Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

The Downfall of RoguesFollow

#1 Sep 17 2007 at 12:47 PM Rating: Decent
So lately people have been talking alot of crap, both on my server and in personal circles, about Rogue DPS. I've been told Shockadins, Shamans and feral druids out DPS Rogues, ALL Rogues, easily. I personally can't see how this could be true with similar level gear but anyone want to set me straight? I'd hate to think I'm just the guy with lockpicking. :[
#2 Sep 17 2007 at 1:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Either the rogues on your server or in your personal circle all suck horribly, or the people saying these things have never actually looked at a damage chart. I easily top the damage charts in any and all 5-mans, usually between 35-40% total damage, and my gear is only moderate at best.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#3 Sep 17 2007 at 1:21 PM Rating: Default
***
1,006 posts
zomg rouges ar getting outdamaged bi drooids?

/slash wristses
#4 Sep 17 2007 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Hahaha.

No, I will never be outdamaged by any other class unless they outgear me severely.

And actually, I beat people in my guild who are serious raiders.

Edited, Sep 17th 2007 2:47pm by Theophany
#5 Sep 17 2007 at 2:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
i only lose to serious raiding warlocks, or serious raiding fire mages

and thats rare at best lol
#6 Sep 17 2007 at 8:42 PM Rating: Decent
*
63 posts
I've heard this a lot on my server, too. Usually retn00bs or feral druids with rogue envy.

Damage meters seems to put the lie to their big talk every time, though.
#7 Sep 17 2007 at 9:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
For example: I just finished a normal Mech run. The only other person in the group competing with me for the top of the damage chart was a warlock in a couple pieces of T4 and a few other very nice rep rewards.

I came in second on the meters by 11,000 damage.

Now take a look at the weapons I'm using and the gear I'm sporting, and you'll see that, had we been evenly geared, I would have whooped the pants off of him, no contest.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#8 Sep 17 2007 at 9:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
443 posts
Yeah I guess the people who told you that crap don't have their statistics straight. Rogues have many things that put them in the top (or extremely near), one being energy bar that rapidly fills. They can keep going till their dura breaks, while casters need mana, etc etc. In ALL my 5-man experience I've never been outdps'd by a loladin. But by other classes, occasionally, when their gear is just out of control. I'm around where Demea sits, usually high 35-40% bracket. Really not hard...I've been with rogues that top 45% D:

Edited, Sep 18th 2007 1:20am by EliminatorX
#9 Sep 17 2007 at 9:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
EliminatorX wrote:
Really not hard...I've been with rogues that top 45% D:

I ran Steamvaults once with a 68 hunter who did less damage than the tank. Luckily for him, I picked up the slack with just under 50% of total damage.

/e-peen
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#10 Sep 17 2007 at 9:50 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
EliminatorX wrote:
I've been with rogues that top 45% D:

And you were only with them for their DPS, right?

I keed, I keed.

No, really...in PuGs I'm usually 50-75% of the party damage.

And the last time I pugged I didn't have 3-4 of my epics.
#11 Sep 17 2007 at 9:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Yo Theo, what's with the sword in your offhand?

L2P, nub!
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#12 Sep 17 2007 at 10:40 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
It's 0.05 DPS better than my mace OH since I have a S1 mace.

Plus this way I get to weapon chain my mace.
#13 Sep 18 2007 at 12:21 AM Rating: Decent
Awesome now when people talk trash I have more than "You're a f*cking idiot" to go back at them with. Infallible.
#14 Sep 18 2007 at 12:26 AM Rating: Decent
**
644 posts
I confirm that decent rogues shouldn't be outdamaged.

After just completing the normal questing (haven't finished a few of the 5-man quests) and easy normal instances (i.e. I stopped at Kara, not having a guild that can take me there), I ran my first heroic instance this week.

I was (logically) the one with the worst gear, all others being half purple or even full purple (I only had two purples at that time, the ingineering googles and the exhalted Aldor's sword). Still, I can up first and second was a warlock with a nice gear.

There was a second rogue, with gear far superior to mine, and he came up third, with just the tank and healer behind. Even more shocking to me was to noticed that on a long boss fight for a 5-man quest a rogue from my guild who is full purple and pve oriented (he doesn't pvp) was WAY behind me, like I was 46% and he was 28% !!!

This shows that a rogue has to know what he's doing if he wants to perform well. As a combat rogue, you can't SS-SS-SS-SS-Evisc and hope to do well. I personally usually start all fights with a 1 point SnD, unless the fights is expected to be super short (casters trash for instance). Normal elites usually die before the end of my SnD. On tougher mobs and on bosses especially, I follow up with a Rupture, then again SnD, etc... keeping those two up at all times. Unless, of course, there is no warrior and then I'll Expose Armor instead of Rupture. With Adrenalin Rush and BF, you can acutally have all three up.

Opening move for me is usually Garrote, since KS is moderately useful when there is a tank and some tank actually complain that it hinders their rage building.

Also, people on this board discuss builds a lot so we tend to end up with close to perfect builds. It's not the case of most players (for instance the rogue from my guild which I mentioned above is a combat rogue wearing a sword and a dagger... no comment).

These are very simple rules, but applying them allows me to always top the damage meter, except when there are either a warlock with great gear or a mage who's using AoE on trash or non elites.

nostra

Edited, Sep 18th 2007 10:32am by nostraaa
#15 Sep 18 2007 at 4:41 AM Rating: Decent
Damage meters can sometimes tell a different tale, with mages coming out on top of rogues.
This is usually the case when u have a lot of group-mobs and thus lots of AOE-targets. As soon as you get Single-target DPS the Rogue comes out shining, no comparison.

People who are deceived by this going "Mages are better than Rogues, Rogues suxx" dont realize that although the Arcane-blasts/Cones of Cold/Flamez etc look cool when u take down grps of mobs (and are very useful at that), it is not essential for the raid to succeed.

Nailing Morose before Shackles break on the minibosses and priests are out of mana/nailed etc IS vital for raid-success - Rogues moment of glory!

Just something to think about when guildies want to take your job in Kara for instance (no pun intended).


Edited, Sep 18th 2007 2:43pm by TheSmisker

Damn, read the last 2 sentences on the post above and you can consider this post an elaborate attemt of trying to say the exact same thing!

Edited, Sep 18th 2007 2:45pm by TheSmisker
#16 Sep 18 2007 at 8:17 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
43% of party in heroic UB, nuff said
#17 Sep 18 2007 at 4:13 PM Rating: Decent
*
207 posts
In a guild run of H UB yesterday I was close to 50% of party damage and they have about as many epics as I do. But, I was an **** and kept the pressure up in a caster heavy group and refused to let them get a break to drink the entire run.
#18 Sep 18 2007 at 7:36 PM Rating: Decent
**
443 posts
Theophany the Sly wrote:
EliminatorX wrote:
I've been with rogues that top 45% D:

And you were only with them for their DPS, right?

I keed, I keed.

No, really...in PuGs I'm usually 50-75% of the party damage.

And the last time I pugged I didn't have 3-4 of my epics.


75% o_O? I find that hard to believe, no offense. I mean, do you have 2 others DPS'ing?

Edited, Sep 18th 2007 11:38pm by EliminatorX
#19 Sep 18 2007 at 9:12 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
EliminatorX wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
EliminatorX wrote:
I've been with rogues that top 45% D:

And you were only with them for their DPS, right?

I keed, I keed.

No, really...in PuGs I'm usually 50-75% of the party damage.

And the last time I pugged I didn't have 3-4 of my epics.


75% o_O? I find that hard to believe, no offense. I mean, do you have 2 others DPS'ing?

Edited, Sep 18th 2007 11:38pm by EliminatorX

Elemental shaman with 0 +dmg and a lock who refused to use DoTs.

'Nuff said, I think.
#20 Sep 18 2007 at 9:52 PM Rating: Decent
*
207 posts
Hmm, im surprised you stayed for that one. Usually those groups I make up an excuse to leave....
#21 Sep 18 2007 at 10:08 PM Rating: Decent
Losing to 'lock DPS early isn't all that uncommon, later on, you should be closing the gap or exceeding them except on a few encounters namely the flying flaming ****.
#22 Sep 18 2007 at 10:16 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
modusTollens wrote:
Hmm, im surprised you stayed for that one. Usually those groups I make up an excuse to leave....

Meh, I wanted the rep and we weren't wiping since the tank was decent as was the healer.

It was funny when the shaman tried to say he was doing good dps, though.

Me: "Uh... <posts SW Stats info>"

Warrior: "ROFL"

Priest: "ROFL"
#23 Sep 19 2007 at 4:37 AM Rating: Decent
*
207 posts
My favorite pugs are where the tanks bad, the dps is worse, and I end up throwing on PvP gear and popping blade flurry and tanking multiple mobs straight through the instance. (non-heroic of course, usually doing alts/RL friends a favor) I tell the bum of a warrior to just throw on his dps weapons or whatever and I get the reply "this is all I got" Thats when I usually say to just put follow on and try and keep the chat interesting.
#24 Sep 19 2007 at 5:07 AM Rating: Decent
Theophany the Sly wrote:
EliminatorX wrote:
Theophany the Sly wrote:
EliminatorX wrote:
I've been with rogues that top 45% D:

And you were only with them for their DPS, right?

I keed, I keed.

No, really...in PuGs I'm usually 50-75% of the party damage.

And the last time I pugged I didn't have 3-4 of my epics.


75% o_O? I find that hard to believe, no offense. I mean, do you have 2 others DPS'ing?

Edited, Sep 18th 2007 11:38pm by EliminatorX

Elemental shaman with 0 +dmg and a lock who refused to use DoTs.

'Nuff said, I think.


Christ, these are the people that completely boggle my mind. It's one thing to be retarded and try to make full sub spec sound leet, but not using a set of spells that has been staple to your class for the last 60+ levels is beyond any human logic. What the @#%^ was he doing, sending in his voidwalker and wanding it to death?

Edited, Sep 19th 2007 9:08am by Norellicus
#25 Sep 19 2007 at 7:59 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,011 posts
Feral Druids, maybe.

Shockadins and Shamans... never.
#26 Sep 19 2007 at 8:43 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Norellicus wrote:
Christ, these are the people that completely boggle my mind. It's one thing to be retarded and try to make full sub spec sound leet, but not using a set of spells that has been staple to your class for the last 60+ levels is beyond any human logic. What the @#%^ was he doing, sending in his voidwalker and wanding it to death?

I've honestly given up trying to understand the damage of most WoW players.

In any case, as for the discussion on hand... I have to join the group tossing their hats in with the Rogues. The only time I've ever seen my buddy's Rogue not top a damage meter is when he's competing with my BM Hunter, and he's freaking Subtlety specced.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 90 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (90)