
**
755 posts
Salwrathis wrote:
Like one of the posters already stated, TBC hasn't been out that long in Korea.


Sadly, even another poster pointed out this is horseshit. They had 2 weeks less time on TBC than US/EU, and actually had more time on vanilla WoW.
#5 Oct 09 2007 at 6:13 AM Rating: Decent
It was a month...not 2 weeks. But regardless, I stand corrected. As for the fact they had more time in vanilla WoW, I fail to see what bearing that has on the conversation due to the fact that strats/abilities/HP have changed so drastically, it would be difficult to make a comparison.



Edited, Oct 9th 2007 9:16am by Salwrathis
#6 Oct 09 2007 at 6:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,006 posts
"due to the fact that" is such an awful phrase. Why? Because someone invented, "because."
#7 Oct 09 2007 at 6:45 AM Rating: Default
EonSprinter wrote:
"due to the fact that" is such an awful phrase. Why? Because someone invented, "because."


You must be really bored.
#8 Oct 09 2007 at 7:08 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,006 posts
Salwrathis wrote:
You must be really bored.

Guilty as charged. Due to the fact that I'm at work.
#9 Oct 09 2007 at 7:15 AM Rating: Decent
EonSprinter wrote:
Guilty as charged. Due to the fact that I'm at work.


Lol...I feel your pain bro.
#10 Oct 09 2007 at 8:16 AM Rating: Good
I'm Hemo and I'm perfectly happy with it. I don't like to admit it up here, because of the running opinion on this forum is that "Sub is dead". I only play BG's and 2v2. I'm sure if I played 5v5 I would be unhappy as hell with it.

Still, Hemo is hecka fun to play. When I tested a combat mace spec versus Hemo on Mobs (yes, yes, I know mobs aren't players) I found the DPS in the CS/KS cycle to be greater with Hemo. Mind you, I was testing a stunlock cycle.

If your into Stunlocks (and I am) Hemo is fun as hell. I feel too naked trying to burn someone down with AR. I'd rather finese them down, which Hemo absolutely excels at. I don't mind giving up the added DPS to have so many tricks up my sleeve. I like getting the opener on other rogues, I like 2 vanishes at my disposal, I like 5 point kidney shots, I like having the energy to get a kick or gouge off exactly when I need to, I like the added damage to rupture (which is enhanced even more by my Druid partners Mangle ability). I like winning against other players by "reopening" as many times as I need to. Hemo may be weak for PVE (specifically the longer boss fights), but you can lay the damage down for pvp, and the added utility is amazing.

It's just too much fun for me to give up, and there are some pretty highly rated rogues using it.....too bad I'm not one of them. :)

Edit: I also like the fact that if I am knocked out of stealth (rarely happens) it's not "game over" since it is a sword build, and CP generation is still quick, while positioning is far less important.


Edited, Oct 9th 2007 9:25am by Slyyth
#11 Oct 09 2007 at 8:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Heh, what's not horsesh*t thought is that Koreans team have yet to consistently get past the first round of any arena tournament.

They're usually seen as a free win by american/europe teams that go against them.

This isn't SC (yet anyway) where people tremble at the mere idea of facing off against a Korean...

While that doesn't mean that Hemo rogue isn't on to something and that he isn't an excellent rogue, I'll stick with Combat for now ;p



Edited, Oct 9th 2007 12:28pm by Tyrandor
#12 Oct 09 2007 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
**
755 posts
Warchief Tyrandor wrote:
Heh, what's not horsesh*t thought is that Koreans team have yet to consistently get past the first round of any arena tournament.

They're usually seen as a free win by american/europe teams that go against them.



Ah ha, this I was unaware of. Kinda weird, since Korea seems to take its e-gaming seriously for the most part, you'd think they'd be all over a winning spec like combat.
#13 Oct 09 2007 at 8:35 AM Rating: Excellent
It's the main reason why loudmouth like Ming have been calling WoW 'a western's e-sport' or 'an american e-sport' - because the asian population just isn't doing so good at it.

That rogue is probably a much better player then I am, I'm not saying he sucks... but I doubt he's better then Nitrana, or Zeck, etc.
#14 Oct 09 2007 at 11:14 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
Quote:
Did he get to that rating as hemo? Or did he respec to hemo once he got to that rating?


Quote:
i duno



Neilyo is one of the top rated rogues in the world. He was Hemo last week.


Did he get to 2400+ in 3 brackets as Hemo?


**** no.
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#15 Oct 09 2007 at 11:43 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Some people in arena also change specs to hide their team make up/specs, so even if you do your homework beforehand you won't know what you're up against.
#16 Oct 09 2007 at 1:19 PM Rating: Good
I'm not trying to defend Hemo as "all that". I just don't think it's nearly as gimp for PVP as some people up here have been led to believe.

There's no argument that Muti/Combat will out DPS Hemo. I just think there is more to PVP than raw DPS.
#17 Oct 09 2007 at 1:29 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Slyyth wrote:
I'm not trying to defend Hemo as "all that". I just don't think it's nearly as gimp for PVP as some people up here have been led to believe.

There's no argument that Muti/Combat will out DPS Hemo. I just think there is more to PVP than raw DPS.

There's a reason hemo isn't feared in arena.

You hit like a girl, and you really don't have more survivability, CP generation, or control than a mut or combat player does.
#18 Oct 09 2007 at 1:53 PM Rating: Excellent
I don't buy it. I've spec'd every possible build, and from my experience the only spec that has a substantial DPS improvement for PVP is Muti/Combat.

Since when did Vanish X2, Sprint X2, or AR X2 not increase survivability? Since when does having the energy to get a kick off at the right time (not 1 second after the cast) not improve survivability? During the course of the stun hemo doesn't hit "like a girl". The stun duration is far better than you get with Combat swords, making up for any increase in white damage. Sure, AR is great, but when it runs out, then what?

Maybe I'm just stuck in old school thought, but I find when I control the fight on MY terms I win. Muti/Combat is the only thing that comes even close in utility because even though you give up a lot of control, you make up for it with a substantial increase in DPS, a DPS increase that's not reliant on a 5 minute cooldown.

Again, not saying hemo is it.....just think it's better than most folks up here suggest.
#19 Oct 09 2007 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
Because in arena, it isn't YOUR fight. They still have 1-4 other people there beating you down.
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#20 Oct 09 2007 at 2:09 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,538 posts
I'm tired of people trying to claim stunlock builds are effective in arenas. I can sum up why they are not in one sentence.

Stunlocks are good for 1v1 ONLY!

You cannot control every opponent in an arena, so you cannot guarantee that you will be able to even do your stunlock. Removing yourself from the fight to remove somebody else is also pretty pointless. Arena teams function as a unit, not as 5 people doing their own thing.
#21 Oct 09 2007 at 3:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Absolutely true. Remember I started this with the statement that I only do BG's and 2v2. I also said I would not try to do 3v3 and 5v5 arena spec'd hemo. I won't even consider 3v3 and 5v5 quite honestly because they just don't appeal to me in the least.

My druid 2v2 partner usually gets targeted first. I can't tell you how many times I survived the fight because when it came down to the 1v1 I COULD stunlock my opponent.

Again....not saying Hemo is the end all be all build. But for BG and 2v2 I really like it a LOT and I simply think credit should be given for the build where credit is due.

#22 Oct 09 2007 at 3:15 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Slyyth wrote:
Absolutely true. Remember I started this with the statement that I only do BG's and 2v2. I also said I would not try to do 3v3 and 5v5 arena spec'd hemo. I won't even consider 3v3 and 5v5 quite honestly because they just don't appeal to me in the least.

My druid 2v2 partner usually gets targeted first. I can't tell you how many times I survived the fight because when it came down to the 1v1 I COULD stunlock my opponent.

Again....not saying Hemo is the end all be all build. But for BG and 2v2 I really like it a LOT and I simply think credit should be given for the build where credit is due.

You 2v2 with the most OP healer in the game. I could go 0/0/0 and still win games with a druid healing me.

Credit is given where credit is due, but in this case, no credit is due because the build sucks.
#23 Oct 09 2007 at 3:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Sorry, he's spec'd Feral, and a Feral druid is NOT the most OP healer in the game. As a matter of fact, for the most part I don't get heals (which I'm working on) because he uses up most of his mana changing forms, etc.

The funny thing is that the build doesn't "suck". You're just stuck in 5v5 mode where rogues in general suck. One on one, and 2v2 Hemo is just fine, if not better than any other build out there.

Theo, when was the last time you actually spec'd 37-40 points deep into a sub sword build? You might be surprised with the results. Just because something is decent in 5v5 doesn't mean it's build to use for everything else.

One more thing. The numbers shared on this board regarding Hemo have been wrong for months. "You need an additional 3000 attack power" to equal sinister strike is just crap. I tested exclusively, and those numbers are wrong. I don't care about your theorycraft....use some common sense. Do you have any idea what 3000 additional attack power would do to any rogue build? It would FAR superceed the small difference in damage I'm seeing between Hemo and Sinister Strike.

#24 Oct 09 2007 at 4:03 PM Rating: Decent
*
207 posts
I did the AR/Prep route for a little bit for 2v2 and for some BG's just to mess around after seeing the video of the two gnomes raping face in 2v2. I wasnt able to do it with mace spec due to not having any good ones for it but I got the idea. I loved that it was versatile but hemo just didnt have the punch that ss does. Punch that I depend on when burning down a healer or whatever. If I was in a double dps 2v2 then it would be different because I could control while they did a majority of the dps. I actually do like 30 games a week in 2v2 atm, because I have 3 friends that want points. Low resilience on some and others are undergeared so I need to have the dps to drop opponents and the hemo build just isnt enough to do that.
#25 Oct 09 2007 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good
If you want Hemo to have even close to the punch of SS, then you have to spec it with Deadliness and Sinister Calling. Hemo specc'd with AR sounds good, but it practice it doesn't hit very hard at all.

#26 Oct 09 2007 at 5:33 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Slyyth wrote:
Sorry, he's spec'd Feral, and a Feral druid is NOT the most OP healer in the game. As a matter of fact, for the most part I don't get heals (which I'm working on) because he uses up most of his mana changing forms, etc.

Your partner is awful, then.


Slyyth wrote:
Theo, when was the last time you actually spec'd 37-40 points deep into a sub sword build? You might be surprised with the results. Just because something is decent in 5v5 doesn't mean it's build to use for everything else.

A month ago.

You're still bad.

edit because I missed this gem:
Slyyth wrote:
If you want Hemo to have even close to the punch of SS, then you have to spec it with Deadliness and Sinister Calling. Hemo specc'd with AR sounds good, but it practice it doesn't hit very hard at all.

You really are awful.

Explain to me why 0/33/28 or 5/31/25 or any variation thereof is the 3rd most popular arena spec, if it's so bad?

You'd be speccing it if you were smart and could CC well at all; your partner is a DPS class and you could have some of the best CC in the effing game if you could learn how to play your class role appropriately.

Edited, Oct 9th 2007 6:35pm by Theophany
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 209 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (209)