Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

SK or NecroFollow

#1 Feb 09 2008 at 10:55 AM Rating: Decent
I know my name is necro king but that was what i was before i went to WoW(i know i know) and became a pallidan. I like the deasese damage a necro does but i also like being able to get hit by a dragon and dropping like 2% health. So is the shadowknight for me? Also the free mount is pretty cool. (just like my Blood Elf charger in WoW!! lol) Thanks in advance for ur time and info! ohand the reason a Necromancer is appelingtto me i cause whats better thn summoninglike 50 rats to tear somene apart? Nuthin!
#2 Feb 21 2008 at 4:38 AM Rating: Decent
**
355 posts
If you want to stand there and get walloped without too much damage, the SK is probably not your best choice of fighter. I would tend to lean towards guardian (high mitigation, low dps) or berserker (medium mit, medium dps - for a fighter), which are generally considered the more able tanks in the game (although there are always exceptions as plenty of SKs, Pallys & Monks will tell you).

Ask yourself, do you want to stand face to face with the mob and clout them, or do you want to dish out some decent dps while your pet(s) keep the mob busy? Both SK & necro are very soloable classes and work well in groups, although many misguided people may prefer a 'true' tank to the SK.

The SK does mainly disease damage, has a number of health & mana taps, good AOE and has a few 'nukes' up his sleeve. The horse (which you have to buy, but is very cheap) is slow, but better than running. Personally I've enjoyed playing my zerker more than my SK. I've not played a necro for long enough to give an opinion.

I hope some of that helps. You could of course try both to see which you prefer. You have at least 7 characters slots on your account...
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 85 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (85)