Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

What's The Difference?Follow

#1 Apr 02 2007 at 5:43 PM Rating: Decent
I have played both warden and fury for a little while, but i dont see much of a difference. (i mean other than the main damage types) what is the big difference between each class of druid?


Thanks in advance.

-Crensen
#2 Jun 07 2007 at 5:28 AM Rating: Decent
From what I know (and that is little trust me), I think a Fury has more dps and single target heals then a Warden. But on the flip side, a Warden has alot a AoE HoTs, that groups love.

But again this is just what I know.
#3 Nov 11 2007 at 1:25 AM Rating: Decent
I learned that Fury's have the better group healing goodies, but that a warden is the overall better healing Class. Also the Fury would be the better solo/dmg class, but with the right melee dmg spec ( AA's ) a Warden comes close.
#4 Jan 10 2008 at 4:46 PM Rating: Good
I've played both (a warden to lvl 70 and a fury into the 50s).

Just try to think of a warden as a "defensive druid" and a fury as an "offensive druid". This is not to say that wardens can't nuke well or that furys can't heal well... only that each one leans a little in one direction or the other.

So while the warden heals a little better (they get a wider variety of both single target and group heals) the fury gets a better selection of damage spells with several different DoTs and nukes (wardens get one DoT and two nukes).

Both can snare and root. Both can port. Each is great at healing and DPS (for a healer). The difference is that each specializes in one thing or the other and so is a little better at that thing.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 89 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (89)