Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Blood Craze Vs. Commanding presenceFollow

#1 Sep 10 2007 at 1:32 AM Rating: Decent
sup warriors

I've been looking over my spec which is 2h PvP and i want it to be deep into PvP as it can possible go

so i was wondering whether BC is worth it or just go wif the bigger AP buff with CP which would obviously make you hit harder (not forgettin commanding shout as well)

would it be more effective hitting harder or lasting longer,

also run over my spec and see what you like and dont like about it, keeping in mind im all for PvP

http://wowhead.com/?talent=LVMLbAoog0zbZVxzuMxRZc

#2 Sep 10 2007 at 4:08 AM Rating: Decent
**
362 posts
Skip Imp Execute and BC get Comanding Presenceand Improved Intercept.

Rest is OK. Maybe I would put it slightly different but it is personal preference.
#3 Sep 10 2007 at 4:47 AM Rating: Good
Blood Craze is fine in PvP, but I prefer Commanding Presence (and, for that matter, TClap over Iron Will) as while Blood Craze is a nice buff for me, Commanding Presence is a better buff for my Arena groupmates with the additional HP from Commanding Shout.

Imp. Thunderclap is nice to go over and drop on any Warriors/Rogues/Feral Druids trying to take out your healers (especially Warriors), as it'll leave them Rage starved especially against the tougher healers (high-resilience Priests, Paladins, Druids), but that's your own option.

If you have free points, I'd take Imp. Slam over Imp. Execute. Imp. Execute is decent, but Imp. Slam becomes invaluable in certain matchups (Paladins come to mind); you save your cooldowns and make good use of Slam after autoattacks, then when they get low enough burst them down with both MS and WW launched right after a Slam. It works fairly well, and much better than the alternative.

If you're speccing for BG PvP, don't worry about Commanding Presence.
#4 Sep 11 2007 at 2:06 AM Rating: Decent
Cheers for the advice, i still do alot more BG than arena, mainly because im pretty crappy 1 on 1 with casters, i freak out half the time and smash my keyboard at ***** frost mages.......anyway i might stick wif blood craze cause i like the fact a warrior can heal himself :D but hey thats just me

o btw my sword is way too fast to be speccing into slam 2.10 swing, so thats why i dodged it and went into execute, because of all the pretty numbers when u crit wif a full rage bar :P
#5 Sep 11 2007 at 2:24 AM Rating: Decent
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=LVMLbAoog0zbZVxzmMxRZc

Is the clasic for PvP and what I use atm.

Blood craze is teribble ( =

Edit:
Quote:
If you have free points, I'd take Imp. Slam over Imp. Execute. Imp. Execute is decent, but Imp. Slam becomes invaluable in certain matchups


It depends on your team as well.

If you roll with a healer then do the above, but If you play with another DPS class, EG. Elem shammy (I'll be replacing my pally partner with one when my IRL freind hits 70 (My pally is terrible)) then being able to kill someone a tad quicker - before a healer ninjas in a heal, is invaluable

Edited, Sep 11th 2007 6:29am by Adoragon
#6 Sep 11 2007 at 2:38 AM Rating: Decent
Yea ill take your word on it, since its only 3 percent of a heal, where as you can get a much better AP bonus

You also made a mistake in that spec, u had an extra point on iron will rather then putting all 2 into Impale, no worries tho :D
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 111 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (111)