What would happen if the Everquest Universe went "head-to-head" with the World of Warcraft.
http://celebrityscraps.wordpress.com
There's a week long debate started at celebrity scraps webblog to find out.
:D
Edited, Sep 28th 2007 6:44am by Sandspider
Edited, Sep 28th 2007 6:45am by Sandspider
- Forums
- EverQuest II
- General Discussion
- Warcraft VS Everquest!!
Warcraft VS Everquest!!Follow
EQ2 would win, I think. It just seems there's more storyline going on in EQ2. Maybe that's because I didn't play WoW long enough to uncover any content. My main beef was the graphics style of WoW. Just wasn't my cup of tea. But hey, if you like it, that's all that counts, right?
From what we hear about the various communities when WoW people start to play EQ2, I'd bet on Norrath!
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
I hear many more stories of how wow players convert to EQ then the other way around.
That and theres a lot more history, 3 MMORPGs if I'm not mistaken along with many single player games based on EQ.
That and theres a lot more history, 3 MMORPGs if I'm not mistaken along with many single player games based on EQ.
If it came down to customer service WOW would win hands down. Thats is really the only positive exp I had with WOW was customer service not sucking like SOE's. However I only played to about 22 and it was just boring.
Hi
i've always noticed WoW didn't have very much Depth and thats why i didn't like it. Its like MMO Lite. The upside is its very easy to do group work. I've really only played WoW so i can play with friends.
I like eq2 due to the quality of the game system, and the zones and character progression, but lately I've been frustrated by my lack of group play.(Maybe i just don't look enough ><) Lots of the time, it doesnt matter what lvl you are, its still fun, plus and minus for that feature.(Lots of good solo + group content for all levels)
I like eq2 due to the quality of the game system, and the zones and character progression, but lately I've been frustrated by my lack of group play.(Maybe i just don't look enough ><) Lots of the time, it doesnt matter what lvl you are, its still fun, plus and minus for that feature.(Lots of good solo + group content for all levels)
WoW is extremely popular based on the fast it is very easy for a new gamer to learn. It's the perfect introductory to gaming. It's easy to understand, everything is laid out for you and the quests tell you exactly where to go. It's more solo friendly than it is group friendly, so for those learning, or who dont have time to get a group together, it's the perfect set up.
But for the gaming community at large, EQ2 has it beat hands down. If you are already familiar with MMOs, this is the perfect combo. You have both solo and group stuff. More is based on group, but there is no way you couldn't get to lvl 70 soloing. Its been done and often. The quest lines have a real good story to follow and they get you involved. There's more of a community feel to it, not every man for himself, as most people do enjoy grouping together. You have guild levels as well, which helps those in guilds really want to work together for the good of their own guild and get it high for the rewards.
And unlike WoW, every class really is desired, and SOE is trying to make it even more true, with the recent addition of raidwide fighter buffs. I remember playing a hunter in WOW and knew full well once I hit cap level I would pretty much be done. And it was all because of the class I chose to play, not because of how good or bad I was as a player. There is no room for hunters in raids. But EQ2 has room for any class, as each one brings something special to the table which enhances raidplay.
I love both games, and I've been known to switch from one to another once in awhile, just to get a fresh breath. But I always invariably come back to EQ2. I've met some of the most amazing people there, and I enjoy having a bunch of friends where we can get together casually and go raiding. You dont have to be hardcore to see end game. You just have to know your class, what other classes do, and find a good guild of people.
But for the gaming community at large, EQ2 has it beat hands down. If you are already familiar with MMOs, this is the perfect combo. You have both solo and group stuff. More is based on group, but there is no way you couldn't get to lvl 70 soloing. Its been done and often. The quest lines have a real good story to follow and they get you involved. There's more of a community feel to it, not every man for himself, as most people do enjoy grouping together. You have guild levels as well, which helps those in guilds really want to work together for the good of their own guild and get it high for the rewards.
And unlike WoW, every class really is desired, and SOE is trying to make it even more true, with the recent addition of raidwide fighter buffs. I remember playing a hunter in WOW and knew full well once I hit cap level I would pretty much be done. And it was all because of the class I chose to play, not because of how good or bad I was as a player. There is no room for hunters in raids. But EQ2 has room for any class, as each one brings something special to the table which enhances raidplay.
I love both games, and I've been known to switch from one to another once in awhile, just to get a fresh breath. But I always invariably come back to EQ2. I've met some of the most amazing people there, and I enjoy having a bunch of friends where we can get together casually and go raiding. You dont have to be hardcore to see end game. You just have to know your class, what other classes do, and find a good guild of people.
Really i would have to say EQ2 heh but thats because i tried WoW and got bored after awhile...plus i like the community here :P
22 posts
The webmaster has updated the site... so it overviews EQ and WoW!
Strangely enough, I just now realised that it's WoW versus Everquest. Not EQII.
That would even more reduce the odds for WoW I'ld say.
That would even more reduce the odds for WoW I'ld say.
22 posts
Was EQ a lot harder than EQ2???
yes. Basically once you hit lvl 10 you could really not do much without a full perfect group, unless you played a necro or drood. And the leveling was a hell of a lot longer than it is in either EQ2 or WoW.
It was a fantastic game, and extrenely addicting. It was a pioneer in the MMO world. Most people got their first taste of MMOs through it, hence why it is still a god among MMOs. Everything out there is basically based off its foundation. But yes, it was a hell of a lot harder to get anywhere.
Remember when you died you would lose a bunch of xp? I remember once getting caught in a death cycle at lvl 54 ( the 50's were the WORST to level!!!) and I lost 1.5 levels before I could get out of there. I cried that night
It was a fantastic game, and extrenely addicting. It was a pioneer in the MMO world. Most people got their first taste of MMOs through it, hence why it is still a god among MMOs. Everything out there is basically based off its foundation. But yes, it was a hell of a lot harder to get anywhere.
Remember when you died you would lose a bunch of xp? I remember once getting caught in a death cycle at lvl 54 ( the 50's were the WORST to level!!!) and I lost 1.5 levels before I could get out of there. I cried that night
Hmmmmm WoW vs EQ2?
We solved that one back in November 2004 with the release of the "Next generation" of MMO gaming, didn't we? WoW won, a smashing defeat. EQII skulked off into the closet and by the designers started fixing the game (a job they have done well on over the last 3 years).
As for WoW vs EQII. Even though they are both MMO's it is apples and oranges since they clearly are looking to appeal to different markets and thus have different focus. There are a bunch of factors to consider and a lot of those are personal taste (graphics for example) so it is hard to say "this is better/worse".
I have a lvl 70 Woodelf Assassin in EQ2 and a lvl 70 Draenei Paladin in WoW. The only misconception I truly feel needs to be blasted out of the water is that WoW is MMO lite. While wow is easily accessible and very easy to pick up for the average gaming there actually is a depth there that really shines and allows those who take the time to do some truly amazing things. Also in terms of raiding, especially looking at BC raids there is absolutely no comparison at all. WoW wins.
We solved that one back in November 2004 with the release of the "Next generation" of MMO gaming, didn't we? WoW won, a smashing defeat. EQII skulked off into the closet and by the designers started fixing the game (a job they have done well on over the last 3 years).
As for WoW vs EQII. Even though they are both MMO's it is apples and oranges since they clearly are looking to appeal to different markets and thus have different focus. There are a bunch of factors to consider and a lot of those are personal taste (graphics for example) so it is hard to say "this is better/worse".
I have a lvl 70 Woodelf Assassin in EQ2 and a lvl 70 Draenei Paladin in WoW. The only misconception I truly feel needs to be blasted out of the water is that WoW is MMO lite. While wow is easily accessible and very easy to pick up for the average gaming there actually is a depth there that really shines and allows those who take the time to do some truly amazing things. Also in terms of raiding, especially looking at BC raids there is absolutely no comparison at all. WoW wins.
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
22 posts
Well i've ordered EQ2 to give it a crack as i've played WoW and am curious about EQ2 now :D
Quote:
Hmmmmm WoW vs EQ2?
We solved that one back in November 2004 with the release of the "Next generation" of MMO gaming, didn't we? WoW won, a smashing defeat. EQII skulked off into the closet and by the designers started fixing the game (a job they have done well on over the last 3 years).
As for WoW vs EQII. Even though they are both MMO's it is apples and oranges since they clearly are looking to appeal to different markets and thus have different focus. There are a bunch of factors to consider and a lot of those are personal taste (graphics for example) so it is hard to say "this is better/worse".
I have a lvl 70 Woodelf Assassin in EQ2 and a lvl 70 Draenei Paladin in WoW. The only misconception I truly feel needs to be blasted out of the water is that WoW is MMO lite. While wow is easily accessible and very easy to pick up for the average gaming there actually is a depth there that really shines and allows those who take the time to do some truly amazing things. Also in terms of raiding, especially looking at BC raids there is absolutely no comparison at all. WoW wins.
We solved that one back in November 2004 with the release of the "Next generation" of MMO gaming, didn't we? WoW won, a smashing defeat. EQII skulked off into the closet and by the designers started fixing the game (a job they have done well on over the last 3 years).
As for WoW vs EQII. Even though they are both MMO's it is apples and oranges since they clearly are looking to appeal to different markets and thus have different focus. There are a bunch of factors to consider and a lot of those are personal taste (graphics for example) so it is hard to say "this is better/worse".
I have a lvl 70 Woodelf Assassin in EQ2 and a lvl 70 Draenei Paladin in WoW. The only misconception I truly feel needs to be blasted out of the water is that WoW is MMO lite. While wow is easily accessible and very easy to pick up for the average gaming there actually is a depth there that really shines and allows those who take the time to do some truly amazing things. Also in terms of raiding, especially looking at BC raids there is absolutely no comparison at all. WoW wins.
No idea about raiding in WoW and very little in EQII, I can't comment on that. But I do agree that WoW also has several elements that are for the more experienced or dedicated player, not exactly all the way lite.
Mind you, Sandspider did post the wrong forum, it's WoW vs Everquest. And then the victory would be clearly for EQ imo.
22 posts
The site mow have a brief weapons overview on it.
http://celebrityscraps.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/the-weapons-of-battle-wow-and-eqeq2/
Sandspider did post the wrong forum, it's WoW vs Everquest
It's the "WoW Universe" VS the "Everquest Universe"
I'm assuming EQ1 and EQ2 are set in the same lands.
If they aren't then you are quite correct... if they are it should have been ok yeah???? :P
http://celebrityscraps.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/the-weapons-of-battle-wow-and-eqeq2/
Quote:
Sandspider did post the wrong forum, it's WoW vs Everquest
It's the "WoW Universe" VS the "Everquest Universe"
I'm assuming EQ1 and EQ2 are set in the same lands.
If they aren't then you are quite correct... if they are it should have been ok yeah???? :P
Quote:
It's the "WoW Universe" VS the "Everquest Universe"
I'm assuming EQ1 and EQ2 are set in the same lands.
If they aren't then you are quite correct... if they are it should have been ok yeah????
I'm assuming EQ1 and EQ2 are set in the same lands.
If they aren't then you are quite correct... if they are it should have been ok yeah????
Well, similar set of lands. It's supposed to be 500 years later and it shows. A whole lot of changes, not just geographically but also spell wise, character development and on about every level.
It's hard to say that EQ and EQII are the same universe, they are but totally different really.
I got a bit confused on that site to be honest, it's WoW vs EQ/EQII now instead of WoW versus Everquest.
Semantics, I do agree.
then you should have stated Azeroth vs. Norrath. And if you're looking for content, Norrath wins by a landslide
Eq1 and EQ2 are in different timelines/universes! So say that Devs, zomg.
That being said EQ2 really does have more content and more to do on the 1-70 trip. Oodles of quest, zones, mobs, etc. Though a lot of the original eq2 stuff is poorly designed and a pain to access. It gets better in DoF and beyond though.
1-60 Azeroth is a pretty big world, nowhere near the quests EQ has but enough to keep you busy. 60-70 Burning Crusade content is obscene in how much there is too do though. In fact I would say that it packs as much content as Dof/KoS and maybe even EoF combined.
That being said EQ2 really does have more content and more to do on the 1-70 trip. Oodles of quest, zones, mobs, etc. Though a lot of the original eq2 stuff is poorly designed and a pain to access. It gets better in DoF and beyond though.
1-60 Azeroth is a pretty big world, nowhere near the quests EQ has but enough to keep you busy. 60-70 Burning Crusade content is obscene in how much there is too do though. In fact I would say that it packs as much content as Dof/KoS and maybe even EoF combined.
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
22 posts
I thought the universe was the same but the time period different as they are both set in Norrath....
22 posts
Sites justt been updated with a few Boss/God overviews
http://celebrityscraps.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/bosses-and-gods-warcraft-and-everquest/
http://celebrityscraps.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/bosses-and-gods-warcraft-and-everquest/
Sandspider wrote:
I thought the universe was the same but the time period different as they are both set in Norrath....
Correct. same universe, 500 years difference between EQ1 and EQ2.
When EQ2 was first released they put the safety clause of it being an alternate future. So as not to upset the EQlive population. However as time goes along and it became less important they stopped emphasizing that.
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
I think if anything EQ2 is pushing the 500 years after eq1 thing now more then ever. I mean the EOF expansion probably reminds me more of Eq1 then any of the previous content. Granted DOF was supposed to be Ro, KOS was Plane of Sky. However other then names they really looked very little like the ones in EQ1. However I have noticed the zones in EOF really look alot like the zones from Faydwear from EQ1. Klak'anon has a pretty similar lay out to Ak'anon, Greater Fay is pretty similar to Gfay from Eq1 as well. Alot of the places in EOF where in Eq1.
When you look at DOF there was no Majdul in eq1, no Pillars of Flame, no Harpies, no floating castle in the sky, etc. Same with KOS there was no area called BArren Sky and it was no where near that big needless to say.
Even eq2 classic zones in alot of cases where just made up such as The Caves, Nek Castle, DFC, etc.
Now we have Kunark coming out and it looks like it has alot of the same zones as Eq1's Kunark had as well. Don't get me wrong im not saying any of that is a bad thing, I just disagree that SOE is getting away from the story involving eq1's future. If anything it seems more dominate now then ever.
When you look at DOF there was no Majdul in eq1, no Pillars of Flame, no Harpies, no floating castle in the sky, etc. Same with KOS there was no area called BArren Sky and it was no where near that big needless to say.
Even eq2 classic zones in alot of cases where just made up such as The Caves, Nek Castle, DFC, etc.
Now we have Kunark coming out and it looks like it has alot of the same zones as Eq1's Kunark had as well. Don't get me wrong im not saying any of that is a bad thing, I just disagree that SOE is getting away from the story involving eq1's future. If anything it seems more dominate now then ever.
Hi
fronglo wrote:
Granted DOF was supposed to be Ro, KOS was Plane of Sky.
That was all just player speculation. Dev's said it wasn't so :)
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
#26REDACTED,
Posted: Oct 05 2007 at 5:41 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) It's changed to Halo 3 vs Fallout 3 now
Recent Visitors: 56
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (56)
- Forums
- EverQuest II
- General Discussion
- Warcraft VS Everquest!!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC