- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- rogue vs warrior question
rogue vs warrior questionFollow
So anyway I try to gank a warrior and he blows reck on me, and since I have little experience as a rogue I keep on attacking, almost kill him but he pots and kills me. Anyway, what do rogues normally do to warriors who blow reck? gouge, vanish or something to wait it out?
your best bet is to probably blind, vanish, then sap and wait it out.
Not to positive as I can't remember the last time I went against a warrior who used it.
Not to positive as I can't remember the last time I went against a warrior who used it.
what's reck, some sort of DoT?
I'm asking because if you use gouge or blind, you probably can stealth manually without wasting a vanish.
I'm asking because if you use gouge or blind, you probably can stealth manually without wasting a vanish.
EonSprinter wrote:
what's reck, some sort of DoT?
I'm asking because if you use gouge or blind, you probably can stealth manually without wasting a vanish.
I'm asking because if you use gouge or blind, you probably can stealth manually without wasting a vanish.
Recklessness.
Then yeah, blind, drop combat, stealth, sap.
actually, stunlock the sh*t out of that warrior. recklessness + zerker stance means +30% damage taken, and is generally suicide vs a rogue. evasion is also proof against reck, since the only thing that will land is overpower, which probably would be critting without reck anyway.
the one rogues need to worry about is retaliation, which is the one with all the flying swords around the warrior. thats when you blind, drop combat, and wait till the floaty swords disappear.
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
the one rogues need to worry about is retaliation, which is the one with all the flying swords around the warrior. thats when you blind, drop combat, and wait till the floaty swords disappear.
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
Quor wrote:
actually, stunlock the sh*t out of that warrior. recklessness + zerker stance means +30% damage taken, and is generally suicide vs a rogue. evasion is also proof against reck, since the only thing that will land is overpower, which probably would be critting without reck anyway.
the one rogues need to worry about is retaliation, which is the one with all the flying swords around the warrior. thats when you blind, drop combat, and wait till the floaty swords disappear.
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
the one rogues need to worry about is retaliation, which is the one with all the flying swords around the warrior. thats when you blind, drop combat, and wait till the floaty swords disappear.
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 1:08pm by Quor
For some reason i was thinking of Retaliation even after I linked the Recklessness haha.
So yea, what Quor said.
you know whats bad vs retaliation? a haste build that allows you with your enh shammy 3v3 partner to get yourself killed in 2 seconds with your .5 MH attack speed ( dragonmaw with all my haste buffs going) and an OH that's at like .27
Edit: forgot to mention this was just after we had created the team and were chilling in naggerland
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 6:17pm by EvilShenanigans
Edit: forgot to mention this was just after we had created the team and were chilling in naggerland
Edited, Sep 7th 2007 6:17pm by EvilShenanigans
Recent Visitors: 126
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (126)
- Forums
- World of Warcraft
- Class Discussion
- rogue vs warrior question
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC