Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

My 2 CentsFollow

#27 Sep 11 2007 at 7:54 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Gaudion wrote:
Qiksilver wrote:
This is the reason that I wanted to post in the first place, not to start flaming other people about this and that but to have a civilized discussion as to why some people think one way and some another.

No, you don't. You don't want a "civilized discussion" and neither does anyone else that starts one of their, "Retribution rocks!" threads. What you people want is for Retribution to be good and for those of us that know better to agree with you that it's good.


Now I have rated you up twice in one thread.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#28 Sep 11 2007 at 8:02 AM Rating: Decent
My only request is for you to explain where anywhere I stated that "Retribution rocks! And how I came across as sounding that way. If that is the only thing you have taken from this thread then I am sorry that I somehow mislead you and I apologize for having wasted you time.
#29 Sep 11 2007 at 8:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
Now I have rated you up twice in one thread.

A sign of the coming apocolypse! =D
#30 Sep 11 2007 at 8:06 AM Rating: Decent
**
387 posts
As long as you know these posters ARE ignorant and they do NOT want you to agree. They just want to tell you "I am ignorant" in a unique fashion.

Anyway, I rest my case. Good luck continuing your arguments.
#31 Sep 11 2007 at 8:06 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I challenge you to show where he said that you said that!

Reading Comprehension ftw!

Edited, Sep 11th 2007 12:06pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#32 Sep 11 2007 at 8:09 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The fact is that the discussions reach more than just the people we bash heads with.

The majority of the time this forum is not used by end game lvl 70 Paladins who know better, but rather by people who are interested in becoming a paladin for the first time and are interested in learning more about the class. It is for their benefit (and the purpose of increasing my gargantuan post count) that I post the responses. Not for the ret'tards who couldn't fight their way past Attumen.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#33 Sep 11 2007 at 8:18 AM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
The fact is that the discussions reach more than just the people we bash heads with.

The majority of the time this forum is not used by end game lvl 70 Paladins who know better, but rather by people who are interested in becoming a paladin for the first time and are interested in learning more about the class. It is for their benefit (and the purpose of increasing my gargantuan post count) that I post the responses. Not for the ret'tards who couldn't fight their way past Attumen.

Indeed.

No one is telling you not to play Retribution. I have never said that once myself. It's your toon. If you enjoy it, by all means, you should play it.

What I, and Bodh, and the rest of the "veterans" here are saying is that Retribution is currently flawed in its execution to the point that it severely underperforms in its intended primary purpose. And if you do, in fact, decide to play that spec, that you had better be damn well prepared to accept the inherent limitations and the game-wise discrimination that comes with it.

Basically, all you have to do is stop saying, "Retribution is good," and stop trying to prove how much WTFBBQPWNAGE damage it does and we will have peace.
#34 Sep 11 2007 at 8:26 AM Rating: Decent
Thank you for that Gaudion, very well put if I may say so. And i will concede that I have not even half the knowledge of playing the class that you and some of the others have. But that is why i posted this in the hopes that some people may see what the problem is( i know pretty naive of me) and like i have seen in this thread, explain why they believe there is a problem in stead of flaming someone and giving negative reasons for what they did.
#35 Sep 11 2007 at 8:26 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
That makes it a hatrick!
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#36 Sep 11 2007 at 8:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Qiksilver wrote:
And i will concede that I have not even half the knowledge of playing the class that you and some of the others have.

No one can know everything about this game no matter how much some people may try to convince others that they do. I am still learning things about other classes and, though not as often, sometimes others still have to correct me on the Paladin class as well.

But if me and Bodh and Maulgak and KTurner and CapJack and any other regulars here (sans tommy; and I apologize if I left anyone out) are all saying the generally the same thing time and time again, then there is probably some truth to it.
#37 Sep 11 2007 at 8:48 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I started my Paladin back in January. I was passingly familiar with the class, I had leveled one to 35, had played with them a lot so I was aware of their abilities and such.

Being aware obviously is not being knowledgeable. I thought that how a Paladin handled in PvP at lvl 50 would be similar at end game, which it is not. I knew that ret had problems but I didn't know the specifics, I knew holy was good at healing but couldn't tell yah why or for how much.

Even when I dinged lvl 70 there was a lot of stuff I didn't know. Started looking it up, talking to other pallies, reading boards and picking up information etc. Now while I will never claim to know anything and everything about Paladins I know a bit and am capable of finding an answer if I am presented with a question I dont know. Guess that is the best one can ever hope for.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#38 Sep 11 2007 at 8:50 AM Rating: Decent
Now here is a question that might be answerable only by a maker of the game and possible belong in a completly other thread but why have a tree, like Retribution that is according to some useless as a primary specc at end game? From most of the threads that i have read, its pretty much SOP to change after lvl 35 or 40 to either Holy or Prot spec.
#39 Sep 11 2007 at 8:59 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Why not? Rogues have the subtlety tree and it is about as useful as ret, if not less useful. :P



#40 Sep 11 2007 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Ret is the leveling build according to one Blizzard employee. While prot post lvl 35 is the new trend and does remarkably well, Ret still outperforms it in terms of leveling speed.

Perhaps ret's dismal performance at end game is to force us to be tanks and healers, lord knows the game always needs more and that Paladins are great at either. There are also discussions of Paladin being defensive as opposed to Shaman Offensive. Or being able to heal/cleanse/bubble while doing dps being OP. That is all conjecture though.

What is clear is that Blizzard has acknowledged that not all specs are viable at end game. In fact they have stated that it is not their intention to have all specs be viable in all aspects of the game. They have stated that ret is being looked at, patch 2.3 I believe, so a couple months away. We will see how that pans out.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#41 Sep 11 2007 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
It's just a matter of numbers, really. When you have nine classes with three seperate trees loaded with numerous talents that can be arranged any way the player desires and then combined with gear...

Every class, if we assume three primary builds (I'm not even going to begin accounting for off-specs), and three hybrid builds, you get 9 x 6 = 54 total builds. It's just virtually impossible to have every 1 build balanced against the other 53 in both PvE and PvP aspects of the game.
#42 Sep 11 2007 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
And that is kinda of what i figured it would be, I just hate haveing the decision kind of forced. If I wanted to play Ret all the way to end game I would prefer to be able to do that. Guess I am just preaching to the choir on this though. Thanks again for the responses and guidance given.
#43 Sep 11 2007 at 9:17 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Anyone else dreading Tommy getting home from school only to find this thread and rehash the same old subject matter over again in the same thread?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#44 Sep 11 2007 at 9:18 AM Rating: Decent
As long as I get to see some screenshots, but He does have some valid points on what on his arguements. So we will have to wait and see.

Edited, Sep 11th 2007 1:20pm by Qiksilver
#45 Sep 11 2007 at 9:34 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The boy likes to BG, his arena experience is about as solid as mine, which ain't that solid. He is just getting into Kara (don't think he has gotten past Curator) and starting to see some of the points I have stated on PvE ret problems at end game. Others such as gear progression not being up to par and dps on 10+ min long fights he hasn't yet.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#46 Sep 12 2007 at 8:27 AM Rating: Decent
Well this has been a very well behaved thread. Took me like 20 minutes to read it all when I got into work this morning.

I'm going to second almost everyone's points in the thread.

Yeah, Ret does not work at end game, we allll realize this. It's not the posts that ask for questions/help that bother us, it's the posts that say "OMFG I RoXXoR as Ret, why you say I can't????" Then bod pulls out his retribution bashing playbook, and the OP pulls out his BG screenshots/movies, then bod goes to town on the guy, with the majority of other poster's on bod's side. (I pick out Bod just cause he loves to argue, and as such has his astronomical post count.)

And just when you thought it was allll over, someone goes and agrees with the OP in the same thread, then it starts over again and again and again.

I swear, I'm going to just copy a debate into the FAQ and from now on, all posts that say "Rets R Teh AWEXOME!" I will just refer them to that.

I played a Paladin since the beta, and I've seen the class go all over the place as it has been redone over and over again. Paladins were only cleanse-bots for a while and they couldn't tank end-game. Now they are one of the most sought-after healers and tanks. The only thing that has stayed true is that Ret is not a viable spec end-game.... though for a while they were the only ones that had BoK.
#47 Sep 12 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
CapJack wrote:
Paladins were only cleanse-bots for a while and they couldn't tank end-game.


Totally killed paladin PvE for me. :\
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 138 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (138)