Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

To all those ppl getting discouraged with their rogue - ReadFollow

#77 Aug 22 2007 at 2:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Quote:
You are smart enough to see where answering my questions would take you, but you don't have the balls to go there anyways. Grollog's got both brains and balls--so far all I've seen from you are weak insults.

Fine then.

1) Yes, but that doesn't mean that they have to be mutually exclusive in all aspects.

2) 5v5, especially since Blizzard has repeatedly said that this is the area in which they've been trying to balance PvP. It's also the area that requires the most cooperation and coordination, as well as the most creative use of class abilities in tandum with other classes (read: skill).

3) No. Why not just join a WSG? Besides, the more you add to the mix, the more chaotic it becomes. This is not to say that 5v5 is worse than 2v2 or 3v3, it just requires more precise execution. One might argue that 9v9 might require even more precise execution, but there's a point where it just becomes a general clusterfück.

Satisfied?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#78 Aug 22 2007 at 3:06 PM Rating: Decent
18 posts
Alright Theo, now you're talking.

A percentage-based EA has considerable merit. In fact, is there anything wrong at all with that suggestion?

Your other suggestions would be nice, too.

And if I might add a few:

Add blind in with sap on dirty deeds so it gets increased range, and change blind to 'have a chance' to break on damage.

#79 Aug 22 2007 at 3:08 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
wow....sounds like alot of fun here...im in!! :D

To start simple out...Arena sucks...i hate it, its annoying. Why? Because all people think that they can be the best and they will attack/flame anyone who says anything against them. If you really wanna fight unfair, go ahead and use potions, thats your choice, not mine.
I mean just look at you now people...this is not the rogues from alla i used to read there post about...it is a big time kindergarden where kids is complaing about who got the smallest and biggest size of cake.

I only have one rule when it comes for a duel: No potions..Which means that i will use any other dirty tricks i have to win a fight and im a engineer. Sounds unfair?? That is my point, Im a rogue and rogues has never been fighting fair. Dont believe me? Then start reading some books and learn from it or try play some good rpg games. In a arena, most of the engineer stuff i can make is useless because they dont allow it. Sure its because to make the fights a little more fair..otherwise warlocks would be able to use soulstones and healthstone..and all the other classes could use there things. But stil it sucks.

One rule of thump an old Diablo 2 player learned me was that every class can be beated, you just need to how to do it. So dont come and say to me that a well played frost mage cant be beaten...With that attitude its no wonder why you lose to a frost mage.

Now about rogues...how should blizz improve them?? give them some debuffs...i dont care that i cant buff my group up, why? Because im a rogue thats why.

That is all for this mad one. Ever the optimist


You are living in a fantasy world of another dimension O.o

Refering to books and movies in order to judge what the rogue class in world of warcraft should/should not be able to do? Get real, lol.

Referring to Diablo 2 with a quote that holds absolutely no water? "that every class can be beated, you just need to how to do it". I actually lol'ed IRL this time. Go take your rogue and duel a frosmage with full merciless gear. I don't care how optimistic you are, and how much you feel like analyzing the situation and how skilled you are in theorycrafting and engineering (hah!), you aren't going to beat him. Sorry to burst your little pink fantasy world bubble.

Quote:
i dont care that i cant buff my group up

Quote:
why? Because im a rogue thats why


Ur arguments R leik RLY MINDBLOWING!!!11

Go read LoTR for the 30th time or something, because you obviously has nothing intelligent to say in a discussion about class balance -.-

EDIT: Goddamit, Teddy beat me to it! *shakes fist angrily*



Edited, Aug 22nd 2007 7:10:22pm by Flagermusen
#80 Aug 22 2007 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
Zimt wrote:

And if I might add a few:

Add blind in with sap on dirty deeds so it gets increased range, and change blind to 'have a chance' to break on damage.



Are you ******** me?!


MAYBE... Just, just maybe... they should, *gasp* decrease the energy cost on both too!?
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#81 Aug 22 2007 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
18 posts
lol, my bad! Yeah, I meant Dirty Tricks (can't keep up with the changes), and I completely forgot blind was included. Flame on, I earned that one.

I'd still like a little more range on those two, though, besides a little durability on blind.

Man, that was pretty stupid of me.
#82 Aug 22 2007 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
20yds(maybe 15) on blind is way more than enough.
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#83 Aug 22 2007 at 10:44 PM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
Thank you for responding flagermusen.

Now the reason i was refering to Diablo2 is is simple. Over the time in that game there has been many unfair kinds of build and there stil is if im not wrong. And it was one of the first games Blizzard made where 2 or more people could duel against each other. Thats why im saying that there are always ways to beat things.

To myteddy.

Of course my spelling is not the best, sinds its not my native tongue, so come on with a link that can help me to be better and you will do me a favor :D

Now i agree that rogues might need something but blizzard stil has to becareful with that. If rogues was getting a instant dps skill, then yes it would really help out but then it is not a rogue anymore.

I got two questions. Shadowstep...i have tried it out before and well...i think it is a cool talent and perhaps blizzard way of helping a rogue out when it comes to kiteing. If you could make one minor change to that skill, what would you do?
2nd question. someone said, that he was using 2 epic maces and used a mace combat spec, because it was/is the best pvp spec. Can someone just explain to me why.

If im not asking, then i wont get an a answear. Keep up the friendly tone :D
#84 Aug 22 2007 at 11:18 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,048 posts
Lord Livies wrote:
Now i agree that rogues might need something but blizzard stil has to becareful with that. If rogues was getting a instant dps skill, then yes it would really help out but then it is not a rogue anymore.

2nd question. someone said, that he was using 2 epic maces and used a mace combat spec, because it was/is the best pvp spec. Can someone just explain to me why.

1) I already explained what we need.

2) Maces are the best because we don't need burst damage in PvP; we need control, and mace spec allows us that.
#85 Aug 22 2007 at 11:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Zimt wrote:
Alright Theo, now you're talking.

A percentage-based EA has considerable merit. In fact, is there anything wrong at all with that suggestion?

Here's an idea. Give rogues a trainable finisher that works like EA, only against resilience. Make it trainable at level 65 that reduces resilience by 2% per CP, and at level 70 that reduces resilience by 5% per CP (a total of 30% reduction). Make the effect last about 15-20 seconds.

Not only would it give us a fighting chance against the rock to our scissors, but it would give rogues a very valuable place in 5v5 Arenas.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#86 Aug 23 2007 at 6:26 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
I got two questions. Shadowstep...i have tried it out before and well...i think it is a cool talent and perhaps blizzard way of helping a rogue out when it comes to kiteing. If you could make one minor change to that skill, what would you do?


The suggestion that has been repeated the most is having an -out of stealth- shadowstep but without the 20% damage bonus. Possibly also root the target for 1 or 2 seconds on top. This would work like a warriors intercept, the difference is that we would be teleported BEHIND the opponent, rather than in the direction that we faced at the point of activation.

Of course, a change like this needs to be ecological, seeing as it would imply some major balance issues in smaller scale pvp. But let's leave shadowstep discussion elsewhere.


Quote:
2nd question. someone said, that he was using 2 epic maces and used a mace combat spec, because it was/is the best pvp spec. Can someone just explain to me why.


It's really simple. The rogue class is designed around Burst damage (= critting with instant attacks) and control.

This is why we got long - but powerful - cooldowns and it's why many of our talents are designed around increasing critical hits and critical hit damage.

Rogue philosphy summed up: Kill your opponent with fast and controlled bursts of damage.

Then TBC (and later arena) came and everything changed. Blizzard had a vision that WoW PvP should be all about longer fights and more survivabilty. Naturally, this philophy had severe implications for the rogue class, seeing as it was in direct opposition to the whole IDEA behind the rogue class.

Hit point pools rised astronomically and the stat resilience was introduced. Resilience is a stat that DIRECTLY mitigates crit damage and crit chance by very large amount.

Furthermore, the control that the rogue has was bound to certain abilities with a fixed amount of "control value". What do I mean by this?

Cheapshot - 4 seconds stun.
Kidneyshot - 6 seconds stun

Four seconds of stun allows only a certain amount of time where you can apply your abilities. Using such a static amount of control has a VERY different outcome on a player with 5000 HP (pre-tbc geared opponents) versus a player with 12000 HP (TBC geared opponents).

You see my point? As survivability scaled BIGTIME with the expansion, the control of the rogue stayed the same. All along the BURST of the rogue took a step BACK in that regard (with resilience completely killing crit builds).

Right now we have a rogue who
1) Can't use their crits
2) Struggling to use their controls

Blind used to be a reliable control ability as well. The new PvP trinket changed that as well.

Sap used to be a reliable control ability as well. The new PvP trinket AND the new PvP environement (Arena - which is VERY stealth unfriendly) changed that as well.

What is a rogue left to do now that he lost his ability to burst and control?

Sustained damage.

Which leads me to the answer to your question: Combat builds.

Combat fist builds allows for crits - which as stated above is kinda gimped.

Combat swords allows for extra attacks - which is good.

Combat maces allows for extra control - which is invaluable.

Which is why combat maces is now the prefered builds in resilience-infested pvp environments (currently, which what WoW top PvP is).


In summary:
TBC and the many changes that followed (arena, trinket change, resilience) destroyed the the original idea behind the rogue class. Change is good, but Blizzard "forgot" to change the rogue class along with the game and adapt their abilities along with the new conditions. Which is why rogues are currently sub-par warriors in high-end PvP battles.

#87 Aug 23 2007 at 7:40 AM Rating: Good
18 posts
Good stuff. I don't doubt Blizz guys read the khazam forums, but one of you articulate guys otta sum up a few of these things and get a petition going on the official wow forums.

Yeah yeah, it's all been said and done before, but cogent arguments with enough people rallying behind 'em does get noticed by Blizzard (as evidenced by Flagermusen's original post).

Thanks for the good posts, Theophany, Demea, and Flagermusen.

#88 Aug 24 2007 at 12:57 AM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
Many thanks flagermusen for the insight you gaved me :D

Now i will stil remain a optimist about rogues. Took my time to read about the frost mage and can understand why its a nightmare. Stil there must be a way to handle them. Either we rogues has to find a weakness we can use against them or we need to find alternative ways of using our skills and talents we have.
#89 Aug 24 2007 at 1:02 AM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
Double post. sorry about that

Edited, Aug 24th 2007 11:02:26am by Livies
#90 Aug 24 2007 at 3:16 AM Rating: Default
QQ.

If your struggling in PvP then you need to get out of outland greens and start playing well.
#91 Aug 24 2007 at 3:39 AM Rating: Decent
What would really help a lot is that CloS would be changed into 10-15 secs instead of 5 sec

That way we would atleast gain back a little bit of what we lost in our controle moves like sap and blind

If other classes gain the ability to counter our moves it aint more then normal we get some better protection vs there crap :P
#92 Aug 24 2007 at 6:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Quote:
QQ.

If your struggling in PvP then you need to get out of outland greens and start playing well.

Do you even play a rogue? All I see in your sig is that you play a shaman. Kindly sod off, since you don't have any authority to talk on a class you don't play.

Quote:
What would really help a lot is that CloS would be changed into 10-15 secs instead of 5 sec

That way we would atleast gain back a little bit of what we lost in our controle moves like sap and blind

That would be ungodly overpowered. 15 seconds of spell immunity wouldn't help us against warriors, but casters wouldn't have a chance against us at all.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#93 Aug 24 2007 at 6:50 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Stil there must be a way to handle them. Either we rogues has to find a weakness we can use against them or we need to find alternative ways of using our skills and talents we have.


Livies you are very naive about the rogue situation which in particular finds expression in your statement above.

You simply fail to see the big picture. PvP doesn't revolve around Frostmage VS Rogue. Or Frostmage VS Warrior. Or Warlock VS Druid.

We all know who got the upper hand in those specific matchups, but battles can still turn either way given x,y,z factors.

But the rogue issue is not about one versus one matchups. It's about overall class balance in relation to Arena.

WoW PvP is not about duels or 1v1

WoW PvP is not about World PvP and ganking

WoW PvP is not about Battlegrounds (which currently is a big fat joke)

WoW PvP is ARENA. This is where you acquire the best items in the game, and it's also where you acquire rating - which is the only measurable feature of an individual player's skill.

If a class cannot perfom in the arena, then what is that class? It's TRASH. Yes, trash.

Should those who enjoy the PvP side of WoW be penalized for rolling a certain character? I keep hearing things like this:

"Well, we are rogues, we are not supposed to be good at larger scale battles"

What? Give me one good argument for that statement.

Basically, what it means is this:

"You rolled a rogue, so for x,y,z reason you can not partake in competitive Player versus Player combat. Sorry man reroll another class"

This is utter ********* All classes (not all class specs - please don't confuse the two) should be desired in, and able to participate in competitve top PvP and bring their unique class capabilities to the table.

As things are now, rogues and druids (and to a certain extent hunters) are absolete (meaning they outright SUCK) in 5v5 pvp. And may I add, 5v5 is THE bracket. The other two brackets are too heavily influenced by the rock, paper, scissors concept that attaining balance here is next to impossible without ******** all other aspects of the game up at the same time.

Balancing classes is heavy duty thinking and takes a lot of manwork to do. But seeing as Blizzard is the most succesful and most econically healthy (understatement) game developing company on the planet, they have MORE than what it takes in resources.

I believe they just have another vision with their game. Instead of perfecting their current game design, they'd rather put all their resources into new content and into a new expansion. I don't blame them. Expansions bring them more money (greedy ********* if I may say so), game balancing does not.

It's a matter of priority. Blizzard prioritizes certain classes viability in current PvP combat much much lower than they prioritize, say, Zul'Aman. Or Northrend. And this way of prioritizing things are what pisses a lot of players off. Including me.

#94 Aug 24 2007 at 7:54 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Superrmann wrote:
QQ.

If your struggling in PvP then you need to get out of outland greens and start playing well.

Hi, I'm a rogue with 10k HP and ~200 resilience with 1200 AP in my PvP gear.

Kindly shut the @#%^ up and gtfo my forums. You're a 45 shaman; your opinion doesn't count for sh*t.

(ding 2700 posts btw)

Edited, Aug 24th 2007 8:58:52am by Theophany
#95 Aug 24 2007 at 8:27 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
QQ.

If your struggling in PvP then you need to get out of outland greens and start playing well.


Either you are reading impaired or just plain stupid. Maybe a spicy combination of both.

Let me spell out a word for you:

C-L-U-E-L-E-S-S

Thanks. Now go level your shimmyshammy.
#96 Aug 25 2007 at 4:44 AM Rating: Decent
**
400 posts
Wrong post sorrry.

Edited, Aug 25th 2007 8:45:56am by Flubgaurd
#97 Aug 25 2007 at 6:48 AM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
flagermusen...*sigh*..i really dont know what or who has pissed on your sugar..

I already know the big picture and seen it many times over many years now and many games. End of that.

Look we all know that a warrior is the rogue counter and also know how to handle them. Now a frost mage is a diffrent thing and so is all the other classes and spec. Are you up for start analyzing all classes and see if you, me and all other who wanna come, can find a way to handle them? Either we can find a weakness or we might find altenative ways of using the skills and talents we rogues have.

By the way, does anyone know a site where i can become better to english, cause im NOT good at it. Many thx

Edited, Aug 25th 2007 4:49:06pm by Livies
#98 Aug 25 2007 at 8:51 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
flagermusen...*sigh*..i really dont know what or who has pissed on your sugar..

I already know the big picture and seen it many times over many years now and many games. End of that.

Look we all know that a warrior is the rogue counter and also know how to handle them. Now a frost mage is a diffrent thing and so is all the other classes and spec. Are you up for start analyzing all classes and see if you, me and all other who wanna come, can find a way to handle them? Either we can find a weakness or we might find altenative ways of using the skills and talents we rogues have.

By the way, does anyone know a site where i can become better to english, cause im NOT good at it. Many thx


I find it quite amusing that you clearly "see the big picture", yet you're stilling yapping about random 1 on 1 encounters.

It's hard to take you seriously ^^

And for english:

School is a magnificent place to start.

Edited, Aug 25th 2007 12:54:57pm by Flagermusen
#99 Aug 25 2007 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
Atleast it is a start :D

Come on flagermusen. Think about it, whouldnt you be happy if you found a way to handle something anoying in 1vs1? Besides it happens that sometime when it comes to arena, that there 1 on each team. We dont need to analyzing them just for 1vs1, but i think that it would be more satisfying to handle like a frost mage alone, then you need to trust your teammates, should it happen they made a mistake.
If you know how to handle a class in 1vs1, then you have one advantage, when it comes to the arena and sinds you have some other classes with you, things might look better. Not much perhaps but it can help you out. Im just trying to help out, by trying to start something up, so we might find things we can use against the other classes.

About the school part...im to old for school. I didnt took it seriously when i did go to school and just look at it now:D

#100 Aug 25 2007 at 9:01 PM Rating: Decent
Theres nothing wrong with having issues 1v1, I just don't appreciate having to rely on the other player making mistakes for some of the fights, this doesn't mean CD blowing.

Anyways, yes Rogues have gotten harder to play in PvP although not wholly impossible like the OP is making it. The main problem is our talent trees where we really can't go anything but deep Combat or deep Assassination. The main issue is with how weak our Subtlety tree is in terms of complementing our other trees, because right now its really a trashy tree with very few gems.
#101 Aug 28 2007 at 5:25 AM Rating: Decent
Rogues just need to get used to being gear dependant. I'd say of the top 15 5v5 teams on my server, 4-5 have very well geared rogues. Now I've watched them do arena (2 of em have PvP videos) and deul outside of Org, and they regularly beat top-end frost mages and warriors. Sure its not a 100% win rate, and all of their deuls are top notch, but the way I see it, at the top tier of PvP, there it is more or less balanced.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 93 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (93)