Quote:
Well in academic research you cant just say 'theft happens alot in XYZ game', you need to back it up with say a survey or whatever.
Lares and Penates, would you please show enough professionalism to proofread your posts? The plural of thief isn't thief's, contractions use an apostrophe, misspelled words (peice) show up as such on Firefox, and so on. How are you going to write any kind of
algorithm if you are so slack you can't even be assed to post like you stayed awake in your English classes?
In academic research, you support your points with proof. You could, far more effectively than by using a survey with questionable methodology and inadequate sample size, go straight to the industry. Bad surveys prove little more than that those who designed the survey have an inadequate understanding of the tool they're using.
Quote:
I am not trying to make it illegal bud, I am coming up with a peice of technology to stop it from being stolen.
Ahem! Your other work suggests that you're not being fully honest. You'll find we're odd here, we actually do check facts. Although you've presented this as an academic activity, it should also be noted that your current position is with the Australian Surveillance Studies Centre and your description of some of your work includes the following:
Quote:
The paper also proposes an approach for handling virtual property theft based on improvements to laws related to virtual property and theft, improvements to the virtual world software components and better regulation from governments.