Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Future Death Knight forum?Follow

#1 Aug 14 2007 at 12:51 AM Rating: Good
***
1,441 posts
To keep this on the assumed topic, as interesting as the mechanisms may sound, I see one fatal flaw with the release of DK with WoTLK, namely that there's no healing hero class released at the same time.

Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?

Partial fix would be that unlocking DK also unlocks the possibility to roll any alt of any class at the same high level. That would also get us rid of running STV yet another bloody damn time.

#2REDACTED, Posted: Aug 14 2007 at 12:51 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Oh, and first! :-)
#3 Dec 19 2007 at 4:47 AM Rating: Good
*
57 posts
Alastaironsiren wrote:
Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?


Thats a really good point youve got there, all servers would be swarming with Deathknights after a couple of months after release.

Alastaironsiren wrote:
Partial fix would be that unlocking DK also unlocks the possibility to roll any alt of any class at the same high level. That would also get us rid of running STV yet another bloody damn time.


A really good idea, but there is 1 problem... it will make people to quickly lvl a character to lvl 80 and never ever have to do the other classes 50 and under quests anymore. And it will also will make people who have played like 3 years and have like 3 or 4 classes at 70 feel they've done it for nothing.

Blizzard would never do that because that means people are going to play less WoW and thats not what they want.



P.S. for people that want to know how i'd get here ^^ :

http://wow.allakhazam.com/db/class.html?wclass=1 ---> warrior
http://wow.allakhazam.com/db/class.html?wclass=10 ---> DK

i was wondering if i putted a 0 after the 1 if i'd get to a other class :P and hey it worked :D
#4 Apr 13 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Alastaironsiren wrote:
How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?


Considering alts are being rolled constantly and considering people still do Uldaman, Scarlet Monastery and all those low level instances, I don't think it'll be that big of a problem.

There'll always be someone taking his healer through Outland and he/she will want to do Hellfire Citadel: Ramparts. It's not like Wrath of the Lich King will make Outland obsolete. I don't think the gear boost will be as huge as we saw in The Burning Crusade. At least not huge enough to make the level 60-70 instances pointless. That would be a really bad move on Blizzard's part, especially considering they've had a couple of years to witness how Azeroth turned into a ghost world with the gear being so much worse there.

I don't think they'll make the same mistake twice.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#5 Apr 13 2008 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
***
1,245 posts
Azeroth's population has lessened,

but it is nowhere near a ghost world for my server. People are leveling alts, and new players are still joining, all the time.

Furthermore, I think I read that there will be a gear jump from OL to Northrend (which we'll all be calling NR, I'm guessing). And like before, those who clear BT/Hyjal/Sunwell (as opposed to Naxx/AQ40) will still hold onto their gear until 75-78.

I actually hope they make the starting areas of Northrend a bit difficult, like starting it with level 72-73 mobs, and that there will be chain quests that bring Mag'har to Northrend or something, so that OL goes far from being obsolete.

As far as DKs overpopulating, that will happen, but not as badly as people think. There were predictions that all one would see for months was Draenei Shamans and Blood Elf Pallies, but there were still plenty who played on their normal characters.
Healers will still exist, as there are many like me who will "wait their turn" to roll a DK, biding their time until the DK spread evens out a bit.
#6 Apr 13 2008 at 2:46 PM Rating: Good
*****
11,852 posts
Mazra wrote:
Alastaironsiren wrote:
How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?


Considering alts are being rolled constantly and considering people still do Uldaman, Scarlet Monastery and all those low level instances, I don't think it'll be that big of a problem.

There'll always be someone taking his healer through Outland and he/she will want to do Hellfire Citadel: Ramparts. It's not like Wrath of the Lich King will make Outland obsolete. I don't think the gear boost will be as huge as we saw in The Burning Crusade. At least not huge enough to make the level 60-70 instances pointless. That would be a really bad move on Blizzard's part, especially considering they've had a couple of years to witness how Azeroth turned into a ghost world with the gear being so much worse there.

I don't think they'll make the same mistake twice.


Ummm...

"Proportion" (You know what that is, right?)

Furthermore, Outlands instances will be as obsolete as any leveling instances - fun, and gear upgrades, but not content to be revisited once you're past it.

In sum, the proportion of healers to overall players will be very askew. Old instances within the DK levels are going to be full of DKs looking for groups and there won't be enough healers to go around.
#7 Apr 13 2008 at 6:06 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?


Thats when you make a healer and get in any group you want. Trust me its not like EVERYONE will be a DK, I'm not into plate characters (as shown below) and I'm sure there are alot more people like me who are going to raid and instance alot once they get to 80 and completely ignore the whole DK thing.

MAAAYYYBE ill make a DK once i've fully explored everything in the expansion and I'm satisfied with my druid (most likely the one I'll get to 80 first) having mostly purples.

You can also wait 'till a couple of DKs get to 80 and get well geared and ask'em how is it like to be a DK, do they like it? what are the ups and downs? How are DKs at PvP, raid, tanking? etc ...

Edited, Apr 13th 2008 10:08pm by Dmadmike
#8 Apr 13 2008 at 8:50 PM Rating: Decent
When TBC first came out we saw hordes of draeni swarming our servers. A good percentage of them were shamans as well. Starting a draeni at lvl 1 would involve huge crowds of people waiting in line for quests. Deadmines would take 5 draeni characters and 3 of them would be shaman.

However over time the population thins out. Nowadays draeni are as popular as most races. Draeni starting areas are only slightly more populated than other starting areas (which is expected because they have the most fun quests). And finally shaman are a bit underpopulated in terms of overall population (at least on my server).

When WotLK comes out we're going to see hordes of deathknights. Hopefully bliz makes unlocking a deathknight something that occurs at lvl 80 and will therefore spread out the release of the new class over a longer time period.

We should expect to see plenty of new deathknights looking for lvl 50 or 60 instances. However we're also going to lvl 80's running their friends through these lower level instances. Over time depending on how the class balances out we'll hopefully see deathknights at about the same proportion as other characters.
#9 Apr 14 2008 at 12:43 AM Rating: Decent
Alastaironsiren wrote:
Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?

Utterly stupid statement. The same thing was said about Draenei shamans and Blood Elf paladins, and there doesn't seem to be an imbalance of classes now.

What you are assuming (and it's probably a pretty bad assumption) is that the Death Knight is going to be a class so overpowered that everybody will switch to it and never return to their mains because the new class is so much "better" than the previous classes.

Quote:
Oh, and first! :-)

Second stupidity. Go back to the o-forums for this type of nonsense.

Edited, Apr 14th 2008 1:48am by ohmikeghod
#10 Apr 14 2008 at 6:22 AM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
Alastaironsiren wrote:
To keep this on the assumed topic, as interesting as the mechanisms may sound, I see one fatal flaw with the release of DK with WoTLK, namely that there's no healing hero class released at the same time.

Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?

Partial fix would be that unlocking DK also unlocks the possibility to roll any alt of any class at the same high level. That would also get us rid of running STV yet another bloody damn time.



I'll heal for you, but you better not drop aggro.
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#11 Apr 14 2008 at 10:01 AM Rating: Good
*****
11,852 posts
ohmikeghod the Venerable wrote:
Alastaironsiren wrote:
Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?

Utterly stupid statement. The same thing was said about Draenei shamans and Blood Elf paladins, and there doesn't seem to be an imbalance of classes now.

What you are assuming (and it's probably a pretty bad assumption) is that the Death Knight is going to be a class so overpowered that everybody will switch to it and never return to their mains because the new class is so much "better" than the previous classes.

Quote:
Oh, and first! :-)

Second stupidity. Go back to the o-forums for this type of nonsense.

Edited, Apr 14th 2008 1:48am by ohmikeghod


Wow Mike relax.

He has a good point. The fact that you can start the class at an already high level means it will be disproportionately much, much higher than any other class. It's a huge factor - who wants to level AGAIN from L1? Not me. Who wants to try out a new class (not just a new class to the faction, a new class to the game) without having to level? Me! (and millions of others).
#12 Apr 14 2008 at 10:09 AM Rating: Decent
Jordster, Assassin Reject wrote:
ohmikeghod the Venerable wrote:
Alastaironsiren wrote:
Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?

Utterly stupid statement. The same thing was said about Draenei shamans and Blood Elf paladins, and there doesn't seem to be an imbalance of classes now.

What you are assuming (and it's probably a pretty bad assumption) is that the Death Knight is going to be a class so overpowered that everybody will switch to it and never return to their mains because the new class is so much "better" than the previous classes.

Quote:
Oh, and first! :-)

Second stupidity. Go back to the o-forums for this type of nonsense.

Edited, Apr 14th 2008 1:48am by ohmikeghod


Wow Mike relax.

He has a good point. The fact that you can start the class at an already high level means it will be disproportionately much, much higher than any other class. It's a huge factor - who wants to level AGAIN from L1? Not me. Who wants to try out a new class (not just a new class to the faction, a new class to the game) without having to level? Me! (and millions of others).

His point was not that everyone will be creating death knights, but that no one would EVER play a healer again due to the creation of death knights. I stand behind my statement.
#13 Apr 14 2008 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Jordster, Assassin Reject wrote:
Ummm...

"Proportion" (You know what that is, right?)

Furthermore, Outlands instances will be as obsolete as any leveling instances - fun, and gear upgrades, but not content to be revisited once you're past it.

In sum, the proportion of healers to overall players will be very askew. Old instances within the DK levels are going to be full of DKs looking for groups and there won't be enough healers to go around.


I can't wrap my head around why you think all the current healers will roll a Death Knight when the class doesn't appeal to their playstyle.

Example: Mr. Mister has a level 70 Rogue, Hunter and Warlock. He loves to deal damage. He enjoys his role in a party. He has never played the Priest class, because healing just doesn't appeal to him.

One day Mr. Mister decides to roll a new alt. He picks the Mage class because Mages are excellent at dealing damage. He levels his Mage to 34 when suddenly Blizzard announces that all Priests below level 55 will now be instantly leveled to 55 for the fun of it.

By your definition, Mr. Mister will instantly quit his Mage and go play on his Priest from level 55-70, despite the fact that the class doesn't appeal to him.

Now that's just silly.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#14 Apr 14 2008 at 11:05 AM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
Mazra wrote:


Example: Mr. Mister has a level 70 Rogue, Hunter and Warlock. He loves to deal damage. He enjoys his role in a party. He has never played the Priest class, because healing just doesn't appeal to him.

One day Mr. Mister decides to roll a new alt. He picks the Mage class because Mages are excellent at dealing damage. He levels his Mage to 34 when suddenly Blizzard announces that all Priests below level 55 will now be instantly leveled to 55 for the fun of it.

By your definition, Mr. Mister will instantly quit his Mage and go play on his Priest from level 55-70, despite the fact that the class doesn't appeal to him.

Now that's just silly.


OMG! Mr. Mister plays WoW!
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#15 Apr 14 2008 at 1:23 PM Rating: Good
**
513 posts
Well, I'm gonna keep playing my priest, she's 70 plus all my other alts, but I'll also roll a DK too. I have 3 70's so the issue for me is who to level to 80 first or all at once? LOL

If you play on US Agewynn, I'll heal for you.
#16 Apr 14 2008 at 9:52 PM Rating: Good
***
2,018 posts
Mazra wrote:
Jordster, Assassin Reject wrote:
Ummm...

"Proportion" (You know what that is, right?)

Furthermore, Outlands instances will be as obsolete as any leveling instances - fun, and gear upgrades, but not content to be revisited once you're past it.

In sum, the proportion of healers to overall players will be very askew. Old instances within the DK levels are going to be full of DKs looking for groups and there won't be enough healers to go around.


I can't wrap my head around why you think all the current healers will roll a Death Knight when the class doesn't appeal to their playstyle.

True enough but despite peoples' playing styles, there will probably still be a lot of people re-rolling DKs just because it's a new class, regardless of their preferred playing style.

The trick is that most of these people are not the people you'd want to group with to begin with.
#17 Apr 15 2008 at 4:13 PM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Admiral Placeholder wrote:
True enough but despite peoples' playing styles, there will probably still be a lot of people re-rolling DKs just because it's a new class, regardless of their preferred playing style.


True that, but it'll pass once people find out that Death Knight isn't the alpha class of the game. The theory that level 55-70 will be packed with Death Knights isn't solid, though. Maybe level 55-60, but then they'll hit Outland and realize it's not the alpha class and they'll go back to whatever they were playing before.

Except for the players who find that the class is just what they'd been waiting for, or the people who couldn't give jack **** about playstyle as long as they get to be Arthazz, Arhthasz, Artaz, Leechking, Deafknite, etc.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#18 Apr 15 2008 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
***
1,331 posts
When Horde got Pali's and Alli's got Shamans, on my server we still had many many people rolling other classes.

I know, it's gonna be a entirely new class, with new rules and different playing styles associated to it. And everyone will probably play one when they get the chance to get one. But I know also that many people get really attached to their already maxed characters.

Pre-BC, a few of my guildies rolled pali. Only 2 of them kept up with it as alts. These both fully knew that we wanted 'healers' and possible a 'tank'. For some things pali tanks are awesome (heroics...).

I feel strongly that many rogue and warrior players will roll DK's and find it very similar. Ret pali's will probably complain, since DK's supposedly get dual wield, but no shield...

I 'unno.

I don't see a fix that would make everyone happy, and we all know 'you can't make everybody happy all the time'. So, the current way things are proposed, make the least amount of people upset, and still require you to learn how to play a DK.

Lvl 55-60 will be, maybe a day of playing, once they increase the xp for leveling again... (that's a hint of sarcasm).

Leveling from 60-70 will probably still be a pain, and leveling from 70-80 will take as long as getting to 70 took (supposedly) from level 1.

If you think "200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range" is a problem, I don't. Since I plan on being in a progression guild as a tank, my perspective is a little screwed, and a little selfish.

Who knows, maybe this will encourage more healers to roll now, and get them to lvl 60, and wait for WotLK to come out.
#19 Apr 20 2008 at 5:23 PM Rating: Decent
Ok here are my personal thoughts on the subject:

-First we ALL know that new things are interesting. It is VERY probable that in the first few days all high level players will rush to do the quest and try the DK first thing after the expansion. HOWEVER, this doest NOT mean that they will stay that way. Why? Simple, people chose to play their class because they like the mechanics. So as in the previous example, I say that if someone chose to play a holy priest to 70, it wasnt because they love tanking.

-BUT, considering that the DK seems as a class with the following attributes:
DPS: Good, can duel-wield, offensive spells
Healing: Probably only self by leeching, and not much? Not sure
Tanking: Good, but cannot use shields, probably depending on dmg output or skeleton minions.

It is very POSSIBLE that the following classes may stick with it, as they have similar mechanics. They are in order of possibility, the first being the most likely to stick with the class:

-Retribution Pallies: Want DPS, some self-supportive healing, able to fight a decent number of mobs without dying. PLUS offensive spells instead of many holy spells made for healing are MUCH better fit for the DPS job. Classes are supposed to be VERY similar, although ironically are opposites.

-Fury Warriors: Want DPS, dont care about healing, want surviveability (not dying as fast), rune system aparrently SIMILAR to rage system (runes regenerate over time, even while in combat, at same rate)

-Combat Warriors: Same as Fury, except a balance in DPS and Tanking capabilities

-Demonology Warlocks: Both classes similar in spell types, tanking ability can replace pets to a certain extent, DPS oriented classes, Dark spells tend to include in MANY cases DoT spells.

-Feral Druids: A mixture of ret pally and fury wars' reasons

-Combat Rogues: Same as Combat Warriors

So, in other words, no current tanks are likely to take up the DK as no shield or some other bonus apart from dmg induced threat does not apply to their current gameplay, and healer are definate no-noes.

In conclusion, NO there wont be a healer wipe from WoW, because healers actually LIKE healing. Second, the DK style of play MAY OR MAY NOT be very similar to a number of classes, causing them to MAYBE turn towards the DK for a longer while or even permanently. I just listed the ones that have more REASONS to do so. Again, no one knos if all priests are actually making a boycott with blizzard to sabbotage WoW, roll DKs and rule the world of teddie bears. Again, it varies, so NOTHING is certain.



#20 May 22 2008 at 3:52 PM Rating: Good
***
1,441 posts
ohmikeghod the Venerable wrote:
Alastaironsiren wrote:
Come level 80, you'll see the masses rushing to do the unlocking quest, and starting to level their brand new toon. How long before you'll get 200+ DKs LFG Ramparts with 0 available healers in the level range?

Utterly stupid statement. The same thing was said about Draenei shamans and Blood Elf paladins, and there doesn't seem to be an imbalance of classes now.


Utterly out of context, as back when I made that statement, the interpretation of Blizzard's plans out of Blizzcon was that you'd have to make it to level 80 and go through an unlocking quest to then make a level 60+ DK.

Quote:
What you are assuming (and it's probably a pretty bad assumption) is that the Death Knight is going to be a class so overpowered that everybody will switch to it and never return to their mains because the new class is so much "better" than the previous classes.


No, what I was assuming at that time, and posited more for the sake of looking whether anyone else had visited this then-generic forum, was that the playerbase would be roughly divided by people who reached 80, unlocked the DK and leveled that one through Outlands, and those who'd start doing the new endgame stuff. Which would have led to a certain period of time where the ratio between freshly unlocked DKs wanting to try out their skills in HFP and available healers in that level range would be heavily slanted towards lack of healers.


Quote:
Oh, and first! :-)

Second stupidity. Go back to the o-forums for this type of nonsense.


Look, when I posted that, a full 8 months before you brought your grumpy curmudgeon temper to this forum, it was called wclass10, and it was totally empty. Reproducing a "first" meme in what was a generic template forum may not be your kind of amusement, but feel free to be less an **** about it.
Because from my point of view you're sounding like the generic idiot who reads the first post in a thread necroed from 8 months ago and decides to flame the OP without realizing that the context in which it had been posted has changed ages ago. In other words, learn to read posting dates.



Edited, May 23rd 2008 1:57am by Alastaironsiren
#21 May 22 2008 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Considering you're replying to a flame that's over a month old, you might want to take your own advice? :P

Do visit the thread that are active tho, I'm psyched about the DK and somewhat sad so few people wish to talk about it :(
#22 May 22 2008 at 10:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,114 posts
Mazra wrote:
Except for the players who find that the class is just what they'd been waiting for, or the people who couldn't give jack sh*t about playstyle as long as they get to be Arthazz, Arhthasz, Artaz, Leechking, Deafknite, etc.


Concidering one of the DK's spells involve making a pile of leeches, I would so use the name Leechking, except that I hate people who rename themselves things like Lagolass, so I guess there goes that name : (
#23 May 24 2008 at 5:36 AM Rating: Good
***
1,502 posts
quote]I'm psyched about the DK and somewhat sad so few people wish to talk about it :([/quote]

Well I've gone from "meh" to "I'll probably make this my main" in the space of about a month. Blizz must be the kings of hype.
#24 May 25 2008 at 3:07 AM Rating: Default
Yeah, you're right. When the expansion comes, all persons wwant to have a DK. i want it 2, presonally, but Blizz should release another helaer at the same time has the DK.
#25 May 26 2008 at 3:28 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,183 posts
There are 4 healing classes in the game currently, but only 3 tanks. It makes logical sense that the first Hero class be a tank. That brings the total of tanks and healers on par class wise. Why do you feel the need for them to release a healer Hero class at the same time? By that logic they really need to release a solely CC/DPS Hero class as well so every "type" of character can have their "own" Hero class.

People need to get out of the mindset that "Hero class" means "Uber and much better than existing classes". This is not the case. It's just Heroic in terms of starting level and how it is acquired. Besides, I'm sure that if the Death Knight goes over well that Blizzard will introduce more Hero classes, possibly a healer.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 154 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (154)