Princess Kyrin wrote:
I like how that one poster thought it was fake and the GM was joking. It doesn't matter his intent, but what was said.
Exactly. The fact that it was unprofessional at best, and borderline a lot of other things, means it was handled well by Funcom.
dacypher wrote:
As the people in that thread had said, it is kind of odd that the screenshots are just bad enough quality that you cannot read them, and the poster has to transcribe them. How does the poster know what it says if that is the best quality SS he has? If he has better quality, why did he not post it? How does the poster have these SS? Was he involved? Something is just odd about this.
I really don't care how the poster got them. I care that Funcom went through their own logs, not depending on proof provided by players, but taking it into account - and took care of the issue.